So again, the basic idea is that by smashing, bumping or even just shaking an object, some of its atoms pop over into time-space and its weight goes down. This also explains Dr. Bruce DePalma’s mysterious Spinning Ball Experiment. DePalma was working for Polaroid in photographic sciences, and lectured part time at MIT. One of his students wanted to see if there was a difference between the effect of gravity on a rotating object and a nonrotating object. DePalma designed an experiment to help find the answer. Two one-inch-wide ball bearings were given a “precisely measured thrust” that should normally cause them to rise and fall in exactly the same arc. The only difference between the two was that DePalma used a hand router to get one of them spinning at 18,000 revolutions per minute, or 300 revolutions per second, first—so this is obviously a very fast spin. He then launched them off in the dark, and photographed the results with a sixty-cycle strobe light. The results were explained on the official Bruce DePalma Web site.
Repeating this numerous times, and analyzing the parallel trajectories of the ball bearings as documented photographically, . . . the rotating ball . . . went to a higher point in its trajectory, fell faster, and hit the bottom of its trajectory before the non-rotating ball bearing.24
Since the spinning ball traveled higher, that obviously meant it had become lighter. And since it plunged faster than ordinary gravity should allow, that also suggested it was then moving slightly faster in time as well. DePalma didn’t know exactly what was causing the ball to fly higher—but once I figured it out, many other pieces fit together. Nairz saw the same thing when he slammed a buckyball against the wall, and Kozyrev saw it by smashing ball bearings and vigorously shaking weights. Then when we add in Ginzburg, we now have a theoretical framework: as soon as a particle begins to move, part of it will transform into pure Field.
DePalma found that you didn’t even need to shoot the balls through the air—simply dropping two ball bearings straight down, from a height of only six feet, “repeatedly demonstrated a small but significant and clearly perceptible effect” if one of them was rotating at a fast speed.25 DePalma got his results published in the British Scientific Research Association Journal in 1976. He also explained it to Dr. Edward Purcell, one of Harvard’s top experimental physicists. Dr. Purcell definitely realized what the implications of this really were: “According to DePalma, Purcell, after contemplating the experiment for several minutes, remarked, ‘This will change everything.’”26 In his 1977 paper on the Spinning Ball Experiment, DePalma revealed he had the same basic idea as Kozyrev.
“Time as a manifestation of a much deeper and basic force is what we have a concern for here. The point of connection I want to make is the inertia of objects relates to the time energy flowing through them.”27 Sounds familiar.
So far, all we’ve done is create a small effect that you need special laboratory equipment to even notice. That’s not very exciting. How do we get the really good stuff to happen on a larger scale? In order to find the answer, we have to go back and take another look at gravity. Remember that in Larson’s model, gravity is all there is. Atoms and molecules are nothing more than vortexes within an energy field we call gravity.
CHAPTER FOURTEEN
The Gravity—and Levity—of the Situation
Protons, neutrons, electrons, whole atoms and even clusters of sixty or more atoms called buckyballs have all been found to pop in and out of a wavelike state, where they no longer appear to exist. With the help of Larson’s new physics model, we now see that these particles are popping into a parallel reality called time-space, where time is three-dimensional. Dr. Vladimir Ginzburg turned a classic Einstein equation upside down and found that atoms and molecules lose mass as they are accelerated to the speed of light and beyond. Then we discovered that by simply smashing or shaking an object, as in Kozyrev’s experiments, or rapidly rotating an object, as in DePalma’s Spinning Ball Experiment, we can apparently accelerate the internal movement in an atom past light speed—and measurably reduce its weight. Kozyrev also found that it took about fifteen to twenty minutes for the missing mass to return, and it did so in sudden jumps—rather than a smooth, gradual change as we might expect. In this new science, gravity and time are interconnected. Ultimately, all atoms are vortexes of motion within an energy most people call gravity, and which we are calling the Source Field.
Let’s look at a whirlpool in a stream of water for a minute. Does any of that water actually disappear when it goes into the whirlpool? What happens to the water after it shoots through the vortex? Does it shift into some parallel reality, never to return? Of course not. The water is obviously still there in the stream, and it keeps right on flowing along. How does this apply to the earth? Simply put, the energy flowing into the earth must also flow back out of the earth. Gravity, as a downward force, must also have an upward force—and my favorite name for gravity’s counterpart is levity. The Source Field, or gravity, rushes into our planet to create all the atoms and molecules on earth simultaneously—but it still has to keep moving. Once this same flow of energy streams back out of our planet, it has now lost some of its momentum—so it would be traveling a little more slowly than it went in. Once you understand this, you will see there may be an upward-pushing force from the earth that is in a constant tug-of-war with the downward-pushing force—and the downward force only wins by a very small amount. If we did not have the upward-pushing force to balance everything out, we would very likely be instantaneously crushed flat by the pressure of gravity.
Atoms and molecules are nothing more than vortexes within gravity. In Larson’s model, there are only three real dimensions—and in this absolute reality, space and time are one and the same. You then have two parallel realities where the space in one reality creates the time in the other reality, and vice versa. There is a constant, flowing exchange between these two realities going on within every atom. When an atom pops over into time-space, its spinning momentum is transferred over into the fluidlike energy within the parallel reality—and it is no longer affected by gravity in our own space-time. Gravity now moves right through that area without pushing on the atom anymore. However, if the atom (or vortex in time-space) starts losing its speed and momentum, gravity pulls it back over into space-time. The full transition can take fifteen to twenty minutes in a larger object with many atoms, as we saw in Kozyrev’s experiments. Interestingly, the renowned mathematician and physicist Roger Penrose said in a 1997 issue of Scientific American that gravity triggers the transition between a particle and a wave at the quantum level.1 Dr. Hal Puthoff calculated that there was a direct relationship between gravity and the trembling motion within all particles the Germans dubbed Zitterbewegung.2
Back in 1982, Princeton scientists had discovered that electrons become fluidlike when kept at super-cold temperatures and zapped with the world’s most powerful magnet. This fits very nicely with our model.
The electrons . . . seemed to “cooperate” and work together to form what scientists call a “quantum fluid,” an extremely rare situation where electrons act identically, in lockstep, more like soup than as individually spinning units.3
Levity Creates Thrust
And here’s my favorite part of all. Theoretically, an atom in space-time gets pushed on by gravity—but once an atom pops over into time-space, it gets pushed on by levity. This means that within our reality, that atom now has thrust . . . as long as it is still bound together with other atoms that have not yet popped over. Therefore, if you want to get an object to levitate, you would need to bring its molecules to a point where they are half in and half out of our own three-dimensional reality of space-time. That way, the levity force can then balance out against gravity—not unlike how you can float perfectly still underwater by controlling how much air you hold in your lungs. If you push an object too far over into time-space, it will dematerialize. Then the same force that was causing it to rise up in our reality will now make it fall down in the parallel reality. Gravity takes over—but in a totally parallel
reality. This may work in a manner similar to a Möbius loop as you pass between realities.
Nature uses these principles all the time. The DNA molecule stores photons of light, and it appears that this same flip-flopping at the lightspeed boundary is what allows DNA to easily exchange energy and information between space-time and time-space—between our physical body and our energetic duplicate. In the remaining part of this chapter, we will explore gravity-shielding effects occurring in air vortexes (tornado levitation), water vortexes (trout rising through vertical waterfalls), plant fibers (the secret ingredient involved in sap flow) and insect wings (to keep certain large insects airborne and prevent collisions with other insects)—not to mention the flow of electromagnetic energy, once properly understood. And that’s not all.
Tornado Anomalies Explained
Let’s start with tornadoes. The conventional explanation is that the levitation inside a tornado is caused by air suction—and that certainly should account for some of what we’re seeing. However, once you add in other curious effects that have been documented, even on government NOAA Web sites, we can no longer be so sure that this is the only cause of the levitation—or even the main cause of it. There are many cases of people, animals, objects, even entire homes ending up inside a whirling tornado and transported large distances without being damaged4—where the fiercely rotating air should have torn them to pieces. Many matter-blending effects have been documented as well. The first time I read about this was in a technical paper by Dr. Alexei Dmitriev. The story that jumped out at me the most was of a clover leaf that had been found pushed into a stucco wall, during a tornado—as if the wall had become soft and spongy.5 At the time, this was a mystery to me—but now it all makes sense. Another good example was of an Oklahoma tornado in 1942 that tore one of the wheels off of a car, while leaving the rest of the car undamaged.6 I realized that if the lug nuts on the wheels had become soft and liquidlike, the levity force could then pull the tire off the car and lift it into the air quite easily.
Dmitriev’s paper also presents evidence of complete dematerialization cases, where the matter is then blended together with other objects once it pops back over into space-time. An old, charred wooden board that was brittle and porous went through a wooden house wall without breaking—and an inch-and-a-half-thick gate frame was punctured by a piece of wood.7 I realized if these stories were true, there should be many more examples. I later found an official NOAA government Web site that collected eyewitness reports from a tornado outbreak in Grand Rapids, Michigan, on April 3, 1956. NOAA said that “in the interest of historical accuracy, these statements have not been edited for content, but are presented as they were submitted to the National Weather Service.” The reports included a living room window that was embedded with sand, but did not break. A farm machine had several leaky holes in the oil pan from pieces of straw that had shot through. Straw was found embedded into the brick wall of a house. A three-inch twig blended into a wall without breaking or cracking the twig or the wall. Blades of grass were driven into tree trunks, and a cow became embedded in a tree.8
In her WeatherBug blog, Stephanie Blozy alluded to stories of a coat hanger blended into a wooden board, and wood splinters stuck into a brick, though no direct references were given. In the comments section, Russell L. DeGarmo claimed he saw a two-by-four driven through both the front and back walls of a two-story brick home, where the entry hole was smaller than the size of the plank. His parents had driven him to see this odd event in Pennsylvania in the early 1940s. Another commenter claimed to have seen a banana embedded halfway into a telephone pole. And Jim Mims claimed that NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama, has a display of a section of telephone pole with a drinking straw embedded into it.9 Stephanie was brave enough to offer an opinion about what causes these events, which now seems fairly accurate.
Another theory based on quantum physics states that the piece of straw is electrically charged super fast as it spins in the center of the tornado, allowing it to exist on a “higher energy density.” When it flies out of the tornado and comes in contact with something of a lower energy density, it passes through that object like a ghost—until the energy levels are equal, and the straw is frozen in the object.10
Of course, numerous commenters attacked her for even stating this as a potential explanation.
In Freaks of the Storm, climatologist Dr. Randy Cerveny shared additional examples. A Minnesota tornado “split open a tree, jammed in an automobile, and clamped the tree shut again” in 1919.11 A tornado in India from 1838 caused a long stalk of bamboo to be completely embedded through a five-foot-thick wall with bricks on both sides.12 In 1896, a tornado in St. Louis, Missouri, drove a two-by-four plank of pine wood through solid iron, five eighths of an inch thick, on the Eads Bridge—and there is an excellent picture of it in the book from NOAA.13
This tree branch was pushed through the thick metal of an iron bridge during the massive St. Louis tornado of 1896.
In Mount Carmel, Illinois, a tornado in 1877 drove a brick through the outer wall of a house, the interior wood, the plaster wall, twenty-seven more feet between two rooms, and lodged it into a rear wall, without ever breaking any corners off the brick.14 In 1951, a bean was blended halfway into a fresh chicken egg—without ever cracking the shell—in Scottsbluff, Nebraska. Cerveny found a photograph of this peculiar incident, though there is not enough detail to really see what the egg looks like up close.15
Washburn University has a Web site discussing the June 8, 1966, tornado in Topeka, Kansas. This includes a report from Jan Griffin that describes how when her car was dug out from the wreckage two days later, items from her bathroom had somehow appeared in the trunk—though she obviously did not put them there, and apparently saw no sign of the trunk ever having opened.16 Another Web site features a photograph of glass pieces that had been embedded into an aluminum pipe—in a tornado on the Isle of Wight on June 19, 1985.17 In 2004, the Boonshoft Museum of Discovery displayed “bizarre artifacts that historical societies like to keep under wraps” in Dayton, Ohio, as reported in an AP press release. This exhibit included a gas meter that had been speared by a stick of wood in the Xenia tornado from 1974.18
This wooden board was driven through a vertical wooden post during the infamous Tristate tornado of 1925.
In some cases, strange orbs are seen. The NOAA Web site reported eerie yellow-colored “giant puff balls” in one tornado. Fred Schmidt reported seeing what looked like greenish “glassy marbles on a plate glass window” that were being “pushed across the sky.” There was no rain, thunder or lightning as he saw this. He also reported what now appears to be a classic case where he was popped over into time-space—thus causing all the normal sounds within space-time to disappear.
The quietness was eerie. There were no birds singing, which there usually were. In fact there were no sounds from any animals at all. . . . I also [later] saw what appeared to be a straw embedded in a telephone pole about halfway in, just as perfect as could be.19
Natural Antigravity in Water, Trees and Insects
A simple case of rotating air is enough to cause effects that fit our model nicely. What about rotating water? Let’s not forget that in our new model, gravity has spin currents in it—because it is caused by a fluidlike energy. If these spin currents get strong enough—by rotating vortex motion within the Source Field—they can create their own gravitational force. They seem to work in a sideways direction, creating rotating currents—such as tornadoes, hurricanes, ocean currents, and mantle currents below the continental plates—but in some cases this force can directly counteract the normal downward push of gravity. As Olof Alexandersson described in the classic Living Water, Viktor Schauberger allegedly discovered a gravity-shielding effect in nature by studying how trout could jump straight up, through high waterfalls, with seemingly very little effort.20 For decades, he observed that the fish would first “dance in a wild spinning movement” and then “float motionlessly upw
ard” through the waterfall, even at unusually large heights. Even more surprisingly, on a late winter night with bright moonlight, he witnessed this same effect happening with egg-shaped rocks. He was looking into a mountain pool, within a rushing stream, when an egg-shaped stone almost as big as a human head started doing a spinning dance just like the trout would do. It then rose to the surface of the water—and a circle of ice quickly formed around it. (Such bizarre and sudden changes in temperature are also consistent with matter popping into time-space. Remember—we might think that a gateway into time-space would increase temperature, but Kozyrev actually proved it makes things colder.) Eventually, Schauberger saw several egg-shaped stones all do the same thing in sequence. He analyzed them and found that besides the egg shape, they all contained metals.21
How do giant trees actually pull sap all the way up their trunks? Physicist Dr. Orvin E. Wagner, who worked at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, taught physics at California State Polytechnic University and conducted research in condensed matter physics at Lockheed Research Laboratory in Palo Alto, California, researched this subject. He did biophysics research since 1966 that led him to discover a wave effect in plants as of 1988, wherein he began devoting himself full-time to studying these mysteries.22 In 1992 and 1994, he published papers in mainstream journals outlining his discovery that plants and trees are using a gravity-shielding effect to create sap flow.23 Although some of the flow could be caused by suction from the evaporation in the leaves, that cannot account for everything Wagner observed. It appears that the branches of trees create a vortex effect not unlike what we see in the pyramids. They may create a rotating spin current of gravitational force that is sufficient to push the sap up the tree.
The Source Field Investigations Page 31