They All Love Jack

Home > Other > They All Love Jack > Page 90
They All Love Jack Page 90

by Bruce Robinson


  65. There had been a ‘violent rain storm’ on the previous day. ‘Notes on the Maybrick Trial, by Dr. William Carter’, Liverpool Medical Chirurgical Journal, 1890 (p.121)

  66. Evidence of Alice Yapp, Irving (pp.70–1)

  67. Letters to Sir Matthew White Ridley, Macdougall, 1896 (p.236)

  68. Florence ‘fainted’ on 11 May, meaning Yapp couldn’t have been given the letter on 8 May

  69. Macdougall, 1896 (p.232)

  70. Evidence of Michael Maybrick at the ‘trial’. Irving (p.24)

  71. Irving (pp.50–1)

  72. This evidence wasn’t given at the ‘trial’, but was written up later by Dr Carter. ‘Notes on the Maybrick Trial, by Dr. William Carter’, Liverpool Medical Chirurgical Journal, 1890 (pp.124–5)

  73. This Friendless Lady, by Nigel Moreland, Frederick Muller Limited, London, 1957 (p.57)

  74. Evidence of Mrs Martha Louisa Hughes at the ‘trial’. Irving (p.45)

  75. Edward Davies was given the bottle of meat juice on the night of Saturday, 11 May by Dr Carter. It wasn’t tested until the following day, on Sunday morning, but no ‘quantitative analysis’ was made until 23 May, when ‘half a grain of arsenic was found in the solution’. Macdougall, 1896 (p.112)

  76. See Macdougall, 1896, where Michael Maybrick is quoted as saying, ‘Florence, or Flory, how dare you change the medicine from one bottle to another’ (p.100)

  77. Evidence of Margaret Jane Callery at the magisterial inquiry. Macdougall, 1896 (p.182): this evidence was withheld at the ‘trial’

  78. Evidence of Elizabeth Humphreys, Irving (p.83)

  79. Macdougall, 1891 (p.219)

  80. A Liverpool cause célèbre. Between 1880 and 1883, sisters Mrs Flannagan and Mrs Higgins poisoned four of their relatives, including Higgins’s husband Thomas, with arsenic, believed to have been boiled out of flypapers (the plan was to collect on life insurance policies). On 14 February 1884 they were found guilty of wilful murder at Liverpool Assizes, and were hanged at Kirkdale Prison a few weeks later.

  81. Post-trial deposition from Cadwallader and cook Humphreys given to Macdougall. Macdougall, 1891 (pp.219–20)

  82. Post-trial statement given to Macdougall by Elizabeth Humphreys and Mary Cadwallader. Macdougall, 1896 (p.183)

  83. Letters from Charles Ratcliffe to John Aunspaugh, 7 June 1889 (Trevor Christie Collection)

  84. Macdougall, 1896 (pp.201–3)

  85. Letter from Charles Ratcliffe to John Aunspaugh, 7 June 1889 (Trevor Christie Collection)

  86. Irving (p.98)

  87. Letter to Trevor Christie from Florence Aunspaugh, circa 1942 (Trevor Christie Collection)

  88. Mrs. Maybrick’s Own Story: My Fifteen Lost Years, by Florence Elizabeth Maybrick, Funk & Wagnalls Co., New York and London, 1905 (p.23)

  89. Letter from Ratcliffe to Aunspaugh, 7 June 1889

  90. Mrs. Maybrick’s Own Story (p.26)

  91. They found in Mrs Maybrick’s writing desk thirteen love letters from Edwin Maybrick, seven from Alfred Brierley, and five from lawyer Williams of London. Michael Maybrick suppressed Edwin’s letters, and also made an arrangement with lawyer Williams that he would return his (Williams’s) letters to him if he would not assist in any way with the defence. Florence Aunspaugh’s letters to Trevor Christie (Trevor Christie Collection)

  92. The Drama of the Law, by Sir Edward Parry, Ernest Benn Limited, London, 1929 (p.101)

  93. Fifty-two Years a Policeman, by Sir William Nott-Bower, Edward Arnold & Co., London, 1926 (pp.131–2)

  94. Macdougall, 1896 (p.25)

  95. Dr Humphreys’ evidence at the inquest, Macdougall, 1891 (p.59)

  96. Dr Barron’s evidence at the inquest, Macdougall, 1891 (p.60)

  97. Statement of Dalgleish to Coroner Brighouse, 28 May 1889, Macdougall, 1896 (p.26)

  98. Macdougall, 1896 (p.26)

  99. Ibid. (p.27)

  100. ‘FOR DEFENCE – As there are no parties, no distinction should be drawn before verdict between evidence for and evidence against the crown. See Rex V. Scorey (1748), 1 Leach C. C. 43, and the C. A. 1887, s. 4(1), which requires all witnesses to be examined without distinction’ (p.19). ‘A Jury man may be sworn as witness’ (p.58). A Digest of the Law and Practice Relating to the Office of Coroner, by Sydney Taylor, Horace Cox, London, 1893

  101. Bro William Pickford, later the Right Honourable Lord Sternsdale, was initiated into Freemasonry on 10 November 1870 (Apollo University Lodge No. 357). The Freemason, 1903, and in 1892 the Northern Bar Lodge No. 1610. History of the Northern Bar Lodge, G. V. D., privately printed, 1976. Knighted in 1907, Pickford became a High Court judge that same year

  102. New York Herald, 28 July 1889

  103. Macdougall, 1896 (p.23)

  104. Ibid. (p.237)

  105. Baroness von Roques’ account in a letter to Alexander Macdougall. Macdougall, 1891 (p.9)

  106. Ibid. (p.10)

  107. Ibid. (p.11)

  108. Ibid. (p.8)

  109. Ibid. (p.12)

  110. Mrs. Maybrick’s Own Story (p.51)

  111. Liverpool Citizen, 29 May 1889

  112. Ibid.

  113. Liverpool Daily Post, 1 June 1889

  114. Ibid.

  115. New York Herald, Wednesday, 21 August 1889

  116. ‘Sale of Mrs. Maybrick’s Furniture’, Liverpool Citizen, 10 July 1889 (p.9). Note: Fletcher Rodgers replaced Dalgleish as foreman at James Maybrick’s inquest. He rented Battlecrease House, where he died in December 1891

  117. New York Herald, Wednesday, 21 August 1889. Note: It was Michael Maybrick who refused the death certificate: see Dr Humphreys’ cross-examination at the ‘trial’, Macdougall, 1896 (p.153)

  118. New York Herald, Wednesday, 21 August 1899

  Chapter 19 Victorian Values

  1. The Freemason, 19 November 1892

  2. ‘There are few more genial fellows than “Fat Jack,” as he’s called, and one cannot meet him, without thinking of Falstaff or Friar Tuck.’ The Man of the World, 10 August 1889 (p.8)

  3. The Trial of Mrs. Maybrick, Irving, 1912 (p.3)

  4. The World, New York, Thursday, 1 August 1889

  5. Liverpool Daily Post, 31 July 1889

  6. Macdougall, 1896 (p.152)

  7. Ibid. (p.32)

  8. Addison’s opening address for the prosecution, The Trial of Mrs. Maybrick, Irving (p.12)

  9. Evidence of Dr. Fuller, Irving (p.58)

  10. Ibid.

  11. Liverpool Weekly Post, 25 May 1889

  12. Ibid.

  13. Irving (p.47)

  14. Arthur Sullivan, a Victorian Musician, by Arthur Jacobs, Oxford University Press, 1984 (p.246)

  15. Ibid. (p.139)

  16. Isle of Wight Observer, Saturday, 20 September 1913

  17. Ganz was G.O. in 1871 and 1873. Sheddon (p.27)

  18. Irving (p.30)

  19. Ibid. (p.36)

  20. This Friendless Lady, by Nigel Morland, Frederick Muller Limited, London, 1952 (p.121)

  21. Irving (p.129)

  22. Ibid. (p.77)

  23. Ibid.

  24. Closing words of Addison presenting case for the Crown, Irving (p.273)

  25. Affidavit to Home Secretary Matthews from Richard Cleaver, 11 August 1889 HO: A50678D-15

  26. Irving (p.98)

  27. Ibid. (p.198)

  28. Ibid. (p.201)

  29. Macnamara was fellow and former President of the Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland, and its representative on the General Medical Council of the United Kingdom, Doctor of Medicine of the University of London, Professor of Materia Medica at the Royal College and author of a standard work on the action of medicines. Irving (p.211)

  30. Irving (p.212)

  31. Liverpool Review, 10 August 1889 (p.15)

  32. Irving (p.216)

  33. What it wasn’t, was James Maybrick’s urine

  34. Irving (p.216)

  35. ‘It is difficult to distinguish between the blunders of counsel or the judge �
� of course the quantity here was not 1/76,000 of a grain, but 76/1000; and a few lines before, it was not 1/26,000 or 1/27,000, but 26/1,000 or 27/1,000. This is one of the ways in which a case may be prejudiced by trial before a physically incompetent judge. Probably if the notes were published, they would be found to contain dozens of errors, some of them of an important character. On the only occasion that they were referred to during the trial they proved to be wrong.’ Footnote on Stephen/Russell, The Necessity for Criminal Appeal, J. H. Levy (p.205)

  36. Reminiscences of a K.C., by Thomas Edward Crispe, Matthew & Co., London, 1909 (pp.102–3)

  37. Sir Charles Russell’s closing speech for the defence. Irving (p.242)

  38. Irving (p.98). Immediately after this disclosure, ‘The Court adjourned.’

  39. Macdougall, 1896 (p.58)

  40. Ibid. (pp.58–9)

  41. Ibid.

  42. Ibid.

  43. Ibid.

  44. Affidavit of Baroness von Roques to Home Secretary Henry Matthews. Stamped: Home Office Received, 15 August 1892. A50678D/92. H. Levy (pp.475–6)

  45. Cleaver’s petition to the Home Office, 11 August 1889. Home Office: A50678D

  46. Irving (p.325)

  47. Ibid. (pp.325–6)

  48. Ibid.

  49. ‘Mr. John Baillie Knight, when he found what use Mr. Justice Stephen had made of his not being called, at once communicated to [Home Secretary] Mr. Matthews, all he knew about what Mrs. Maybrick did while in London, but I venture to think it would be more satisfactory to the public, and more fair to Mrs. Maybrick, that he should publicly clear up the mystery which Mr. Justice Stephen made about him …’ Macdougall, 1896 (p.21)

  50. Irving (p.328)

  51. Ibid. (p.332)

  52. Ibid.

  53. Ibid. (p.333)

  54. Review of Reviews, W. T. Stead, Vol. 6, July–December 1892 (p.393)

  55. Liverpool Review, 10 August 1889 (p.4)

  56. ‘The carpenters were, in fact, engaged in erecting the gallows, and Mrs. Maybrick could hear them raising her own death scaffold.’ Macdougall, 1896 (pp.231–2)

  57. Eched in Arsenic, by Trevor L. Christie (p.166)

  58. The Umpire, Sunday, 11 August 1889

  59. The Story of My Life, by Sir Edward Clarke, John Murray, London, 1923 (p.280)

  60. New York Herald, 14 August 1889

  61. Pall Mall Gazette, 8 August 1889

  62. Review of Reviews, W. T. Stead (p.393)

  63. Washington Evening Star, 13 August 1889

  64. To the editor of the Manchester Courier: ‘Sir, – Referring to my letter of the 15th inst. Relating to the above case, I have, since writing the same, learnt that the suggestions made therein are not correct, and hereby beg to tender apologies to Messrs. Michael and Thomas Maybrick for causing same to be published. – Yours, etc, R. F. Muckley. Malvern, August 26, 1889.’ Manchester and Lancashire General Advertiser, Wednesday, 28 August 1889

  65. New York Herald, Wednesday, 21 August 1889

  66. Stamped: Home Office: A50678D.29

  67. Manchester Courier and Lancashire General Advertiser, 22 August 1889

  68. New York Herald, 22 August 1889 (i.e. Bro Sir Charles Russell)

  69. Minute to Henry Matthews. Stamped: Home Office, 20 August 1889. No. A50678D

  70. Macdougall, 1896 (p.53)

  71. Dr Coats’ report to Macdougall, 1896 (p.249)

  72. Mr. E. Godwin Clayton’s report, Chemical Laboratory, 43 & 44 Holborn Viaduct, London, E.C., 2 May 1890. Macdougall, 1896 (p.257)

  73. Our Conservative and Unionist Statesmen, London, Newman, Graham & Co., n.d., circa 1890, Vol. 2 (p.72 et seq.)

  74. Henry Matthews announcement, 22 August 1889, Irving (p.xxxvii)

  75. Ibid.

  76. Reminiscences of a K.C., by Thomas Edward Crispe (pp.102–3)

  77. Ibid.

  78. Ibid.

  79. Letter from Sir Charles Russell to Sir Matthew White Ridley, 21 November 1895. HO 144/1640/A50678(D)

  80. Etched in Arsenic, by Trevor Christie (p.169)

  81. Ibid. (p.173)

  82. Mrs. Maybrick’s Own Story (p.67)

  83. Ibid. (p.75)

  84. Letter to City Police, Date stamped, 22 May 1890. Police Box 321 No. 332

  85. New York Times, 11 October 1891

  86. The Hawk, 13 September 1892 (p.3)

  87. Ibid.

  88. Etched in Arsenic, Christie (p.190)

  89. The Hawk, 6 December 1892

  90. The Hawk, 13 December 1892

  91. The Hawk, 20 December 1892 (p.11)

  92. Ibid.

  93. The Maybrick Case, English Criminal Law, by Dr Helen Densmore, London and New York, December 1892 (p.127)

  94. Levy (p.470)

  95. Liverpool Daily Post, 14 August 1889

  96. Macdougall, 1891 (p.333)

  97. Ibid. (pp.536–7)

  98. Ibid.

  99. Ibid. (p.524)

  100. Macdougall, 1891 (p.221)

  101. The Trial of Mrs. Maybrick, Irving (p.31)

  102. New York Herald, Monday, 19 August 1889

  103. Reynold’s News, Sunday, 27 March 1892

  104. Isle of Wight Observer, Saturday, 20 September 1913

  105. The Diary of Jack the Ripper, by Shirley Harrison, London, 1993

  106. Letter from Dr Rosemary Williamson, Chief Librarian, Trinity College of Music, 22 November 2001

  107. My Life, Sixty Years’ Recollections of Bohemian London, by George R. Sims, Eveleigh Nash, London, 1917 (p.149)

  108. Memories of a Musician: Reminiscences of Seventy Years of Musical Life, by Wilhelm Ganz, John Murray, London, 1913 (p.102)

  109. Orpheus, From Consecration to Jubilee, by Bro T. G. E. Sheddon, 1977

  110. Reminiscences of My Life, by Charles Santley, Sir Isaac Pitman, London, 1909 (p.34)

  111. Student and Singer: The Reminiscences of Charles Santley, Edward Arnold, London, 1892, and Reminiscences of My Life, Santley

  112. Sims Reeves: Fifty Years of Music in England, by Charles E. Pearce, Stanley Paul, London, 1924

  113. Piano and Gown, by Fred E. Weatherly, G. P. Putnams Sons, London & New York, 1926

  114. The Arts Club and its Members, by G. A. F. Rogers, Truslove & Hanson, London, 1920 (p.99)

  115. The World, 15 January 1890 (p.8)

  116. Mrs. Maybrick’s Own Story (p.223)

  117. Manchester Times, 25 October 1895

  118. The Maybrick Case: A Statement of the Case as a Whole, by Alexander William Macdougall, Baillière, Tindall & Cox, London, 1896

  119. Levy (p.19)

  120. Eight Studies in Justice, by Jack Smith-Hughes, Barrister-at-Law of the Inner Temple, Castle & Co. Limited, London, 1953 (p.209)

  121. Levy (p.vii)

  Picture Credits

  The page numbers in this index relate to the printed version of this book; they do not match the pages of your ebook.

  Page 18: Universal History Archive/UIG via Getty Images

  Page 152: Private Collection/©Look and Learn/Illustrated Papers Collection/Bridgeman Images

  Page 166: Hulton Archive/Getty Images

  Page 176: Private Collection/©Look and Learn/Illustrated Papers Collection/Bridgeman Images

  Page 183: Stephen Barnes/Religion/Alamy

  Page 338: © The Royal London Hospital Archives & Museum

  Page 366: TopFoto

  Page 444: Gregory S. Paulson/Corbis

  Page 651: New Statesman

  Page 740: Hulton Archive/Getty Images

  The following images are reproduced courtesy of the London Metropolitan Archive, City of London: page 75 (original held at the Royal London Hospital Archives & Museum); page 120 (original held at the Royal London Hospital Archives & Museum); page 182 (original held at the Royal London Hospital Archives & Museum); page 382 (top and bottom); page 385; page 388 top and bottom; page 390 (original held at the Royal London Hospital Archives & Museum), page 391; page 458; page 459; page 466; page 467; page 468 left an
d right; page 475; page 477; page 726; page 727, page 728.

  The following images are reproduced courtesy of the Metropolitan Police Service, via the National Archives, Kew: page 145, MEPO 3/142 Pt 2 (302, 303 reverse); page 163 left and right, MEPO 3/140; page 334, MEPO 3/142 Pt1 (137, 138, 139); page 336 top, MEPO 3/142 Pt1 (137, 138, 139); page 349, MEPO 3/142 pt 1 (94v-95v); page 350, MEPO 3/142 Pt1 (96); page 354, MEPO 3/3157; page 355, MEPO 3/142 Pt2 282, 283 reverse); page 369 left, MEPO 3/142 Pt2 (282, 283 reverse); page 369 right, MEPO 3/142 Pt2 (282, 283) page 370, MEPO 3/142 pt 1 (128-130); page 371 top, MEPO 3/142 Pt1 (131, 132, 133 reverse); page 371 bottom, MEPO 3/142 Pt3 (483, 484, 485 reverse); page 372, MEPO 3/142 Pt3 (545, 546); page 373 top, MEPO 3/142 Pt3 (517, 518, 519 reverse); page 373 bottom, MEPO 3/142 pt 2 (240-242); page 374 top, MEPO 3/142 Pt2 (333, 334, 335, 336); page 374 bottom, MEPO 3/142 pt 1 (5); page 375, MEPO 3/142 Pt3 (503, 504, 505, 506 reverse); page 378, MEPO 3/142 pt 1 (90-91); page 384 bottom, MEPO 3/142 Pt3 (526); page 387 bottom, MEPO 3/142 Pt2 (293); page 389, MEPO 3/142 Pt3 (520, 521 reverse); page 394, MEPO 3/142 Pt3 (514, 515); page 395, MEPO 3/142 Pt2 (192, 193, 194); page 398 top, MEPO 3/142 Pt2 (340); page 398 bottom, MEPO 3/142 Pt2 (339, 341, 342); page 430, MEPO 3/142 Pt3 (491); page 457 top, MEPO 3/142 Pt2 (339, 341, 342); page 457 bottom, MEPO 3/142 Pt2 (340); page 460, MEPO 3/142 Pt1 (179, 180, 181, 182 reverse); page 472, MEPO 3/3155; page 511 top, MEPO 3/142 Pt1 (149); page 511 bottom, MEPO 3/142 Pt1 (149 reverse); page 512, MEPO 3/142 Pt2 (269, 270, 271); page 513, MEPO 3/142 Pt2 (269, 270, 271); page 514, MEPO 3/142 Pt3 (556); page 533 top, MEPO 3/142 pt 1 (14-15); page 533 bottom, MEPO 3/142 Pt3 (500, 501, 502); page 538, MEPO 3/3155; page 540, MEPO 3/3155; page 543, MEPO 3/3155; page 554, MEPO 3/142 pt 1 (124-127); page 555, MEPO 3/142 pt 1 (160-162); page 561, MEPO 3/142 pt 1 (124-127); page 567 top, MEPO 3/142 Pt1 (74); page 567 bottom, MEPO 3/142 Pt1 (74 reverse); page 568, MEPO 3/142 pt 1 (121-123); page 570, MEPO 3/142 Pt3 (520, 521 reverse); page 608, MEPO 3/142 Pt2 (268); page 671 bottom, MEPO 3/142 Pt2 (266, 267); page 730, MEPO 3/142 Pt2 (272 reverse); page 795 top left, MEPO 3/142 Pt2 (298, 299, 300, 301); page 795 bottom, MEPO 3/142 pt 1 (82-84); page 801, MEPO 3/142 Pt2 (272 reverse).

 

‹ Prev