Collected Works of Booth Tarkington

Home > Literature > Collected Works of Booth Tarkington > Page 543
Collected Works of Booth Tarkington Page 543

by Booth Tarkington


  There are, indeed, Parliaments in Prussia and in the German Empire, but they are weak bodies, being little more than debating societies. German writers have called the Reichstag, the most powerful assembly in Germany, a “Hall of Echoes.” Even this body can do little except to register its assent or disapproval of plans presented to it by the Emperor’s ministers. These ministers can, and on occasion do, defy the representatives of the German people and taunt them with their powerlessness to oppose the wishes of the Emperor. There is no democracy in the German Government, nor any safety for democracy in any land while the despotism of Prussia exists. This power, resting upon a large structure of militarism which has sacrificed everything to make the nation efficient in war, is the power which has attacked the United States. It can be resisted only by force of arms, because that is the argument to which it has appealed. This means that unless this war is won by the forces which are fighting in defence of democracy, we must prepare ourselves to undergo a discipline as rigorous and to support a burden as heavy as that now borne by the German people. A standing army of tremendous size, supported by huge expenditures for the latest and best equipment, would be forced upon this nation as a permanent institution, so long as the menace of Prussian military power remained. There is not only mighty force in Germany, but the determination to use that force in aggression against the rest of the world. The declarations of the Emperor to Ambassador Gerard show that Germany was planning to strike at the United States when she had finished the present conflict. Already official German press dispatches talk of “the next war” which shall give Germany the world dominion she so much covets. The chief benefit of a victory for the opponents of such aggression would be greater safety for democracy, which is but another way of saying greater freedom and opportunity for the common man in every nation.

  This, and other gains from this war belongs to the rich man and the poor man alike. This war, which secures such benefits, is indeed everybody’s war.

  The costs of this great struggle are tremendous and they are to be borne by those to whom the benefits shall come. As all the people gain, so all contribute of their services and powers to the support of the government in its prosecution of the war. The Selective Service Law has given us a truly democratic army into which we have called all our young men, without distinction between rich and poor. In calling for contributions of money, also, the Government has not laid upon the poor burdens greater than they ought to be called upon to bear in this hour of great danger to the nation. The charge that this war was undertaken at the behest of the rich men of the country finds strong refutation in the distribution of taxes in all war revenue bills passed by the last Congress. In this law the heaviest contributions are laid upon large incomes and profits from great business. A Congress which made war upon the order of the wealthy would hardly have dared to treat its masters so. The taxes which would most directly affect the great mass of the people, such as those on tea, coffee and sugar were not accepted by the lawmakers, though urged upon their attention. It cannot, however, be argued that the rich man is only paying for special advantages he will gain from the war. There are no gains which will come to the rich in which all the people will not share. The advantages of living in a world freed from the menace of Prussian Militarism are of greater value to the poor man than to the rich. In a state where there is no democracy the advantages of the rich man over the poor are greatly increased. The security won by this war is valuable to all Americans, without respect to wealth. In no sense can this be called a rich man’s war.

  A further burden now being borne by the property owners of this country arises from the depreciation in the value of their investments in stocks and bonds. Many of the most reliable issues have suffered a serious decline in price. The underlying cause is not to be found in the activities of speculators and jugglers of the stock market. Many factors combine to produce this result, among which should certainly be named the heavy taxes which have been found necessary in order to support this war. The United States Government, further, has come into the financial field offering bonds at an unusually high rate of interest and this has had the effect of making other investments less attractive and hence of lowering their price. It is idle to argue that these losses are only on paper. They are real losses in value, since they are based on the decreases in the income yielded by the securities. Nor can it be argued that the rich get a return for the burden thus borne, since they gain nothing from this war which is not shared by everyone in the country, whether or not he owns a single bond or share of stock.

  In particular it can be shown clearly and briefly that the American participation in this war does not benefit the makers of munitions in any such degree as the public has been led to believe. The first false impression to be overcome is the notion that the making of munitions during the present war has been uniformly profitable at a fabulous rate. The fact is quite the contrary.

  Figures compiled by the United States Treasury Department reveal that only about half the munition makers of the country earned enough to make them taxable under the special taxes imposed by Congress. These figures relate to the period prior to the declaration of war by the United States, the time when the profits in this particular business were at their greatest. Figures produced in Congress during the debates on the subject of special taxation of profits from munition making proved clearly, that, while a few concerns had made large amounts of money, the general run of concerns in this business had not earned a rate of profit upon their investments equal to that obtained in the field of ordinary business. To use a business phrase, the making of munitions has been a particularly “spotty” sort of enterprise. It is notable that one of the concerns whose aggregate gains have reached the highest figure has actually earned a rate of profit less than that prevailing in the general run of industrial undertakings. Bankruptcy has been the fate of many an enterprise in this field. This experience, it should be added, has not been confined to the United States, but has been duplicated in all the belligerent countries. Abroad most of the war taxation of excess profits was at first aimed solely at the munition manufacturers, because it was thought that they would be most likely to reap unusual gains from the war situation. In all these countries the event proved this to be a false assumption, and the taxes have therefore been broadened to include other lines of enterprise. The fact of the matter is that those who reap the greatest gains from their nation’s participation in war are the producers of the fundamental raw materials upon which the structure of industry rests. The list of such producers includes the miner and the farmer, but not the maker of shrapnel.

  The entry of the United States into the war has, moreover, hurt, rather than helped the munition makers. Their taxes have been increased, until they now bear a burden heavier than that laid upon similar industries in Great Britain. Though the rate of the American tax is lower, the basis upon which excess profits are computed in such less favorable to the corporations than that used in England. In addition to this our munitions manufacturers no longer profit from the advantageous market they formerly enjoyed. Their dealings with our own Government are on the basis of fixed prices which cut the margin of profit to a small figure. As the buying of the Allies becomes centralized the possibility of getting a higher price from foreign governments also disappears. Without mentioning increasing costs due to labor conditions consequent upon the entry of this country into the war the situation of the maker of munitions is worse than it was before the United States joined the ranks of Germany’s foes. The munition makers were in a position to know these things before our Government declared war. They can hardly be thought to have urged such a step.

  The war cannot be called a “rich man’s war,” for it is everybody’s war. The benefits to be gained belong to everyone in the nation. In particular, it is fallacy to hold that the rich man, or any fragment of them, such as the munition makers, urged the war for their own gains. They now bear a heavy burden, it is true, but they will derive no benefits other than those shar
ed by all the people when the world shall have been made safe for all the people.

  The Delphi Classics Catalogue

  We are proud to present a listing of our complete catalogue of English titles, with new titles being added every month. Buying direct from our website means you can make great savings and take advantage of our instant Updates service. You can even purchase an entire series (Super Set) at a special discounted price.

  Only from our website can readers purchase a complete Parts Edition of our titles. When you buy a Parts Edition, you will receive a folder of your chosen author’s works, with each novel, play, poetry collection, non-fiction book and more divided into its own special volume. This allows you to read individual novels etc. and to know precisely where you are in an eBook. For more information, please visit our Parts Edition page.

  Series Contents

  Series One

  Anton Chekhov

  Charles Dickens

  D.H. Lawrence

  Dickensiana Volume I

  Edgar Allan Poe

  Elizabeth Gaskell

  Fyodor Dostoyevsky

  George Eliot

  H. G. Wells

  Henry James

  Ivan Turgenev

  Jack London

  James Joyce

  Jane Austen

  Joseph Conrad

  Leo Tolstoy

  Louisa May Alcott

  Mark Twain

  Oscar Wilde

  Robert Louis Stevenson

  Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

  Sir Walter Scott

  The Brontës

  Thomas Hardy

  Virginia Woolf

  Wilkie Collins

  William Makepeace Thackeray

  Series Two

  Alexander Pushkin

  Alexandre Dumas (English)

  Andrew Lang

  Anthony Trollope

  Bram Stoker

  Christopher Marlowe

  Daniel Defoe

  Edith Wharton

  F. Scott Fitzgerald

  G. K. Chesterton

  Gustave Flaubert (English)

  H. Rider Haggard

  Herman Melville

  Honoré de Balzac (English)

  J. W. von Goethe (English)

  Jules Verne

  L. Frank Baum

  Lewis Carroll

  Marcel Proust (English)

  Nathaniel Hawthorne

  Nikolai Gogol

  O. Henry

  Rudyard Kipling

  Tobias Smollett

  Victor Hugo

  William Shakespeare

  Series Three

  Ambrose Bierce

  Ann Radcliffe

  Ben Jonson

  Charles Lever

  Émile Zola

  Ford Madox Ford

  Geoffrey Chaucer

  George Gissing

  George Orwell

  Guy de Maupassant

  H. P. Lovecraft

  Henrik Ibsen

  Henry David Thoreau

  Henry Fielding

  J. M. Barrie

  James Fenimore Cooper

  John Buchan

  John Galsworthy

  Jonathan Swift

  Kate Chopin

  Katherine Mansfield

  L. M. Montgomery

  Laurence Sterne

  Mary Shelley

  Sheridan Le Fanu

  Washington Irving

  Series Four

  Arnold Bennett

  Arthur Machen

  Beatrix Potter

  Bret Harte

  Captain Frederick Marryat

  Charles Kingsley

  Charles Reade

  G. A. Henty

  Edgar Rice Burroughs

  Edgar Wallace

  E. M. Forster

  E. Nesbit

  George Meredith

  Harriet Beecher Stowe

  Jerome K. Jerome

  John Ruskin

  Maria Edgeworth

  M. E. Braddon

  Miguel de Cervantes

  M. R. James

  R. M. Ballantyne

  Robert E. Howard

  Samuel Johnson

  Stendhal

  Stephen Crane

  Zane Grey

  Series Five

  Algernon Blackwood

  Anatole France

  Beaumont and Fletcher

  Charles Darwin

  Edward Bulwer-Lytton

  Edward Gibbon

  E. F. Benson

  Frances Hodgson Burnett

  Friedrich Nietzsche

  George Bernard Shaw

  George MacDonald

  Hilaire Belloc

  John Bunyan

  John Webster

  Margaret Oliphant

  Maxim Gorky

  Oliver Goldsmith

  Radclyffe Hall

  Robert W. Chambers

  Samuel Butler

  Samuel Richardson

  Sir Thomas Malory

  Thomas Carlyle

  William Harrison Ainsworth

  William Dean Howells

  William Morris

  Series Six

  Anthony Hope

  Aphra Behn

  Arthur Morrison

  Baroness Emma Orczy

  Captain Mayne Reid

  Charlotte M. Yonge

  Charlotte Perkins Gilman

  E. W. Hornung

  Ellen Wood

  Frances Burney

  Frank Norris

  Frank R. Stockton

  Hall Caine

  Horace Walpole

  One Thousand and One Nights

  R. Austin Freeman

  Rafael Sabatini

  Saki

  Samuel Pepys

  Sir Issac Newton

  Stanley J. Weyman

  Thomas De Quincey

  Thomas Middleton

  Voltaire

  William Hazlitt

  William Hope Hodgson

  Series Seven

  Adam Smith

  Benjamin Disraeli

  Confucius

  David Hume

  E. M. Delafield

  E. Phillips Oppenheim

  Edmund Burke

  Ernest Hemingway

  Frances Trollope

  Galileo Galilei

  Guy Boothby

  Hans Christian Andersen

  Ian Fleming

  Immanuel Kant

  Karl Marx

  Kenneth Grahame

  Lytton Strachey

  Mary Wollstonecraft

  Michel de Montaigne

  René Descartes

  Richard Marsh

  Sax Rohmer

  Sir Richard Burton

  Talbot Mundy

  Thomas Babington Macaulay

  W. W. Jacobs

  Series Eight

  Anna Katharine Green

  Arthur Schopenhauer

  The Brothers Grimm

  C. S. Lewis

  Charles and Mary Lamb

  Elizabeth von Arnim

  Ernest Bramah

  Francis Bacon

  Gilbert and Sullivan

  Grant Allen

  Henryk Sienkiewicz

  Hugh Walpole

  Jean-Jacques Rousseau

  John Locke

  John Muir

  Joseph Addison

  Lafcadio Hearn

  Lord Dunsany

  Marie Corelli

  Niccolò Machiavelli

  Ouida

  Richard Brinsley Sheridan

  Sigmund Freud

  Theodore Dreiser

  Walter Pater

  W. Somerset Maugham

  Series Nine

  Aldous Huxley

  August Strindberg

  Booth Tarkington

  C. S. Forester

  Erasmus

  Eugene Sue

  Fergus Hume

  George Moore

  Gertrude Stein

  Giovanni Boccaccio

  Izaak Walton

  J. M. Synge

  Johanna Spyri
>
  John Galt

  Maurice Leblanc

  Max Brand

  Molière

  Norse Sagas

  R. D. Blackmore

  R. S. Surtees

  Sir Thomas More

  Stephen Leacock

  The Harvard Classics

  Thomas Love Peacock

  Thomas Paine

  William James

  Series Ten

  A. E. W. Mason

  Abraham Lincoln

  Baruch Spinoza

  Carolyn Wells

  Charles Brockden Brown

  Earl Derr Biggers

  Evelyn Waugh

  Fred M. White

  Frederick Douglass

  Gaston Leroux

  Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel

  George Berkeley

  Howard Pyle

  John Kendrick Bangs

  John Steinbeck

  John Stuart Mill

  Marion Crawford

  Martin Luther

  Penny Dreadfuls Collection

  Sherwood Anderson

  Thomas Dekker

  Thomas Hobbes

  Thomas Jefferson

  Willa Cather

  William Faulkner

  William Le Queux

  Ancient Classics

  Achilles Tatius

  Aeschines

  Aeschylus

  Ammianus Marcellinus

  Apollodorus

  Appian

  Apuleius

  Apollonius of Rhodes

  Aristophanes

  Aristotle

  Arrian

  Athenaeus

  Augustine

  Aulus Gellius

  Bede

  Callimachus

  Cassius Dio

  Cato

  Catullus

  Cicero

  Claudian

  Clement of Alexandria

  Cornelius Nepos

  Demosthenes

  Dio Chrysostom

  Diodorus Siculus

  Dionysius of Halicarnassus

  Diogenes Laërtius

  Ennius

  Epictetus

  Euripides

  Florus

  Frontius

  Fronto

  Herodotus

  Hesiod

  Hippocrates

  Homer

  Horace

  Isocrates

  Josephus

  Julian

  Julius Caesar

  Juvenal

 

‹ Prev