Crucible of a Generation

Home > Other > Crucible of a Generation > Page 25
Crucible of a Generation Page 25

by J. Kenneth Brody


  Roosevelt addressed his last-minute appeal to the Emperor. It reflected his earlier

  inquiry about the presence and number of Japanese troops in French Indo-China.

  The President ritually invoked the right of all nations to live in peace, and cited

  especially peace between Japan and China. He recounted the agreement between

  Japan and Vichy for the stationing of a limited number of Japanese troops in Indo-

  China. Japan had far exceeded these limits, creating a “legitimate fear” of invasion

  in the Philippines, in the Netherlands East Indies and in Thailand. None of these

  countries, the President said, could sit for long on a keg of powder. The President

  offered to obtain assurance from them not to attack Indo-China, and, yes, assur-

  ance from China as well, thus obviating the need for Japanese troops to defend the

  Vichy colony. He called for the elimination of military threats and in the present

  “definite emergency” to find ways to dispel the dark clouds, a sacred duty in the

  name of humanity to prevent further death and destruction in the world. 20

  Not surprisingly, the long-sought Japanese reply to Secretary Hull, delivered

  by the Japanese envoys while the bombs were falling on Oahu and on the U.S.

  156 First Week at War: December 8–13, 1941

  Pacific Fleet, took a mirror-opposite position to Hull’s statement, both as to the

  facts and the principles. It was, it said, the immutable policy of the Japanese gov-

  ernment to ensure the stability of East Asia and to promote world peace, enabling

  all nations to find their proper place in the world. The note then cited the fun-

  damental grievance—measures by the United States and Britain to aid China,

  “an important subject” obstructing Japan’s efforts to establish peace there. The

  note declared that U.S. insistence that Japan not support any regime other than

  Chungking disregarded utterly the existence of Japan’s Nanking government,

  thereby “shattering the very basis of the present negotiation” and disregarding,

  too, “Japan’s sacrifice in the four years of the China affair.” It castigated the Hull

  principles as utopian in the light of the realities of the world’s actual condition.

  No, the United States was accused of catering to Chungking and keeping Japan

  at war with China. The belated conclusion: it would be impossible to reach

  agreement. 21

  The Japanese note lauded Japan’s fairness and moderation and willingness to apply

  principles of nondiscrimination to commerce with all nations, China included. But

  it was clear that China was the rock against which all other considerations shattered.

  The fourth document in this futile exchange was the Emperor’s Declaration

  of War. He spoke of his nation’s desire for ages eternal to cultivate friendship

  and prosperity with all nations. The war was “truly unavoidable” since China,

  which had failed to comprehend Japan’s true intentions, had caused trouble, and

  disturbed the peace of East Asia, forcing Japan to take up arms. The Emperor

  charged the United States and Britain with supporting Chungking against Japan’s

  efforts to establish neighborly intercourse and cooperation with the rival Nanking

  regime. In short, Britain and France wished to dominate the Orient. They were

  increasing their military preparations and obstructing peaceful commerce. This

  included direct severance of vital economic ties, gravely threatening to Japan.

  The Emperor praised Japan’s patience and conciliatory spirit in the face of

  action that would nullify its efforts to establish peace and prosperity in East Asia.

  For its continued existence and self-defense there was no recourse but the appeal

  to arms, which would eradicate the sources of evil, establish enduring peace in

  East Asia and preserve the glory of the Empire. 22

  Thus starkly were the issues drawn that led to Japan’s attack and subsequent

  declaration of war against the United States and Britain.

  In his final meetings with the Japanese envoys, Secretary Hull had stood by

  the principles that had animated his note of November 26. In a statement dated

  December 7, the Secretary of State expressed his outrage at the Japanese reply:

  I must say that in all my conversations with you [the Japanese envoys],

  during the last nine months, I have never uttered one word of untruth.

  This is borne out absolutely by the record.

  In all my fifty years of public service I have never seen a document that

  was more crowded with infamous falsehoods and distortions on a scale so

  huge than I never imagined until today that any government on this planet

  was capable of uttering them. 23

  Monday, December 8, 1941 157

  A Nation at War: The President Addresses the Nation

  Meetings at the White House had filled the evening of that fateful Sunday,

  December 7. Amid shattering events in the Pacific the President had met with

  the cabinet in the Oval Room at 8:30 p.m. Eastern Standard Time. He had

  already conferred with advisor Harry Hopkins, Army Chief of Staff George C.

  Marshall, and Chief of Naval Operations Harold Stark. Congressional leaders

  arrived at 9:00 p.m. Texas Senator W. Lee O’Daniel—whose election had been

  celebrated with a rendering by the Lightcrust Doughboys of his campaign song

  “Pass the Biscuits, Pappy”—had not been invited to the meeting. But he came

  anyway, he said, “to make sure that Texas is represented at the conference.” 24

  The conference closed after 11:00 p.m. and an official announcement was

  issued. It stated that the President and his advisors had reviewed the available facts

  and that the President’s message to Congress had not yet been written.

  Speaker of the House Sam Rayburn was asked if the President would ask Con-

  gress for a declaration of war. “He didn’t say,” was the answer. Would Congress

  support a declaration of war? “I think that is one thing on which there would be

  unity,” Rayburn replied.

  FIGURE 15.2

  Crew of the USS Wichita listening to President Roosevelt’s “day of

  infamy” address to Congress, December 8, 1941.

  Courtesy of Naval History and Naval Command, photo 80-G-464088.

  158 First Week at War: December 8–13, 1941

  House Minority Leader Joseph Martin echoed the thoughts of many when he

  said: “There is only one party when it comes to the integrity and honor of the

  country.” 25

  Senator Connelly of Texas announced that the President would address a joint

  session of Congress at 12:30 p.m. on Monday, December 8.

  The events of December 8, 1941, were chronicled with passion and precision

  by a great reporter, James Reston, writing in The New York Times :

  The United States went to war as a great nation should—with simplicity,

  dignity and unprecedented unity.

  There were absent the deep divisions of 1776, 1812, 1861, 1898 and 1917.

  If the atmosphere of the Capital was grave, it was free from doubt. 26

  At noon the President emerged from the White House on the arm of his son

  James. The President wore the formal attire of another era—a frock coat and

  striped trousers. His son was in his Marine Corps uniform. In the car headed for

  the Capitol were the President’s wife Eleanor, his mother, Mrs. James Roosevelt,


  his acting secretary, and his military and naval aides. 27

  A crowd of more than 2,000 had gathered on the Capitol Plaza. It was a con-

  fident, patriotic crowd, seething with righteous indignation. They came from all

  walks of life, singly and in groups, women and children, students and business-

  men, in a public spirit, leaving their homes, their classrooms and their businesses

  behind. Three hundred Metropolitan Police were deployed around the Capitol,

  and Marines with fixed bayonets stood at its entrances. Modest hand-clapping

  gave way to a roar as the President’s car arrived and turned into a side entrance. 28

  Members of the cabinet arrived in the House of Representatives at 12:28 p.m.

  At 12:30, Speaker of the House Sam Rayburn rapped his gavel and announced:

  “The President of the United States.” After an instant of silence there was a grow-

  ing crescendo of applause which ended abruptly when the speaker again rapped

  his gavel. It was at that moment that the President appeared.

  The ovation that greeted him, applause and cheering, was greater, observers

  said, than any he had received in the past eight years. After a brief prayer, the

  President spoke to the assemblage and to the array of movie cameras amid and

  under their glowing lights. 29

  The President’s address was brief, only six and one-half minutes. If the Presi-

  dent was brief, he was eloquent. He described the Japanese attack, which he said

  had been deliberately planned during fraudulent negotiations. He did not hesitate

  to tell hard truths: the attack had done “severe damage” to American naval and

  military forces, and “many, many American lives had been lost.” He recited the

  litany of Japanese assaults across the Pacific. He assured the American people that

  however long it took, they would in their righteous might win through to abso-

  lute victory.

  Thunderous cheers greeted many a moment of the address, none more than

  when Roosevelt railed against the treachery that would ensure the date of this

  transformative event would live in infamy. 30

  Monday, December 8, 1941 159

  “Seldom, if ever in an address to Congress,” Reston reported, “has the President

  judged the temper of the representatives of the people better than he did in this

  speech.”

  The vote in the Senate, which followed at 1:00 p.m., was unanimous. The

  House acted swiftly at 1:31 p.m.; the enrolled resolution was signed by Speaker

  Rayburn at 3:14 p.m. and by Vice President Wallace at 3:25 p.m. It was signed by

  the President only forty-five minutes later. In the House only one vote had been

  lacking for unanimity. As she had twenty-four years before in 1917, pacifist Jean-

  nette Rankin, Representative for Montana, uttered only the word “No” when the

  roll was called. Her vote was greeted with hisses, and she later sought refuge from

  a swarm of reporters and cameramen in a telephone booth. 31

  The President’s radio address to the nation displayed some of his important

  qualities as a war leader. He did not shrink from the facts:

  So far the news is all bad. We have suffered a serious setback in Hawaii.

  Our forces in the Philippines, which include the brave people of that com-

  monwealth, are taking punishment but they are defending themselves vig-

  orously. The reports from Guam and Wake and Midway Islands are still

  confused but we must be prepared for the announcement that these three

  outposts have been seized. The casualty lists of these first few days will

  undoubtedly be large. 32

  He confessed to what he did not know: the exact damage, clearly serious, to the

  Navy at Pearl Harbor. Nor could he say how soon that damage could be repaired.

  But he assured the American people that they would know the facts when they

  had been officially confirmed and when they would not give valuable aid to the

  enemy.

  The President reviewed the history of aggressions, not only by Japan starting in

  1931 but also by Germany and Italy. Remember, he said, whether or not there are

  formal declarations (and there had not been), Italy and Germany consider them-

  selves as much engaged in war with the United States as with the Soviet Union.

  The United States had been right, he said, in the shipment of war materials to

  nations resisting Axis aggression. The defense of any country resisting aggression

  was in the long run the defense of the United States. He announced important

  economic policies: war industry to operate on a seven-day week and new capacity

  for these industries.

  He had faith, he said, in the stamina of the American people. The nation was

  at war, indeed the most tremendous undertaking in American history. To serve

  in the armed forces of the country was not a sacrifice but indeed a privilege. He

  closed with the assurance that the country would accept no result save victory,

  final and complete. 33

  The country paused in its daily round of activities to listen and to reflect upon

  the President’s speech. Fifth Avenue, an avenue of flags on many an historic occa-

  sion, was alive with red, white, and blue banners. The city suspended its regular

  routines so that all might listen. Five thousand gathered in City Hall Park to hear

  160 First Week at War: December 8–13, 1941

  the speech through loudspeakers. The crowd joined in the applause and in the

  cheers that emanated from the Capitol, none more so than that in response to the

  President’s charge of Japanese treachery. With bared heads the crowds stood to

  attention to the strains of the National Anthem. 34

  Throughout the city crowds gathered wherever there was a radio, in a store, a

  restaurant, a bar, a taxi. Courts were adjourned. In Kings County Court Judge

  Samuel Leibowitz had installed a radio. When the speech ended, a court attaché

  placed an American flag front and center in the courtroom and the judge led the

  solemn assemblage in the Pledge of Allegiance. This was the pattern in crowded

  courtrooms, in Justice Jacob Pankin’s Washington Heights Magistrates Court, in

  Magistrate Peter Abeles’s court where he was joined by Magistrate William Klapp

  from the Traffic Court. 35

  At City College classes were suspended while 12,000 students listened to the

  President’s address. They sent a telegram to the President backing him and offer-

  ing to serve “as students.” The president of the student council, Elliot Bredhoff,

  urged all-out support for the defense program; afterward the students bought $300

  worth of defense stamps. At Brooklyn College 5,000 undergraduates listened to

  the historic address. An announcement, before President Roosevelt spoke, of the

  sinking of two Japanese ships was met with jubilant cheers. College president

  Harry Gideonse told the students that it was a matter of living up to their ideals.

  They should, he said, show their patriotism by faithfully devoting themselves to

  the tasks demanded of them in their college lives. 36

  A Nation at War: Editorial Turnaround

  It was only the previous day, Sunday, before any knowledge of the bombs fall-

  ing on Pearl Harbor, that the Chicago Tribune , referring to its report of a vastly increased American army and a five-million-man expeditionary force, had

  printed thi
s accusation: “We have known for a long time that the war party was

  betraying the American people. Now we have proved it.” 37

  The Tribune ’s turnaround was swift and complete. Its Monday edition showed

  a single man bearing the label “every American,” saluting a large wind-whipped

  American flag beneath the caption “At Your Service.”

  War had been forced on America, the Tribune editorialized, by “an insane clique of Japanese militarists” and there had come to pass what so many had worked so

  hard to prevent:

  Recriminations are useless and we doubt that they will be indulged in.

  Certainly not by us. All that matters today is that we are in the war and the

  nation must face up to that simple fact. All of us, from this day forth, have

  only one task. That is to strike with all our might to protect and preserve

  the American freedom that we all hold dear. 38

  The New York Times spoke with the same voice as so many editorial writers

  of the day. There was only one possible answer to Japan’s attack, and that was an

  Monday, December 8, 1941 161

  immediate declaration of war. “The United States has been attacked. The United

  States is in danger. Let every patriot take his stand on the bastions of democracy.”

  The Times made two other points. It characterized as a myth that the President

  had been “trying to drag us into war.” The Times did not impugn those who had

  believed the myth; it had questioned only their judgment. The second interest-

  ing point was the insistence by The Times that the country’s greatest danger was that posed by Hitler’s Nazi regime. The real battle, it said, would not be fought

  in the Far East but on the English Channel. And it warned that the United States

  would be openly and formally at war with Germany well before the war across the

  English Channel had been finished. 39

  The New York Daily News said that neither the American nor the Japanese peo-

  ple wanted this war. “But now that we are in it, there is nothing for us to do but

  to see it through with everything we’ve got.” 40

  The New York Daily Mirror called for silencing any voices of disunity and

  endorsed Steven Decatur’s pronouncement of a century ago: “Our country, right

  or wrong.”

  The Boston Herald made a perceptive comment. The attack on Hawaii, it said,

 

‹ Prev