With Kozyrev’s discoveries under our belt, we now have definite, provable signs of action at a distance, as Einstein called it. The position of every planet, moon, asteroid and comet in our solar system now has the potential to affect all the others in measurable ways—just as Shnoll’s discoveries strongly implied. Energy appears to be exchanged instantaneously as these celestial objects dance around—pushing and pulling on the flow of time. Our own solar system appears to be moving into an area of greater coherence—which is creating a short-term, rapid evolution of human DNA and consciousness, as we’ve discussed. The Maya calendar end-date, the expected arrival date for the Age of Aquarius and the exact time window for the coming Golden Age in Hindu scriptures all highlight the same, small window of time—circa 2012—as a key watermark for when these changes will occur. Humans gained a massive burst of intelligence fifty thousand years ago, and the Neanderthals phased out of the evolutionary cycle some twenty-five thousand years ago—right on schedule with the end of each Great Year. Our DNA has been evolving one hundred times faster in the last five thousand years than in all human history. More and more, it seems that our ancient ancestors knew what they were talking about.
How Much Can We Change the Flow of Time?
The strangest and most amazing part of Kozyrev’s work was in finding out that our own minds can actually change the flow of time. This also appears to be what the Global Consciousness Project discovered. If the human mind really can make the flow of time speed up or slow down, then what about highly gifted people? Could they possibly do things that were much more extraordinary and dramatic than what Kozyrev has discovered?
In his book China’s Super Psychics, Paul Dong wrote about children who are “Extra High Functioning,” or EHF. In 1992, China held an official meeting for U.S. oil executives at the Tianjin City Human Body Science Institute. This was considered a high honor for the visiting dignitaries, as they were permitted to witness something that very few Westerners have ever been allowed to see. A young girl named Yao Zheng was seated in front of a series of flower buds that were days or even weeks away from opening. The dignitaries watched her in good lighting, from several different angles. After she prayed for about fifteen minutes, she was able to speed up time within the buds—and they suddenly bloomed in front of everyone’s own eyes. Another child sitting next to her was able to teleport pills out of a sealed glass bottle, without ever opening it, and never brought any part of her body closer than one or two feet away from the bottle.
Paul Dong revealed just how far this phenomenon really can go.
There are many people with the ability to open flowers in China, and Yao Zheng is only one example. Of course, there are others whose powers are stronger. On the evening of April 1, 1994, in the Beijing Signal Corps auditorium, Colonel Fu Songshan was able to open all of the flower buds in the hands of an audience of over a thousand people within thirty minutes. . . . However, Fu Songshan is not the top man. There is one mysterious woman who, facing thousands upon thousands of flower buds, can make them all bloom instantly by saying, “I want you all to open,” and waving her hand.”21
In The Synchronized Universe, Dr. Claude Swanson discusses experiments in China in which a tiny, battery-powered radio transmitter was allegedly teleported from the pocket of one individual, through a wall and into a sealed container held by another person. The transmitter broadcast a steady frequency of electromagnetic signals, allowing for a precise measurement of time to be calculated. These impressive feats were witnessed by Hartwig Hausdorf and discussed in his 1998 book The Chinese Roswell.
As the teleportation occurred, the frequency of the transmitter . . . slowed down and actually stopped for a brief moment during the transmission, then gradually returned to the original frequency. This suggests that time itself may have been affected by the teleportation, since frequency is a measure of time. This behavior is reminiscent of what happens in quantum mechanics. If an elementary particle, such as an electron, stops in space, its frequency becomes very low and its position becomes spread out over a large area. This is a consequence of the Uncertainty Principle. If this is [what happened in] the Chinese experiment, it suggests that the teleportation process involves a quantumlike delocalization of the object.22
Swanson also mentions Tara Bey, an Indian yogi who could slow time to almost a standstill within his own body. His helpers actually covered his eyes, ears, nose and mouth with wax to prevent insects from entering his body—and if he was going to do it for weeks or more, he instructed his helpers to seal his entire body in wax. That’s right—he never even drew a single breath. The yogi explained to Paul Brunton how it works.
People, when confronted with the phenomena which I can produce, think it either some kind of conjuring, or else something entirely supernatural. In both cases they are wrong. They do not seem to grasp the fact that these things are perfectly scientific, obeying the laws of nature herself. It is true that I am using psychic laws which are little understood—but nevertheless, they are laws. Nothing that I do is arbitrary, supernatural, or against such laws.23
The ancient prophecies of a Golden Age suggest that spectacular abilities like this will not remain in the hands of a small number of extremely talented people—they will become commonplace. And if human beings can create such remarkable changes in the flow of time, then we should ultimately be able to accomplish the same feats with technology—just as Sid Hurwich apparently discovered. Indeed, Kozyrev’s work may well be just the very beginning of a whole new world that we will soon have at our fingertips.
CHAPTER THIRTEEN
What’s the Matter—Dematerialization, Teleportation and Time Travel
Dr. Nikolai Kozyrev’s most astonishing discovery was that stars give off measurable energy—from their past, present and future positions. The energy is the strongest in the current, actual position of the star, and decreases in a smooth, even curve as you look at either its past or its future position. We do also know there is a very similar effect occurring in quantum physics—though only a handful of scientists seem to understand what is actually going on. Every quantum physicist knows you can look at a subatomic particle and measure it as if it were perfectly solid and stable—but then when you use other measuring techniques, the particle turns into a wave—and it becomes nonlocal. This seems to defy our intuition completely, and has led to the so-called Uncertainty Principle—which is a fancy way of saying, “We just don’t know what the heck is going on down at the quantum level. Nothing seems to exist in any stable, rational, logical way down there. It’s not a particle, it’s not a wave—it’s something we can never understand. It’s both at the same time.”
Since Einstein proved that space and time are interconnected, particles are not merely spreading out in space when they turn into waves—they are also nonlocal in time.1 That means some of the particle now appears in the past, some of it is still there in the present, and some of it has moved into the future. As mind-boggling as this must sound, “wave-particle duality” has been observed in protons, neutrons, electrons and even entire atoms2—and that’s all there is down there. This means everything in the quantum realm pops in and out of existence all the time. We do have all the evidence we need to understand this, but we’re just not used to thinking this way. Conventional scientists cannot explain what is going on, and therefore have concluded that the mystery will never be solved. We simply live in a universe of uncertainty. Thankfully, this is not true. There is an answer, as we will see—it just hasn’t gotten very popular yet.
If this idea of entire atoms dematerializing isn’t strange enough, the mystery got even greater in 1999, thanks to Dr. Olaf Nairz and his colleagues. Nairz and his crew were able to transform a soccer-ball-shaped cluster of 60 carbon molecules—known as a fullerene or buckyball—directly into a wave. (This hollow, geometric sphere of carbon atoms was first devised by Buckminster Fuller, so it was named after him.) Bear in mind that buckyballs are solid objects. They can even be used to store other materi
als inside of them. Each buckyball has a mass of 720 atomic units, built from 60 different carbon atoms that are tightly bound together. And yet, by simply bumping the buckyball against a wall with a series of tiny slits in it, Nairz was able to transform it into a wave—and it popped through more than one slit at the same time.3
If you and I had this ability, a locked door would never be able to stop us. All we’d have to do is run toward it at top speed and collide with it. As soon as we hit the door, instead of having a terribly painful injury, we’d pop into a wave. Then, as a wave, we would slip through the cracks along one or more of the four sides of the door—only to immediately pop back into our normal, solid physical form on the other side. That’s what these little geometric objects are doing.
This experiment is ridiculously simple, and its full implications have definitely not yet become a part of our common knowledge—even though it was published in the prestigious journal Nature.4 Then in 2001, this same group discovered they did not need to slam the buckyballs against a wall—all they needed was laser light, which is coherent light, to transform these solid objects into waves.5 This was published in Physics Review Letters, a respected science journal.6
Faced with these paradoxes, some scientists have already started to “think the unthinkable.” What if these particles are not actually doing something that is seemingly impossible? What if they are simply flip-flopping in and out of a reality where they have some room to stretch out and relax, because time is not linear? Tim Folger discussed a similar concept in a Discover magazine article from 2007.
Some four decades ago, the renowned physicist John Wheeler, then at Princeton, and the late Bryce DeWitt, then at the University of North Carolina, developed an extraordinary equation that provides a possible framework for unifying relativity and quantum mechanics. But the Wheeler-DeWitt equation has always been controversial. . . . “One finds that time just disappears from the Wheeler-DeWitt equation,” says Carlo Rovelli, a physicist at the University of the Mediterranean in Marseilles, France. . . . “It may be that the best way to think about quantum reality is to give up the notion of time—that the fundamental description of the universe must be timeless.”7
Ever since relativity and quantum mechanics emerged, dealing with the very large and the very small, scientists have struggled to unify them. Einstein’s dream was that ultimately everything would be made from the unified field—meaning there are no protons, no neutrons, no electrons—just rotations of the Field itself. The problem, of course, is that these weird time-bending properties of quantum mechanics don’t seem to allow us to build a working model like that. However, according to Discover, we may be able to solve all these problems by changing how we think about time.
A sizable minority of physicists, Rovelli included, believe that any successful merger of the two great masterpieces of twentieth-century physics will inevitably describe a universe in which, ultimately, there is no time. . . . [Even better,] all the laws—whether Newton’s, Einstein’s, or the quirky quantum rules—would work equally well if time ran backward.8
Therefore, these radical new concepts about the nature of time cannot be shot down by skeptics who use science as a weapon—they are already on the verge of being accepted as scientific facts. We don’t need time to be linear in order to explain the laws of physics. It is unfortunate that Kozyrev’s research is not commonly known outside of Russian scientific circles, as it provides dramatic new evidence to help us understand that when the particle turns into a wave, it’s still a particle. Only now, it’s a particle in time.
Dewey Larson and Three-Dimensional Time
In our own reality, time keeps moving forward at a steady rate—barring a few little hiccups and glitches. That’s why Einstein assumed it was only one-dimensional. However, if we want to solve the biggest scientific mysteries, all we have to do is allow time to have three dimensions. The idea of anything in nature being one-dimensional is nothing more than a mathematical concept—not unlike the idea that the earth could be flat. Dr. Dewey Larson built a very successful model of our Universe, beginning in the 1950s, by assuming time has three dimensions—but mainstream scientists wouldn’t accept it. Nonetheless, Larson was able to solve many of the greatest quantum physics problems, as well as many perplexing issues in astronomy, with this model. Larson concluded there was a three-dimensional Time Region, or what I and others now like to call time-space—which is constantly interacting with our own three dimensions of space-time. Larson’s other big concept was that the entire Universe is formed by nothing more than motion—and what’s moving, in my opinion, is the Source Field. Gravity, electromagnetic energy, and all the other forces normally associated with quantum mechanics are just different ways of talking about the same thing. The entire Universe is built from nothing more than fluidlike, swirling vortexes within the Source Field. Einstein’s greatest dream—of a Unified Field—was correct.
Here’s a more technical way of saying the same thing from K. Nehru, a scientist developing Larson’s theory.
Larson asserts that the atom is without parts, that it is a unit of compound motion—[with] motion being the basic constituent of the physical universe. This means that both the nucleus and the so-called orbital electrons are non-existent. Secondly, he argues that there is no electrical force either, involved in the atomic structure. This, therefore, leaves gravitation and the space-time progression as the only two motions (forces) that operate inside the Time Region . . . .9
Based on all the available evidence, gravitation and the “space-time progression” are the exact same thing—which is ultimately what Larson is saying by concluding that “All is Motion.” It’s a very mind-expanding concept to consider that gravity is powering physical matter. That’s all there is. Nothing else. Just a flowing vortex within a mysterious force we usually call gravity. Without the flow of gravity doing its work, there would be no matter—at least not anything that was visible in our own space-time.
According to Nehru, this same theory, which Larson calls the Reciprocal System, also does an excellent job of clarifying astrophysics observations.
Besides other things, the concept of coordinate [three-dimensional] time in the Reciprocal System explains and derives the characteristics of supernovae, the white dwarfs, the pulsars, the quasars, the compact X-ray sources and the cosmic rays—without taking recourse to concepts like degenerate matter, the curvature of space-time, etc. . . . All [Einstein’s] so-called Relativistic effects come out, in the Reciprocal System, of the existence of this additional time component.10
Better yet, Larson predicted the existence of quasars in 1959, even though they weren’t officially discovered until 1963 by Maarten Schmidt.11
A computer programmer named Dave Ashley12 read Larson’s books after hearing me talk about them in my videos, and then was brave enough to start a discussion on the James Randi skeptics’ forum about it.
[Larson’s physics] makes obsolete the last 100 years or so of conventional wisdom as regards the physics of everything. As such it is not acceptable to the mainstream scientific communities. It can’t get accepted into peer-reviewed journals because it essentially is debunking all of current theory. . . . [Larson’s model] makes a huge number of accurate predictions about atoms, chemicals, spacing between atoms in compounds, and such. The numbers add up. . . . If [Larson] is right, a whole lot of professors and graduate students are out of a job. There goes the gravy train of government grants. If the underlying physics is really much simpler, it won’t take years of painstaking study to “get it.” It could be taught in high school. So there is a very strong vested interest in maintaining the status quo.13
Space and Time Are Exact Opposites of Each Other
Larson named his theory the Reciprocal System because he felt that space and time were in a perfectly opposite relationship to each other . . . a reciprocal relationship. Though most people believe space and time couldn’t be more different, Larson said that’s only because we’ve been conditioned to thi
nk that way. Instead, Larson now invites us to envision a parallel reality, all around us, which is just like the space we now see—in almost every way. This parallel reality would have solid objects and livable areas just like our own—made from the same atoms and molecules we see all around us. Our scientists would normally think these atoms exist only as waves in this stage of their existence. Remember—a wave over here is a solid particle over there.
We might even enter this parallel reality and walk around in it by certain means we will soon discuss. The only difference is that from our perspective, this parallel reality would all exist in a higher dimension—or more correctly, three parallel dimensions. Theoretically, we are surrounded by this parallel reality—by time-space—right now. It’s where the energetic duplicate of our physical body and brain would be found. It’s very likely where we go in dreams, out-of-body experiences, remote-viewing sessions or the so-called afterlife. And the main way we can measure this parallel reality is by tracking its effects on the flow of time.
One of the most mind-expanding concepts Larson raises is that the space we see around us, the Known Universe, isn’t strictly real at all. The parallel reality of time-space isn’t actually real either. The only thing that does genuinely exist is the three real dimensions that they both are a part of. Within these three real dimensions, energy constantly flows between the two realities so they can both continue to exist. (Technically, Larson would call this motion, not energy, but I believe we are still talking about the same thing.)
The Source Field Investigations Page 29