Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man and Dubliners (Barnes & Noble Classics Series)

Home > Fiction > Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man and Dubliners (Barnes & Noble Classics Series) > Page 28
Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man and Dubliners (Barnes & Noble Classics Series) Page 28

by James Joyce


  His arm was taken in a strong grip and Cranly’s voice said:

  -Let us eke go.

  They walked southward in silence. Then Cranly said:

  -That blithering idiot, Temple! I swear to Moses, do you know, that I’ll be the death of that fellow one time.

  But his voice was no longer angry and Stephen wondered was he thinking of her greeting to him under the porch.

  They turned to the left and walked on as before. When they had gone on so far for some time Stephen said:

  -Cranly, I had an unpleasant quarrel this evening.

  —With your people? Cranly asked.

  —With my mother.

  -About religion?

  —Yes, Stephen answered.

  After a pause Cranly asked:

  —What age is your mother?

  -Not old, Stephen said. She wishes me to make my easter duty.pl

  -And will you?

  —I will not, Stephen said.

  -Why not? Cranly said.

  —I will not serve, answered Stephen.

  -That remark was made before, Cranly said calmly.

  -It is made behind now, said Stephen hotly.

  Cranly pressed Stephen’s arm, saying:

  -Go easy, my dear man. You’re an excitable bloody man, do you know.

  He laughed nervously as he spoke and, looking up into Stephen’s face with moved and friendly eyes, said:

  -Do you know that you are an excitable man?

  —I daresay I am, said Stephen, laughing also.

  Their minds, lately estranged, seemed suddenly to have been drawn closer, one to the other.

  -Do you believe in the eucharist? Cranly asked.

  —I do not, Stephen said.

  -Do you disbelieve then?

  —I neither believe in it nor disbelieve in it, Stephen answered.

  -Many persons have doubts, even religious persons, yet they overcome them or put them aside, Cranly said. Are your doubts on that point too strong?

  —I do not wish to overcome them, Stephen answered.

  Cranly, embarrassed for a moment, took another fig from his pocket and was about to eat it when Stephen said:

  —Don’t, please. You cannot discuss this question with your mouth full of chewed fig.

  Cranly examined the fig by the light of a lamp under which he halted. Then he smelt it with both nostrils, bit a tiny piece, spat it out and threw the fig rudely into the gutter. Addressing it as it lay, he said:

  -Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire!pm

  Taking Stephen’s arm, he went on again and said:

  -Do you not fear that those words may be spoken to you on the day of judgment?

  —What is offered me on the other hand? Stephen asked. An eternity of bliss in the company of the dean of studies?

  -Remember, Cranly said, that he would be glorified.

  -Ay, Stephen said somewhat bitterly, bright agile, impassible and, above all, subtle.

  -It is a curious thing, do you know, Cranly said dispassionately, how your mind is supersaturated with the religion in which you say you disbelieve. Did you believe in it when you were at school? I bet you did.

  —I did, Stephen answered.

  -And were you happier then? Cranly asked softly. Happier than you are now, for instance!

  -Often happy, Stephen said, and often unhappy. I was someone else then. —How someone else? What do you mean by that statement?

  —I mean, said Stephen, that I was not myself as I am now, as I had to become.

  -Not as you are now, not as you had to become, Cranly repeated. Let me ask you a question. Do you love your mother?

  Stephen shook his head slowly.

  —I don’t know what your words mean, he said simply.

  -Have you never loved anyone? Cranly asked.

  -Do you mean women?

  —I am not speaking of that, Cranly said in a colder tone. I ask you if you ever felt love towards anyone or anything.

  Stephen walked on beside his friend, staring gloomily at the footpath.

  —I tried to love God, he said at length. It seems now I failed. It is very difficult. I tried to unite my will with the will of God instant by instant. In that I did not always fail. I could perhaps do that still ...

  Cranly cut him short by asking:

  -Has your mother had a happy life?

  -How do I know? Stephen said.

  -How many children had she?

  -Nine or ten, Stephen answered. Some died.

  —Was your father.... Cranly interrupted himself for an instant: and then said: I don’t want to pry into your family affairs. But was your father what is called well-to-do? I mean when you were growing up?

  —Yes, Stephen said.

  —What was he? Cranly asked after a pause.

  Stephen began to enumerate glibly his father’s attributes.

  -A medical student, an oarsman, a tenor, an amateur actor, a shouting politician, a small landlord, a small investor, a drinker, a good fellow, a storyteller, somebody’s secretary, something in a distillery, a taxgatherer, a bankrupt and at present a praiser of his own past.

  Cranly laughed, tightening his grip on Stephen’s arm, and said:

  -The distillery is damn good.

  -Is there anything else you want to know? Stephen asked.

  -Are you in good circumstances at present?

  -Do I look it? Stephen asked bluntly.

  -So then, Cranly went on musingly, you were born in the lap of luxury.

  He used the phrase broadly and loudly as he often used technical expressions as if he wished his hearer to understand that they were used by him without conviction.

  -Your mother must have gone through a good deal of suffering, he said then. Would you not try to save her from suffering more even if... or would you?

  -If I could, Stephen said, that would cost me very little.

  -Then do so, Cranly said. Do as she wishes you to do. What is it for you? You disbelieve in it. It is a form: nothing else. And you will set her mind at rest.

  He ceased and, as Stephen did not reply, remained silent. Then, as if giving utterance to the process of his own thought, he said:

  —Whatever else is unsure in this stinking dunghill of a world a mother’s love is not. Your mother brings you into the world, carries you first in her body. What do we know about what she feels? But whatever she feels, it, at least, must be real. It must be. What are our ideas or ambitions ? Play. Ideas! Why, that bloody bleating goat Temple has ideas. MacCann has ideas too. Every jackass going the roads thinks he has ideas.

  Stephen, who had been listening to the unspoken speech behind the words, said with assumed carelessness:

  -Pascal,pn if I remember rightly, would not suffer his mother to kiss him as he feared the contact of her sex.

  -Pascal was a pig, said Cranly.

  -Aloysius Gonzaga,po I think, was of the same mind, Stephen said.

  -And he was another pig then, said Cranly.

  -The church calls him a saint, Stephen objected.

  —I don’t care a flaming damn what anyone calls him, Cranly said rudely and flatly. I call him a pig.

  Stephen, preparing the words neatly in his mind, continued:

  —Jesus, too, seems to have treated his mother with scant courtesy in public but Suarez,20 a jesuit theologian and Spanish gentleman, has apologised for him.

  -Did the idea ever occur to you, Cranly asked, that Jesus was not what he pretended to be?

  -The first person to whom that idea occurred, Stephen answered, was Jesus himself.

  —I mean, Cranly said, hardening in his speech, did the idea ever occur to you that he was himself a conscious hypocrite, what he called the jews of his time, a white sepulchre?pp Or, to put it more plainly, that he was a blackguard?pq

  -That idea never occurred to me, Stephen answered. But I am curious to know are you trying to make a convert of me or a pervert of yourself ?

  He turned towards his friend’s face and saw there a raw smil
e which some force of will strove to make finely significant.

  Cranly asked suddenly in a plain sensible tone:—Tell me the truth. Were you at all shocked by what I said?

  -Somewhat, Stephen said.

  —And why were you shocked, Cranly pressed on in the same tone, if you feel sure that our religion is false and that Jesus was not the son of God?

  —I am not at all sure of it, Stephen said. He is more like a son of God than a son of Mary.

  —And is that why you will not communicate,pr Cranly asked, because you are not sure of that too, because you feel that the host, too, may be the body and blood of the son of God and not a wafer of bread. And because you fear that it may be?

  —Yes, Stephen said quietly, I feel that and I also fear it.

  —I see, Cranly said.

  Stephen, struck by his tone of closure, reopened the discussion at once by saying:

  —I fear many things: dogs, horses, firearms, the sea, thunderstorms, machinery, the country roads at night.

  -But why do you fear a bit of bread?

  —I imagine, Stephen said, that there is a malevolent reality behind those things I say I fear.

  -Do you fear then, Cranly asked, that the God of the Roman catholics would strike you dead and damn you if you made a sacrilegious communion?

  -The God of the Roman catholics could do that now, Stephen said. I fear more than that the chemical action which would be set up in my soul by a false homage to a symbol behind which are massed twenty centuries of authority and veneration.

  —Would you, Cranly asked, in extreme danger commit that particular sacrilege? For instance, if you lived in the penal days?ps

  —I cannot answer for the past, Stephen replied. Possibly not.

  —Then, said Cranly, you do not intend to become a protestant?

  —I said that I had lost the faith, Stephen answered, but not that I had lost selfrespect. What kind of liberation would that be to forsake an absurdity which is logical and coherent and to embrace one which is illogical and incoherent?

  They had walked on towards the township of Pembrokept and now, as they went on slowly along the avenues, the trees and the scattered lights in the villas soothed their minds. The air of wealth and repose diffused about them seemed to comfort their neediness. Behind a hedge of laurel a light glimmered in the window of a kitchen and the voice of a servant was heard singing as she sharpened knives. She sang, in short broken bars,

  Rosie O’Grady.pu

  Cranly stopped to listen, saying:

  —Mulier cantat.pv

  The soft beauty of the Latin word touched with an enchanting touch the dark of the evening, with a touch fainter and more persuading than the touch of music or of a woman’s hand. The strife of their minds was quelled. The figure of woman as she appears in the liturgy of the church passed silently through the darkness: a white robed figure, small and slender as a boy, and with a falling girdle. Her voice, frail and high as a boy’s, was heard intoning from a distant choir the first words of a woman which pierce the gloom and clamour of the first chanting of the passion:pw

  —Et tu cum Jesu Galilœo eras.21

  And all hearts were touched and turned to her voice, shining like a young star, shining clearer as the voice intoned the proparoxytonpx and more faintly as the cadence died.

  The singing ceased. They went on together, Cranly repeating in strongly stressed rhythm the end of the refrain:And when we are married,

  O, how happy we’ll be

  For I love sweet Rosie O‘Grady

  And Rosie O’Grady loves me.

  -There’s real poetry for you, he said. There’s real love.

  He glanced sideways at Stephen with a strange smile and said:

  -Do you consider that poetry? Or do you know what the words mean?

  —I want to see Rosie first, said Stephen.

  -She’s easy to find, Cranly said.

  His hat had come down on his forehead. He shoved it back: and in the shadow of the trees Stephen saw his pale face, framed by the dark, and his large dark eyes. Yes. His face was handsome: and his body was strong and hard. He had spoken of a mother’s love. He felt then the sufferings of women, the weaknesses of their bodies and souls: and would shield them with a strong and resolute arm and bow his mind to them.

  Away then: it is time to go. A voice spoke softly to Stephen’s lonely heart, bidding him go and telling him that his friendship was coming to an end. Yes; he would go. He could not strive against another. He knew his part.

  -Probably I shall go away, he said.

  —Where? Cranly asked.

  —Where I can, Stephen said.

  —Yes, Cranly said. It might be difficult for you to live here now. But is it that makes you go?

  —I have to go, Stephen answered.

  -Because, Cranly continued, you need not look upon yourself as driven away if you do not wish to go or as a heretic or an outlaw. There are many good believers who think as you do. Would that surprise you? The church is not the stone building nor even the clergy and their dogmas. It is the whole mass of those born into it. I don’t know what you wish to do in life. Is it what you told me the night we were standing outside Harcourt Street station? 22

  —Yes, Stephen said, smiling in spite of himself at Cranly’s way of remembering thoughts in connexion with places. The night you spent half an hour wrangling with Doherty about the shortest way from Sallygap to Larras.py

  -Pothead! Cranly said with calm contempt. What does he know about the way from Sallygap to Larras? Or what does he know about anything for that matter? And the big slobbering washingpot head of him!

  He broke out into a loud long laugh.

  —Well? Stephen said. Do you remember the rest?

  —What you said, is it? Cranly asked. Yes, I remember it. To discover the mode of life or of art whereby your spirit could express itself in unfettered freedom.

  Stephen raised his hat in acknowledgment.

  -Freedom! Cranly repeated. But you are not free enough yet to commit a sacrilege. Tell me would you rob?

  —I would beg first, Stephen said.

  —And if you got nothing, would you rob?

  —You wish me to say, Stephen answered, that the rights of property are provisional and that in certain circumstances it is not unlawful to rob. Everyone would act in that belief. So I will not make you that answer. Apply to the jesuit theologian Juan Mariana de Talaverapz who will also explain to you in what circumstances you may lawfully kill your king and whether you had better hand him his poison in a goblet or smear it for him upon his robe or his saddlebow qa Ask me rather would I suffer others to rob me or, if they did, would I call down upon them what I believe is called the chastisement of the secular arm?

  -And would you?

  —I think, Stephen said, it would pain me much to do as to be robbed.

  —I see, Cranly said.

  He produced his match and began to clean the crevice between two teeth. Then he said carelessly:

  -Tell me, for example, would you deflower a virgin?

  -Excuse me, Stephen said politely, is that not the ambition of most young gentlemen?

  -What then is your point of view? Cranly asked.

  His last phrase, sour smelling as the smoke of charcoal and disheartening, excited Stephen’s brain, over which its fumes seemed to brood.

  -Look here, Cranly, he said. You have asked me what I would do and what I would not do. I will tell you what I will do and what I will not do. I will not serve that in which I no longer believe, whether it call itself my home, my fatherland or my church: and I will try to express myself in some mode of life or art as freely as I can and as wholly as I can, using for my defence the only arms I allow myself to use, silence, exile and cunning.

  Cranly seized his arm and steered him round so as to lead back towards Leeson Park. He laughed almost slyly and pressed Stephen’s arm with an elder’s affection.

  -Cunning indeed! he said. Is it you? You poor poet, you!

  -And yo
u made me confess to you, Stephen said, thrilled by his touch, as I have confessed to you so many other things, have I not?

  —Yes, my child, Cranly said, still gaily.

  —You made me confess the fears that I have. But I will tell you also what I do not fear. I do not fear to be alone or to be spurned for another or to leave whatever I have to leave. And I am not afraid to make a mistake, even a great mistake, a lifelong mistake and perhaps as long as eternity too.

  Cranly, now grave again, slowed his pace and said:

  —Alone, quite alone. You have no fear of that. And you know what that word means? Not only to be separate from all others but to have not even one friend.

  —I will take the risk, said Stephen.

  -And not to have any one person, Cranly said, who would be more than a friend, more even than the noblest and truest friend a man ever had.

  His words seemed to have struck some deep chord in his own nature. Had he spoken of himself, of himself as he was or wished to be? Stephen watched his face for some moments in silence. A cold sadness was there. He had spoken of himself, of his own loneliness which he feared.

  -Of whom are you speaking? Stephen asked at length.

  Cranly did not answer.

  20 March. Long talk with Cranly on the subject of my revolt.

  He had his grand manner on. I supple and suave. Attacked me on the score of love for one’s mother. Tried to imagine his mother: cannot. Told me once, in a moment of thoughtlessness, his father was sixty-one when he was born. Can see him. Strong farmer type. Pepper and salt suit. Square feet. Unkempt grizzled beard. Probably attends coursing matches.qb Pays his dues regularly but not plentifully to Father Dwyer of Larras. Sometimes talks to girls after nightfall. But his mother? Very young or very old? Hardly the first. If so, Cranly would not have spoken as he did. Old then. Probably, and neglected. Hence Cranly’s despair of soul: the child of exhausted loins.

  21 March, morning. Thought this in bed last night but was too lazy and free to add it. Free, yes. The exhausted loins are those of Elizabeth and Zachary.qc Then he is the precursor. Item: he eats chiefly belly bacon and dried figs. Read locusts and wild honey.qd Also, when thinking of him, saw always a stern severed head or death mask as if outlined on a grey curtain or veronica.qe Decollationqf they call it in the fold. Puzzled for the moment by saint John at the Latin gate.23 What do I see? A decollated precursor trying to pick the lock.

 

‹ Prev