ZetaTalk: Science
Page 6
covered with volcanic dust, organic material lies as a potential. Where Siberia may appear to be a frozen wasteland,
the center of the Earth is hot, and decomposition of trapped matter, proceeding slowly but over a long time, can
accumulate a large, trapped pool of methane gas. Released Due to a Shift in the Earth's crust and encountering a raise in temperature sufficient to act as a spark, this would explode, with the size of the explosion in proportion to the
volume of violently venting gas.
The burn was lit by the wick traveling back along the wisp of methane that had been blow up and southwest by the
prevailing westerlies over Siberia. What witnesses saw was the burn off of methane that had disbursed into the air and
was not sandwiched between burning masses so that its heat had nowhere to go, the basis of exploding, rather than
burning, gas bombs. The process was:
1. Methane gas hisses out from under frozen permafrost that had been cracked like a sheet of glass due to earth
stress, pre-shock to the earthquake that was recorded during the Tunguska explosion.
2. Methane gas mixes with the air as it rises, followed by more hissing air, so that a huge cloud of methane has
formed in the atmosphere over Tunguska, equivalent to all the natural gas at any given time in the US.
3. A wick of methane that has drifted upward and southeast, driven by the prevailing westerlies, is sparked due to
the air movement, the same process that causes lighting due to rapid air movement during storms.
4. The lit methane burns rapidly back along the wick, the "meteor" that was seen, lights all the gas that is
encountered but before all but the nearest witnesses can see it, those who died in the explosion, an overburn over
gasses closer to the surface prevents heat from rising and an explosive situation occurs.
The explanation that a meteor exploded above ground is an attempt by the establishment to avoid the methane gas, and
thus the pole shift and shifting crust issue. Comets and meteors do not explode when encountering Earth’s atmosphere.
This is not what your history or science presents to you! If they are monstrous, they plunge to Earth and leave a crater
such as the Gulf of Mexico off Yucatan. If they are tiny, they burn up in the atmosphere as shooting stars. If they are
midsized, they burn on their periphery but land to be rocks picked up and examined by your scientists. The lack of
meteor particles or dust proves that it was not an exploding meteor. Methane, once burned or disbursed into the air,
leaves no trace. Meteors leave traces, methane does not.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s57.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:52 AM]
ZetaTalk: Deflecting Asteroids
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Deflecting Asteroids
Note: written on Jul 15, 1996.
Recently the media and Internet message boards have been alerting the populace to the presence of what is termed
near-miss asteroids. Discussion ensues on how to deflect them should they threaten to impact the Earth, as though
deflection would be possible. Does mankind now have the means to deflect such large, rapidly moving objects? Such a
deflection would require a precisely placed explosive device of sufficient strength to vaporize the asteroid.
Disintegration would be required because deflection is not possible in space. This statement will meet with vehement
objection, especially from the arm of the establishment which seeks only to deflect panic in the populace. It is not a
collision with an asteroid which will shortly devastate Earth, it is the passage of the monster 12th Planet, ever drawing
closer. Nor will deflection of the trash in this giant comet's tail be possible - boulders as large as trucks thumping to
Earth on occasion and the peppering of red dust and gravel. Deflection of these few boulders is not possible either, as
they are shrouded in the swirling dust of the tail, and only visible just before impact.
Deflection of large objects traveling in space or plummeting to Earth must address several problems.
The object is traveling because it is caught in a gravitational attraction. This might not be the case in deep space,
but within the Solar System this is most certainly the case. If an asteroid is heading toward Earth, bumping it to
the side a bit or even temporarily stopping its motion is at best a delaying action. The asteroid will resume its
path, as the factors that influenced the path in the first place are still there.
Attempting to aim the asteroid so it falls in the ocean has the potential for making matters worse, not better.
Unlike the winged space shuttles, which can start their descent path at precise points and behave predictably,
asteroids do not take orders or respond to controls. They are odd shaped, their shape an unknown variable. They
may or may not burn fiercely, a heated air factor that is not known. They may circle or plummet, depending on
their weight and size, more unknown variables. Thus attempting to steer them could prove disastrous. Oops,
dropped it it right on the Pentagon!
A nuclear explosion set off on the surface of an object in space would have minimal effect, as the explosion can
expand in all directions at once. Nuclear explosions on the Earth's surface are an irresistible force meeting an
immovable object - the Earth! Where the explosion can expand up or outward into the atmosphere there is only
air turbulence. The portion of the explosion that is on the land side, or in the case of an underground explosion is
encapsulated, is between a rock and a hot expanding place. The explosion is forced into the rock strata by the
continuously expanding center of the explosion. Solid rock vaporized by nuclear explosions on the Earth's
surface does not equate to the damage that would be done by one or even many nuclear devices on the surface of
an asteroid. All parts of the explosion move rapidly out into space, and thus the asteroid is safely away before
the nuke really gets going. A firecracker. A gnat. A sneeze. And the asteroid proceeds on its way, having only
momentarily stepped aside to avoid mankind's silly experiment.
All the sudden upsurge in talk about the dangers asteroids present, and all the talk in the late 1990's about reviving the
Star Wars program to address this threat is not because something can actually be done. Short of making practical
plans to survive the coming pole shift while hunkered down on the surface of the Earth, mankind has no options, and
those in the establishment who talk up asteroid deflection possibilities know this. They are simply buying themselves
time by pushing the point where panic in the populace gets heated as far out as possible. Hopefully, the panic button
won't be hit until those members of the establishment are safely away in their well stocked enclaves, and then the rest
of humanity, who has been reassured that their government can protect them, be damned.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s74.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:53 AM]
ZetaTalk: Deflecting Asteroids
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s74.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:53 AM]
ZetaTalk: Light Particles
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Light Particles
Note: written on Feb 15, 1997.
In the recent past, humans considered the world around them to be composed of either mass or energy, energy being
anything they could not put their hands around. Only within the past century has the notion that both mass and energy
are solid particle
s become widely accepted. Energy is just really small stuff, moving fast. Increasingly, the really small
stuff is identified, at least in theory as it is too small to be observed directly. The clues, for humans struggling to
understand the world around them, lies in the behavior of small particles under different circumstances. Light is not
composed of a singular particle, but dozens of particles, thereby accounting for much of what humans call the strange
behavior of light.
Rainbows are caused by the various particles responsible for what humans call color, the color of an object being
determined by which particle is overwhelmingly present in the flood of particles striking the eye. Diffraction of
light in water laden air following a rain storm results in what humans call a rainbow, where the eye perceives
light particles sorted out by the degree, or angle, of diffraction from one side of the rainbow to the other.
Auroras, colorful light displays of waving banners across the northern or southern skies, are caused by the
susceptibility of the various particles to the gravitational pull from the Earth. These light displays are visible to
humans where the glare of sunlight does not drown them out, as the eye registers the overwhelming particle
nature of the light flood, discarding minor particles that might be present as so much noise.
Brilliant sunsets and dawns have been assumed by humans to be caused by dust suspended in the air, when of
course those dust particles are present during the day as well and cause no such color variation. The human eye
receives in the dim light of dawn or dusk an overwhelming flood of light composed of particular particles which
are more prone to bend toward the gravitational pull of the Earth than other particles. Thus the sunset or dawn is
most brilliant at a point just before or after the full glare of sunlight, when the particle flood is strong but is not
mixed in with competing light particles to the point of being drown out.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s90.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:53 AM]
ZetaTalk: Light Particle Bonds
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Light Particle Bonds
written Apr 22, 2004 during godlikeproduction.com message board debates on why light bends toward a gravity sink
In trying to understand the behavior of light particles, which are many and not a single particle, humans boggle. They
ascribe the various colors to speed of vibration, the wave pattern high or low, long or short. The breaking of a ray of
sunlight going through a prism into a rainbow of colors is thus ascribed to a change in speed or a modified wave
pattern, as though a sub-atomic particle is forced to compact and squeeze in some invisible tunnel. Does glass have
invisible tunnels they force light rays into, or the ability to hold light particles back so they compress? They speak of
reflection or refraction of light as though it were an object bouncing, which sub-atomic particles do not do unless a
direct repulsion occurs. Are light particles repulsed by the sub-atomic qualities of a silver backed mirror, such that
they bounce? They ascribe the Auroras to an attraction by light particles to electro magnetic particle, such that they
dance, apparently, only at the poles, but balk at giving this attractive quality to gravity. The orange light that floods the
sky at sunrise and sunset is ascribed to dust, of all things, with no explanation of why this spectrum is so affected but
the other spectrums not. The huge size of a light emitting object such as the Sun coming over the horizon, in conflict
with established human explanations, is rejected. If it conflicts with the current establishment line, it did not occur, and
they call anyone saying otherwise deluded.
Why does light reflect from some surfaces, absorb into others, or change color when emerging from a prism? And
what does this have to do with the obvious bending of orange/red light over the surface of the globe, as seen at sunrise
or sunset? Is there a relationship? There is indeed. Some sub-atomic particles, a ready example being the many
particles in the electro-magnetic arena, flow together, are attracted to each other, and are incited to move with each
other by that attachment. Man thinks of electrons as being one sub-atomic particle and has barely considered
magnetism to be a particle flow, yet these particles number in the hundreds, and are not all the same in their behavior.
Light particles, thus, are immense in their numbers, and the various wave forms with resulting color signature
recognized by a retina only one example of the many. Do these light particles like to flow with one another, being
attracted to one another in a similar manner to the electro-magnetic particles? Obviously.
And as we have described, they flow not in a straight line, not in a wave form, but in a twisted cable form. Like the
Moons of Planet X, they swirl about each other in a double helix pattern, neither escaping or bonding, in perpetual motion. These helix strands likewise coil around other strands, often in a criss-cross pattern depending upon how much
distance the strands need from each other. Like electrons that chase but do not catch each other, and magnetons that
are likewise always in motion and cannot stand crowding but likewise desire to clump, this is a dance that never ends,
perhaps by God’s design. Where electrons can be caught and reside around the nucleus of an atom, and magnetons are
normally humming about the nucleus of an atom, the flow of light particles is an aberration of their normal abode,
within and around a nucleus. They emerge when this nucleus is flooded with particles and are pushed out due to
crowding, due to pressure which crowds them or the application of heat which is in and of itself a particle flow, or the
introduction of some bonded atoms that act as a catalyst for change. Light can be produced by friction, heat, emerges
during fire, or by chemical mix, as man knows.
When the twisted coil is on the move it, as a group, moves in the direction that they particles were flung in by the
explosion of particle crowding they were escaping. The direction of the light ray. When many particles are involved,
this is considered by man to be white light, all color spectrums included, as the colors emerge when this white light is
separated into its parts. The helix coils have another direction, other than the overall direction, which is straight ahead.
They are moving away from, and back toward, the pairing particle in their coil. Depending upon the particle, this coil
is tight or loose, with a wide wave length or short, and involves many other coils tightly attracted to it or few. When
encountering other matter, these particle pairs find themselves in a marital crisis. One of the pair wants to have an
affair with the other matter encountered, lingering, while the other partner cannot because the pair would then be too
close, too crowded. Thus, the particle lingering forces the partner to exit the coil, suddenly, in the manner of their
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta91.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:54 AM]
ZetaTalk: Light Particle Bonds
original expulsion from some comfortable atom into a light ray direction. The exiting particle of the pair leaves,
likewise, in a direction that creates the least crowding for it with the other helix coils they are entwined with.
Thus, white light entering a prism of glass finds that the most vulnerable particle to an attraction affair lingers and
expels its partner first. These particles having peeled off, the next most vulnerable particle is exposed to the adulter
ous attraction of some quality of glass, and lingers and expels its partner. This process proceeds until there is only the helix
coils of those light particles that are resistant to attraction, by being so tightly bound to the coils, and resist the
flirtations of nearby particles inherent in the glass. Some material simply absorbs the light rays by preventing them
from leaving, an affair that has become a new marriage of sorts. Some material is so attractive that the lingering
partner and expulsion proceeds at an almost violent pace, considered a complete reflection surface by man. When light
coils pass over a gravity giant such as a planet, it is not the long distance call of a lover they are listening to when they
curve toward that giant, it is the flow of gravity particles flowing back toward the planet. These are encountered on the way, slow the flow of those parts of the coil that are most attracted to the gravity particles, causing them to separate
from the other parts of the larger intermeshed coil. This separation is not violent or sudden, as adjustments are made
during the bumping process so the coils of those particles wanting to pull along with the flow of gravity eventually
find themselves outside of the larger coil, and free to move in independent helix coils. Thus where white light, or light
in color spectrums not susceptible to gravity particle attraction, move forward in their straight line path, the red
spectrum light susceptible to gravity pulls toward the gravity particles drifting back to their gravity sink, and are bent thus, toward the gravity giant.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta91.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:54 AM]
ZetaTalk: Red Shift
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Red Shift
Note: written on Feb 15, 1998. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.
Regarding the red color that the 12th Planet emits. This is due to the majority light particle that emits, a flood that to your eye or imaging equipment dominates and then becomes the color of record. It is not the only color arriving from
that source. It is a particle, a light particle, operating at a certain frequency. That's all. Leaving or approaching, the