The relationship between Isabella and Lee, between a highborn aristocrat with a face like a medieval saint and an overweight son of an East End taxi driver with, as Blow observed, teeth that ‘looked like Stonehenge’, was a complex one.29 Their friendship was bound together by their love of the metamorphosing power of fashion, its ability to mutate and transform the appearance and mindsets of those who felt ugly, shy, strange or at odds with the world. Both of them knew that fashion was not only about the surface. ‘With me, metamorphosis is a bit like plastic surgery, but less drastic,’ McQueen said in 2007. ‘I try to have the same effect with my clothes. But ultimately I do this to transform mentalities more than the body.’30 Ultimately, fashion did not have the ability to save either of them; in fact, there are those who claim that the industry contributed to their deaths. According to McQueen, Isabella ‘would say that fashion killed her’, but he added, ‘she also allowed that to happen in a lot of ways.’31 The same could be said of McQueen himself.
After the prayers, led by Philip Treacy, the Reverend Jason Rendell, Gary James McQueen, the designer’s nephew, and Jonathan Akeroyd, the CEO of Alexander McQueen, the London Community Gospel Choir got to their feet once more to sing Quincy Jones’s ‘Maybe God Is Tryin’ to Tell You Something’. Friends and family stood for the blessing – ‘Go forth into the world in peace,’ said the canon in residence, ‘hold fast that which is good; render to no one evil for evil’ – at which point a lone piper, Donald Lindsay, wearing McQueen tartan, walked gracefully down the centre aisle and led the congregation out of the church to the Braveheart pipe motif. As the crowd gathered on the steps of St Paul’s they listened as twenty more men, all dressed in tartan kilts, struck up their bagpipes. ‘The whole thing was just like one of his shows,’ said Andrew Groves. ‘We were cursing him, just in terms of his music choice, because he was pushing all your buttons and emotions.’32
McQueen was an anti-intellectual and his formal education was patchy to say the least, but he had an innate ability to provoke and manipulate emotion. ‘I don’t want to do a cocktail party, I’d rather people left my shows and vomited,’ he once said. ‘I prefer extreme reactions.’33 He certainly divided opinion. ‘He was one of a kind, the service was bitter-sweet, perfect,’ said Sarah Jessica Parker after the memorial.34 Kate Moss said simply, ‘I loved him,’ while Shaun Leane added that McQueen ‘never knew quite how many people cared about him’.35 Yet it can’t be denied that there were those who felt betrayed, frustrated, and angry with him; very often the same people who also loved him so deeply. ‘He’s the one person I would probably forgive anything,’ said Annabelle Neilson, who together with some of his friends helped organize the service. ‘Maybe you forgive difficult people more.’36 He was, as he described himself, ‘a romantic schizophrenic’, a personality often at battle with itself.37
Accessing his creativity was never hard for McQueen – he said he could plan a collection in the space of two days – because he used his raw and unfettered self as his subject. ‘My collections have always been autobiographical,’ he said in 2002, ‘a lot to do with my own sexuality and coming to terms with the person I am – it was like exorcizing my ghosts in the collections. They were to do with my childhood, the way I think about life and the way I was brought up to think about life.’38 His work can be read, in the words of Judith Thurman of the New Yorker, as ‘a form of confessional poetry’. In the same essay, Thurman continues, ‘Therapists who treat children often use dolls’ play as a tool for eliciting their stories and feelings, and one has the sense that the dolls’ play of fashion was such a tool for McQueen.’39
His life has many of the elements of a dark folk tale or a mythic fable. It is the story of a shy, strange-looking boy from a poor working-class background who used his gothic imagination to transform himself into a fashion superstar – by the time of his death, at the age of forty, he had amassed a fortune of £20 million – but who along the way lost a part of his innocence. As one commentator observed, his life was a ‘modern-day fairy-tale infused with the darkness of a Greek tragedy’.40 It’s no surprise to learn that in his posthumous collection, Angels and Demons, one of the pieces, an exquisite coat ‘tailored from lacquered gold feathers’,41 referenced both Grinling Gibbons, who worked his sculptural magic in St Paul’s Cathedral, and the myth of Icarus, the boy whose wild aspirations drew him too close to the sun. Birds swept in and out of McQueen’s brief life, from the birds of prey he used to watch from the roof of the tower block behind his childhood home, to the beautiful prints of swallows featured in his Spring/Summer 1995 collection, The Birds, inspired by M. C. Escher’s illustrations and Hitchcock’s film. Then there were the hawks and kestrels and falcons that he had learnt to handle at Hilles, Issie and her husband Detmar Blow’s grand country home in Gloucestershire. ‘He’s a wild bird and I think he makes clothes fly,’ said Isabella of her friend.42
There were others who took the metaphor one step further. ‘He behaves like a bird, twitchy and nervous, rarely making eye contact,’ said the journalist Vassi Chamberlain.43 Easily bored and restless, McQueen sometimes behaved like someone with an attention deficit disorder – he would often return from expensive exotic holidays early and, like a bird or wild animal, hated the idea of being constrained or contained. His most challenging work explored the idea of the hybrid and the mutant, the way that strands of our primitive and savage state continued to twine their way through our DNA. His favourite books were the Marquis de Sade’s The One Hundred and Twenty Days of Sodom and Patrick Suskind’s Perfume, works that explore transgression and the darker aspects of human existence. He injected the seemingly superficial world of fashion with classic Freudian concepts of dreams and delusions, totem and taboo, the ego and the id and civilization and its discontents. ‘I don’t think like the average person on the street,’ he said. ‘I think quite perversely sometimes.’44 He visualized and made real the deviant and the depraved, but swathed his dark ideas in exquisite fabrics and constructed them around elegantly tailored pieces, clothes that were beautiful and, despite repeated accusations of misogyny, incredibly empowering for women. ‘When you see a woman wearing McQueen, there’s a certain hardness to the clothes that makes her look powerful,’ he said. ‘It kind of fends people off.’45
This book will tell the twisted fairy story of McQueen’s life, from his hard east London upbringing to the hedonistic world of fashion. Those closest to McQueen – his family, friends and lovers – have spoken for the first time about the man they knew, a fragmented, insecure individual, a lost boy who battled to gain entry into a world that ultimately destroyed him.
‘There’s blood beneath every layer of skin,’ McQueen once said.46 This biography aims to get beneath his skin to reveal the raw source of his genius and to show the links between his dark work and even darker life. ‘McQueen is totally unlike what one expects him to be,’ wrote one observer six years before his death. ‘He is his own wounded work of art.’47
Chapter One
A history of ‘much cruelty and dark deeds’
Joyce McQueen
When Lee Alexander McQueen was born, on 17 March 1969 at Lewisham Hospital in south-east London, he weighed only five pounds ten ounces. The doctors told his mother Joyce that his low weight could mean that he might have to be placed in an incubator, but he soon started to feed and mother and baby returned home to the crowded family home at 43 Shifford Path, Wynell Road, Forest Hill. Although Joyce and Ron, in the words of their son Tony, ‘always said that he [Lee] was the only one they tried for’, the birth of the youngest of their six children did nothing to soothe the tense atmosphere in the McQueen household.
‘My dad had a breakdown in 1969, just as my mum gave birth,’ said Lee’s brother Michael McQueen. ‘He was working too hard, a lot of hours as a lorry driver with six children, too many really.’1 His brother Tony, who was fourteen years old at the time, remembers noticing that one day his father went unnaturally quiet. ‘He was working seven days a week, he was hardl
y ever home,’ said Tony. ‘My mum got someone round and they institutionalized him. It was a difficult period for us.’ Joyce, in an unpublished manuscript she compiled for the family, noted that her husband spent only three weeks in Cane Hill Hospital, Coulsdon, but according to Tony, ‘Dad had a nervous breakdown and he went into a mental institution for two years.’2
Cane Hill Hospital was the archetypal Victorian asylum, an enormous rambling madhouse of the popular imagination. Designed by Charles Henry Howell, it was originally known as the Third Surrey County Pauper Lunatic Asylum, so-called because the county’s other two institutions, Springfield and Brookwood, had reached full capacity. ‘Cane Hill was typical of its time, providing specialized wards for different categories of patients, with day rooms on the ground floor and dormitories and individual cells mostly on the second and third floors,’ wrote one historian. ‘Difficult patients were confined to cells and those of a more clement disposition could walk the airing grounds . . . By the 1960s, the hospital had changed little.’3 Former patients included Charlie Chaplin’s mother, Hannah, and the half-brothers of both Michael Caine and David Bowie, who used a drawing of the administration block on the American cover of his 1970 album The Man Who Sold the World.
Lee McQueen was fascinated by the idea of the asylum – he featured the iconography of the madhouse in a number of his collections, particularly Voss (Spring/Summer 2001) – and he would have been intrigued by the rumours about a subterranean network of tunnels near Cane Hill. Over the years it has been suggested that the series of brick-lined tunnels housed a mortuary, a secret medical testing facility and a nuclear bomb shelter. Although the truth was much more mundane – the tunnels were built as bomb shelters during the Second World War and then taken over by a company that manufactured telescopes – the network of underground chambers ‘became somehow connected with the institution and the obscure rusting of machinery took on sinister new overtones, driven by the superstition surrounding the complex’.4
Years after the closure of Cane Hill, a couple were walking around the grounds of the hospital when, in the Garden House, they came across a bundle of faded yellow pages, remnants of the kind of questionnaire Ronald McQueen would have encountered while a patient at the institution. Many of the fifty-one questions, which patients were encouraged to answer with a response of ‘true’ or ‘false’, would have had a particular resonance if they had later been applied to Lee: ‘I have not lived the right kind of life’, ‘Sometimes I feel as if I must injure myself or someone else’, ‘I get angry sometimes’, ‘Often I think I can’t understand why I have been so cross and grouchy’, ‘I have sometimes felt that difficulties were piling up so high that I could not overcome them’, ‘Someone has it in for me’, ‘It is safer to trust nobody’, and ‘At times I have a strong urge to do something harmful or shocking’.5
It’s difficult to know the exact effect of Ronald’s breakdown on his youngest son. A psychotherapist might be able to draw links between Lee’s later mental health issues and his father’s illness. Did Lee come to associate his birth, his very existence, with madness? Did the boy feel some level of unconscious guilt for driving his father into a psychiatric ward? There is no doubt, however, that in an effort to comfort both her infant son and herself, Joyce lavished increased levels of love on Lee and, as a result, the bond between them intensified. As a little boy Lee had a beautiful blond head of curls and photographs taken at the time show him to be an angelic-looking child. ‘He had preferential treatment from my mother but not my dad; he was a bit Neanderthal because of his hard upbringing,’ said Michael McQueen.6
When Lee was less than a year old the family moved from south London to a council house in Stratford, a district close to the dock area of east London. ‘I think if you’re from the East End you can’t get used to the south side,’ said Lee’s sister Janet McQueen. ‘They say you can’t move an old tree and it was like that. I think it was probably that a housing initiative came up and we had the chance of moving into a house, a new house.’7 The council house, at 11 Biggerstaff Road, was a three-storey brick terraced house and although it had four bedrooms it was still a squeeze for the family. ‘We boys slept three to a bed in there,’ said Tony McQueen. ‘My mum would say, “Which end would you like?” and I would say, “The shallow end; Lee keeps pissing himself.”’8 Family photos show that the house was a typical modern working-class home with a fitted patterned carpet, floral sofas with wooden arms, papered walls and gilt-framed reproductions of paintings by Constable. At the back of the house there was a small paved garden with a raised fish pond and a white gate that led out onto a grassy communal area in front of a tower block.
Ron couldn’t work because of his condition and money was in short supply. Janet left school at fifteen and took a job in London Bridge in the offices of a dried egg import business to help support the family. Her brother Tony recalls how difficult it was for the family to survive. ‘My mum would give me the money to go on the bus to where Janet was working, to get her wages off her, and then I would bring the money back to my mum and meet her and do the shopping with her,’ he said. ‘Mum was working as well, doing cleaning in the morning and the evening.’9
When Ron returned from Cane Hill to the house in Stratford he trained to become a black cab driver so he could work the hours that suited him. He had, in Joyce’s words, ‘wonderful willpower to get better again’.10 He took up fishing and snooker and finally started to earn a little more money. Life in 1970s Britain was, for many ordinary families like the McQueens, a rather grim affair. In 1974 there were two general elections and the country was gripped by economic and social unrest. Power cuts were a regular feature of daily life (a three-day weekly limit for the commercial consumption of electricity had been imposed), rubbish went uncollected for weeks and unemployment surged past the all-important one million mark (by 1978 it stood at 1.5 million).
Yet the work ethic was strong in the McQueen family – Ron eventually bought the house from the council in 1982 – and he expected his sons to get steady and reliable jobs as plumbers, electricians, bricklayers or cab drivers. The upbringing was strict, almost Victorian. If he saw his children ‘getting beyond or above themselves’ he would try and bring them back down to earth, quashing their confidence in the process. ‘We were seen and not heard,’ said Lee’s sister Jacqui.11 By the time Tony was fourteen he had travelled all over the country with Ron in a lorry. ‘So my education suffered a bit,’ he said. ‘That was me and Michael’s childhood.’12 Tony left school to work as a bricklayer and Michael became a taxi driver like his father. They were born into the working classes and their father believed that any aspiration above and beyond that would not only lead to personal unhappiness and dissatisfaction, but would serve as a betrayal of their roots too. Creativity in any form was frowned upon and regarded as a total waste of time; dreaming was all well and good but it would not put food on the table.
It was into this world that Lee, a sensitive, bright child with a vivid imagination, was born. From the very beginning the cherubic-looking boy strived for something more, a desire that he found he could express through the medium of clothes. When he was three he picked up a crayon lying around his sisters’ bedroom and drew an image of Cinderella, ‘with a tiny waist and a huge gown’, on a bare wall.13 ‘He told me about that Cinderella drawing on the wall, I thought it was quite magical,’ said his friend Alice Smith, who visited the house in Biggerstaff Road a number of times. ‘I also remember him telling me about how one day his mum dressed him up to go out when he was little. He was wearing trousers with an anorak and they were going to the park and he said, “Mum, I can’t wear this.” She asked him why not and he replied, “It doesn’t go.”’14 His sisters started to ask him about what they should wear to work and he soon became their ‘daily style consultant’. ‘I was absorbed early on by the style of people, by how they expressed themselves through what they wear,’ he said.15
When Lee was three or four he was playing by himself at the to
p of the house in a bedroom that looked out towards Lund Point, a 23-storey tower block behind the terrace. He climbed onto a small ottoman that sat beneath the window and pushed the window wide open. Just as he was stretching out to reach through the window his sister Janet walked into the bedroom. ‘The window had no safety catch and he was stood on the ottoman reaching out,’ she said. ‘I thought to myself, “No, don’t say anything.” I went up behind him and grabbed him. I probably told him off because he could easily have fallen out of the window.’16 He was, by all accounts, a mischievous, spirited little boy. He stole his mother’s false teeth and put them in his mouth for a joke or repeated the same trick with a piece of orange peel cut into jagged, teeth-like shapes. He would take hold of his mother’s stockings and pull them over his head to frighten people. With his sisters he would go along to the local swimming club to take part in synchronized swimming competitions. ‘You would hear our trainer, Sid, shouting, “Lee – Lee McQueen?” and he would be under the water looking at us,’ said Jacqui. ‘Or he would have a hula skirt on and suddenly jump into the water. He was so funny.’17 One day, Lee did a back flip off the side of the swimming pool and hit his cheek bone, an accident that left him with a small lump.
After Lee and Joyce’s deaths her treasured photograph albums were passed around between her remaining five children. Seeing images of Lee as a boy, looking bright-eyed and full of fun, was especially hard for the McQueens. Here was Lee with a swathe of white fabric around his head, his right foot wrapped in bandage, his left eye smudged with make-up so as to give him a black eye, and a cane in one hand and a box of chocolates in the other; around his neck hangs the sign ‘All Because the Lady Loved Milk Tray’. There are plenty more taken at similar holiday camp competitions – one of him holding a prize while staying at Pontin’s and another of him, when he was only three or so, dancing with a little girl the same age, his blond hair falling down the side of his head, his mouth open wide with joy. There is one of him enjoying being picked up and cuddled by a man in a panda suit and another of him looking a little more self-conscious, probably a photograph taken at junior school, trying to smile but careful to keep his mouth closed because he did not want his prominent and uneven front teeth to show. One day when Lee was a young boy he tripped off the small wall in the back garden of the house in Biggerstaff Road and hit his teeth. ‘He was always self-conscious about his teeth after that,’ said Tony.18 ‘I remember he had an accident when he was younger and lost his milk teeth and the others came through damaged or twisted,’ said Peter Bowes, a schoolfriend who knew him from the age of five. ‘So he had these buck front teeth, one of the things that would give him a reason to be humiliated and picked on. He was called “goofy” and things like that.”’19
Alexander McQueen Page 2