Three-Act Tragedy

Home > Mystery > Three-Act Tragedy > Page 24
Three-Act Tragedy Page 24

by Agatha Christie


  Of note: Taken at the Flood marks the debut of Superintendent Spence, a Poirot sidekick who will feature in three more Poirot novels.

  Elizabeth Bowen, The Tatler: ‘One of the best…Her gift for blending the cosy with the macabre has seldom been more in evidence than it is here.’

  Manchester Evening News: ‘Told briskly, vivaciously, and with ever-fertile imagination.’

  New York Herald Tribune: ‘Don’t miss it.’

  28. Mrs McGinty’s Dead (1952)

  ‘Mrs McGinty’s dead!’ / ‘How did she die?’ / ‘Down on one knee, just like I!’ So goes the old children’s rhyme. A crushing blow to the back of the head kills a real-life Mrs McGinty in her cottage in the village of Broadhinny—Superintendent Spence’s jurisdiction. Then the killer tore up the floorboards in search of…what? Justice presumes a pittance of cash; and justice has condemned James Bentley, her loathsome lodger, to hang for the crime. But Superintendent Spence is not satisfied with the verdict, and appeals to Poirot to investigate—and save the life of the wretch Bentley.

  Of note: Crime novelist Ariadne Oliver, of Cards on the Table, returns to help Poirot and Spence solve the crime.

  Sunday Times: ‘So simple, so economical, so completely baffling. Each clue scrupulously given, with superb sleight of hand.’

  San Francisco Chronicle: ‘The plot is perfect and the characters are wonderful.’

  The New York Times: ‘The best Poirot since…Cards on the Table.’

  29. After the Funeral (1953)

  Mrs Cora Lansquenet admits to ‘always saying the wrong thing’—but this last remark has gotten her a hatchet in the head. ‘He was murdered, wasn’t he?’ she had said after the funeral of her brother, Richard Abernethie, in the presence of the family solicitor, Mr Entwhistle, and the assembled Abernethies, who are anxious to know how Richard’s sizable fortune will be distributed. Entwhistle, desperate not to lose any more clients to murder, turns to Hercule Poirot for help. A killer complicates an already very complicated family—classic Christie; pure Poirot.

  Liverpool Post: ‘Keeps us guessing—and guessing wrongly—to the very last page.’

  30. Hickory Dickory Dock (1955)

  An outbreak of kleptomania at a student hostel is not normally the sort of crime that arouses Hercule Poirot’s interest. But when it affects the work of his secretary, Miss Lemon, whose sister works at the hostel, he agrees to look into the matter. The matter becomes a bona fide mystery when Poirot peruses the bizarre list of stolen and vandalized items—including a stethoscope, some old flannel trousers, a box of chocolates, a slashed rucksack, and a diamond ring found in a bowl of a soup. ‘A unique and beautiful problem,’ the great detective declares. Unfortunately, this ‘beautiful problem’ is not just one of thievery and mischief—for there is a killer on the loose.

  Times Literary Supplement: ‘An event…There is plenty of entertainment.’

  The New York Times: ‘The Christie fan of longest standing, who thinks he knows every one of her tricks, will still be surprised by…the twists here.’

  31. Dead Man’s Folly (1956)

  Sir George and Lady Stubbs desire to host a village fete with a difference—a mock murder mystery. In good faith, Ariadne Oliver, the much-lauded crime novelist, agrees to organise the proceedings. As the event draws near, however, Ariadne senses that something sinister is about to happen—and calls upon her old friend Hercule Poirot to come down to Dartmoor for the festivities. Ariadne’s instincts, alas, are right on the money, and soon enough Poirot has a real murder to investigate.

  The New York Times: ‘The infallibly original Agatha Christie has come up, once again, with a new and highly ingenious puzzle-construction.’

  Times Literary Supplement: ‘The solution is of the colossal ingenuity we have been conditioned to expect.’

  32. Cat Among the Pigeons (1959)

  A revolution in the Middle East has a direct and deadly impact upon the summer term at Meadowbank, a picture-perfect girls’ school in the English countryside. Prince Ali Yusuf, Hereditary Sheikh of Ramat, whose great liberalizing experiment—‘hospitals, schools, a Health Service’—is coming to chaos, knows that he must prepare for the day of his exile. He asks his pilot and school friend, Bob Rawlinson, to care for a packet of jewels. Rawlinson does so, hiding them among the possessions of his niece, Jennifer Sutcliffe, who is bound for Meadowbank. Rawlinson is killed before he can reveal the hiding place—or even the fact that he has employed his niece as a smuggler. But someone knows, or suspects, that Jennifer has the jewels. As murder strikes Meadowbank, only Hercule Poirot can restore the peace.

  Of note: In this novel we meet Colonel Pikeaway, later to appear in the non-Poirots Passenger to Frankfurt and Postern of Fate, and we meet the financier Mr Robinson, who will also appear in Postern of Fate and who will show up at Miss Marple’s Bertram’s Hotel.

  Daily Express, of Cat Among the Pigeons: ‘Immensely enjoyable.’

  The New York Times: ‘To read Agatha Christie at her best is to experience the rarefied pleasure of watching a faultless technician at work, and she is in top form in Cat Among the Pigeons.’

  33. The Adventure of the Christmas Pudding (1960)

  ‘This book of Christmas fare may be described as “The Chef’s Selection.” I am the Chef!’ Agatha Christie writes in her Foreword, in which she also recalls the delightful Christmases of her youth at Abney Hall in the north of England. But while the author’s Christmases were uninterrupted by murder, her famous detective’s are not (see also Hercule Poirot’s Christmas). In the title novella, Poirot—who has been coerced into attending ‘an old-fashioned Christmas in the English countryside’—gets all the trimmings, certainly, but he also gets a woman’s corpse in the snow, a Kurdish knife spreading a crimson stain across her white fur wrap.

  Collected within: The Adventure of the Christmas Pudding (novella); ‘The Mystery of the Spanish Chest’; The Under Dog (novella); ‘Four-and-Twenty Blackbirds’; ‘The Dream’; and a Miss Marple mystery, ‘Greenshaw’s Folly.’

  Times Literary Supplement: ‘There is the irresistible simplicity and buoyancy of a Christmas treat about it all.’

  34. The Clocks (1963)

  Sheila Webb, typist-for-hire, has arrived at 19 Wilbraham Crescent in the seaside town of Crowdean to accept a new job. What she finds is a well-dressed corpse surrounded by five clocks. Mrs Pebmarsh, the blind owner of No. 19, denies all knowledge of ringing Sheila’s secretarial agency and asking for her by name—yet someone did. Nor does she own that many clocks. And neither woman seems to know the victim. Colin Lamb, a young intelligence specialist working a case of his own at the nearby naval yard, happens to be on the scene at the time of Sheila Webb’s ghastly discovery. Lamb knows of only one man who can properly investigate a crime as bizarre and baffling as what happened inside No. 19—his friend and mentor, Hercule Poirot.

  The New York Times: ‘Here is the grand-manner detective story in all its glory.’

  The Bookman: ‘Superlative Christie…extremely ingenious.’

  Saturday Review: ‘A sure-fire attention-gripper—naturally.’

  35. Third Girl (1966)

  Hercule Poirot is interrupted at breakfast by a young woman who wishes to consult with the great detective about a murder she ‘might have’ committed—but upon being introduced to Poirot, the girl flees. And disappears. She has shared a flat with two seemingly ordinary young women. As Hercule Poirot—with the aid of the crime novelist Mrs Ariadne Oliver—learns more about this mysterious ‘third girl,’ he hears rumours of revolvers, flick-knives, and blood-stains. Even if a murder might not have been committed, something is seriously wrong, and it will take all of Poirot’s wits and tenacity to establish whether the ‘third girl’ is guilty, innocent, or insane.

  Sunday Telegraph: ‘First-class Christie.’

  Financial Times: ‘Mesmerising ingenuity.’

  36. Hallowe’en Party (1969)

  Mystery writer Ariadne Oliver has been invited to a Hallowe
’en party at Woodleigh Common. One of the other guests is an adolescent girl known for telling tall tales of murder and intrigue—and for being generally unpleasant. But when the girl, Joyce, is found drowned in an apple-bob-bing tub, Mrs Oliver wonders after the fictional nature of the girl’s claim that she had once witnessed a murder. Which of the party guests wanted to keep her quiet is a question for Ariadne’s friend Hercule Poirot. But unmasking a killer this Hallowe’en is not going to be easy—for there isn’t a soul in Woodleigh who believes the late little storyteller was actually murdered.

  Daily Mirror: ‘A thundering success…a triumph for Hercule Poirot.’

  37. Elephants Can Remember (1972)

  ‘The Ravenscrofts didn’t seem that kind of person. They seemed well balanced and placid.’

  And yet, twelve years earlier, the husband had shot the wife, and then himself—or perhaps it was the other way around, since sets of both of their fingerprints were on the gun, and the gun had fallen between them. The case haunts Ariadne Oliver, who had been a friend of the couple. The famous mystery novelist desires this real-life mystery solved, and calls upon Hercule Poirot to help her do so. Old sins have long shadows, the proverb goes. Poirot is now a very old man, but his mind is as nimble and as sharp as ever and can still penetrate deep into the shadows. But as Poirot and Mrs Oliver and Superintendent Spence reopen the long-closed case, a startling discovery awaits them. And if memory serves Poirot (and it does!), crime—like history—has a tendency to repeat itself.

  The Times: ‘Splendid.’

  38. Poirot’s Early Cases (1974)

  With his career still in its formative years, we learn many things about how Poirot came to exercise those famous ‘grey cells’ so well. Fourteen of the eighteen stories collected herein are narrated by Captain Arthur Hastings—including what would appear to be the earliest Poirot short story, ‘The Affair at the Victory Ball,’ which follows soon on the events of The Mysterious Affair at Styles. Two of the stories are narrated by Poirot himself, to Hastings. One, ‘The Chocolate Box,’ concerns Poirot’s early days on the Belgian police force, and the case that was his greatest failure: ‘My grey cells, they functioned not at all,’ Poirot admits. But otherwise, in this most fascinating collection, they function brilliantly, Poirot’s grey cells, challenging the reader to keep pace at every twist and turn.

  Collected within: ‘The Affair at the Victory Ball’; ‘The Adventure of the Clapham Cook’; ‘The Cornish Mystery’; ‘The Adventure of Johnnie Waverly’; ‘The Double Clue’; ‘The King of Clubs’; ‘The Lemesurier Inheritance’; ‘The Lost Mine’; ‘The Plymouth Express’; ‘The Chocolate Box’; ‘The Submarine Plans’; ‘The Third-Floor Flat’; ‘Double Sin’; ‘The Market Basing Mystery’; ‘Wasps’ Nest’; ‘The Veiled Lady’; ‘Problem at Sea’; ‘How Does Your Garden Grow?’

  Sunday Express: ‘Superb, vintage Christie.’

  39. Curtain: Poirot’s Last Case (1975)

  Captain Arthur Hastings narrates. Poirot investigates. ‘This, Hastings, will be my last case,’ declares the detective who had entered the scene as a retiree in The Mysterious Affair at Styles, the captain’s, and our, first encounter with the now-legendary Belgian detective. Poirot promises that, ‘It will be, too, my most interesting case—and my most interesting criminal. For in X we have a technique superb, magnificent…X has operated with so much ability that he has defeated me, Hercule Poirot!’ The setting is, appropriately, Styles Court, which has since been converted into a private hotel. And under this same roof is X, a murderer five-times over; a murderer by no means finished murdering. In Curtain, Poirot will, at last, retire—death comes as the end. And he will bequeath to his dear friend Hastings an astounding revelation. ‘The ending of Curtain is one of the most surprising that Agatha Christie ever devised,’ writes her biographer, Charles Osborne.

  Of note: On 6 August 1975, upon the publication of Curtain, The New York Times ran a front-page obituary of Hercule Poirot, complete with photograph. The passing of no other fictional character had been so acknowledged in America’s ‘paper of record.’ Agatha Christie had always intended Curtain to be ‘Poirot’s Last Case’: Having written the novel during the Blitz, she stored it (heavily insured) in a bank vault till the time that she, herself, would retire. Agatha Christie died on 12 January 1976.

  Time: ‘First-rate Christie: fast, complicated, wryly funny.’

  Charles Osborne on Three-Act Tradegy

  Nineteen thirty-five saw the publication of three Agatha Christie crime novels, all of them featuring Hercule Poirot: Three-Act Tragedy (whose American title was Murder in Three Acts,) Death in the Clouds (or, in America, Death in the Air) and The ABC Murders. Hastings is absent from the first two but makes an appearance in the third…

  The particular kind of deception played by the author on her readers in Three-Act Tragedy is one which some of them might on this occasion see through, for this is by no means one of the best examples of it. The novel is a delight to read, for the characters are a more varied lot than usual. However, a few of them are brought to life as fully as you would wish them to be. Mrs Christie seems this time to have been so interested in her murderer that she has neglected to round out some of the other characters. A minor mystery is that, when some of the suspects are entertained by Poirot in London, it is ‘in his slightly florid suite at the Ritz’. Why does he need to stay at the Ritz? Is his apartment being redecorated? We are never told.

  Though the characters of the actor (Sir Charles Cartwright) and the female playwright with the male nom de plume (Anthony Astor) are certainly not based upon real people in those professions, Mrs Christie surely intended her readers to note a light-hearted superficial resemblance to certain personality traits of the celebrated actor-manager, Sir Gerald du Maurier, and the playwright, Gordon Daviot. Du Maurier, ‘a great exponent of natural acting and of the art that conceals art, was virtually the leader of the English stage.’24 He died in 1934 at the age of sixty-one. The pseudonym of Gordon Daviot (in whose Richard of Bordeaux John Gielgud achieved his first big success in 1932) concealed the identity of Elizabeth MacKintosh (1896-1952) who also wrote detective fiction, first as Gordon Daviot and later as Josephine Tey.

  Though it is no longer likely to be thought one of the best of Agatha Christie’s crime novels of the thirties, Three-Act Tragedy was initially very favourably received, and became the first Christie novel to sell more than 10,000 copies within a year of publication.

  The New English Weekly thought Three-Act Tragedy ‘her writtiest novel so far’, The Times Literary Supplement was of the opinion that ‘very few readers will guess the murderer before Mr Hercule Poirot reveals the secret’, the Manchester Guardian thought the author ‘in great form’ and found ‘the characters (as always with Mrs Christie)…lifelike and lively’, and Ralph Partridge in the New Statesman was enormously impressed:

  Mrs Christie can be trusted to turn out at least one book a year up to her own impeccable standard. Three-Act Tragedy has given scope for all her art. The power to wrap up clues in the easiest and most natural conversation; the choice of contrasting characters, each outlined with just sufficient sharpness to give them all individuality; the steady pulse of events in chapter after chapter; the originality of the murder plot itself, and the dramatic suspense of the solution hold you until the latest possible minute. These are the characteristics of a Christie novel in the Roger Ackroyd tradition, and it is here that Three-Act Tragedy takes its place in the succession, a worthy descendant of Lord Edgware Dics… Nothing could be more baffling to any reader or detective than the opening crime. Even Poirot could find nothing to suggest foul play.

  And even the famous drama critic, James Agate, writing in the Daily Express, succumbed to Mrs Christie’s ‘tender strokes of art’:

  In my opinion, Three-Act Tragedy succeeds, because as a hardened reader of crime stories I have ceased to care who murders anybody so long as up to the last chapter the story has held me. Here Mrs Christie succeeds abundantly for the
simple reason that she is an amusing writer.

  The ending of Three-Act Tragedy is certainly an amusing example of Poirot’s endearingly childlike egotism. When Mr Satterthwaite remarks that he might accidentally have drunk the poisoned cocktail, ‘There is an even more terrible possibility that you have not considered,’ said Poirot. ‘Eh?’ ‘It might have been me,’ said Hercule Poirot.

 

‹ Prev