You knew this when you signed up, and no namby-pamby bleeding-heart left wing socialist political whore has the right to demand that you defy that oath. If you don’t have the courage to do what you know needs to be done, then you don’t deserve to wear that badge.
How many innocent Americans do we need to lose to deported illegals who come back to the US and go on to kill? Every politician who ordered you not to cooperate with federal authorities has blood on their hands.
You would never allow an American criminal to roam freely in your jurisdiction if another law enforcement agency asked you to hold them. Why is it different for illegal aliens? Why do these criminals have protections American criminals don’t? It’s absurd.
If you release him, you guarantee fellow officers or agents are going to be in harm’s way when they go out to find him.
To be clear, most are not talking about calling the illegal simply working in the fields, waiting tables, babysitting, or cleaning houses. We’re talking about criminals who pose a clear threat to American citizens.
So, what to do? You notify ICE as soon as you can. And I don’t care what you must do to get that done. If you must do it quietly, anonymously, behind closed doors, underground, through a special hotline, email, or carrier pigeon, damnit, just do it.
You instinctively understand danger. It’s in your DNA.
If you have an MS-13 gang member whose initiation you know requires that he beat somebody to death or rape someone in front of fellow gang members and you don’t tell ICE, you have blood on your hands.
Americans have the right to know when they are in danger. Why would you treat an illegal criminal different than an American criminal? Hell, maybe law-abiding states should clear out their prisons and send their own criminals to sanctuary states; since they’re open to taking other countries’ criminals, the least they can do is take ours. Think of the money we could save not jailing them.
Can’t you see that you’re being used in a political tug-of-war?
If this is a tough one for you and you are going to start listening to the ACLU or some LIBERAL mayor who doesn’t give a damn about you, your contract, or your oath, when they direct you to release the wanted criminal alien out the side door, then maybe you should rethink this and go into social work.
As of this writing, the state of California is locked in a legal fight with the United States of America, trying to defend its right to ignore federal law. Only they’re arguing from the opposite direction. Sure, they say, the federal government has jurisdiction over immigration, but in this case, we’re going to do everything we can to make it impossible for them to enforce it!
News flash: The United States Constitution’s Supremacy Clause can’t be set aside because California—or Colorado, New Mexico, Oregon, Illinois, Vermont, or the Queen of England—says it should be. That’s why it works. States do not get to make their own rules that fly in the face of our founding documents, so they can appease LIBERAL voters and ensure LIBERAL politicians stay in office for a few more terms. There’s a new sheriff in town, who actually cares about our founding principles and won’t stand by while they’re ignored and mocked.
“Democrats’ priority is to protect criminals, not to do what’s right for our country,” President Trump said recently. “My priority and the priority of my administration is to serve, protect, and defend the citizens of the United States.”1 Just as it should be, Mr. President.
But not everyone feels the same way, apparently.
LIBERAL Libby Schaaf is the Democratic mayor of Oakland, California. She’s one of the people currently involved in the lawsuit between California and the United States. In February 2018, she decided that the courts weren’t the only place that she and her state would go after lawful federal processes. She decided to send out a message to illegals herself. This message came in the form of a tweet—a public document, which will someday be admissible as evidence. The tweet warned that ICE was about to conduct an illegal immigration sweep throughout Northern California, including Oakland. She cried: The feds are coming; the feds are coming. The sweep, of course, was something ICE was well within its rights to do. The tweet foiled the operation, sent the immigrant community in that city into a panic, and left some eight hundred illegal immigrant criminals, including violent ones with violent felony convictions that include rape, domestic violence, pedophilia, larceny, burglary, and assault, on the streets.
Betrayal! She put her concerns for people who are in this country illegally, and who have committed crimes while here, ahead of the safety of the people of Oakland.2
ICE was able to detain 232 illegal immigrants over the four days after the mayor’s tweet. According to Tom Homan, the acting director of ICE, out of those 232, 115 had prior felony convictions of serious and violent offenses.
But the ones that got away are still out there. In the weeks that followed the tweet, at least three of those eight hundred illegal immigrants, who had criminal records that included drug possession, hit-and-runs, and spousal abuse, committed new serious crimes. One was a robbery with gun charges.
Being a law enforcement officer is already dangerous enough, giving the criminals a heads-up that cops are coming for you should be a jailable offense.
So, the question is, do we protect illegals, who flouted our laws to come here, who committed crimes while here, or law-abiding American citizens, who should be able to live safely without sanctioned criminals in their midst?
You can march, and you can hate, and you can demonize the forty-fifth president, but mayors like LIBERAL Bill de Blasio in New York, LIBERAL Rahm Emanuel in Chicago, and LIBERAL Libby Schaaf in Oakland, who say their policies only improve relations between the immigrant community and law enforcement, are now effectively removing law enforcement protection from American citizens and legal immigrants.
Proud To Be An American
Donald Trump has launched a new era in American history that will last for decades. It’s called “Americanism.” He is announcing our agenda of America First, the safety and security of her citizens, her allies, and her interests here and abroad. The LIBERAL Left—both here and across the globe—are doing everything they can to destroy both his vision and our way of life. We finally have a leader who understands the need to take care of us, to do what’s in America’s interest.
Our NATO so-called allies, acting like children refusing to leave Mommy’s and Daddy’s basement, should be on notice: they can no longer despise us, take advantage of us, and reap the benefits of our largesse. But like spoiled children, they continue to kick and scream. Thanks to Trump’s leadership, they are finally starting to pay their way.
My Own Cases Prove Sanctuary Cities Don’t Work
LIBERALS believe that if illegal immigrants don’t have to fear being found out and deported, they’ll be more likely to engage with the community or report crimes when they are victims or witnesses. It almost makes sense when you hear it for the first time.
But it doesn’t work. Thirty-two years as a prosecutor, judge, and DA, in a county of about a million, tells me that.
As evidence, consider a case handled by my office when I was DA. It involved two illegals:
The victim, José Martinez, was an illegal immigrant from Ecuador. He was a hardworking painter who was paid in cash every Friday. Almost every Friday, another illegal immigrant would assault him and steal his cash.
One day the other guy took a rock and smashed José’s head in, killing him. Like most homicide victims, I only ever knew him through the cold lens of the camera taking black and white autopsy photos. He was a small man with a big heart, who simply wanted to work and take care of his family.
Talking to José’s family was a real eye-opener for me. They told me José had been afraid for his life but was too scared to come forward. There is a law intended to provide the illegal victims a safe haven and to encourage illegals to report crimes. This provides the sanctuary wacky leftists think they’re creating. So, in order to protect “innocent” i
llegals we need to allow criminal illegals to roam freely to victimize citizens, legal aliens, and even other illegal aliens? That’s what José was afraid of. In his mind, Westchester was already a sanctuary the criminal illegal was free to roam.
Even if Westchester County was declared a “sanctuary county” and hung banners that said “You’re Safe, We Won’t Deport You” from every building in the county, José still wouldn’t have come forward. Declaring communities “sanctuary” for illegal aliens sends a message to criminals that they will be protected and you won’t.
When LIBERAL politicians enact laws protecting criminal illegals from deportation, all they’re doing is further excusing these people from the rule of law. They’re allowing criminal enclaves to form and fester, and giving rise to all the shady codes of honor that come along with them. Why, when you are illegal yourself, would you report another illegal immigrant for beating you up and robbing you when you know he’ll be right back on the street the next week, without fear of the police? Why would you say a word when the government can’t send a lowlife like this guy back to where he came from?
In order to get undocumented immigrants to cooperate with law enforcement, you don’t need a blanket sanctuary city. The law is already in place. It’s called a U visa. It’s intended to encourage illegals to report crimes and provide them and their families a safe haven in America. I used it as DA. If you’re illegal and you want to report a crime, this visa will protect you and give you and your family sanctuary from deportation. It’s already the law. So, in the end, sanctuary cities are nothing more than safe havens for criminal aliens and not their innocent victims, legal or illegal!
José Ines Garcia Zarate came to San Francisco, where he shot and killed Kate Steinle, because it was a sanctuary city. He knew he wouldn’t be deported—that he could continue his life of crime without fear of deportation or any substantial repercussions. And just to prove California is truly a sanctuary irrespective of any legislation, a jury acquitted him of murder in spite of conflicting statements about where he found the gun.
How many parents must lose their children?
And now, Mexico gets into the mix. They say that a wall and a crackdown on illegal immigrants is an affront to Mexico. They want us to have sanctuary cities.
Really?
So enough of this benign-sounding sanctuary city nonsense that protects criminals. At what point do we stop the killings and the violence? Why risk it all to protect criminal illegals? Who would it be okay to lose? Your son? Your mother? Or as Jim Steinle did, his daughter, who died in his arms after asking him to help her.
To all those mayors like De Blasio in New York, Eric Garcetti in Los Angeles, and Muriel Bowser in Washington, D.C., who say they won’t retreat from being sanctuary cities, my question to you is this: Who put you in office? Who did you take an oath to protect? Don’t you understand that the first order of government is the protection of its citizens? American citizens? That’s your job!
LIBERALS, you have a decision to make. Are you willing to lose federal dollars that help pay for the cops in your city, who protect American citizens and legal immigrants, just to resist the deportation of criminals who are here illegally? Because that is where this is going. You cannot continue to accept federal money for law enforcement while at the same time doing everything you can to undermine federal law.
Let me make one thing clear: we are all immigrants—except those of us who are Native American. But most of us came here under the rules. In fact, the happiest days for me as both district attorney and judge were when I welcomed newly naturalized citizens who worked hard to get here and pledged allegiance to our republic. But the concept of sanctuary cities is wrong—fundamentally flawed. Because of this mutinous refusal to follow federal law, you and your family are in real danger.
So, what to do? I’ll tell you what to do: enforce the law. If a city refuses to comply with federal warrants, they get no federal money. California gets $40 million a year to house criminal illegals until the feds pick them up. That’s our money. Don’t give me this “have a heart” nonsense! Americans are the most charitable, generous people on the face of the earth. But don’t you dare ask us to create a zone of lawlessness and ignore the murder of innocent victims, so some criminal here illegally won’t have to go home.
Don’t tell me I have to be welcoming to people who break the law to come here. It’s bad enough I must pay for their food, education, and medicine, but now I must bite my tongue and pretend to like it? I don’t think so.
I continue to believe a border wall is necessary, in whatever form it may ultimately take.
I want the wall, so we can know who is in our country.
I want the wall to prevent drugs from entering our country and our neighborhoods.
Most of all, I want the wall to protect American lives. Anyone in law enforcement, especially in states on the border, will tell you the border wall is imperative to the safety and well-being of our citizens. So is the enforcement of federal laws.
If you don’t believe me, ask Kate Steinle’s family.
CHAPTER SIX
Lying, Leaking, Liberal Leadership
If you want to understand the constitutional crisis and attempted coup unfolding before our eyes you must know how it originated. This plot against Donald Trump and every American who voted for him goes all the way to the top of the previous administration. It was conceived and planned at the top and executed by like-minded Deep Staters in law enforcement, the intelligence community, and their Swamp Party talking heads in the media. Allow me to introduce you to a few of the highest-ranking LIARS, LEAKERS, and LIBERALS involved in this scheme.
Pond Scum Brennan
I can only imagine the joy the Deep State experienced on Inauguration Day in 2009 when LIAR President Obama was sworn in. The intel community got a craven, malleable community organizer who would go along with their globalist plans as if he wrote them himself.
Right off the bat, Obama’s administration sent the message it could be talked into anything and was ready to work with anyone, regardless of the damage to our country. It all began with his “apology for being an American” speech in Cairo, Egypt, in January 2009—the first row filled with members of the Muslim Brotherhood, political arm of Hamas, picked by the Obama White House. The bottom line was Obama didn’t have the balls to stand up to anyone. He was famous for boiling down his lead-from-behind foreign policy with the phrase “Don’t do stupid shit!”
“If you can’t beat ’em, join ’em” would have been more appropriate.
As “luck” would have it, he found a guide, someone who knew the Swamp better than anyone else. And Obama wouldn’t have to compromise his far-left ideology to accept this person’s help. On the contrary, he might have to double down. His eventual CIA director and Swamp guide, John O. Brennan, had once voted for Communist Party nominee Gus Hall in a US presidential election.1 But that didn’t stop Brennan from rising through the ranks of the Central Intelligence Agency. Far from it.
Make no mistake: LIBERALS control the Deep State.
Writing for National Review a few years back, Fred Fleitz, a retired CIA analyst, wrote how LIBERALS had taken control of our intelligence agencies. According to Fleitz, who is vice president of the Center for Security Policy, a Washington think tank, the Clinton years were like a Petri dish for the politicization of the CIA. “The liberal tilt within the CIA, especially in the Directorate of Intelligence (the analysis office), grew worse during the Clinton years as personnel were hired and promoted to support Clinton-Gore policy objectives,”2 he wrote. Those policy objectives didn’t seem to include keeping the United States safe from Osama bin Laden.
By the time George W. Bush took office, Clinton’s petri dish had become a biohazard waste dump, and W didn’t help matters any by retaining Clinton’s CIA director, George Tenet. With the Clinton operatives burrowed in, the intelligence complex began to protect its liberal flanks. Fleitz cited several examples of the political maneuvering in
the agency, including a CIA officer in Bush’s inspector general’s office leaking classified information about Bush’s counterterrorism programs to the Washington Post, and intelligence officers trying to torpedo John Bolton’s nomination as UN ambassador.
Corruption in the intelligence community spread like mold. That’s what happens when no one’s looking.
The days after 9/11, when the country was still shaken and vulnerable, presented the opportunity a career spook like John O. Brennan, waits for his whole life. He was an old boy from an old boys’ club playing on the public’s fear to seize powers they had failed to persuade the country to give them in saner times. In the mid-2000s, LIAR Brennan was running counterterrorism operations for George W. Bush and likely dreaming about his chance to run the entire Swamp the way most kids dream of becoming astronauts.
Having crawled from under the same, far-left rock and then been elected president, LIAR Obama liked what he saw in LIAR Brennan and named him the head of his CIA. Brennan’s long and murky history in the intelligence complex made him the perfect reptile to work in Obama’s Swamp.
The Brennan-Obama CIA became not only the most careless in the agency’s history but the least transparent. It was Brennan’s CIA that spied on the Senate Intelligence Committee while that committee was investigating the CIA’s detention and interrogation program.3 Not only did it read senators’ emails; it sent a criminal referral to the Justice Department based on false information. So, the FBI was just following established Deep State protocol when it requested its FISA warrant to spy on the Trump campaign. In fact, the whole Russia-collusion delusion was cooked up to get a wiretap on the campaign.
By the time Brennan became CIA director, the post-9/11 American public had been relentlessly browbeaten into believing they had to give up their freedom for safety. To Congress and much of the public, the credibility of the CIA and NSA was unimpeachable. Exploiting this misplaced, blind trust, Brennan’s CIA wasn’t just a cloak-and-dagger outfit. It was looking for someone to stab in the back. Obama gave Brennan’s agency a million daggers and a black cloak with which to operate.
Liars, Leakers, and Liberals_The Case Against the Anti-Trump Conspiracy Page 7