“Then,” exclaimed Woodstock, “for God’s sake get hold of him, and let me know what he says, so that I can report to Hollis. And let him know that there will be no trouble about costs.”
With this Mr. Woodstock rose and, after an unemotional leave-taking, made his way out of the office, followed by Hepburn.
CHAPTER XIII
Thorndyke Takes Up the Inquiry
Mr. Penfield’s visit to Dr. Thorndyke’s chambers in King’s Bench Walk, Inner Temple, was productive of some little surprise, as such visits were rather apt to be. For the old solicitor had definitely made up his mind that Woodstock’s theory of the robbery was untenable and that the burden of proof ought to be cast on Hollis; and he was therefore not a little disconcerted to find Thorndyke tending to favour the view that the probabilities pointed to the strong-room as the scene of the robbery.
“After all,” the latter said, “we must not ignore the obvious. It is undeniable that Osmond’s disappearance—which has the strongest suggestion of flight—is a very suspicious circumstance. It occurred almost immediately after the discovery of the thefts and the suggestion that the gems had been stolen from the strong-room. Osmond had access to the strong-room—though I admit that a good many other persons had, too. Then there is the striking fact that the period of the robberies coincides exactly with the period of Osmond’s presence at the office. During the four years which preceded his arrival no robbery appears to have occurred, although all the other conditions seem to have been the same. So far as we can see, the robberies must have commenced very shortly after his arrival. These are significant facts which, as I have said, we cannot ignore.”
“I am entirely with you,” Mr. Penfield replied, “when you say that we must not ignore the obvious. But are you not doing so? These packages were most carefully and elaborately sealed; and it is admitted that they were returned to the owner with the seals unbroken. Now, it seems to me obvious that if the seals were unbroken, the packages could not have been opened. But apparently you think otherwise. Possibly you attach less importance to seals than I do?”
“Probably,” Thorndyke admitted. “It is easy to exaggerate their significance. For what is a seal, when all is said? It is an artificial thing which some artist or workman has made and which another artist or workman could copy if necessary. There is no magic in seals.”
“Dear, dear!” Mr. Penfield exclaimed with a wry smile. “Another illusion shattered! But I think a Court of Law would share my erroneous view of the matter. However, we will let that pass. I understand that you look upon Osmond as the probable delinquent?”
“The balance of probabilities is in favour of that view. But I am keeping an open mind. There are other possibilities, and they will have to be explored. We must take nothing for granted.”
Mr. Penfield nodded approvingly. “And suppose,” he asked, “the police should arrest Osmond?”
“Then,” replied Thorndyke, “Mr. Woodstock would be in difficulties, and so would the police—who have shown less than their usual discretion—unless the prisoner should get in a panic and plead ‘guilty.’ There is not even a prima-facie case. They can’t call upon Osmond to prove that he did not steal the gems.”
“Exactly,” Mr. Penfield agreed. “That is what I tried to impress on Woodstock—who is really a most extraordinarily unlegal lawyer. But have you any suggestion to offer?”
“I can only suggest that, as we are practically without data, we should endeavour to obtain some. The only fact that we have is that the stones have been removed from their settings and replaced by imitations. There seems to be no doubt about that. As to how they came to be removed, there are evidently four possibilities. First, they may have been taken from Hollis’s cabinets by some person unknown. Second, the substitution may have been effected by Hollis himself, for reasons unknown to us and by no means easy to imagine. Third, they may have been stolen from the strong-room by some person other than Osmond. Fourth, they may have been stolen from the strong-room by Osmond. The last is, I think, the most probable. But all of the four hypotheses must be impartially considered. Do I understand that Hollis is prepared to offer facilities?”
“He agrees to give every assistance, financial or other.”
“Then,” said Thorndyke, “I suggest that we make a beginning by inspecting the boxes. I understand that there are still some unopened.”
“Yes; six. Hollis reserved them to be opened in the presence of witnesses.”
“Let Hollis bring those six boxes together with those that have been opened, with their packings and wrappings, if he has them. If we can fix a day, I will arrange for an expert to be present to witness the opening of the six boxes and give an opinion on the stones in them. If it appears that any robbery has been committed, I shall ask Hollis to leave the boxes and the counterfeit jewels that I may examine them at my leisure.”
Mr. Penfield chuckled softly and helped himself to a pinch of snuff.
“Your methods, Dr. Thorndyke,” said be, “are a perennial source of wonder to me. May I ask what kind of information you expect to extract from the empty boxes?”
“I have no specific expectations at all,” was the reply; “but it will be strange indeed if we learn nothing from them. They will probably have little enough to tell us; but, seeing that we have, at present, hardly a single fact beyond that of the substitution—and that is not of our own observing—a very small addition to our knowledge would be all to the good.”
“Very true, very true,” agreed Mr. Penfield. “A single definite fact might enable us to decide which of those four possibilities is to be adopted and pursued; though how you propose to extract such a fact from an empty box, or even a full one, I am unable to imagine. However, I leave that problem in your hands. As soon as you have secured your expert, perhaps you will kindly advise me and I will then make the necessary arrangements with Mr. Hollis.”
With this Mr. Penfield rose and took his departure, leaving Thorndyke to read over and amplify the notes that he had taken during the consultation.
As matters turned out, he was able to advise Mr. Penfield within twenty-four hours that he had secured the services of an expert who was probably the greatest living authority on gem stones; with the result that a telegram arrived from Mr. Hollis accepting the appointment for the following day at eleven in the forenoon, that time having been mentioned by the expert as the most suitable on account of the light.
It wanted several minutes to the appointed hour when the first visitor arrived; for the Treasury clock had hardly struck the third quarter when, in response to a smart rat-tat on the little brass knocker, Thorndyke opened the door and admitted Professor Eccles.
“I am a little before my time,” the latter remarked as he shook hands, “but I wanted to have a few words with you before Mr. Hollis arrived. I understand that you want me to give an opinion on some doubtful stones of his. Are they new ones? Because I may say that I looked over his collection very carefully less than two years ago and I can state confidently that it contained no gems that were not unquestionably genuine. But I have heard some rumours of a robbery—unfounded, I hope, seeing that Hollis proposes to bequeath his treasures to the national collection.”
“I am afraid,” replied Thorndyke, “that the rumours are correct; but that is what you are going to help us to decide. It is not a case of simple robbery. The stolen stones seem to have been replaced by imitations; and as you examined the collection when it was undoubtedly intact, you will see at once if there has been any substitution.”
He proceeded to give the professor a brief account of the case and the curious problem that it presented, and he had barely finished when a cab was heard to draw up below. A minute later, as the two men stood at the open door, the visitor made his appearance, followed by the cabman, each carrying a bulky but apparently light wooden case.
Mr. Hollis was a typical business man—dry, brisk, and shrewd-looking. Having shaken hands with the professor and introduced himself to Thorndyke, he di
smissed the cabman and came to the point without preamble.
“This case, marked A, contains the full boxes. The other, marked B, contains the empties. I will leave you to deal with that at your convenience. My concern and Professor Eccles’s is with the other, which I will open at once and then we can get to work.”
He thrust the despised case B into a corner, and hoisting the other on to the table, unbuckled the straps, unlocked it, threw open the lid, and took out six sealed packages, which he placed side by side on the table.
“Shall I open them?” he asked, producing a pocket knife, “or will you?
“Before we disturb them,” said Thorndyke, “we had better examine the exteriors very carefully.”
“I’ve done that,” said Hollis. “I’ve been over each one most thoroughly and, so far as I can see, they are in exactly the same condition as they were when I handed them to Woodstock. The writing on them is certainly my writing and the seals are impressions of my seal, which, as you see, I carry on my finger in this ring.”
“In that case,” said Thorndyke, “we may as well open them forthwith. Perhaps I had better take off the wrappings, as I should like to preserve them and the seals intact.”
He took up the first package and turned it over in his hands, examining each surface closely. And as he did so, his two visitors watched him—the professor with slightly amused curiosity, the other with a dry, rather impatient manner not without a trace of scepticism. The package was about fourteen inches in length by nine wide and five inches deep. It was very neatly covered with a strong, smooth white paper bearing a number—thirteen—and a written and signed list of the contents, and sealed at each end in the middle. The paper was further secured by a string, tied tightly and skilfully, of which the knot was embedded in a mass of wax on which was an excellent impression of the seal.
“You see,” Hollis pointed out, “that the parcel has been made as secure as human care could make it. I should have said that it was perfectly impossible to open it without breaking the seals.”
“But surely,” exclaimed the professor, “it would be an absolute impossibility! Don’t you agree, Dr. Thorndyke?”
“We shall be better able to judge when we have seen the inside,” the latter replied. With a small pair of scissors he cut the string, which he placed on one side, and then, with great care, cut round each of the seals, removing them with the portions of paper on which they were fixed and putting them aside with the string. The rest of the paper was now taken off, disclosing a plain, white-wood box, the keyhole of which was covered by a strip of tape secured at each end by a seal seated in a small circular pit. Thorndyke cut the tape and held the box towards Hollis, who already held the key in readiness. This having been inserted and turned, Thorndyke raised the lid and laid the box on the table.
“There, Professor,” said he; “you can now answer your own question. The list of contents is on the cover. It is for you to say whether that list correctly describes the things which are inside.”
Professor Eccles drew a chair up to the table, and lifting from the inside of the box a thick pad of tissue paper (which Thorndyke took from him and placed with the string and the seals), ran his eye quickly over the neatly-arranged assemblage of jewels that reposed on a second layer of tissue. Very soon a slight frown began to wrinkle his forehead. He bent more closely over the box, looked narrowly first at one gem, then at another, and at length picked out a small, plain pendant set with a single oval green stone about half an inch in diameter.
“Leaf-green jargoon,” said he, reading from the list as he produced a Coddington lens from his pocket; “that is the one, isn’t it?”
Hollis grunted an assent as he watched the professor inspecting the gem through his lens.
“I remember the stone,” said the professor. “It was one of the finest of the kind that I have ever seen. Well, this isn’t it. This is not a jargoon at all. It is just a lump of green glass—flint glass, in fact. But it is quite well cut. The lapidary knew his job better than the jeweller. There has been some very rough work on the setting.”
“How much was the stone worth?” Thorndyke asked.
“The original? Not more than thirty pounds, I should say. It was a beautiful and interesting stone, but rather a collector’s specimen than a jeweller’s piece. The public won’t give big prices for out-of-the-way stones. They like diamonds, rubies, sapphires, and emeralds.”
“Is this counterfeit a true facsimile of the original? I mean as to size and style of cutting?”
Professor Eccles took from his pocket a small leather case, from which he extracted a calliper gauge. Applying this delicately to the exposed edges of the “girdle” between the claws, he read the vernier and then reapplied it in the other diameter.
“Seven-twelfths by three-quarters of an inch, brilliant cut,” he announced. “Do you happen to remember the dimensions, Mr. Hollis? These can’t be far out, as the stone fits the setting.”
“I’ve brought my catalogue,” said Hollis, producing a small, fat volume from his pocket. “Thought we might want it. What’s the number? Three-sixty-three. Here we are. ‘Jargoon. Full leaf-green. Brilliant cut. Seven-twelfths by three-quarters.’
“Then,” said the professor, “this would seem to be a perfect replica. Queer, isn’t it? I see your point, Doctor. This fellow has been to endless pains and some expense in lapidary’s charges—unless he is a lapidary himself—to say nothing of the risk; and all to get possession of a stone worth only about thirty pounds, and not easily marketable at that.”
“Some of the other stones are worth more, though,” remarked Hollis.
“True, true,” agreed the professor. “Let us look at some of the others. Ha! Here is one that looks a little suspicious, if my memory serves.”
He picked out a gold ornament set with a large cat’s-eye bordered with small diamonds and exhibited it to Hollis, who bent down to inspect it.
“Cat’s-eye,” he commented, after a long and anxious inspection. “Well, it looks all right to me. What’s the matter with it?”
“Oh, it is a cat’s-eye, sure enough, but not the right kind, I think. What does the catalogue say?”
Hollis turned over a page and read out: “Chrysoberyl. Cymophane or cat’s-eye. Brown, oval, cut en cabochon. Five-eighths by half an inch. Bordered by twelve diamonds.”
“I thought so,” said the professor. “This is a cat’s-eye, but not a chrysoberyl. It is a quartz cat’s-eye. But I should hardly have thought it would have been worth the trouble and expense of making the exchange. You see,” he added, taking the dimensions with his gauge, “this stone is apparently a facsimile of the missing one in size and shape and not a bad match in colour. The diamonds don’t appear to have been tampered with.”
“What about that emerald?” Hollis asked anxiously, indicating a massive ring set with a large, square stone bordered with diamonds. Professor Eccles picked up the ring, and at the first glance he pursed up his lips, dubiously. But he examined it carefully through his lens, nevertheless.
“Well?” demanded Hollis.
The professor shook his head sadly. “Paste,” he replied. “A good imitation as such things go, but unmistakable glass. Will you read out the description?”
Hollis did so; and once again the correspondence in dimensions and cutting showed the forgery to be a carefully-executed facsimile.
“This fellow was a conscientious rascal,” said the professor. “He did the thing thoroughly—excepting the settings.”
“Yes, damn him!” Hollis agreed, savagely. “That ring cost me close on twelve hundred pounds. It came from Lord Pycroft’s collection.”
Professor Eccles was deeply concerned; naturally enough, for any robbery of precious things involves a wicked waste. And then there was the depressing fact that the valuable “Hollis bequest” was melting away before his eyes. Gloomily, he picked out one after another of the inmates of the box and regretfully added them to the growing heap of the rejected.
; When the first box had been emptied, the second was attacked with similar procedure, and so on with the remainder, until the last box had been probed to the bottom, when the professor sat back in his chair and drew a deep breath. “Well,” he exclaimed, “it is a terrible disaster and profoundly mysterious. In effect, the collection has been skimmed of everything of real value. Even the moonstones have been exchanged for cheap specimens with the rough native cutting untouched. I have never heard of anything like it. But I don’t understand why the fellow took all this trouble. He couldn’t have supposed that the robbery would pass undetected.”
“It might easily have remained undetected long enough to confuse the issues,” said Thorndyke. “If the jewels had been returned to the cabinets and lain there undisturbed for a few months, it would have been very difficult to determine exactly when, or where, or how the robbery had been carried out.”
“Yes,” growled Hollis. “The scoundrel must have known that I am no expert and reckoned on my not spotting the change. And I don’t suppose I should, for that matter. However, the cat slipped out of the bag sooner than he expected and now the police are close on his heels. I’ll have my pound of flesh out of him yet.”
As he snapped out this expression of his benevolent intentions, Mr. Hollis gathered up the remnant of unrifled jewels and was about to deposit them in one of the empty boxes when Thorndyke interposed.
“May I lend you a deed-box with some fresh packing? I think we agreed that the empty boxes and the packing should be left with me, that I might examine them thoroughly before returning them.”
“Very well,” said Hollis, “though it seems a pretty futile thing to do. But I suppose you know your own business. What about those sham stones?”
“I should like to examine them too, as they are facsimile imitations; and we may possibly learn some thing from the settings.”
The Third R. Austin Freeman Megapack Page 42