You just can’t understand vaccinations and autism without looking at the bigger picture … One part is the regulatory capture [the revolving door of scientists working for public health and Big Pharma companies] which exists in nearly every country. The role of the World Health Organization and our future overlord, Bill Gates, looms large in all of this. When you say we’re not going back to normal until everybody is vaccinated, as Bill Gates has said, or that African farmers have to buy the seeds for their crops from Big Agriculture, then the bigger picture begins to peek out. The stuff you and Judy wrote about with Tony Fauci, and the way the vaccines are contaminated with animal viruses, it all started to come together.
You’re really looking at a multi-headed monster that has managed to seize control of health on this planet. It was never enough before, but they have to get more. When you’re looking at COVID you see their end game, or at least their end game so far. It’s basically to control the health of the planet and to make big bucks as well. Because the wealth of the billionaires and their friends are not going down during this pandemic. It’s going up. These people are concentrating wealth and power to levels where they get to dictate what everybody does. And the politicians are either ignorant or bought off.20
I wish I didn’t share the dark views of Chris Shaw, but I do. These people do intend harm. If there was nothing to worry about, they could easily show us the data.
We would listen and have a discussion.
However, we know we will have to force the conversation.
***
I think one of the most unfair portraits painted of me in the media is that I don’t like to work with people. Put me with good, honest researchers and we’ll get along fine. That doesn’t mean we won’t have lively arguments about interpretation of data, as Frank Ruscetti and I have done for thirty-eight years. No, I don’t suffer fools lightly and when data doesn’t support conclusions and the health of millions of innocent people are at stake, I’m not going to remain silent. I didn’t serve in the military, but I did spend twenty years at the National Cancer Institute and considered that to be the most honorable of public services. When I see rampant corruption driven by a few individuals like Robert Gallo, Anthony Fauci, Harold Varmus, Ian Lipkin, and John Coffin, it hurts all the scholars who have no idea what’s been done to corrupt the knowledge so carefully constructed.
All these considerations make Shaw more determined than ever to fight:
I grew up in that fifties and sixties generation and my dad and uncles all fought in the Second World War. And you always asked yourself, if I’d been in France when the Nazis invaded, would I have joined the Maquis [rural guerilla bands of French Resistance fighters] and fought the Nazis? Everybody thinks they would have. But you know what? Most people wouldn’t. Most people would just go along. It falls upon relatively few people to say this is bullshit. And I’m not going to put up with this and I’m going to resist.21
I guess I’m one of those people who stands up. And if you’re reading this book, you’re at least considering the possibility.
Shaw shares my rationale in how he will behave in this time:
The last few years have launched me into seeing the bigger picture and to try to educate. Not to proselytize, but to educate. And you can listen to me and believe what I say or don’t. But if I’m silent I haven’t done my duty. I have little children and a couple of big ones and I want to be able to look them in the eye and say I did what I had to do? Did I succeed? I hope. But if I didn’t, I still did what I had to do. Because how do I raise good and moral people if I don’t live up to those standards?22
And it’s good to know that, like me, Shaw is an optimist:
Fear is very contagious. But courage is also contagious. People develop courage by seeing it in action. Which is why it’s important when somebody like Bobby Kennedy stands up. With his family background, he knows it can all end very badly. But he gets up there, all the time, speaks the truth, and put himself at risk. When you watch him be brave, day in and day out, with all of his family history, you say to yourself, maybe I can show a little more courage.23
We need more people in science like Dr. Chris Shaw.
***
Dr. Frank Shallenberger first became aware of me when he watched the twenty-six-minute “Plandemic” video put together by Mikki Willis. He then bought and read our book, Plague of Corruption, and said to himself, “My goodness! I have such respect for Judy sticking her neck out, just so she could get her head chopped off!”24 He was ignorant of many things we covered in our book, but felt he also had several important pieces to add to the puzzle.
I was introduced to Dr. Shallenberger by Dr. Rich Fischer during the International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology conference (AMOT.org), which he had invited me to speak at in September 2020. We emailed and talked through the fall and winter of 2020. In November he invited me to attend the annual meeting of ozone therapy (AAOT.us) to be held in Dallas, Texas, May 13–15, 2021, with the single request that I commit to appear in person. I was honored and optimistic, but apprehensive as I knew nothing about ozone therapy and viruses. I did know Dr. Lori had used it on me during life-saving oral surgery.
This was the fifth medical conference I had been invited to attend live since Plandemic: Indoctornation had aired on August 18, 2020. I was encouraged and enthusiastic. I was being asked by experienced physicians and scientists to talk about mechanisms of pathogenesis of gamma retroviruses and vaccine contaminants. The most important thing about medical conferences is interactions with health-care practitioners and scientists in attendance. So much happens in the discussions, at dinner, coffee breaks, and at the exhibits.
Those lessons Frank Ruscetti instilled were now instinct, or as he might call it, intuition. There are no accidents. Constructing knowledge is hard work. The clear message was to study Shallenberger’s work. I added Dr. Frank Shallenberger to Kent’s short list to interview for this book.
As Shallenberger later recalled in a long interview with my coauthor, Kent Heckenlively:
In the early part of my career I worked in emergency medicine and that’s all I did. That and surgery also share some similarities. They’re kind of unique in medicine. There’s an analogy I often tell people. If somebody walks into an emergency room with a knife sticking out of their back, we actually take the knife out and sew up the wound. I joke that if somebody walked into an internal medicine office with a knife sticking out of their back, they’d give him some Prozac to deal with the repercussions of having a knife stuck in their back. That’s my complaint with internal medicine. They just don’t look for causes. I did emergency medicine for five years and that’s just where my head is. Getting to the cause of what’s wrong.25
After doing emergency medicine for several years, Shallenberger started at a more traditional medical practice in internal medicine at a hospital. But after about six months, he found himself questioning his decision.
Shallenberger told the chief of the medical staff:
“Look, I’m kind of frustrated. I’ve only been doing this for about six months. But most of my patients, although they usually feel better, don’t actually get well, unless they accidentally get well. And most of them, they’re getting side-effects from the drugs I’m giving them. I don’t think I’m doing a very good job here.”
To his credit, the chief of the medical staff sat and discussed the issues with Frank for several hours in his office, acknowledging his concerns and finally saying, “Frank, you’re doing a great job.”
Shallenberger replied, “That’s not satisfying.”
The chief shrugged and said, “Yeah, but with chronic problems, relieving their symptoms is usually the best we can do.”26
Around the time the chief of the medical staff told him he was doing a “great job,” Shallenberger got a call from his father, also a physician, who was on the verge of retiring. While cleaning out his office, he’d stumbled across several old medical textbooks and wondered if Frank would like t
hem.
Shallenberger later recalled:
I thought it might be fun to see what they were doing back in the early 1900s. So, he sent me all these books and I pulled out one that had been published by a large pharmaceutical company in the 1920s. I opened the first page and it was all about vitamins. I didn’t realize that back in the 1920s vitamins were the big thing. I’m looking through the book and one of the very first entries was about vitamin B-1, thiamine. And they’re talking about the symptoms of vitamin B-1 deficiency, things like fatigue, headaches, rashes, and lack of energy. I’m looking at this information and realizing it sounds like most of the patients I see. I’m thinking this might have something to do with B complex vitamins. I gave B complex vitamins to my patients, and dang it, a lot of them got better. The headaches really went away. And I’m thinking to myself, if somebody has a symptom, like a headache, and you give them something natural, like a vitamin, and the symptom goes away, you probably just treated the cause of the symptom. At that point I thought, they didn’t teach me everything I needed to know in medical school.27
When I read Kent’s transcript of the interview, I thought of the book I’d been given by Upjohn in 1987 called A Century of Caring. It described many natural product elixirs and how one of the Upjohn brothers invented a pill-making machine.
With this newfound appreciation that there might be answers found in therapies pushed out of the traditional medical system, Shallenberger started to look for fellow renegades outside of the medical establishment. He found a study group led by two-time Nobel Prize winner Linus Pauling. Pauling received the Nobel Prize for Chemistry in 1954 and Nobel Peace Prize in 1962, the only scientist to receive two unshared Nobel Prizes. The group met once a month in San Francisco. Shallenberger remembered that Pauling had come to his medical school and given a talk about vitamin C, so he decided to attend.
A coincidence is that the first book I ever read after my grandfather died was about vitamin C and cancer, by Linus Pauling. I even have an autographed copy that I found at a garage sale.
After a few meetings, Shallenberger realized this was a group of physicians who were thinking way out of the box and he was excited to be a part of them, just as we were excited about the “Amazing Papers Journal Club,” in the early days of the Biological Response Modifiers program. Many of them had been using vitamin therapies for fifteen or twenty years. After about a year of attending meetings, Shallenberger had an epiphany. “Gosh, there’s all these chronic diseases going around and for the most part all the medical system is doing is just treating the symptoms. As soon as I got that through my skull, I realized I was going to spend the rest of my life trying to figure out how this stuff works.”28
Shallenberger believes his complete break with the traditional medical establishment occurred sometime in the mid-1980s, when he officially and irrevocably joined this renegade band of physicians who were trying to find a better way. As an outgrowth of these monthly meetings, Pauling and other luminaries founded the Orthomolecular Medical Society, which met once a year and tried to summarize the important findings of the group for the previous twelve months. One year, Frank was to put together the speaker list and he agreed.
At the time, AIDS was dominating the national conversation and it wasn’t well-understood how the virus was killing people. One of the topics people were talking about was oxidative stress, especially with the recent publication of a book called Antioxidant Adaptation: It’s Role in Free Radical Pathology by Dr. Parris Kidd and Dr. Stephen Levine.29 Oxidative stress is caused by the presence of too many “oxidants,” and they were suggesting the use of certain molecules called “anti-oxidants” to battle this oversupply of oxidants. The book laid out the theory that most diseases were caused by this oxidative stress. Now oxidants and their accompanying free radicals are natural molecules formed in the body by biological processes, but a healthy person eliminates them at a higher rate than a sick person. One of the clear pieces of evidence from the HIV/AIDS patients, just as with almost all other patients with a chronic illness, was that their bodies were under immense oxidative stress. For some reason, these HIV/AIDS patients were not controlling these oxidants and free radicals, and this oversupply was destroying their immune systems.
Shallenberger got a call from a guy named Charlie Farr, an MD/PhD from Oklahoma, and he said, “I hear you’re putting together the orthomolecular program in San Francisco and I want to talk.”
“Okay,” Shallenberger said, “What do you want to talk about?
Farr replied, “For the last couple years I’ve been taking hydrogen peroxide and I’ve been infusing it into people’s veins. And they’re getting better.”
Shallenberger was skeptical. “Dr. Farr, that’s hard to believe, knowing that hydrogen peroxide is an oxidant and people who are sick are almost always in oxidant stress. It doesn’t make sense that they would get better. You would think they would only get worse.”
But Farr said he had science, data, and case studies to back him up. Shallenberger was so intrigued by Farr’s confidence that he immediately booked him to speak. Shallenberger recalled, “He came to the program and blew everybody’s mind. He talked about a concept developed by a Swiss physician named Paracelsus, dating back to the 1400s. If you take a molecule and apply it to the body in tiny doses, it has an opposite effect of the same molecule at higher doses. It turns out, an oxidant, like hydrogen peroxide, given in tiny doses, actually decreases oxidant stress.”30 It was a very strange concept and was new to Shallenberger and virtually every other member of the Orthomolecular Medical Society. According to Shallenberger, “Charlie showed case after case of his patients who were chronically sick and in oxidative stress, as he was measuring it, then giving them intravenous hydrogen peroxide in the doses he’d developed. And dang it, their oxidant stress went away, and they got better.”31
Shallenberger was intrigued by hydrogen peroxide and immediately started using it with success on many of his patients. But two years later he ran across a substance which seemed to have even greater applications. It was called ozone, which is actually three atoms of oxygen, sharing unstable electron bonds. As Shallenberger explained in his recent book, The Ozone Miracle:
Thus, ozone, referred to as O3, is a molecule which consists of three oxygen atoms sharing the same amount of electrons that make two oxygen atoms stable. This means because of its extra oxygen atom, ozone is a relatively unstable molecule. This instability is why it is so powerful in the human body. Much more powerful that O2. And that’s why when ozone is introduced into the human body, a remarkable thing happens. It instantly starts moving electrons around and ultimately stimulates the mitochondria in your cells to generate energy from oxygen more efficiently.32
Shallenberger started investigating ozone, finding it had first been discovered in the mid-1800s and was often used in the public water systems as a disinfectant, rather than chlorine.
In the early 1990s Shallenberger read a paper by Dr. Carpendale out of the University of California, San Francisco. He took samples of blood, bubbled ozone through them, and then poured this serum on cultures of HIV. He found it killed all the HIV in the cultures. This is from the abstract of the article, published in 1991 in the Journal of Antiviral Resistance:
The inactivation of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and cytotoxic properties of ozone-treated serum and serum-supplemented media were examined. The titer of HIV suspensions in human serum was reduced in a dose-dependent manner when treated with total reacted ozone concentrations at a range of 0.5 to 3.5 micrograms/ml-1. Complete inactivation of HIV suspensions was achieved by 4.0 micrograms/ml-1 of ozone in the presence or absence of H-9 cells.33
“Complete inactivation of HIV suspension cultures in human cell lines?” This was remarkable information. Shallenberger wondered why he never knew of this work. As Shallenberger recounted to Kent:
I’m looking at this data and I call him up. I end up hanging out with him and he tells me everything he’s done. At this point, like mos
t people, I’m convinced that AIDS was caused by a virus. I was thinking, ‘Wow! AIDS is caused by a virus. You bubble ozone through somebody’s blood, and it kills the virus. This is no-brainer. I’m going to be famous.’ I developed this system where I put a needle in one arm of a patient, and I had a pump attached to it. I developed an apparatus where the blood circulated through a container with a bunch of ozone in it. So, the blood got ozonated outside the body and ozonated blood was then pumped back into the other arm.34
Now you can understand why I call Shallenberger a problem-solver. I think it was that emergency room training which made him think, if I understand a problem, I can fix it.
But it wouldn’t turn out to be that easy.
Shallenberger continued his recollections.
I’m keeping these people on the system for a good three or four hours and I know damn well I’m oxidizing the hell out of their body. I published a study on four of these patients in 1998. These were patients with advanced AIDS. They didn’t get cured. The virus didn’t go away. The antibodies didn’t go away. But the patients got better.
And what I did discover was that this massive, huge dose of ozone I’d been giving them didn’t work any better than a tiny dose of ozone. I might have been giving them say 400 milligrams of ozone in each session. It didn’t work any better clinically than what I could get with 10 milligrams of ozone. I’m scratching my head and thinking, ‘What’s up with that?’
Then I thought, ‘Well, maybe it’s the Paraclesus principle.’ Different things happen with different doses. Then it occurred to me, maybe the disease isn’t actually caused by the virus. If I’m killing the hell out of a virus, and the disease doesn’t go away, maybe there’s more to it than that.”35
Shallenberger eventually published the results of his findings and his speculations in 199836, and when he read what I’d written, thought our views were highly compatible.
Ending Plague Page 30