Erotic Classics I

Home > Other > Erotic Classics I > Page 4
Erotic Classics I Page 4

by Various Authors


  Nayikas, 31 therefore, are of three kinds: maids, women twice married, and public women. Gonikaputra has expressed an opinion that there is a fourth kind of Nayika, a woman who is resorted to on some special occasion even though she was previously married to another. These special occasions are when a man thinks thus:—

  (a) This woman is self-willed, and has been previously enjoyed by many others besides myself. I may, therefore, safely resort to her as to a public woman though she belongs to a higher caste than mine, and in so doing I shall not be violating the ordinances of Dharma.

  Or thus:—

  (b) This is a twice-married woman and has been enjoyed by others before me, there is, therefore, no objection to my resorting to her.

  Or thus:—

  (c) This woman has gained the heart of her great and powerful husband, and exercises a mastery over him, who is a friend of my enemy; if, therefore, she becomes united with me, she will cause her husband to abandon my enemy.

  Or thus:—

  (d) This woman will turn the mind of her husband, who is very powerful, in my favour, he being at present disaffected towards me, and intent on doing me some harm.

  Or thus:—

  (e) By making this woman my friend I shall gain the object of some friend of mine, or shall be able to effect the ruin of some enemy, or shall accomplish some other difficult purpose.

  Or thus:—

  (f) By being united with this woman, I shall kill her husband, and so obtain his vast riches which I covet.

  Or thus:—

  (g) The union of this woman with me is not attended with any danger, and will bring me wealth, of which, on account of my poverty and inability to support myself, I am very much in need. I shall, therefore, obtain her vast riches in this way without any difficulty.

  Or thus:—

  (h) This woman loves me ardently, and knows all my weak points, if therefore, I am unwilling to be united with her, she will make my faults public, and thus tarnish my character and reputation. Or she will bring some gross accusation against me, of which it may be hard to clear myself, and I shall be ruined. Or perhaps she will detach from me her husband, who is powerful, and yet under her control, and will unite him to my enemy, or will herself join the latter.

  Or thus:—

  (i) The husband of this woman has violated the chastity of my wives, I shall therefore return that injury by seducing his wives.

  Or thus:—

  (j) By the help of this woman I shall kill an enemy of the king, who has taken shelter with her, and whom I am ordered by the king to destroy.

  Or thus:

  (k) The woman whom I love is under the control of this woman. I shall, through the influence of the latter, be able to get at the former.

  Or thus:—

  (l) This woman will bring to me a maid, who possesses wealth and beauty, but who is hard to get at, and under the control of another.

  Or, lastly, thus:—

  (m) My enemy is a friend of this woman’s husband, I shall therefore cause her to join him, and will thus create an enmity between her husband and him.

  For these and similar other reasons the wives of other men may be resorted to, but it must be distinctly understood that is only allowed for special reasons, and not for mere carnal desire.

  Charayana thinks that under these circumstances there is also a fifth kind of Nayika, a woman who is kept by a minister, and who repairs to him occasionally; or a widow who accomplishes the purpose of a man with the person to whom she resorts.

  Suvarnanabha adds that a woman who passes the life of an ascetic and in the condition of a widow may be considered as a sixth kind of Nayika.

  Ghotakamukha says that the daughter of a public woman, and a female servant, who are still virgins, form a seventh kind of Nayika.

  Gonardiya puts forth his doctrine that any woman born of good family, after she has come of age, is an eighth kind of Nayika.

  But these four latter kinds of Nayikas do not differ much from the first four kinds of them, as there is no separate object in resorting to them. Therefore Vatsyayana is of opinion that there are only four kinds of Nayikas, i.e., the maid, the twice married woman, the public woman, and the woman resorted to for a special purpose.

  The following women are not to be enjoyed:—

  A leper.

  A lunatic.

  A woman turned out of caste.

  A woman who reveals secrets.

  A woman who publicly expresses desire for sexual intercourse.

  A woman who is extremely white.

  A woman who is extremely black.

  A bad-smelling woman.

  A woman who is a near relation.

  A woman who is a female friend.

  A woman who leads the life of an ascetic.

  And, lastly, the wife of a relation, of a friend, of a learned Brahman, and of the king.

  The followers of Babhravya say that any woman who has been enjoyed by five men is a fit and proper person to be enjoyed. But Gonikaputra is of opinion that even when this is the case, the wives of a relation, of a learned Brahman and of a king should be excepted.

  The following are the kind of friends:—

  One who has played with you in the dust, i.e., in childhood.

  One who is bound by an obligation.

  One who is of the same disposition and fond of the same things.

  One who is a fellow student.

  One who is acquainted with your secrets and faults, and whose faults and secrets are also known to you.

  One who is a child of your nurse.

  One who is brought up with you.

  One who is an hereditary friend.

  These friends should possess the following qualities:—

  They should tell the truth.

  They should not be changed by time.

  They should be favourable to your designs.

  They should be firm.

  They should be free from covetousness.

  They should not be capable of being gained over by others.

  They should not reveal your secrets.

  Charayana says that citizens form friendship with washermen, barbers, cowherds, florists, druggists, betel-leaf sellers, tavern keepers, beggars, Pithamardas, Vitas and Vidushekas, as also with the wives of all these people.

  A messenger should possess the following qualities:—

  Skilfulness.

  Boldness.

  Knowledge of the intention of men by their outward signs.

  Absence of confusion, i.e., no shyness.

  Knowledge of the exact meaning of what others do or say.

  Good manners.

  Knowledge of appropriate times and places for doing different things.

  Ingenuity in business.

  Quick comprehension.

  Quick application of remedies, i.e., quick and ready resources.

  And this part ends with a verse:—

  The man who is ingenious and wise, who is accompanied by a friend, and who knows the intentions of others, as also the proper time and place for doing everything, can gain over, very easily, even a woman who is very hard to be obtained.

  * * *

  30 This term does not apply to a widow, but to a woman who had probably left her husband, and is living with some other person as a married woman, maritalement, as they say in France.

  31 Any woman fit to be enjoyed without sin. The object of the enjoyment of women is twofold, pleasure and progeny. Any woman who can be enjoyed without sin for the purpose of accomplishing either the one or the other of these two objects is a Nayika. The fourth kind of Nayika which Vatsya admits further on is neither enjoyed for pleasure or for progeny, but merely for accomplishing some special purpose in
hand. The word Nayika is retained as a technical term throughout.

  Part II—Of Sexual Union

  Chapter I—Kinds of Sexual Union According to Dimensions, Force of Desire or Passion, Time

  Kinds of Union

  Man is divided into three classes: the hare man, the bull man, and the horse man, according to the size of his lingam.

  Woman also, according to the depth of her yoni, is either a female deer, a mare, or a female elephant.

  There are thus three equal unions between persons of corresponding dimensions, and there are six unequal unions, when the dimensions do not correspond, or nine in all.

  In these unequal unions, when the male exceeds the female in point of size, his union with a woman who is immediately next to him in size is called high union, and is of two kinds; while his union with the woman most remote from him in size is called the highest union, and is of one kind only. On the other hand when the female exceeds the male in point of size, her union with a man immediately next to her in size is called low union, and is of two kinds; while her union with a man most remote from her in size is called the lowest union, and is of one kind only.

  In other words, the horse and mare, the bull and deer, form the high union, while the horse and deer form the highest union. On the female side, the elephant and bull, the mare and hare, form low unions, while the elephant and the hare make the lowest unions.

  There are then, nine kinds of union according to dimensions. Amongst all these, equal unions are the best, those of a superlative degree, i.e., the highest and the lowest, are the worst, and the rest are middling, and with them the high 32 are better than the low.

  There are also nine kinds of union according to the force of passion or carnal desire.

  A man is called a man of small passion whose desire at the time of sexual union is not great, whose semen is scanty, and who cannot bear the warm embraces of the female.

  Those who differ from this temperament are called men of middling passion, while those of intense passion are full of desire.

  In the same way, women are supposed to have the three degrees of feeling as specified above.

  Lastly, according to time there are three kinds of men and women: the short-timed, the moderate-timed, and the long-timed, and of these as in the previous statements, there are nine kinds of union.

  But on this last head there is a difference of opinion about the female, which should be stated.

  Auddalika says, “Females do not emit as males do. The males simply remove their desire, while the females, from their consciousness of desire, feel a certain kind of pleasure, which gives them satisfaction, but it is impossible for them to tell you what kind of pleasure they feel. The fact from which this becomes evident is, that males, when engaged in coition, cease of themselves after emission, and are satisfied, but it is not so with females.”

  This opinion is, however, objected to on the grounds that if a male be a long-timed, the female loves him the more, but if he be short-timed, she is dissatisfied with him. And this circumstance, some say, would prove that the female emits also.

  But this opinion does not hold good, for if it takes a long time to allay a woman’s desire, and during this time she is enjoying great pleasure, it is quite natural then that she should wish for its continuation. And on this subject there is a verse as follows:

  “By union with men the lust, desire, or passion of women is satisfied, and the pleasure derived from the consciousness of it is called their satisfaction.”

  The followers of Babhravya, however, say that the semen of women continues to fall from the beginning of the sexual union to its end, and it is right that it should be so, for if they had no semen there would be no embryo.

  To this there is an objection. In the beginning of coition the passion of the woman is middling, and she cannot bear the vigorous thrusts of her lover, but by degrees her passion increases until she ceases to think about her body, and then finally she wishes to stop from further coition.

  This objection, however, does not hold good, for even in ordinary things that revolve with great force, such as a potter’s wheel, or a top, we find that the motion at first is slow, but by degrees it becomes very rapid. In the same way the passion of the woman having gradually increased, she has a desire to discontinue coition, when all the semen has fallen away. And there is a verse with regard to this as follows:

  “The fall of the semen of the man takes place only at the end of coition, while the semen of the woman falls continually, and after the semen of both has all fallen away then they wish for the discontinuance of coition.” 33

  Lastly, Vatsyayana is of opinion that the semen of the female falls in the same way as that of the male.

  Now some may ask here: If men and women are beings of the same kind, and are engaged in bringing about the same result, why should they have different works to do.

  Vatsya says that this is so, because the ways of working as well as the consciousness of pleasure in men and women are different. The difference in the ways of working, by which men are the actors, and women are the persons acted upon, is owing to the nature of the male and the female, otherwise the actor would be sometimes the person acted upon, and vice versa. And from this difference in the ways of working follows the difference in the consciousness of pleasure, for a man thinks, “this woman is united with me,” and a woman thinks, “I am united with this man.”

  It may be said that if the ways of working in men and women are different, why should not there be a difference, even in the pleasure they feel, and which is the result of those ways.

  But this objection is groundless, for the person acting and the person acted upon being of different kinds, there is a reason for the difference in their ways of working; but there is no reason for any difference in the pleasure they feel, because they both naturally derive pleasure from the act they perform. 34

  On this again some may say that when different persons are engaged in doing the same work, we find that they accomplish the same end or purpose: while, on the contrary, in the case of men and women we find that each of them accomplishes his or her own end separately, and this is inconsistent. But this is a mistake, for we find that sometimes two things are done at the same time, as for instance in the fighting of rams, both the rams receive the shock at the same time on their heads. Again, in throwing one wood apple against another, and also in a fight or struggle of wrestlers. If it be said that in these cases the things employed are of the same kind, it is answered that even in the case of men and women, the nature of the two persons is the same. And as the difference in their ways of working arises from the difference of their conformation only, it follows that men experience the same kind of pleasure as women do.

  There is also a verse on this subject as follows: “Men and women being of the same nature, feel the same kind of pleasure, and therefore a man should marry such a woman as will love him ever afterwards.”

  The pleasure of men and women being thus proved to be of the same kind, it follows that in regard to time, there are nine kinds of sexual intercourse, in the same way as there are nine kinds, according to the force of passion.

  There being thus nine kinds of union with regard to dimensions, force of passion, and time, respectively, by making combinations of them, innumerable kinds of union would be produced. Therefore in each particular kind of sexual union, men should use such means as they may think suitable for the occasion. 35

  At the first time of sexual union the passion of the male is intense, and his time is short, but in subsequent unions on the same day the reverse of this is the case. With the female, however, it is the contrary, for at the first time her passion is weak, and then her time long, but on subsequent occasions on the same day, her passion is intense and her time short, until her passion is satisfied.

  On the different kinds of Love

  Men learned in the huma
nities are of opinion that love is of four kinds:

  1. Love acquired by continual habit.

  Love resulting from the constant and continual performance and habit, as for instance the love of sexual intercourse, the love of hunting, the love of drinking, the love of gambling, etc., etc.

  2. Love resulting from the imagination.

  Love which is felt for things to which we are not habituated, and which proceeds entirely from ideas, is called love resulting from imagination, as for instance, that love which some men and women and eunuchs feel for the Auparishtaka or mouth congress, and that which is felt by all for such things as embracing, kissing, etc., etc.

  3. Love resulting from belief.

  The love which is mutual on both sides, and proved to be true, when each looks upon the other as his or her very own, such is called love resulting from belief by the learned.

  4. Love resulting from the perception of external objects.

  The love resulting from the perception of eternal objects is quite evident and well-known to the world, because the pleasure which it affords is superior to the pleasure of the other kinds of love, which exists only for its sake.

  * * *

  32 High unions are said to be better than low ones, for in the former it is possible for the male to satisfy his own passion without injuring the female, while in the latter it is difficult for the female to be satisfied by any means.

  33 The strength of passion with women varies a great deal, some being easily satisfied, and others eager and willing to go on for a long time. To satisfy these last thoroughly a man must have recourse to art. It is certain that a fluid flows from the woman in larger or smaller quantities, but her satisfaction is not complete until she has experienced the “spasme génêsique,” as described in a French work recently published and called “Breviare de l’Amour Experimental par le Dr. Jules Guyot.”

 

‹ Prev