Pyramid Technology Explained
When we have a perfect sphere, the flow of the Source Field into that object would obviously be spherical. Now here is a significant question: How would the Source Field flow into the shape of a pyramid? Would it be equally as symmetrical? Obviously, if the object is not symmetrical, the flow will not be symmetrical either. The pyramid shape apparently acts like a funnel, and causes a vortex to form in the Source Field as it flows in—just like water swirling down the drain. This appears to be one of the single most important physics principles we have missed—but the ancients were seemingly well aware of it. Some people might think that each atom would act like an individual, separate unit—where the flow never spills over into its neighbors. Instead, the Source Field appears to be flowing through the entire object, with all of its atoms, as a single, large vortex. The shape of the object then determines how the fluidlike energy flows. Some shapes could create powerful currents just by sitting there—causing them to act like machines that run with no moving parts.
In 1995, Dr. Harold Aspden discovered a remarkable “swirling effect” inside a magnetic rotor—the central, rotating part of an engine. Aspden’s experiment involved an eight-hundred-gram rotor that was spun up to a cruising speed of 3,250 revolutions per minute, from a dead stop. Normally it took three hundred joules of energy to get this to happen. However, if you run the rotor for five minutes or more and then bring it to a complete stop, it only takes thirty joules of energy to get it going again—if you do it within sixty seconds. It now takes ten times less energy to get the motor up to speed. The overall effect takes several minutes to wear off completely. This implies that once the spinning rotor comes to a complete stop, there is still some form of energy swirling around inside of it—which Dr. Aspden called “virtual inertia.”
The experimental evidence is that there is something spinning of an ethereal nature coextensive with the machine rotor . . . [it] can spin independently and take several minutes to decay, whereas the motor comes to rest in a few seconds. Two machines of different rotor size and composition reveal the phenomenon—and tests indicate variations with time of day, and compass orientation . . . this discovery was unexpected as it has crept in loud and clear in a project aimed at testing a motor principle totally unrelated to “vacuum spin.” It has appeared obtrusively and I do not yet know whether, in adapting to its presence, it can serve in improving machine performance or become detrimental.6
I propose that gravity is what pushes on the rotor to get it spinning again with ten times less energy. You create a flowing current in the Source Field and it will still be there for a while—it doesn’t immediately disappear. The pyramid structure appears to operate on the same basic principles—a solid-state machine, with no moving parts, that creates a stable, ongoing vortex in the Source Field simply due to its shape. The flowing pyramid current doesn’t seem to have any noticeable effect on the downward force of gravity, which is a much larger river of energy moving through the whole area—but the pyramid shape does create a dramatic increase in the coherence and structure of its surroundings, apparently by creating a measurable spin in the fluidlike flow of gravity. This, in turn, generates greater crystallization and organization within physical matter—and dramatically improves the health of biological life.
Of course, other shapes would create Source Field currents as well—such as cones and cylinders. Let’s think back to Lyall Watson’s quotes from his book Supernature that we shared earlier. A French firm patented a specially shaped container because it made better yogurt, claiming it somehow improved the microbial action. Czechoslovakian beer makers got better fermentation when they used round barrels instead of angular ones. A German researcher found that mice would heal faster in spherical cages. And Canadian architects discovered that schizophrenic patients showed a “sudden improvement” once they were relocated to a trapezoid-shaped hospital ward.7 We are now concentrating and focusing the energy of Mind just like we might work with water or electricity—and the results are impressive.
Dr. Viktor Grebennikov made many breakthroughs with these same principles, studying what he called the Cavity Structural Effect. He initially discovered the effect from bee honeycombs. There was a noticeable tingling and burning sensation in his hand over certain types of honeycombs. He also noticed that when bees got lost on the way back to their hives late at night, they would start trying to ram themselves right through the brick wall of the building—as if they could feel the energy of their hive, which was directly on the other side of the wall. Grebennikov also speculated that bees were naturally attracted to the shape of flowers by this same effect. By simply creating a chair with honeycombs or a stack of egg cartons suspended over the top of it, he got noticeable healing effects—and was granted Russian patent number 2061509 for this invention.8
Einstein discovered that space and time were completely indivisible—two manifestations of the same underlying energy. This suggests that as the Source Field (gravity) flows into an atom, it drives the flow of time within the atom as well. The speed of time would then be determined by the speed of the motion inside the atom. As the flow inside the atom becomes more coherent, time begins moving faster inside of it as well. This is an extremely important concept—as it suggests that there could be much more variation in the flow of time from one local area to another than we ever imagined. Sid Hurwich may have independently discovered the Aspden effect—the swirling energy we just found inside a magnet—and found a way to drive that flow into a current, not unlike a propeller creating a powerful vortex in water. This appears to be how he created such a massive change in the flow of time within a local area. Pier Luigi Ighina may have discovered the same thing with his magnetic stroboscope, shaped like a strange propeller, which was able to immediately open a hole in the clouds over his lab.
We already have a great start on a working model, but if this is really how things work, then we need to find more evidence. We need to invent some way to observe the flow of time in the laboratory—on a very sensitive mechanical level. (Precise digital clocks are built on the component level with a form of shielding that stops them from being able to detect these fluctuations easily—as we will discuss.) Once we find an appropriate system to detect the flow, we could potentially catch time in the act of speeding up and slowing down. We may even find ways to change that speed on our own, just like Sid Hurwich apparently discovered. This would obviously require innovative new designs that most scientists had never thought of. So what are the options?
Let’s think back to the rotation of the earth on its axis. When the Sun gives off a burst of energy, the earth’s rotation slows down. The rotation of the Sun’s inner core changes the speed of radioactive decay rates. These effects may be caused by a change in the flow of time. What if we used a spinning gyroscope to give us a much smaller model of the earth’s rotation in the laboratory? If we could change the flow of time in a small local area, wouldn’t the speed of the gyroscope also change in that same spot?
This is exactly what Dr. Nikolai Kozyrev discovered in the 1950s.
Kozyrev’s Stunning Breakthroughs
Kozyrev started out as a bright, gifted Russian scientist with a great future ahead of him. He was the first to propose that there may be ice on the moon we could use for water, so we could eventually live on bases up there. Tragedy struck when the fascist policies of Stalin condemned him and many other scientists to spend years in concentration camps. Stalin knew scientists were more apt to be freethinkers who would oppose his hard-line Communist policies. While suffering through the horrors of the concentration camp, Kozyrev worked out the concept of a changing flow of time—and he began conducting experiments to prove his ideas once he got free in the 1950s.
An incredible scientific revolution was triggered—leading to over ten thousand papers being published as of 1996.9 More than half of these papers were written by Russian scientists, though others have explored these areas as well. This research has awesome implications,
including a variety of usable new technologies. Since the flow of time can ultimately affect gravity, weather, electromagnetic devices and the human mind, any nation that knew how to control it would have a clear tactical advantage. Thus, the Soviet government kept much of this research classified for “national security.” It wasn’t until after the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991 that more of this groundbreaking information became available to the general public—ultimately thanks to the Internet—but most of the scientific community is still unaware of it. If it wasn’t for this robust, largely classified scientific background, Dr. Alexander Golod would probably never have spent the money to build his pyramids.
The problem with keeping all this information secret is that this science contains many of the blueprints for a Golden Age. We’ve already seen how it can create miraculous healing effects—including completely regrowing human teeth, as well as dead or diseased organs. Ordinary water becomes a miracle cure that can save premature babies that would otherwise almost certainly die. Anything harmful to the human body becomes transformed into a nontoxic substance. Radioactivity is alleviated. Earthquakes, atmospheric disturbances and all other potential calamities are greatly reduced. Our overall level of intelligence and insight appears to increase—perhaps because the energy in our holographic brain is moving faster. This faster “vibrational speed” in the holographic brain may be causing our thoughts to move faster, making our overall IQ steadily increase. DNA can be seen like a jigsaw puzzle with more than one solution—so we can transform into a higher level of what it means to be human. And now, we’re also finding out that we may even be able to control time.
So now we have a gyroscope in a laboratory. If we can change the flow of time in that local area, then perhaps the gyroscope will speed up or slow down. Here’s the problem: The flow of time in the rest of our laboratory must not change. Otherwise, the clocks, the instruments, the energy fields and even our own bodies would all speed up or slow down at the same time the gyroscope did—and there would be no way for us to know that anything was happening. Einstein thought the flow of time could not change in a local area like a science lab—it was “locally invariant.” However, Kozyrev’s discoveries, along with the others we’ve already been discussing, throw that idea right out the window.
A spinning gyroscope has a slow, circular wobble called precession, just like the earth’s. When the flow of time slows down or speeds up, a small but noticeable change will appear in the speed of a gyroscope’s precession—if you set it up according to Kozyrev’s instructions. These gyroscopes were electrically powered, so they would continue to run perfectly for long periods of time. That meant any hiccups we might see in the rotation were not the result of the gyroscope running out of energy and naturally slowing down.
The changes Dr. Anderson found in the speeds that various NASA probes traveled through space were very small—only about thirteen millimeters per second. Kozyrev’s effects were also very small. According to A. P. Levich, who wrote an incredible summary of Kozyrev’s work that I will reference throughout this chapter, the amount of change in Kozyrev’s gyroscopes, or other mechanical detectors, could be as little as ten to the minus six, or ten to the minus seven, of the overall amount of movement in the object.10 This is comparable in size to the very small changes NASA found in the speed their space probes were traveling. Therefore, Kozyrev needed to develop extremely sensitive methods in order to detect changes in the flow of time.
Another mechanical detector that gave Kozyrev results was a beam balance, which is just a bar dangling horizontally on a string, or filament, so it remains perfectly level from left to right. Kozyrev found it was important that the beam weighed much more on one side than the other—in fact ten times as much—as this made it much more sensitive to tiny little movements. However, the real “secret ingredient” was to vibrate the hook the beam was hanging from at a high speed. Once you did this, the beam would move very suddenly and noticeably—even from touching it with the most delicate puff of air. For this very reason, you had to keep it sealed under a glass dome, and suck all the air out of the inside. That way you could guarantee that air would not cause it to move. You then let the beam come to a perfect state of rest, so it doesn’t appear to move at all. However, when there is a flicker in the flow of time, the vibrating speed of the hook at the top will make a subtle but delicate change. The beam is so precariously balanced that this little change in vibrational speed actually causes it to move—noticeably.
Kozyrev found a variety of things that would cause a change in the flow of time, as we will discuss in a minute. However, the greatest surprise of his life came when he was reading Goethe’s classic Faust, in which the hero is approached by the devil, Mephistopheles, and offered the greatest riches of the world in exchange for his immortal soul. Don’t forget that Kozyrev went through grinding hunger, poverty and hard labor in the concentration camp. It’s easy to see how many temptations he must have felt to steal food, shoes, clothing, blankets or soap, or to find a way to avoid working. Thus, the story had a very personal feeling. He sat there reading the book in his lab, near the balance-beam detector. As the story reached its climax, he had a sudden emotional surge. Right at that very same moment, the beam suddenly turned and pointed at him.
This was when he first realized that he had not merely discovered the flow of time. It was not just an energy that flowed in and out of physical matter. It was the energy of Mind as well. The Source Field. With this discovery, Kozyrev could now prove that our thoughts were not locked away privately in our own brains—they created measurable signals that his detectors could pick up. Many more tests confirmed that this effect was real—and in the Global Consciousness Project, we find that when enough people think the same way, it creates a worldwide effect we can measure electronically. Kozyrev’s discovery fits perfectly with everything we discovered in the early chapters—from Backster, Braud and so on. We do appear to be sharing the same Mind—at least to some degree. That energy is all around us—and it actually has fluidlike flow patterns.
Some people might attack Kozyrev’s work and say that it had to be caused by magnetic fields, or static electricity. He prevented this by also placing his detectors inside a Faraday cage, which screens out all electromagnetic fields. Keeping his detectors in a vacuum under glass insured that air couldn’t move them either. If his detector started moving, he was now observing the flow of time directly—a ripple in the Source Field.
Another effective mechanical detector Kozyrev developed was a swinging pendulum, which was also electrically powered like the gyroscope. Once again, if he vibrated the hook it was hanging on, the pendulum responded to the time flow much more noticeably—just like we saw with the balance beam and the gyroscope. In this case, the actual direction of the pendulum’s swing would change. Of course, he also had to keep it sealed in a vacuum and shielded from electromagnetic fields.
Creating and Absorbing Time
So now what? We have three different choices of detectors, but now we have to figure out what we can do to speed up or slow down the flow of time. Kozyrev found that “ice melting, liquid evaporation, dissolution of substances in water and even plant withering” would speed up the flow of time, or create time, as Kozyrev called it. Furthermore, “the contrary processes, such as cooling of bodies and water freezing, [will] absorb time,” thus causing the flow of time to slow down in a tiny but measurable way.11
This gives even more proof for the idea that the flow of time is actually responsible for building and maintaining physical matter. When matter starts breaking apart—when a piece of ice melts, a liquid evaporates, a substance dissolves in water or a plant dies—it gives off some of the energy stored within it. We already saw Dr. Fritz-Albert Popp strike living DNA with a chemical that made it unwind and die, and in the process it released a burst of photons. I also suggested that the photons were not the only energy we should be looking at; currents in the Source Field are also being released at the same time, causing effects
Kozyrev could measure in the laboratory.
This is such a central point that it does require more explanation. When matter breaks down, the tight little circuits of coherent energy that have been spinning along on the quantum level suddenly burst free. This creates a ripple—a sudden release of energy and movement—in the Source Field. Then, as Kozyrev discovered, time speeds up in that immediate area as all that energy flows out. On the other hand, when the Source Field is spiraling into an area to increase coherence, making matter more organized, time slows down in the surrounding, outside region. The flow in that outside area now behaves like the outer edge of a whirlpool—where the water moves more slowly than it normally would if the vortex wasn’t there. In the case of Burlakov’s fish-egg experiment, where older fish eggs seemed to be sucking the life force out of the younger ones, we can now see that there is no cruelty involved by the hand of Nature. The older eggs are simply absorbing more Source Field energy than the weaker eggs, by their nature—creating a stronger, faster vortex. This naturally draws energy away from the slower, weaker vortex of energy flowing into the younger eggs.
As Kozyrev discovered, this temporary slowdown in the flow of time starts happening when an object cools down (thus making its quantum movement less chaotic and more coherent, which in turn draws in more Source Field energy), water freezes (causing more coherent crystals to form), a life form such as a plant grows (increasing the coherence as new cells are formed), or crystals form out of a liquid solution. So again, any time we’re seeing crystallization and growth, these processes absorb energy from the Source Field—and time moves more slowly in the surrounding area. This is obviously a whole new way of thinking about things. It’s strange to think of a decrease in heat as actually drawing an increase in the flow of the Source Field, since we’re used to thinking of an increase in heat as an increase in energy. In this case, there appears to be an inverse relationship between the level of heat and the amount of Source Field flow—or at least the amount of coherence we find in the Source Field. Heat destroys coherence by increasing the amount of random, chaotic movement at the quantum level.
The Source Field Investigations Page 27