The Year's Best Science Fiction 10 - [Anthology]

Home > Other > The Year's Best Science Fiction 10 - [Anthology] > Page 23
The Year's Best Science Fiction 10 - [Anthology] Page 23

by Edited By Judith Merril


  “Benefactor” was first published in 1958—but its first sale was in 1964, to Francesca van der Ling of SSI, who found it in a 1959 issue of the Indian magazine Thought—which had reprinted it from a 1958 U.S. edition of the Socialist Call-where it had been published originally without payment.

  Now, James T. Farrell’s place among twentieth-century American authors has long survived both the shocked gasps of the thirties at the “realism” of Studs Lonigan, and the horror of the forties at the “leftist” politics of the thirties.

  But this time he had stepped out of character: out of his specialty. Hollywood is not the only American scene where typecasting prevails.

  And believe me, Isaac Asimov would have as much trouble selling a realistic novel (no matter how good) about the Chicago Irish as James Farrell had with “Benefactor.”

  * * * *

  SYNCHROMOCRACY

  Hap Cawood

  Synchromocracy, the newest concept in Total Democracy, was hailed by the President as “the answer to peace and the pure voice of majority rule” shortly before the chief executive was replaced by an IBM-Computer-Center today.

  Synchromocracy was achieved by advances in the computer field along with the discovery of the D-3 solution, the first drug proved to “definitely cause democracy.” D-3 solutions were put in all known world water supplies last week.

  In the U.S., IBM-Registers were distributed among the population to relay public opinion to state and national consoles where they are converted instantaneously into policy.

  The American governmental machinery has run smoothly, despite difficulties in approaching the first foreign-policy problems. Overseas countries, although 98.4% democratic, are without register-computers and unable to achieve a consensus. Committees could be organized, but individuals are unable to call them without consent of the majority. There is also some question as to how many constitute a majority, but this cannot be answered without a quorum.

  Human elements are also incorporated into Synchromocracy. Political corruption is programmed regularly for Thursday nights. Reportedly, some feel this is not a sufficient corruption percentage, but the quotient cannot be altered unless the majority agrees. However, the majority isn’t presently thinking of it and the minority cannot officially raise the issue until the majority does think of it.

  The political forecast for tomorrow is mild conservatism in the South with scattered liberalism in the New York area; a light reign through the night in England. Moderate anarchy is scheduled for tomorrow morning along the Great Lakes, dissent at 30% with a high of 34 in some portions.

  This is a recorded announcement.

  <>

  * * * *

  Hap Cawood is a graduate student at Ohio State University. Has published satires and poetry in University publications and in motive. Spent two years teaching with the Peace Corps in Sierra Leone. Is now completing work for his Master’s in —you guessed it—journalism.

  He says what he wrote is a satire. I agree, the style is satirical. But what bothers me is, while everybody’s talking about how “science is catching up with science fiction,” nobody seems to notice how IBM is catching up with satire.

  There is an IBM down in Florida that writes love poems. Like:

  Darkly the peaceful trees crashed

  In the serene sun

  While the heart heard

  The swift moon stopped silently.

  What really hurts is, the 709 had a vocabulary of exactly 78 words when that was written. Presumably it knows more now. At the time that Russell Baker reported on it (but this one was no joke; it was a straight news article), 709 could only do 30 poems a minute, but it was supposed to work up to 500/per shortly.

  And then there was this inspirational photograph in the paper the other day—a happy schoolgirl looking up at the beaming broad panel of the teacher. I mean, that one was no joke, either.

  Sometime between the spring when I write this, and the winter when it is published, Peter Redgrove (who was represented in the Ninth Annual with a prose-poem short story, “Mr. Waterman”) will have initiated a series of programs on the B.B.C. to show, he hopes, that “poetry and SF are trying to digest the same things.”

  “Machines are so much in our lives,” he says. “Why have so few poets tackled this? Is it that they don’t know enough? Is it that they’re so afraid of the machine that all they can make of it is satire . . .?

  “Hart Crane saw that one way of making a complete living world-picture was to treat machines as a kind of comrade in evolutionary advance—if you treat them as mere instruments, when of course they’re images of the mind, then you deaden yourself and them. . . .

  “We don’t want satire,” he concludes, “we want synthesis.”

  * * * *

  THE SEARCH

  Bruce Simonds

  The first robots were pretty shoddy

  Back in the Seventies.

  They were uncoordinated and clumsy

  And they thought too slowly

  And they didn’t understand more than a few simple words

  And they would wash a dish to a powder

  If you didn’t stop them in time.

  So in August of 1978

  Arthur Chumley called in the Product Development Group

  Of Chumley Robot

  And in they came

  With the latest model.

  It clanked over to Arthur Chumley

  And said

  “Hello (klik) Mister (klik) Chumley (klik).”

  And put out its hand.

  But before Arthur Chumley could shake the hand

  It had knocked over a gilded bust of him

  Badly denting the halo.

  “This is not good,”

  Said Arthur Chumley.

  “We must think, we must draw, we must work

  “To build the More Perfect Robot.

  “Build me a robot

  “That does everything our present model does

  “But has none of its clumsy, uncoordinated movements.

  “And while you’re at it

  “Knock its weight down to two hundred kilos.”

  And he chased them all out of his office

  And he looked at the sales graph

  And he poured himself a bourbon-and-water.

  Easy on the water.

  A year and two months later

  In October of 1979

  The Product Development Group marched in proudly

  With their robot.

  It walked smoothly and gracefully over to Arthur Chumley

  And said

  “Hello (klik) Mister (klik) Chumley (klik),”

  And held out its hand

  Which Arthur Chumley shook.

  “Make me a Chumley Martini,”

  Said Arthur Chumley.

  But the robot did not make him a Chumley Martini.

  Instead, it said

  “(Whir) (buzz) (klik) (whir) (klik) (buzz) (paf!)”

  And blew a $4.79 pentode tube

  Signifying Arthur Chumley had said something beyond its grasp.

  Whereupon Arthur Chumley leaned back

  And folded his pudgy hands over the convenient ledge

  Made by his stomach

  And said

  “This is not good.

  “We must think, we must draw, we must work

  “To build the More Perfect Robot.

  “Build me a robot

  “That does everything our present model does

  “And has a complete working vocabulary

  “To fit its particular function.

  “And while you’re at it

  “Get rid of that damn (klik) it makes switching tapes.”

  And he chased them all out of his office

  And he looked at the sales graph

  And he made himself a Chumley Martini:

  Three ounces of gin in a cocktail glass

  And smiled at the portrait of Martini & Rossi.

  Six years and six
months later

  In April of 1986

  The Product Development Group trooped in

  With their robot.

  It walked over to Arthur Chumley

  And said

  “Good morning, Mister Chumley.”

  And Arthur Chumley turned to the Product Development Group

  And said

  “Do you know what’s going to happen if we market this thing?”

  And the Group members all quivered

  And shook their heads

  And the robot said it did not.

  “I’ll tell you what’s going to happen if we market this thing,”

  Said Arthur Chumley.

  “The entire American public is going to laugh at us

  “If we market this thing.

  “And do you know why?”

  And the Group members all quivered

  And shook their heads

  And the robot said it did not.

  “I’ll tell you why.

  “Because they have a right to laugh at a company

  “That markets a robot

  “That says ‘Good morning’ at four-thirty in the afternoon.”

  Said Arthur Chumley.

  And he sat down at his desk

  And put his head in his hands

  And said

  “This is not good.

  “We must think, we must draw, we must work

  “To build the More Perfect Robot.

  “Build me a robot

  “That does everything our present model does

  “And can see

  “And smell

  “And hear

  “And taste

  “And feel.

  “And while you’re at it

  “Cover it with a soft, fleshlike substance

  “So it looks like a human being.

  “And just for the hell of it

  “Give it the ability to perceive a person’s emotional state

  “From his actions

  “And know how to act accordingly.”

  And he had a vice-president throw them all out of his office

  And he looked at the sales graph

  And he went to the liver bank.

  Twenty-two years and eleven months later

  In March of 1999

  The Product Development Group snivelled in

  With their robot.

  It seated the Group Chairman

  Remarking about how cold it had been last night.

  Then it walked over to Arthur Chumley

  And held out its soft, fleshlike hand

  Which Arthur Chumley ignored.

  Somewhat disconcerted

  The robot said

  “How are you, Mister Chumley?”

  Whereupon Arthur Chumley replied

  “Miserable. My wife had an affair with my best friend

  And my servants have run off with my plane

  And all my clothes.”

  And the robot smiled

  And said

  “You’re joking, Mister Chumley.”

  And Arthur Chumley leaned forward

  And said

  “You’re right. I’m joking.”

  And Arthur Chumley turned to the Product Development Group

  And said

  “I am proud of you.

  “I gave you a very difficult task:

  “To build the More Perfect Robot.

  “But you did it.

  “And now I will give you an even more difficult task:

  “To build The Perfect Robot.

  “Build me a robot that is a companion.

  “Build me a robot that is a friend.

  “Build me a robot that can feel emotion

  “And can pass for human

  “And that, gentlemen, will be The Perfect Robot.”

  And he dismissed them from his office

  And he looked at the sales graph

  And he smiled

  For he knew that in a few years

  The Group would present him with The Perfect Robot.

  And they did

  Early in the May of 2039.

  Seven years and six months after that

  In December of 2046

  The people from Beta Centaurus IV came.

  They didn’t invade

  They just came

  And they’re our very best friends now.

  They were interested in our technology

  And one day

  Arthur Chumley was talking to one of them in his office.

  They picked up the language rather quickly.

  He was telling it

  About the time

  And money

  And effort they had expended

  To build a robot

  That had smooth, agile movements

  And weighed only two hundred kilos

  And had a complete working vocabulary

  To fit its particular function

  And made no damn (klik) switching tapes

  And could see

  And smell

  And hear

  And taste

  And feel

  And was covered with a soft, fleshlike substance

  And could perceive a person’s emotional state

  And act accordingly

  And was a companion and a friend

  And could feel emotion

  And could pass for human.

  Whereupon the Centurian said

  “He can’t do much of anything you can’t do.

  “Why not just hire people to do the same things?”

  And Arthur Chumley chuckled

  And leaned back And opened his mouth

  To tell the Centurian why not.

  And then he closed his mouth

  And excused himself

  And went downstairs

  And hailed a cab

  And went home

  And dashed off a few notes to his wife and broker

  And packed four suitcases with stocks and bonds and money

  And closed out all his bank accounts

  And went to the spaceport

  And chartered a small ship

  And disappeared. ...

  <>

  * * * *

  Quite in keeping with the other trends in SF, the second largest occupational group represented this year are students-ranging from Bruce Simonds in high school to M. E. White, working for her PhD. The only other groups, by the way, represented with more than one selection, are doctors, editors, and college-level teachers.

  Larry Eisenberg is in the last group: “I am a Research Associate in Electronics at Rockefeller Institute, where my duties include teaching and the design of research instrumentation. The ‘Pirokin Effect’ was stimulated by a revival of the Velikovsky controversy which appeared in Science magazine.”

  * * * *

  THE PIROKIN EFFECT

  Larry Eisenberg

  On Friday the eleventh of July, 1962, Irving Pirokin, a ham radio operator working his twenty-watt rig out of a restaurant kitchen on lower Second Avenue, picked up a succession of unusual clicks while scanning the forty-megacycle band. Mr. Pirokin’s instinctive reaction was to take down these clicks as a message in International Morse Code, and the letters J T S A L appeared again and again on his note pad. Before Mr. Pirokin could pursue the matter, he was called out to his post as waiter by the owner of the restaurant, an impatient beefy-faced gentleman with a foghorn voice.

  When his tour of duty had ended, Mr. Pirokin returned anxiously to his set and monitored the same band of frequencies with great care, but to his intense disappointment, he could detect no signals. However, on the following (and successive) Fridays, he was able to receive the same repetitive series of clicks at about the same time of day. His curiosity piqued by this mystery, he wrote to his cousin, Sam Pirokin, in Philadelphia. Sam, by one of those great coincidences that enrich real life, is also a ham operator working his rig out of a kitchen where he, too, functions as a waiter. He was elated to find that h
e was also able to detect the clicks, almost identical in sequence to those his cousin Irving was receiving in New York.

  Baffled but excited by the cryptic JTSAL, Sam, who was then in attendance at a night school in cryptography, showed the “message” to his instructor, Bertram Luftmensch, a man who had steeped himself in the lore of code-cracking for the past twenty years. Although Mr. Luftmensch prepares a daily coded column for a local Philadelphia newspaper wherein the crossing out of certain letters reveals some advice for the reader, he nevertheless took time out of his demanding schedule to work on the problem posed by Sam Pirokin. Although Luftmensch tried every trick of the trade, he could not make sense out of the letter sequence, JTSAL.

  And thus the matter languished for several weeks, with Irving and Sam still receiving the clicks but unable to explain their meaning or origin. One Sunday morning, Mr. Luftmensch noticed that his son was using as a bookmark in his high-school Hebrew grammar, the very sheet of paper on which he had worked over the J T S A L sequence. Opening the volume, Mr. Luftmensch took note of the Hebraic alphabet and with sudden inspiration decided to juxtapose the English alphabet alongside the Hebrew.

  Using this device, he found that the message JTSAL, read as LASTJ from right to left in the Hebrew manner, became in Hebrew characters, (Israel).

  With tremendous excitement, he communicated his findings to Sam Pirokin, who immediately put through a long-distance call to a candy store in New York, which promptly called down his cousin Irving. Irving was at first unbelieving, but when the import of the discovery penetrated his core of disbelief, he reacted with a first-rate suggestion. Irving proposed that he and Sam employ directional antennae to attempt to localize the source of the signals.

  Although the finances of these two men are generally unstable, relying as they do primarily on tips and the uncertain tempers of innately hostile diners, they each did manage to procure at considerable expense, a highly directional array of antennae able to focus a beam to within one or two degrees of arc. On the very next Friday, by means of crude triangulation, Sam and Irving determined that the origin of the clicks was not some Israeli source (as they had expected), but appeared to come from a position in the sky, roughly corresponding to the position of the planet, Mars.

 

‹ Prev