The Collaborative Sale

Home > Other > The Collaborative Sale > Page 5
The Collaborative Sale Page 5

by Keith M Eades


  Nancy leaned across the table to look Jon straight in the eye, “Now I know you're accustomed to doing demos early in the sales process, so you'll be surprised when I tell you that the demo isn't the best next step.”

  Jon sat up, ramrod straight. “You're kidding.”

  “From where I sit, the most successful salespeople hold product back until they're convinced they can provide real value. What about your insurance broker? What has your prospect told you about his revenue shortfalls?”

  “Nothing, but who doesn't need more revenue?”

  “How are you going to get your foot back in the door with him?”

  “I've been trying to figure that out.”

  They both leaned back in their chairs. Nancy said nothing as Jon chewed the inside of his cheek, deep in thought.

  “You know, I got that appointment through a friend who sold his interests in the brokerage when he retired. He's been gone a few years, but thought there was a place for ExyRisk, especially with what new technologies are able to do to forecast and analyze wacky weather. He called ahead and I got the appointment.”

  Nancy said, “All's not lost. You struck out on the first meeting, but on the strength of your referral you can probably get one more appointment with him if you show him that you've done some work and have something to offer besides a demo. Let's get to work.”

  1 Solution Selling® is a registered trademark of Sales Performance International, LLC (SPI), and pertains to the exclusive methodology and related tool set for engaging with buyers and effective sales execution. For more information about Solution Selling, see our published works: Keith M. Eades, The New Solution Selling: The Revolutionary Sales Process That Is Changing the Way People Sell (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2003), and Keith M. Eades, James N. Touchstone, and Timothy T. Sullivan, The Solution Selling Fieldbook (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2005). SPI reserves all rights to the proper use of the Solution Selling trademark, worldwide.

  2 Peter Ostrow, “Sales Performance Optimization 2013: Aligning the Right People, Processes, and Tools,” Research Brief, AberdeenGroup, February 2, 2013. Accessed December 1, 2013, at www.aberdeen.com/Aberdeen-Library/8347/RB-sales-performance-optimization.aspx.

  3 Breaking Out of the Funnel: A Look Inside the Mind of the New Generation of BtoB Buyer. DemandGen Report, sponsored by Genius.com, March 24, 2010. Accessed December 1, 2013, at www.demandgenreport.com/industry-resources/research/430-breaking-out-of-the-funnel-a-look-inside-the-mind-of-the-new-generation-of-btob-buyer.html.

  4 Lori Wizdo, “Buyer Behavior Helps B2B Marketers Guide the Buyer's Journey,” Forrester Blogs, Forrester Research, October 4, 2012. Accessed December 1, 2013.

  5 Rick Levine, Christopher Locke, Doc Searls, and David Weinberger, The Cluetrain Manifesto: The End of Business as Usual (New York: Perseus, 2011). Also: “People of Earth . . . ,” The Cluetrain Manifesto, 2013, www.cluetrain.com.

  6 Megan Heuer, “Where Sales and Marketing Meet,” SiriusDecisions Blog, SiriusDecisions, July 3, 2013. Accessed December 1, 2013, at www.siriusdecisions.com/blog/three-myths-of-the-67-percent-statistic/.

  7 “The Rise of the Digital C-Suite: How Executives Locate and Filter Business Information,” Forbes, June 2009. Accessed December 1, 2013, at www.forbes.com/forbesinsights/digital_csuite/index.html. Based on an exclusive survey of 354 top executives at large U.S. companies with annual sales greater than $1 billion, conducted in association with Google.

  8 Trip Kucera and Peter Ostrow, “The Marketing Executive's Agenda for 2012: Uncovering the Hidden Sales Cycle,” AberdeenGroup, October 4, 2011. Accessed December 1, 2013, at www.aberdeen.com/Aberdeen-Library/7364/AI-marketing-agenda-technology.aspx.

  9 John Bottom, The 2013 Buyersphere Report: The Industry's Favourite Expose of B2B Buyer Behaviour, Base One, September 5, 2013. Accessed December 1, 2013, at www.baseone.co.uk/beyond/2013/09/the-2013-buyersphere-report-the-industrys-favourite-expose-of-b2b-buyer-beh.

  10 Online Buyer Expectations, Velocify, Autumn 2013. Accessed December 1, 2013, at http://pages.velocify.com/OnlineBuyerExpectations2.html?wp=109. An online survey of more than 1,000 adults in the United States who had submitted an online form requesting information or expressing interest in a product or service with a value of $1,000 or more. Commissioned by Velocify and PossibleNOW and conducted by Zogby Analytics.

  11 Jim Dickie, “2013 Sales Performance Optimization,” Sales Performance Optimization Report, CSO Insights, Summer 2013. Accessed December 1, 2013, at www.csoinsights.com/Publications/Shop/Sales-Performance-Optimization.

  12 Ibid.

  13 Richard Nixon, “The Power of Procurement,” KPMG, February 21, 2012. Accessed December 1, 2013, at www.kpmg.com/global/en/issuesandinsights/articlespublications/pages/management-consulting-benchmarking.aspx.

  14 Jim Dickie, “2012 Sales Performance Optimization,” Sales Performance Optimization Report, CSO Insights, Summer 2012. Accessed December 1, 2013.

  Chapter 3

  What the New Buyers Expect: Situational Fluency

  Psychologists define a persona as a social role or a character played by an actor. The word is derived from Latin, where it originally referred to a theatrical mask.1 In The Collaborative Sale we are introducing you to three new sales personae, which are character parts that sellers must play within the buyer's process in order to be successful with Buyer 2.0.

  So what does this mean, exactly? It means that no matter what job title, function, or role a seller may take on, the seller must assume the mask or the persona that selling to Buyer 2.0 requires.

  We want to be perfectly clear about what we are saying. To help us do this, let's first take a look at how sellers are often categorized. For example, sellers can be classified by different types, profiles, roles, or titles. Figure 3.1 displays only a few of the dozens of different classifications of sellers that we've seen our clients use.

  Figure 3.1 Examples of Seller Classifications

  Another example of seller classification is used by the Chally Group, which provides a hierarchical model of sales roles organized into 12 different selling job functions, classified by hunter/farmer, inside/outside, direct/indirect, specialized product/full line, and major account/territory. (See Figure 3.2.)2

  Figure 3.2 Chally Group Sales Job Classifications

  A persona is not a sales title, type, profile, or job role. A persona is a character role that sellers need to assume and play no matter how they are categorized or profiled, in order to be successful with Buyer 2.0. For example, some sellers prefer to pursue new business in new accounts—they are often called hunters. Other sellers prefer to cultivate relationships and grow recurring business with existing accounts—they are typically called farmers. Both are legitimate and valuable sales types. Both are useful, but with a different focus. Both can achieve high levels of success with Buyer 2.0 if they assume the correct persona at the right time, in order to align with the buyer's process and state of mind. No matter the sellers' type, role, or function, they must assume the right character parts as they interact with Buyer 2.0. All three personae in The Collaborative Sale—the Micro-Marketer, the Visualizer, and the Value Driver—are usually played in every sales opportunity involving Buyer 2.0.

  Seller Agility

  A collaborative seller must know when to play the right persona, in order to keep in harmony with Buyer 2.0. There is not a single best or only sales persona that always produces the highest results. Instead, the most effective selling persona is the one that matches each specific customer situation and aligns with Buyer 2.0's current state. An effective seller knows how to play all three sales personae and can migrate easily between them, from one to another as needed. This is called seller agility.

  Analyzing what individual sellers need in order to play each persona successfully reveals the essential competencies required for each. This can be very useful for evaluating the suitability of candidates for certain selling jobs, or for determining what knowledge, skills, and abilities need to be developed for executing the sales pe
rsonae and for higher levels of performance. Sellers who lack the right competencies or the necessary sales agility to execute all types of sales personae are more likely to fail because they cannot adjust and align with Buyer 2.0.

  The three sales personae of The Collaborative Sale align with Buyer 2.0's concerns as they progress through the buying process. In actual practice, the application of the three sales personae overlaps. (See Figure 3.3.) Each can be utilized at any point of the buying process, as required.

  The Micro-Marketer persona is typically played by sellers when engaging with Buyer 2.0 early in the buying process. This persona seeks to provide useful advice and innovative ideas to potential buyers who are in the latent stage of their buying process when the goal is to stimulate their interest or to help shape their view of possible solutions. However, the Micro-Marketer persona really never ends. Sellers continuously need to create and stimulate demand as well as grow their pipelines with new opportunities, without exception.

  The Visualizer persona is typically played in the middle of Buyer 2.0's buying process. The Visualizer seeks to create, expand, or reengineer visions of solutions that are compelling, so the buyer wants to take action. Being able to collaborate with buyers, understand their situations, and provide valuable insight and visions on how to address their issues are key Visualizer competencies.

  The Value Driver persona is played by sellers throughout Buyer 2.0's entire buying process. The Value Driver never stops thinking about value. This persona literally leads with, sells with, and closes with the value of the solution. Value Drivers give buyers a compelling reason to act and avoid the negative impact of delay, and they use value to mitigate buyer perceptions of risk.

  Figure 3.3 Sales Personae in the Buying Process

  The foundational competency required for mastery of all three of the personae in The Collaborative Sale is called situational fluency.

  Situational Fluency

  Conversations between buyers and sellers have to change. As we learned in the previous chapter, the profound changes in buyer behavior dictate this. The sales conversation can no longer focus on the seller's products and services; it must be about the buyer's business results. Buyer 2.0 specifically wants to talk and do business with sellers who understand buyers' business, situations, challenges, and opportunities. They have very little time for a generalist. They prefer to deal with a specialist in their given field or industry.

  Buyer 2.0 does not have time for overly aggressive or excessively friendly sellers who are only interested in selling them something. After all, Buyer 2.0's process isn't about the seller at all. Buyer 2.0 wants sellers to collaborate with them, to act more like consultants, and to provide useful expertise.

  This requires sellers to possess a foundational selling competency called situational fluency. It is a unique combination of knowledge, skills, abilities, and attitude that makes sellers effective with today's buyers. It is the key competency required to execute successfully all three personae of the Collaborative Sale.

  Ironically, we have found that many sales managers tend to look for certain qualities when hiring sellers, but those qualities are often different from what most buyers want and look for in sellers. Sales managers tend to seek sellers with successful track records and great selling skills—someone who can close business. Buyers, in contrast, want to engage with someone who really knows their business and who is interested in helping them solve problems and achieve results. However, this doesn't mean these two very different desires have to be mutually exclusive. With good situational fluency, sellers can do both—they can help buyers solve problems while at the same time helping their own organization reach sales and revenue targets.

  So, why don't companies simply change their hiring and development practices to align with what buyers want in sellers? It is really very simple: they are too short-term focused. Organizations depend upon monthly and quarterly results, and they think assertive or aggressive sellers who push for the business are the answer. In truth, this is really very old-fashioned thinking.

  Granted, previous sales success and some assertiveness are useful characteristics in selling, but they don't ensure future success. This is particularly true when selling into new industries, or selling new products and services, or selling under a new business model. For example, take our story about Jon in our opening chapter. His past success was due in large part to selling in periods of high demand when winning business was much easier than it is today. High-demand markets are like rising tides—they help to float all boats.

  Components of Situational Fluency

  As illustrated in Figure 3.4, the three components of situational fluency are:

  Knowledge—situational knowledge and capability knowledge

  Skills—people skills and selling skills

  Attitude—willingness to collaborate

  Figure 3.4 Components of Situational Fluency

  Situational Knowledge

  Knowledge is both the awareness of something, as well as any information, understanding, or skill one learns from experience or education. Situational knowledge is the awareness of a buyer's circumstances, as well as the understanding of the implications of that situation based on the seller's experience or learning. A thorough knowledge and understanding of the buyer's industry, trends, key players, problems, challenges, opportunities, and desired results is therefore a requirement for sellers today. Remember, Buyer 2.0 wants to do business with sellers who can collaborate with buyers to help them see ways of solving problems, including those they may have not yet seen or considered. How can a seller do this without first understanding the buyer's situation and what it means?

  Buyer 2.0 doesn't have time to spend on sellers who only pitch products or services, especially when what they pitch isn't a capability that is relevant or it doesn't solve a problem. Sellers who don't understand the buyer's business are reduced in status to mere vendors, not the valued and trusted advisers they aspire and need to be.

  Capability Knowledge

  Sellers must know more than just the essential capabilities of their products or services; they must also know how those capabilities can be converted into a desired result. Sellers' capability knowledge enables them to collaborate and create visions of possible solutions for buyers.

  When Buyer 2.0 engages sellers, the sellers are expected to add value immediately. Therefore, sellers must not only understand their own products or services and the capabilities they can provide, but they must also have very good knowledge of available alternatives in the marketplace that could address the buyer's challenges or opportunities.

  One caution: too often, product and services training focuses on features and functions, bells and whistles, or “speeds and feeds,” and not enough on applications and results. Collaborative sellers need to know what their capabilities do for customers, and not just what the capabilities are.

  People Skills

  Though they are universally acknowledged as vital to the success of sellers, interpersonal or people skills have many different definitions and descriptions.

  In 1936, Dale Carnegie popularized the value of people skills in his book How to Win Friends and Influence People.3 In the original 1936 edition, he described the power of interpersonal skills for sellers, saying that they “Enable you to win new clients, [and] new customers.… Increase your earning power.…Make you a better salesman.”4

  According to Harriet Rifkin of the Business Journal News Service, “people skills” are described as:

  Understanding ourselves and moderating our responses

  Talking effectively and empathizing accurately

  Building relationships of trust, respect, and productive interactions5

  The Macmillan Dictionary provides a more succinct definition of people skills: “The ability to communicate effectively with people in a friendly way, especially in business.”6

  Our clients have shared various ways of describing people skills with us. Some of the typical characteri
stics of individuals with good people skills are:

  They understand themselves and how their behavior impacts others.

  They control their responses; they try to be less impulsive and to think before acting.

  They have a sincere desire to assist others in the pursuit of goals; they are able to tune in accurately to the feelings and needs of others and then treat people accordingly.

  They work at managing relationships, building networks, and finding common ground in order to minimize conflict and maximize rapport.

  They are consistently approachable.

  They create an environment of trust.

  People buy from people, and they are much more likely to buy from people whom they like. More importantly in this risk-averse world, people are very hesitant to collaborate with people they dislike. Therefore, the collaborative seller must possess good people skills, no matter whether engaging with buyers face-to-face or by any other means. But collaborative sellers must be more than just likable experts. They must get customers excited about a new solution, appealing to Buyer 2.0's emotions as well as intellect.

  Selling Skills

  At their most basic level, the skills required to sell are learned abilities that allow people to carry out specific tasks that lead to predetermined results within a specified period of time. Quite simply, selling skills are taught and learned—they are not something you are born with. This is contrary to many people's beliefs who say, “He or she is a natural-born seller.” Sellers are not born; they are developed.

  This does not mean that certain human characteristics associated with sellers, such as being friendly, persuasive, talkative, outgoing, and likable, are not characteristics that many good sellers have. In fact, they often do have these qualities. The key point is these characteristics alone do not make a good seller.

 

‹ Prev