EARLY BIRD BOOKS
FRESH EBOOK DEALS, DELIVERED DAILY
LOVE TO READ?
LOVE GREAT SALES?
GET FANTASTIC DEALS ON BESTSELLING EBOOKS
DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX EVERY DAY!
The Web’s Creepiest Newsletter
Delivered to Your Inbox
Get chilling stories of
true crime, mystery, horror,
and the paranormal,
twice a week.
On the Third Day
A Novel
Piers Paul Read
On the third day, he rose again from the dead.
The Apostles’ Creed
Prologue
The Israeli archaeologist, Michal Dagan, once Professor at the Hebrew University on Mount Scopus, later director of the Staedtler Institute of Archaeology in West Jerusalem, lived with his wife in that leafy quarter of the city called Rehavya. Their flat had three bedrooms – one for the parents and one for each of their two children. Their daughter Anna’s was rarely used: she had been to school in the United States, and was now studying in London.
Their son, Ya’acov, was in the army. In 1988 he was stationed in Jerusalem, attached to a unit of Military Counter-intelligence headed by Colonel Yehuda Louvish. He worked in plain clothes and lived at home, driving every day from his parents’ flat in Rehavya to a military compound on the Ramallah Road. The Professor never asked what his son did from day to day, content that it was undoubtedly of some importance to the defence of the Jewish nation, not just from external enemies, but from the enemies within who at that time were organizing protests and demonstrations against Israeli rule – the intifada.
One evening in late May, Ya’acov returned to have supper with his parents and, as they were eating, abandoned his usual discretion to tell them about his work. Because of the intifada, it was necessary to eavesdrop on the Arabs in their sanctuary on the Temple Mount. Existing devices on the hills surrounding the Old City were proving inadequate. A decision had been reached to go in from below.
Professor Dagan was familiar with the excavations which had already taken place beside the retaining walls of Herod’s Temple. Since the conquest of the Old City in 1967, a tunnel had been dug under the Muslim quarter, adjacent to the Western Wall, linking the area around Wilson’s Arch with the cisterns under the Via Dolorosa. Israeli archaeologists had itched to know what lay on the other side of the wall, but they had always been prevented from excavating under the Temple Mount itself by the religious sensitivities both of the Muslims above and of the Orthodox Jews in the Ministry of Religious Affairs.
Now, the needs of security seemed to have overridden all other considerations, and a decision had been made to go through the Western Wall at the north-west corner, where it bisected an old cistern and blocked the Hasmonean watercourse from the Damascus Gate.
The point Ya’acov made to his father was this: that if it was left to the sappers and engineers, they might overlook and inadvertently destroy things of great archaeological importance. He, Ya’acov, had some archaeological training, but he had neither the knowledge nor the experience to judge the importance of what his unit might find. He had therefore asked his superior, Colonel Louvish, to let his father in on the operation and allow him to go first through the Western Wall.
Michal Dagan could not refuse. His wife, Rachel, directed a doubting look from across the table, and asked Ya’acov who, beyond Louvish, had authorized the operation. Ya’acov’s answer was vague, but it satisfied his father. Whether legal or illegal, dangerous or safe, it was a unique opportunity to gain access to the whole labyrinth of caves, conduits and cisterns which were known to be beneath the mosques on the Temple Mount, and had remained untouched since the destruction of the Temple by Titus.
The operation proceeded in great secrecy, with five young sappers in plain clothes working under Ya’acov and two fellow officers called Mordecai and Asher. It took more than three weeks to cut around one of the massive blocks of Herod’s Western Wall, and another week to dislodge it. At the start, Dagan visited the site almost every day but, since progress was slow and he had other work to do, he began to visit the site less often, leaving it to Ya’acov to tell him when he was needed.
Almost a month after the work had started, Ya’acov came home and told his father that they hoped to remove the stone the next day. They both went early in the morning to the plaza in front of the Temple Mount, and were met there by Asher, Mordecai and the young sappers. They walked along the tunnel to where the massive block of stone protruded from the wall, held up by a tangle of chains, pulleys and scaffolding. It took another two hours to edge it out of the wall, and so tight were the blocks around it that, when it finally swung free, there was no movement whatsoever, but simply a black rectangular hole leading through to the other half of the bisected cistern.
Dagan looked through and inhaled the musty air. He shone a torch into the darkness to look for the level of the floor. They had assumed that it would be lower, and that they would need a ladder to reach it, but he found instead that there was a shelf of rock only a few feet down. He pulled himself through, followed by Ya’acov, Asher and then Mordecai, who carried with him a powerful lamp attached by a cable to the circuits in the tunnel.
This revealed a large cavern, similar to other cisterns of the Roman era which Dagan had seen before. The shelf of rock upon which they were standing was around fifteen feet above the floor. Dagan called for a ladder which was passed through to them from the other side of the wall.
Ya’acov went down first, to make sure it was steady for his father. Dagan went next, followed by Mordecai with the lamp, trailing the cable behind him. Once on the floor, they looked up to see if there was an entrance to the cistern from above, then shone their torches around the wall to find the outlet from which water would have flowed to other cisterns beneath the Temple itself. It was only when he was standing on shingle which had collected at the lowest point, that Dagan noticed a large earthenware jar, cracked and lying on its side.
The jar was not unusual. Like the cistern, it was of a kind common to the period, used for storing olives or grain, with a wide neck and a tapered stem. It was too heavy to have been used to draw water from the cistern, and perhaps for that reason had been left there, submerged under the surface.
It did not seem of immediate interest, and while Ya’acov and Mordecai looked up at the roof of the cavern for places where they might plant their bugs, Dagan searched for the opening that would lead on through a conduit to the cisterns beneath the site of the Holy of Holies. It was only after he had found it, walled up from the other side with masonry from the Herodian period, that Dagan returned to the jar.
He knelt and peered in. The beam of his torch fell on what remained of a wooden lid about halfway down the jar. There was something beneath it, but he could not see what it was. If he moved the lid before spraying it, the wood would undoubtedly crumble. He asked Mordecai to fetch tape and a plastic sheet, intending to bind the jar to prevent it splitting open where it was cracked, and then remove it from the cistern to the laboratories at the Staedtler Institute.
It was Ya’acov who pointed out that it would be difficult to carry the jar up the ladder and through the hole in the wall without disturbing the contents. Dagan agreed, and when Mordecai returned they put the tape aside, unrolled the plastic onto the shingle, and gently lifted the jar onto the transparent sheet. Then, while Mordecai held the lamp, Ya’acov and Asher separated the two halves of the broken jar, lifting one off the other like the lid off a box.
Dagan crouched to examine the contents. ‘How curious,’ he said. He took a magnifying glass from his pocket, then knelt, and looked more closely. Ya’acov, Mordecai and Asher watched in silence. Then th
e Professor looked up. His face was pale. ‘Touch nothing,’ he said. ‘Leave everything exactly as it is. We must have a witness to this, another archaeologist; someone, above all, who is not a Jew.’
PART ONE
One
Among the world’s most celebrated archaeologists was a Catholic priest called John Lambert. He was a monk of the order of St Simon Doria, a community founded in the Middle Ages to copy the Bible onto parchment. It had evolved over the centuries into a body of celibate scholars who ran schools and universities all over the world. In France the Simonites rivalled the Dominicans, in America the Jesuits. In Britain they had been exiled at the time of the Reformation, and had only returned towards the end of the nineteenth century when invited by Cardinal Manning to found a Catholic university in London.
A site had been bought in the borough of Paddington, and the money raised to build a large Gothic church, and a monastery for fifty monks. When the idea of a university came to nothing, the Simonites built a school instead. Some of the pupils later joined the order, together with other English Catholics who had been educated elsewhere. By the early 1960s, the small group of Irishmen, Frenchmen and Germans who had brought the Simonites back to England had grown into a community of thirty or forty Englishmen, renowned for their scholarship and Papist zeal.
By far the most distinguished of these was Father Lambert. He had entered the monastery in Paddington as a young man but had spent little time in London. In the 1950s, he had studied under the French Dominican, Roland de Vaux, at the Ecole Biblique et Archéologique in Jerusalem. Later, he had taught at Tübingen, and for a time at the Simonites’ own Pater Noster University in Seattle. In 1969 he came back to Europe, to the Pontifical Biblical Institute in Rome, but only returned to England in 1975, as Professor of Archaeology at Huntingdon College, part of the University of London.
He was then aged forty – a tall, vigorous man with close-cropped hair, pale blue eyes, and skin that had grown tough and dark from the time he had spent digging under the burning sun. He was considered an ascetic by the other monks because he mortified his flesh in a way that was quite out of fashion. His expression was stern, and his manner remote, even forbidding. Few people called him John or even Father John: it was always Father Lambert. Yet, despite this austerity, he had a gentle manner; he was always kind; he was often funny. People crossed London when it was known that he was preaching, and his lectures at Huntingdon were so popular that they drew students from many different faculties, some of whom sat around the lectern like groupies at the concert of a pop musician.
His reputation went further than academic circles, and though several of the English Simonites were eminent in their fields, Father Lambert was the only one who could be described as a celebrity. He was often called upon for his opinion by the national press, and was invited to appear on television, but neither his fame, nor his dedication to uncovering the past, had ever distracted him from his obedience to his calling as a Catholic priest. He said mass every day, at an altar in a church or at a table in a tent; and when in London he would sit in the confessional for an hour every Saturday morning, waiting for penitents who rarely came.
Every summer he spent two months in Palestine, working on different excavations with Michal Dagan, a man he had known for twenty years and one of his closest friends. It was an unlikely friendship because Dagan was a committed Zionist and Father Lambert a Catholic of an uncompromising kind. Though each had always respected the other’s learning and skill, they would never have chosen to work together had cooperation not been forced upon them by political considerations. The Israelis unquestionably ruled Palestine, but some of the most important archaeological sites had been controlled by the Catholics since the time of the Crusades. It had therefore been thought politic for Professor Dagan to work with a Catholic and for Father Lambert to work with a Jew.
Though they shared an enthusiasm for uncovering the Palestinian past, each was inspired by a different vision. To Dagan, God had made a Covenant with the Jews which gave them Palestine. To Father Lambert, God had made a new Covenant with all who believed in Christ which gave them the kingdom of Heaven. Dagan wanted to inspire the disparate groups of modern Israelis, by rediscovering what the Romans destroyed, to make a nation fit for the coming of the Messiah. For Father Lambert the Messiah had already come: he wanted to unearth the stage upon which he had played out the drama of his life. Their convictions were incompatible; if the one was right, the other was wrong; but when men work and eat together, and sleep under the same stars, a bond is forged between them, and after twenty years they were now such close friends that Michal Dagan had sent his difficult daughter Anna to study under Father Lambert in London.
In early June of 1988, soon after the feast of Corpus Christi, Father Lambert was telephoned by Michal Dagan and asked to come at once to Jerusalem. To Lambert, it was an odd request. The term at Huntingdon College, where he lectured twice a week, was not over. In addition, he had to prepare a paper for the Congress of Biblical Archaeologists in Oxford in July, and attend meetings of the organizing committee. Dagan was coming to the Congress, and Father Lambert had planned to return with him to Israel for his usual season of excavation. This was known to Dagan, yet he insisted all the same that Father Lambert should drop everything and take the next flight to Tel Aviv.
Father Lambert agreed to go because he trusted Michal Dagan. He asked the permission of his Prior, Father Godfrey – a formality – and told his secretary at Huntingdon College to cancel his appointments and reserve a seat. To neither did he give the reason for his precipitate departure: this he confided only to Brother Andrew Nash, who was both a Simonite monk and one of his graduate students.
Andrew, at the age of twenty-eight, had almost completed his seven years’ probation as a member of the order. In six months’ time he was due to take his solemn vows and be ordained as a deacon. He was considered by the other monks to be a valuable addition to their number. There were few vocations to the priesthood, and intelligent young men usually went into better-known orders like the Jesuits, Dominicans or Benedictines.
What had drawn Andrew to the Simonites was the personality of Father Lambert himself. He had first seen him on the podium of a lecture hall at Huntingdon College at a time when Andrew was not even a Catholic, let alone a would-be priest. His father was an agnostic, his mother an atheist; and the Anglicanism he had been taught at school had been so bland that he had gone up to London University with no beliefs at all.
The influence of Father Lambert had overwhelmed Andrew. It was not just his lectures which had impressed him, but the way in which his ambitions soared above the mediocre values of the times. While every other member of the older generation, particularly his parents, seemed to pursue banal objectives – more money, a faster car, a better job, a new wife – Father Lambert had devoted his whole life to a striving for sanctity and a search for truth.
Other students who were impressed in this way did not go on to become Catholics, let alone monks in the Simonite order, and some of those who knew Andrew’s background felt that he had joined the Simonites only because he had found in Father Lambert a better father than the one nature had provided. It was also thought that perhaps the spectacle of his parents’ unhappy marriage had led Andrew to consider a celibate life – something some of the young women at Huntingdon had reason to regret, because he was both good-natured and good-looking, with shaggy black hair and rumpled clothes which, as a concession to his calling, were dark in colour – grey flannel trousers, say, with a black corduroy jacket or a black jersey, and a blue denim, open-necked shirt.
Some doubts had been expressed by the novice-master, in the early years of his novitiate, as to whether Andrew’s vocation was a genuine call from God, or the immature emulation of a man he inordinately admired. After he had graduated from Huntingdon, he had been sent to study theology at the Simonite house in Rome. He had returned as determined as ever to become a Simonite monk, and had been considered sufficiently mature
by the Prior both to proceed towards ordination, and to return to Huntingdon College as one of Father Lambert’s graduate students. It had also suited the community to assign him as an assistant to the man who was now the most distinguished member of their order. This was why Father Lambert had told him of the mystery surrounding his summons to Jerusalem, and why Andrew was impatient for his return.
He was due back on the Saturday morning – exactly a week after he had gone – but when Andrew came in on the Friday evening from Huntingdon College he was told by Gerry, the old Irish porter at the monastery, that Father Lambert had already returned.
‘When did he get in?’ asked Andrew.
‘This morning,’ said the Irishman, ‘and I can tell you, Brother, he looked terrible. I think I would say he was ill.’
‘He always gets jet-lag,’ said Andrew, ‘and he may not have slept much on the plane.’
‘Then you’d think he’d rest,’ said the porter, ‘but he was out again almost as soon as he came in, and then in and out, with hardly a cheerful word, which is very unlike the father.’
‘Is he here now?’
‘I think so, but I couldn’t be sure because I haven’t been at the door for most of the afternoon. They asked me to help them with moving the chairs down at Our Lady of Victories for the jumble sale, you know, which is tomorrow, so I went off with Father Godfrey’s blessing …’
Andrew left the porter talking, as he had learned to do over the past few years, and walked along the clammy tiles of the monastery hall to the broad stairs of polished wood. Polish was the prevalent aroma around the place, sometimes mixed with the scent of incense wafting in from the church after high mass on a Sunday. He climbed the stairs to the first floor and went to his room.
It was not yet dark outside, but his window was overshadowed on one side by the Gothic church and on the other by a wing of the monastery itself. He took out the books and papers from the Air France airline bag which he used as a briefcase. He then looked at his telephone, wondering whether he should ring Father Lambert’s room, or should assume that he was resting and wait to see him at supper.
On the Third Day Page 1