Well, well. What a smooth answer. Only a judge can issue a surveillance warrant. But you knew that, didn’t you Kevin?
Why aren’t we making all those outraged liberals eat their words? They had painted Donald Trump as a lunatic, crazy, a guy wearing a tinfoil hat. He thinks they were tapping his wires, they snickered. Well, guess what? They were. So, he used the wrong word. The gist was right on. In our upside-down world you can attack someone for telling the truth and there is no consequence. Drives me nuts.
Lewis’s statement is misleading on its face. It’s the FISA court that permits the surveillance. It’s the Justice Department that asks the court to do it. The idea that LIAR Obama was somehow above the conspiracy against Donald Trump is hogwash. He has done much worse. Many believed Obama’s intelligence agencies listened in, and, in fact, recorded a phone call of Congressman Dennis Kucinich because he had the temerity to stand against Hillary’s failed war in Libya. So why would he have any compunction to listening in on Hillary’s opponent? To say Obama didn’t condone or instruct his Justice Department to petition the court for permission means either Lewis doesn’t know what he’s talking about, or he’s lying. Guess which one I think it is?
Obama has a history of asking courts to snoop on people. Ask my Fox News colleague James Rosen.
Rosen was the chief Washington correspondent for Fox News. In 2009, he broke a story that North Korea was about to respond to a UN Security Council resolution condemning their nuclear tests by testing a nuclear weapon. He got his information from a LEAKER in the State Department named Stephen Jin-Woo Kim.23 Obama’s Justice Department obtained a warrant from a federal judge deeming Rosen a “criminal co-conspirator” and a flight risk. Armed with the warrant, they captured his phone records, his emails from two accounts, and tracked him by phone traces. Even the New York Times, and the Washington Post condemned the feds for the action.
He also had a history of manipulating intelligence for political purposes. Just ask General Lloyd J. Austin III, CENTCOM commander, who oversaw a whitewash of Obama’s war against ISIS by painting it in a positive way. Guess what? Obama’s war wasn’t going in a positive way.
The truth is, the Obama administration was so desperate to keep Donald Trump from being elected that his Justice Department, prodded by his CIA chief John O. Brennan, misled the most secret court of the United States. The goal was simple: spy on the Trump campaign to undermine a presidential election. Members of the highest echelon in Obama’s FBI, CIA, and Department of Justice, all conspired to prevent an outsider from breaking the establishment’s stranglehold on the American people.
They used a dossier of lies, paid for by a major political party, the Democratic National Committee, and a presidential candidate, Hillary Rodham Clinton, and even the FBI, to dupe the court! But based on text messages later found between FBI agent Peter Strzok and his girlfriend Lisa Page, they wanted to forum shop for their favorite judge, Rudolph Contreras, plotting their move under the pretense of a dinner party to get their warrant. They swore to facts they knew were lies to get what they wanted to surveil a candidate they could not imagine being president. So was the FISA court duped, or was it complicit with the fraud?
The top echelon of our intelligence agencies, whose salaries we pay, decided we didn’t deserve a free and fair election!
Why isn’t this the biggest scandal in America today? Why isn’t a sitting president’s use of national security surveillance against a candidate from the opposite party in a presidential election at least as big as Watergate?
The answer is: it is!
Furthermore, former president Obama knew all along what Russia was up to. He didn’t do anything because he, and the establishment pollsters, thought Hillary would win. He tells us, though, that he met with Putin and told him to “knock it off.” Picture this visual: Putin, bare chested, riding his horse and Obama riding a bicycle with his helmet on. Do you think Putin was scared? Do you even believe Obama said it?
It was only after the election that he imposed sanctions on Russia. Why not before? Maybe because it’s he who had the cozy relationship with Vladimir Putin, and not Donald Trump? Let’s look at the facts. Fact: in 2009, it was Obama’s vice president Joe Biden who first expressed the president’s wish to press “the reset button” on the US’s relationship with Russia. It was Obama’s secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, who met with the Russian foreign minister in Geneva where together they pushed a symbolic button on which reset was printed in both English and Russian. It didn’t matter that Obama’s advance team, or whoever oversaw the details, misspelled the Russian word for reset and instead used one that meant overload. Everybody just got a big laugh about it because it was Obama who wanted to make nice with the Russian bear.
Fact: It was Obama who was overheard speaking to Russian president Medvedev asking for time with missile defense and, in that famous hot mic, moment saying “This is my last election. After my election, I have more flexibility.”
Fact: It was under Obama’s watch when 20 percent of our uranium was sold to Putin with a $145 million kickback to the Clinton Foundation and a $500,000 speech fee paid to Bill by a Kremlin-connected company.
Fact: It was Obama who put Putin in charge of overseeing the elimination of chemical weapons in Syria. Putin pressured Obama to let him handle the situation for his ally, Assad, and Obama caved. Putting the fox in charge of the henhouse clearly failed since chemical weapon elimination deadlines were missed repeatedly. You remember that? A line in the supermarket was taken more seriously than Obama’s line in the sand.
Fact: It was Obama who watched like a Cheshire cat as Russia invaded and annexed Ukraine and the Crimea Peninsula in 2014. He knew what was happening.
Fact: Long before she met with Don Jr., it was Obama’s DOJ that let the Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya into the United States, without a visa, using a legal loophole called “extraordinary circumstances.” Then, Obama’s administration then allowed her to then sit in the front row of a congressional hearing!
So, who’s Russia’s pal? Donald Trump or you, Mr. Former President?
The facts speak for themselves. The witch hunt and false narrative put forth by the Swamp’s propaganda machine has turned the truth on its head. The United States president who had the coziest relationship with Vladimir Putin is not the one in the Oval Office today, it’s good old Mr. Former President, smooth-talking Barack, who pulled the wool over the eyes of all his fawning liberal lambs.
Obama is the best evidence that the Democrat Party who expects and relies on the African-American and Latino vote, does nothing for them.
As we go to print, while every major media source is busy fantasizing about a Trump-Russia collusion, under Trump’s administration, African-American unemployment rates are at an historic all-time low.
As a presidential candidate, Trump had anticipated he could do as much when he told African-American voters, “What do you have to lose?”
In August 2015, even before the first Republican primary debate, Trump was calling out Obama for his poor record on helping African Americans.
In an interview with ABC’s Jonathan Karl, Trump said, “(Obama) has done nothing for African Americans. You look at what’s gone on with their income levels. You look at what’s gone on with their youth. I thought that he would be a great cheerleader for this country. I thought he’d do a fabulous job for the African-American citizens of this country. He has done nothing.” I agree.
Just eighteen months into his presidency, Trump accomplished what Obama couldn’t do in two terms: provided concrete proof that African-Americans are legitimately better off under the Trump presidency.
The Real Deplorables: Crooked Hillary and Lying Bill
Any case against an anti-Trump conspiracy must include the high priestess of the Deep State, LIAR Hillary Clinton.
In January 2018, I took a camera crew to Chappaqua, New York, in search of Hillary. You might have seen the segment on my show Justice with Judge Jeanine. In it, I
stand at the edge of the woods that surround the quaint town yelling her name. I peek into a local dry cleaner asking whether she ever comes in and gets her famous pantsuits cleaned. It’s good for a chuckle, anyway.
No, I didn’t find her. I wasn’t expecting to. If she weren’t so good at keeping herself out of the spotlight when she has to, she’d have been thrown in jail a long time ago. Still, in her own hometown, we thought there’d be a chance of getting some good interviews with people who know her. But none of the businesses we stopped at, from pizza parlors to nail salons, had seen any sign of her for months. As the owner of a bookstore told me, she rarely came into town anymore. While Bill would stop at the store and look around quite often, Hillary usually ordered her books—and I bet her white wine—by phone. She would then send someone into town to pick them up.
Her reluctance to come into town and mingle with the hardworking Americans who run the shops there shouldn’t surprise you. She’s a Clinton, after all. And Clintons don’t leave the house for less than $250,000 per trip. They figure if you’re going to talk to people, you might as well get paid for it.
Nice work if you can get it, right? Bill has been doing it for years and making big piles of cash for his time. It’s no surprise that Hillary has decided to do the same thing. You would think that being the most famous loser in the world wouldn’t look as good on an event program as “former president.” Yet, Hillary has made it work for herself. She’s still cashing plenty of checks on her “Boohoo Tour.”
Since losing the election in the worst upset in American electoral history, Hillary Clinton has given over fifty paid speeches blaming just about everyone she can think of for the loss except, of course, herself.
The sad truth of the matter is that she’s got a captive audience. There’s a whole group of whiners who haven’t gotten over the fact that Donald J. Trump won the presidency of the United States fair and square. They don’t like that he’s securing our borders, making trade fairer for Americans, lowering unemployment, boosting the economy, lowering taxes, putting North Korea on its knees and creating a strategy together in the Middle East. They just want someone to blame, and Hillary, as always, is happy to provide.
For instance, she made a speech at the India Today Conclave, which was held in Mumbai just a few weeks prior to this writing. If you thought her “basket of deplorables” remark during the 2016 presidential campaign was bad, get a load of this. I call it the “basket of deplorables, part two.” LIAR Hillary, it seems, just can’t help herself. In Mumbai she continued to call Trump supporters misogynists, racists, and immigrant-haters.
“And his whole campaign—Make America Great Again—was looking backward,” she said. “You didn’t like black people getting rights; you don’t like women, you know, getting jobs; you don’t want to, you know, see that Indian American succeeding more than you are—you know, whatever your problem is, I’m going to solve it.”
While the audacity of Hillary Clinton never truly surprises me anymore—trying to list all the lies that leave this woman’s mouth is like trying to count the snowflakes in a Buffalo blizzard.
Trump supporters don’t like women getting jobs? Really? Why doesn’t she tell that to Kellyanne Conway, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Betsy DeVos, Gina Haspel, Nikki Haley, and Seema Verma—both of whom are, ironically, of Indian descent. How about the millions of women who voted for Trump? The ones who must have real jobs to support their families because no one’s going to pay them hundreds of thousands of dollars to babble on stage?
When I first ran for county judge in 1989, my critics said, “We can’t have a woman county judge. She won’t be strong enough to sentence people!” That made me laugh. What a joke. The people who said that obviously hadn’t met me. Still, I held a press conference where I assured voters I had the intestinal fortitude to sentence anyone to life. What they didn’t know was that I had the fortitude to sentence a man to death. I made history in Westchester when I was elected the first woman county judge. My being a mother of two babies was proof of my incompetence to some of my peers.
“You can’t be a judge and a good mother,” one guy said to me. He was wrong.
I was a duty judge, meaning I was on call 24/7. During the week of Christmas, I was called in to work and I didn’t have a babysitter. So, I took my toddler son Alex, to court with me and hid him under my bench while I arraigned a shackled out-of-state murder defendant. I thought I had gotten away with it until he started yelling, “Mommy, it’s dark!” Moms do what they have to do.
In 1993, the first time I ran for DA, the concern wasn’t about my credentials and whether I had the fortitude to do the job. It was about who would take care of my little kids if I couldn’t get home at night. Al, my husband at the time, and I had to issue a statement that if I couldn’t get home at night, he would watch the kids.
The guy I was running against, Michael Cherkasky, had three kids, and his wife was pregnant with their fourth. I only had two! No one ever asked him about who would be watching his kids! It was ridiculous, but it was classic. I was never a bra burner or ballistic about that stuff; it was just the way things were and I had to work within that context. My job was to be at least as good as any guy and just get it done, and I did.
Hillary says Trump supporters don’t like working women. Let her say that to my face. Hillary also floated the notion that white women only voted for Donald Trump because their husbands told them to. I don’t know about you, but the day a man tells me how I’m going to cast my vote is the day I’m dead. But maybe things are different in the Clinton household. There, when your husband tells you to go dig up dirt on the women he’s been running around with behind your back, you do it. You even set up a war room in the White House for it.
In Mumbai, LIAR Hillary wasn’t finished. She also called all Trump voters—wait for it—slackers. Yup, good-for-nothing, lazy slobs. That’s what half of America is to Hillary. This coming from a woman who wouldn’t get off her ass to go to Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin when she needed to in the last weeks of the campaign, and ended up losing all three states. She couldn’t find Wisconsin on a map, and neither could any of the “brilliant” political operatives to whom she was paying six-figure salaries to run the campaign while she spewed her hate. But she never really cared about Wisconsin or the other states in what she and the other liberal elites consider “flyover country.”
“If you look at the map of the United States, there’s all that red in the middle where Trump won,” Clinton said. “I win the coast. I win, you know, Illinois and Minnesota—places like that. But what the map doesn’t show you is that I won the places that represent two-thirds of America’s gross domestic product. I won the places that are optimistic, diverse, dynamic, moving forward.”
She wears her disdain for the heartland of America as a badge of honor.
Hillary, if you really want to know what happened, here’s a hint: he won, you lost! You lost because you were a lousy candidate, you didn’t have a message, and you lied just about every time you opened your mouth. You put our national security at risk with your email setup, and ran a foundation that was nothing more than an organized “pay to play” enterprise parading as a charity. Four men died in the attack in Benghazi under your watch as you lied about what caused it.
I could go on, but my readers might have something to do next Thursday. Stop with the poor me nonsense, Hillary. We’ve had it with you Clintons, always claiming victimhood. You say you take absolute personal responsibility? Well how does that square with blaming everyone, including just about all Middle America? The truth is you’re damn lucky you’re not in jail wearing a cheaper version of one of your pantsuits.
And you say it’s a painful process, reliving the campaign. Think about the rest of us! Since as far back as we can remember, we had to watch you go from one lie to the next. I know how you operate from firsthand experience.
Allow me to enter a bit of background: it was 2005 and I was just finishing up my third term as district
attorney in Westchester County. During my time as DA, I ran an office that prosecuted virtually every type of criminal: robbers, rapists, murderers, drug dealers, mobsters, and cyber criminals. When it came to domestic violence abuse and sex offenders, I was relentless.
It’s the way I’ve always been, and the way I’ll remain. I go with my gut. Always have. I’ve lived by that my entire life, with one exception: when I agreed at the insistence of the Republican Party to run against Hillary for US senator in New York.
That wasn’t my first rodeo—I’d campaigned before—but it was the first time I’d run against a political machine like the Clintons. Let me refresh your memory. Hillary was running for the junior US Senate seat in New York State. Bill and Hillary had slipped into the leafy town of Chappaqua in 1999, just in time to qualify for her first run in 2000. But this was 2005, and Hillary was up for reelection even though she had no plans to stay a senator for long. Oh, no. She already had her carpetbags packed for her 2008 run for the White House. Becoming a senator was just a stepping-stone. For the record, I was born and raised in the upstate city of Elmira, New York. There I worked on a dairy farm while going to school.
I wasn’t completely naive. I knew what I was in for. People always attack you when you run for office; if you don’t have thick skin you should get the hell out of the race. But it was different running against Hillary. Suddenly, there were things that the press attributed to me that were just lies.
Early in my campaign, we visited a farm. When we were leaving, one of my staffers handed me an article about the visit. That article had been written ahead of time! Most of the “facts” in the story weren’t true. Although I didn’t understand what it was at the time, I came to find out that it was Fake News with—surprise, surprise—Hillary Clinton’s gang orchestrating the whole thing.
When I got home from the farm that night, I was a bit shell-shocked. My boots were clean, but it still felt like I had stepped in crap. I’d spent my life as DA. I’d grown accustomed to truth and justice. This is what happened, these are the facts. What good were facts in the world of national politics?
Liars, Leakers, and Liberals_The Case Against the Anti-Trump Conspiracy Page 10