However strong the suspicion might be that David Atkinson was Milly’s killer, there remains the fundamental problem – lack of proof. Because of the skeletal state of Milly’s remains after six months, it was not possible to ascertain exactly how she died. Nor was it possible to find out whether she had been sexually assaulted. No traces of the killer’s DNA remained; and Atkinson’s DNA was not on the data base for correlation anyway, so it is hard to see how the police could have picked Atkinson out as even a potential suspect until after his suicide and confession.
Other violent sex offenders present themselves as potential suspects, too. The Soham killer, Ian Huntley, who killed the two young girls Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman, was investigated as a possibility. The M25 rapist, Antoni Imiela, was also investigated.
The Milly Dowler murder remains unsolved. The ‘best-fit’ hypothesis is that David Atkinson was the murderer. He had a history of violence, which first emerged on a tour of duty in Germany. He married a German woman, Liane Haake, and she actually reported him to the military police for his assaults on her. She said that he raped her and threatened her with an axe. The charges were later withdrawn. In 1997, Atkinson carried out a violent attack on an eighteen-year old Polish woman called Katrin Schyroki. He was court martialled for this, but Katrin condemned the hearing as ‘a whitewash’. Like Sally Geeson, Katrin Schyroki was attacked in a car. In each of these attacks, Atkinson managed to trap the young woman in the car. Katrin thinks her life was saved when some bystanders saw what was happening and rushed to her rescue. The initial charges included indecent assault and kidnapping, but they were dropped and Atkinson was found guilty on a lesser charge of false imprisonment. He was fined and allowed to carry on with his military career. The leniency with which he was treated may have exposed Milly Dowler and other girls and young women to extreme danger. It is possible that the outcome was unintentional, that the army authorities had not intended to be lenient, but that the result was produced by the way the local German authorities gathered evidence on behalf of the victim. Even so, given the seriousness of the false imprisonment conviction, the British military police in Germany were entitled to pass Atkinson’s DNA on the British Home Office’s burgeoning DNA database. Atkinson was a violent criminal who clearly needed watching and storing his DNA profile would have been a wise precaution. The reasons why that did not happen are being explored by the MoD.
As it is, the police forces in three towns in Germany are keen to check Atkinson’s DNA against forensic evidence they have collected from a string of unsolved sex crimes, including at least one murder. The main focus of their inquiry is the 1998 murder in Krefeld of a thirty-five-year-old prostitute called Jacqueline. She was found strangled in her flat in the town centre. Not only was Atkinson on his tour of duty in Germany at the time, he was living in Krefeld.
Whether Atkinson’s DNA had been on the British national DNA database or not has made no difference as far as solving the Milly Dowler case is concerned, as there is no scene of crime sample with which to compare it. The strong suspicion nevertheless remains that David Atkinson is the nearest thing we currently have to a suspect for Milly’s murder, though proof that he did it is still lacking.
The nagging question that still remains at the back of my mind relates to the second man. There was, as mentioned earlier, a significant sighting close to the place where Milly’s body was later found, a sighting of two men with a schoolgirl. Does this mean that David Atkinson had an accomplice when he murdered Milly? And does this perhaps explain why Milly felt it was safe to get into the car? She may, like all well-trained youngsters, have hesitated to get into a car with a stranger, but getting into a car with two young soldiers offering her a lift may have seemed to her to be somehow safer.
Killing the Cricket Coach: Bob Woolmer
On Saturday 17 March 2007, the Pakistan cricket team was knocked out of the World Cup when it was defeated by the Ireland team. The defeat was all the more mortifying for Pakistan because the Ireland team was made up of part-time players. At a quarter to eleven the following morning, Sunday 18 March, a chambermaid at the Pegasus Hotel in Kingston, Jamaica, found the Pakistan cricket team’s fifty-eight year old coach, Bob Woolmer, naked on the floor in his bathroom. He was taken to hospital but shortly afterwards pronounced dead.
It was four days later that the Jamaican police announced that Woolmer had not died of natural causes as at first thought: he had been murdered. He had been strangled with enough force to break a bone in his neck and splatter the walls with vomit. There was no sign of a forced entry into the hotel room, implying that Woolmer had known his murderer and let him in. The police had to wait some weeks before the results of toxicology tests came through. These might establish whether Woolmer was to some extent disabled with poison before being strangled.
British experts wondered whether their Jamaican counterparts had too quickly jumped to the conclusion that Woolmer died by manual strangulation. A British pathologist spoke contemptuously of the standards of Jamaican pathologists. If Woolmer had indeed died by manual strangulation, it was very odd that there were no bruises or scratches on his neck. His last meal had been lasagne, which was delivered to his room by room service. The Jamaican police had not ruled out the possibility that death was due to aconite poisoning, which can cause asphyxia.
The Interpol forensic expert, Susan Hitchin, took the view that the post mortem examination was bungled. She believed that the evidence pointed towards Woolmer dying from natural causes. He was a diabetic, and his blood testing kit was found on the floor near the body, which was leaning against the door. This had made it difficult for the chambermaid to push the door open. The fact that Woolmer’s body was propped up against the door raises the question of how a killer could have escaped. He would have needed to push the body out of the way to get out, but how would he then have got the body back up against the door? The location of the body alone suggests that no killer entered the bathroom. Woolmer could therefore not have been strangled – though he could have been poisoned.
Police investigators travelled to Pakistan to clear up discrepancies between the statements given by officials and team members. The scale of the investigation expanded when a team of detectives from Scotland Yard arrived, and an Interpol forensic expert. The British police carefully searched the twelfth floor hotel room, looked through the witness statements, and scrutinized the closed-circuit television footage showing the corridor outside Woolmer’s room.
The police had no particular suspect in the frame, but it was not hard to guess that Bob Woolmer’s death was closely connected to the humiliating defeat of his team the previous day. The performance of Pakistan’s cricket team was closely followed, with an almost hysterical zeal, by its millions of supporters. Any one of them could have felt sufficiently let down to want to wreak revenge on a scapegoat – and who better than the coach who trained the team? Pakistan’s defeat by Ireland was the most humiliating in the team’s history. It was greeted in Pakistan by the ritual burning of effigies of Bob Woolmer, and chants of ‘Death to Woolmer’. With feelings among the team’s fans running this high, it is a distinct possibility that an over-zealous fan could have taken the chanting literally.
The Kingston police began looking for three Pakistani fans in particular: the three who checked out of the Pegasus Hotel immediately after the murder. It would have been quite in character for Woolmer to have opened his door to chat to a fan, or even a trio of fans. He was friendly, approachable, good-natured and freely mixed with fans. He would have thought nothing of opening the door, wearing only a towel after his morning shower, to oblige an autograph hunter.
But there are other possibilities. Woolmer was white, not a Muslim, and something of an outsider as far as the Pakistan team were concerned. Allegations of match-fixing had circled round the sport for many years. The match with Ireland was regarded in cricketing circles as a very strange game. Pakistan’s opening match against the West Indies was similar. Bob Woolmer may have ha
d his suspicions that team members had accepted bribes to throw these games. Given his strength of character, he would have confronted his players with these suspicions.
Gambling on the outcome of cricket matches and even on individual batsmen’s scores is a major activity in the subcontinent of India. It is estimated that as much as £20 billion a year is gambled on cricket matches in India alone. Such large sums are staked that there is an enormous temptation to fix matches. For significant bribes, players may produce the desired outcome. Both the Pakistan and the South Africa teams have been involved in match-fixing in the past. Bob Woolmer had acted as manager to both teams and he knew all about match-fixing. He had also written about the sport, and it was rumoured that he was about to write a book that would reveal the extent of the match-fixing. If that rumour was believed, it is possible that one of the illegal betting syndicates hired a professional killer to silence Woolmer before he got round to publishing. On the other hand, the book Woolmer was writing is said to have contained no such material. Following his death, his co-writer said that match-fixing would be included.
Match-fixing is a possibility, but at the same time the Pakistan players had their reputation as players to consider, and it seems unlikely that they would have exposed themselves to humiliation and ridicule for the sake of bribes. It would be a very short-term gain. Tim Noakes, Woolmer’s co-author, does not believe that Woolmer was murdered because of the match-fixing. In his view it is match-fixers and not coaches who are killed by other match-fixers.
The book Bob Woolmer was working on when he was murdered will have a section on match-fixing added to it prior to publication, its co-author has revealed. At the time of his death, Woolmer was working on a book with Tim Noakes, who was at one time doctor to the South African team and a sports science professor at Cape Town University. Woolmer was editing the original 600 pages, of which he wrote over three-quarters in the week before he died. The page proofs arrived at the Pegasus Hotel the day after he died. These were clearly not the manuscripts that were said to have been stolen from his room. Noakes decided to let it be known that there would be a chapter on match-fixing in their jointly-written book. He also made it known that the print-run would be increased from 5,000 to 100,000 copies, anticipating a huge surge of interest in what Woolmer might have to say about the sport. The rumour that Woolmer might have been murdered because he was about to blow the whistle on match-fixing led to the decision to examine the match-fixing phenomenon statistically. Thomas C. Gilfillan was recruited by Noakes to analyze all the data relating to South Africa’s one-day matches in the 1990s. For much of that time the team was coached by Woolmer. Gilfillan worked on the assumption that if you know the form of both of the teams playing, it is possible to predict the outcome of seventy per cent of matches. Noakes commented that the results would shed light on the character of the team captain.
A third possibility is that Bob Woolmer was an incidental victim of Kingston’s high crime rate. Murder is not an uncommon crime there and this might have been a random killing completely unconnected with cricket or Pakistan. Meanwhile, the Pakistan cricket coach’s body remains at four degrees Celsius in a zipped-up black bag in a cold room in the basement of a Kingston funeral parlour. The body, like the case itself, is going nowhere. It stays in Jamaica until the coroner decides to release it to the family in South Africa. Nothing of any substance has so far emerged to resolve the mystery. Woolmer’s final e-mail messages give no hint of concern about match-fixing. There is no hint of any fear, either.
Copyright
© 2011 Omnipress Limited
www.omnipress.co.uk
This 2011 edition published by Canary Press,
an imprint of Omnipress Limited, UK
www.canarypress.co.uk
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission in writing of the publisher.
The views expressed in this book are those of the author but they are general views only, and readers are urged to consult a relevant and qualified specialist for individual advice in particular situations. Rodney Castleden and Omnipress Limited hereby exclude all liability to the extent permitted by law for any errors or omissions in this book or for any loss, damage or expense (whether direct or indirect) suffered by the third party relying on any information contained in this book.
ISBN: 978-1-907795-44-2
Cover & internal design
Anthony Prudente on behalf of Omnipress Limited
Great Unsolved Crimes Page 42