The Political Memoir of a Feminist Militant

Home > Other > The Political Memoir of a Feminist Militant > Page 8
The Political Memoir of a Feminist Militant Page 8

by Andrea Dworkin


  long, highly psychedelic years. There I fought for on-campus

  contraception - a no-no when colleges and universities functioned in loco parentis - and legal abortion. I fought against the Vietnam War. I tried to open up an antiwar counseling

  center to keep the rural-poor men in the towns around the

  college from signing up to be soldiers. Most of these were white

  men, and Vietnam was the equivalent of welfare for them. But

  the burning issue was boys in rooms. Bennington, an all-girls'

  school with a few male students in dance and drama, had

  parietal hours: from 2 a. m. to 6 a. m. the houses in which the

  students lived were girls only. One could have sex with another

  girl, and many of us did, myself certainly included. But the

  male lovers had to disappear: be driven out like beasts into the

  cold mountain night, hide behind trees during the hour of the

  wolf, and reemerge after dawn. The elimination of parietal

  hours was a huge issue, in some ways as big as the war. In

  colleges across the country girls were required to be in their

  gender-segregated dormitories by 10. Girls who went to Bennington in the main valued personal freedom; at least this girl

  83

  Heartbreak

  did. As one watched male faculty sneak in and out of student

  bedrooms, one could think about lies, lies, lies. As one saw the

  pregnancies that led to il egal abortions from these liaisons,

  one could think about the secret but not subtle cruelty of ful y

  adult men to young women. Everyone knew the Bennington

  guard who was deaf, and one prayed he would be on the 2-

  to-6 shift so one could have sex with a man one’s own age

  without facing suspension or expulsion. When a student would

  go with a boy to a motel, she could expect a cal at the motel

  from a particular administrator, a lesbian in hiding who tried

  to defend law and order. It was law and order versus personal freedom, and I was on the side of personal freedom.

  The college had a new president, Edward J. Bloustein, a

  constitutional lawyer, or so he said. The U. S. Constitution is

  amazingly malleable. Regardless, he was a law-and-order guy,

  and he didn’t belong at Bennington. You might say it was him

  or me. He wanted a more conventional Bennington with a more

  conventional student body and a fully conventional liberal-

  arts curriculum. He wanted to expand the student body, which

  would make classes bigger. He wanted al the hippies gone

  and al the druggies gone and al the lesbian lovers gone. He

  was for abstinence at a time when virginity before marriage

  was highly prized; he was against abortion and once told me

  in a confrontation we had in his of ice that Jewish girls tried to

  get pregnant - thus the problem with pregnancy on campus.

  That was a new one. He considered the faculty blameless.

  84

  Strategy

  Feeling under siege by this gray, gray man, students elected

  me to the Judicial Commit ee of the college. It was clear that

  he was looking for a scapegoat, someone to expel for defying

  parietal hours especially but also for smoking dope and

  having girl-girl sex. The students knew I could stand up to

  him, and I could. The scapegoat he wanted to punish was my

  best friend, and he just fucking was not going to get the

  chance to do it.

  She had been seen kissing another girl on the steps inside

  the house in which she lived. I’ve rarely met a Bennington

  woman from that time who does not think that she herself

  was the girl being kissed. Someone reported my friend for

  shooting up heroin in the living room. I recently asked her if

  she had, and she said no. In the thirty-five years that I've known

  her, I've never known her to lie - which was the problem back

  then. The college president confronted her on marijuana use,

  and she told him the truth - that she only had a joint or two

  on her right then. Knowing her, I’d bet she offered to share.

  The house where I lived, Franklin House, was a hotbed of

  treason, so first we had her move there. She could not quite

  grasp the notion of turning down music while people were

  sleeping, and in our house that was a crime. One could shoot up

  heroin or kiss girls, but one could not be a nuisance. Nevertheless, everyone knew a lot was at stake and so the music blared. To protect the personal freedom of each person living

  in Franklin we seceded from the school. We declared ourselves

  85

  Heartbreak

  entirely independent and we voted down parietal hours. So

  stringy, hairy boys were in the bathrooms at 4 a. m., as one of

  the few female professors noted in outrage at one of the many

  public meetings. If they weren’t bothering anyone, it was no

  crime. If they were, it could be bright and sunny and midafternoon and it was a crime. We elected an empress, an oracle, and other high of icials. (I was the oracle, though I

  preferred the tide “seer. ”) This was a pleasant anarchy. No one

  had to live there who didn’t want to, but my best friend was

  not going to be homeless because some rat as was upset by

  some deep kissing.

  The secession heightened the conflict between students and

  the administration. It was just another version of adults lying,

  having a pretense of order, as the foxes on the faculty sneaked

  into the henhouse with impunity. They impregnated with

  impunity. They paid for criminal abortions with impunity.

  The apocalypse was coming. Each day the class warfare

  between students on the one side and faculty and administration on the other intensified. The lying, cheating faculty began to piss a lot of us of . They always presented themselves as being

  on our side against the administration because this was how

  they got laid, but slowly the truth emerged - they wanted the

  appearance of professorship during the day and randy acces to

  the students at night, between 2 and 6 being hours that carried

  a lot of traf ic. As the tension grew, my best friend was closer

  and closer to being tied down on the altar and split in half.

  8 6

  Strategy

  I worked out a plan. The school was governed by a constitution. The Judicial Commit ee had the right to expel students.

  My plan was to cal a school meeting, ask everyone to submit

  a signed piece of paper saying that she had broken the parietal

  hours, and then expel everyone, as we had the right to do. Out

  of a student body of a few hundred students, only about six

  refused. The Judicial Commit ee expelled everyone else. In

  effect the school ceased to exist.

  It’s always the law-and-order guys who turn to tyranny

  when they’ve been legally beat. In this case Bloustein exercised

  raw power. He waited until graduation before reacting; he

  sent a let er to al the expelled students' parents that said they

  could not come back to school unless they signed a loyalty

  oath to obey the school’s rules. I didn’t go back to school. I

  would never sign any such oath. But I thought his tactic was

  disgusting: it’s bad to break the spirit of the young, and that’s

  what he did. In order to go back to school, students ha
d to

  betray themselves and each other, and most did. I learned

  never to ignore the reality of power pure and simple. I also

  learned that one could get a bunch of people to do something

  brave or new or rebellious, but if it didn’t come from their

  deepest hearts they could not maintain the honor of their

  commitment. I learned that one does not overwhelm people

  by persuading them to do something basically antagonistic

  to their own sense of self; nor can rhetoric create in people a

  sustained determination to win. I thought Bloustein did

  87

  Heartbreak

  something evil by making students sign that oath; how dare

  he? But he dared, they did, and I left sickened.

  8 8

  Suf er the Lit le

  Children

  In Amsterdam I knew a hippie man whose children from an

  early mar iage were coming to stay with him. They were thirteen and eleven, I think. The older girl had been incested by her stepfather. This came into the open because the older girl

  tried to kill herself. This she did at least in part valiantly

  because she saw the stepfather beginning to make moves on

  the younger girl in exactly the same way he had gradually

  forced himself on her. The stepfather had started to wash and

  shower with the younger girl. The mother, in despair, wrote

  the hippie man, who had abandoned al of them, for help. She

  wanted to mend the relationship with the second husband

  while keeping her children safe. The hippie man made clear

  to those of us who knew him that he considered his older

  daughter responsible for the sex; you know how girls flirt and

  al that. His woman friend made clear to him that he was

  wrong and also that she was not going to take care of the children. She wouldn’t have to, he said; he would be the nurturer.

  When the girls arrived in Amsterdam, one recently raped, the

  89

  Heartbreak

  other exceptionally nervous and upset by temperament or

  contagion or molestation, the hippie man forgot his vows of

  responsibility, as he had always forgotten al the vows he had

  ever made, and let al the work, emotional and physical, devolve

  on his woman friend. She wasn’t having any and simply

  refused to take care of them. Eventually she left.

  One night I got a cal from her: the hippie man had given

  each kid 100 guilders, set them loose, and told them to take

  care of themselves. He just could not be with them without

  fucking them, he told her (and them). In a noble and compassionate alternative gesture, he put them out on the streets. His woman friend made clear to me that this was a mess she was

  not going to clean up. I asked where they were.

  They had taken shelter in the frame of an abandoned building, squatters without a room that had walls. They lived up toward the wooden frame for the ceiling. Their light came from

  burning candles. I found them and took them home with me,

  although “home” would be stretching it a bit. At that moment

  I lived in an emptied apartment, the one I had lived in with

  my husband, a batterer. I had married him after I left Bennington for the second time (the first was Crete, the second Amsterdam). After I had played hide-and-seek with the brute

  for a number of months, he decided I could live in the apartment he had cleaned out. By then I was grateful even if it meant that he knew where I was. A woman’s life is ful of

  such trade-offs. So when the girls came with me, it wasn’t to

  90

  Suf er the Lit le Children

  safety or luxury or even just enough. The apartment, however,

  did have walls, and one does learn to be grateful.

  The older girl thought that she was probably pregnant. Her

  father, the hippie man, did light shows, many for rock bands;

  he had the habit of sending musicians into the older girl’s bed

  to have sex with her; the younger daughter slept next to the

  older girl, both on a mattress on the floor. They were wonderful and delightful girls, scared to death; each put up the best front she could: I'm not afraid, I don’t care, none of it hurts me.

  The first order of business, after get ing them down from

  the wood rafters il uminated by the burning candles, was getting the older one a pregnancy test. If she was pregnant, she was going to have an abortion, I said. I’m not proud now of

  using my authority that way, but she was a child, a real child;

  anyway, for bet er or worse, I would have forced one on her.

  In Amsterdam the procedure was not so clandestine nor so

  stigmatized. It turned out that she wasn’t pregnant.

  One day she was suddenly very happy. One of the adult

  rockers sent into her bed by her father was going to Spain and

  he wanted to take her. This was proof that he loved her. I knew

  from the hippie father that he had paid the rocker to take the

  girl. Finally I was the adult and someone else was the child.

  I told her. I told her carefully and slowly and with love but

  I told her the truth, al of it, about the rot en father and the

  rot en rocker. Her mother now wanted her and her sister

  back. I sent them back. Nothing would ever be simple for me

  91

  Heartbreak

  again. A strain of melancholy entered my life; it was the

  fusion of responsibility with loss in a world of bruised and

  bullied strangers.

  92

  Theory

  I went to Amsterdam to interview the Provos - not the blood-

  soaked Irish Provos but the hashish-soaked Dutch ones. They

  served as the prototype for the U. S. yippies, though their

  theory was more sophisticated; as one said to me, “Make an

  action that puts crowds of ordinary people in direct conflict

  with the police, then disappear. This will undermine police

  authority and politicize those they beat up. ” The man I eventually married said that he envisaged social change as circles on a canvas; the idea was to destabilize the circles by adding

  ones that didn’t fit - the canvas would inevitably lose its

  integrity and some circles would fal off, a paradigm for social

  chaos that would topple social hierarchies.

  What I found infinitely more valuable, however, were three

  books: Sexual Politics by Kate Millet ; The Dialectic of Sex by

  Shulamith Firestone; and Sisterhood Is Powerful, an anthology

  edited by Robin Morgan. These were the classic, basic texts of

  radical feminism; what happened when women moved to the

  left of the left. I was hardheaded though; I defended Norman

  Mailer even though his attacks on Mil et were philistine; I

  stil liked D. H. Lawrence, though now I find him unbearable

  93

  Heartbreak

  to read, such a prissy and intolerant hee-haw; and I again

  learned the power of listening, this time because of someone

  who listened to me.

  Her name was Dr. Frankel-Teitz. I had found out that when

  you told people your husband was beating you, they turned

  their backs on you. Mostly they blamed you. They said it

  wouldn’t be happening if you didn’t want it and like it. You

  could be, as I was, carrying al you could hold in an effort to

  escape or you could be, as I was, badly hurt and bleeding, and

  they stil told you that you wanted it. Yo
u could be running

  away fast and furious, but it was still your will, not his, that

  controlled the scenario of violence: you liked it. You could ask

  for help and they’d deny you help and it was still your fault

  and you liked it. I’d like to wipe out every person on earth

  who ever said that to or about an abused woman.

  I had a lot of physical problems from having been beaten

  so much and from the tough months of running and hiding,

  including terrible open sores on my breasts from where he

  burned me with a cigarette. The sores would open up without

  warning like stigmata and my breasts would bleed. Finally

  women helping me found me a doctor. “Al the lesbians go to

  her, ” they said, and in those days that was a damned good

  recommendation. I went to her but was determined not to say

  I had been beaten or I was running; I couldn’t bear one more

  time of being told it was my fault. Stil , I said it; it fel out of

  me when she saw the open sores. “That’s hor ible, ” she said -

  94

  Theory

  about the beatings, not the sores. I'l never forget it. “That’s

  horrible. ” Was she on my side; did she believe me; was it

  horrible? “No one’s ever said that, ” I told her. No one had.

  A few years later, back in the United States, I sent Dr.

  Frankel-Teitz a copy of Woman Hating and a let er thanking

  her for her help and kindness. She replied with a fairly cranky

  letter saying that she didn’t see what the big deal was; she had

  only said and done the obvious. The obvious had included

  get ing me medicine I couldn’t afford. I thought that she was

  the most remarkable person I had ever met. “That’s hor ible. ”

  Can saving someone really be that simple? “That’s hor ible. ”

  Horrible, that’s hor ible. What does it take? What’s so hard

  about it? How can the women who don’t say those words live

  with themselves? How can the women who do say those

  words now, thirty years later, worry more about how they

  dress and which parties they go to? In between the early days

 

‹ Prev