Liars, Leakers, and Liberals_The Case Against the Anti-Trump Conspiracy

by Jeanine Pirro

  That night, I knew I couldn’t finish the race. Politics with the Clintons in the picture became all about lies and smears. The message didn’t matter, and neither did integrity. That’s not a game I was willing to play. It still isn’t. Later, a former Clinton adviser told me Hillary had me in her sights since I was a native New Yorker and rising Republican star with a record of accomplishment. He told me she’s a powerful enemy to have.

  But, I’ll give you this, Hillary. You did say one thing in that Mumbai speech that had some merit. When someone asked whether Vladimir Putin might “have something” on Donald Trump, a question that is right out of the liberal conspiracy textbook, you gave the India Today Conclave this response: “Follow the money,” you said.24

  Why, Hillary, I thought you’d never ask.

  As of this writing, the hardworking men and women at the FBI (and not their politicized bosses) are investigating the Clinton Foundation. What are they looking for? Donations to the Clinton Foundation that directly influenced official actions taken by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.25

  The old pay-to-play scheme. It’s as old as politics itself. Money goes in, favors and contracts come out.

  A ruthless, profit-driven woman, LIAR Hillary’s attempted ascension to the presidency was all about money and power. Underneath those pantsuits were pure corruption, crookedness, and a callous disregard for morality. She covered for her sexual predator husband and her sexual predator financial supporters in that den of inequity known as Hollywood. She hated anyone in the economic class beneath her. And, she headed an organized pay-to-play enterprise parading as a 501(c)(3) charity known as the Clinton Foundation.

  How big of a crime are we talking about? Well, ask yourself this: How do two people who start with nothing, without a business, without a product, without any practical business expertise, amass a fortune worth hundreds of millions of dollars? How do you go from dead broke to rolling in dough while working in government? I’ll tell you how: you use your position and power to engage in a give and take.

  Since the day it filed for tax-exempt status with the Internal Revenue Service—don’t get me started on those wackadoos—the Clinton Foundation has been little more than the world’s biggest superstore for political favors and under-the-table deals. Foreign heads of state, some of whom are antagonists to the United States, make donations, and in return, they get all the power and influence that comes with being a former president of the United States or secretary of state. And because these are donations to charity, which for Americans are tax deductible under the Internal Revenue Code, the amounts are much larger than your typical campaign contribution. It’s a simple arrangement, when you think about it. But it’s also easy to screw up. That’s why most amateur politicians who try it get caught.

  Take LIAR Hillary’s buddy Bill de Blasio, for example. He’s been taking contributions for favors for years, and now he can’t get through a press conference without some reporter asking about it.26 When they write his obituary, just under the line about how he caved to liberal pressure on sanctuary cities and gave safe harbor to illegal criminals, you’d better believe there’s going to be a section on the widespread corruption he brought back to New York City politics.

  But Bill and Hillary Clinton are more cunning than that. They’re lawyers, and they know how to tiptoe through a legal minefield. Together, they’ve managed to operate their foundation on the very edge of legality, offering only the briefest glimpses into the operation underneath.

  One of these glimpses came when Anheuser-Busch donated just over a million dollars to the Clintons. According to Peter Schweizer’s explosive book, Clinton Cash, the beer giant gave the money to the Clinton library, and then watch President Bill Clinton, who was just a few months from leaving office, drop a bill that would have regulated beer advertising that targeted minors. Interesting timing, huh? Another of Schweizer’s revelations told about Secretary Hillary Clinton’s failure in 2007 to impose the strictures of a law called the Congo Relief, Security, and Democracy Prevention Act, which would have taken a Marxist dictator in Africa out of power. This wouldn’t have been interesting—secretaries of state fail to impose the law all the time; just look at Benghazi—if it weren’t for a $100 million donation to the Clinton Foundation that had come through a few months before. The donation had come from Lukas Lundin, who ran a corrupt mining company in the Congo, and needed the dictator to stay in power if he was going to keep his business running. So, he slipped a hundred million bucks to the Clinton Foundation, and Hillary decided to abandon the legislation—which, by the way, she had supported just a few months before the donation went through.

  It’s impossible to know how many other actions Clinton failed to take or how many shady deals she cut because of big donations just like that one. We can only hope that the FBI is allowed to do its job, far from the political biases of its top brass and find out.

  Here’s one more Schweizer unearthed: in 1998, when India conducted illegal tests of nuclear weapons, shocking the world and flagrantly violating the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, Bill Clinton imposed economic sanctions. They remained in place until well into Barack Obama’s first term. To combat these sanctions, the Indian government sent scores of lobbyists to the United States throughout the early 2000s. Officials in New Delhi also encouraged all influential Indians in the US who would listen to affiliate strongly with the Democrat Party. As a result, millions of dollars in cash donations flowed into the Clinton Foundation’s bank account. Suddenly, just a few months after Hillary Clinton had been named secretary of state, those sanctions were gone. She became a vocal supporter of ending sanctions on the country and played a large part in lifting them.

  Bill and Hillary Clinton, two people who once had a remarkably tense relationship with India, were now being honored at dinners in that country and seeing their friends get “person of the year” awards in front of huge Indian crowds. It’s amazing what a few million dollars in cash will do.

  And as just mentioned, Hillary still stops by India on occasion to give a speech and pick up an extra few bucks. Any place that’s given up that much cash is worth another hit every once in a while, I guess. This woman does not even have the decency to commit crimes and then stay away from her accomplices like a good criminal. Instead, she throws her criminality in our faces, knowing that no federal prosecutor in the country would ever make a move and indict her. Especially not Jefferson Beauregard Sessions.

  There is a pattern with the Clintons always walking the line. Remember the Whitewater papers and the Rose Law Firm scandal? How about giving a pardon to Marc Rich after Denise Rich raised a fortune for the Clintons? (Oh, and before I forget, I was so sad to see Denise denounce her American citizenship.)

  Let’s look at more recent manifestations of this “enough is never enough” playbook. Let’s start with Uranium One and the Iran deals. Both deals set the stage for an unbelievable sale of 20 percent of the US supply of uranium to Russia. Unfortunately, Iran—Russia’s puppet state—will receive highly enriched uranium, used to make nuclear bombs, under the guise that it will use it for submarines and the production of radioactive isotopes, used to treat diseases like cancer.

  Who else but LIAR Hillary Clinton could have talked the State Department into approving a deal that sent 20 percent of America’s weapons-grade uranium to a state-sponsored company in Russia—a country, by the way, which has just announced a frighteningly revamped nuclear weapons program, built using uranium? Who else would have had the insane belief that she’d never get caught?

  If you’ve watched my show you know how angry I am about this. And if you don’t watch my show (I won’t hold it against you), here’s why I’m mad: uranium is essential to make molybdenum-99 (Mo-99). Better known as Moly-99, this isotope is used in medical nuclear imaging. Moly-99 is one of the most important weapons we have in the fight against cancer; often, it’s how doctors detect cancer, as well as diabetes and heart disease, early enough to save a patient�
�s life. I know all about Moly-99, because for me it’s personal.

  In 2012, I was diagnosed with cancer. I didn’t talk about it. Even now, I try to avoid talking about it. I continued to do my show every week as if nothing were wrong. Toward the end, as the chemotherapy and radiation treatments progressed, I was on air talking to my audience as usual, but I was exhausted. I didn’t have my eyebrows or my eyelashes. I was wearing a wig because I was bald. Like too many who’ve battled cancer, my doctor’s initial diagnosis was confirmed thanks to nuclear imaging, That imaging and the medical isotopes used to treat disease are made from uranium. It is uranium that saved my life and countless others. But do we have enough uranium?

  It seems like the Department of Energy has sipped the Obama Kool-Aid on the domestic production of Moly-99. There is no domestic production of Moly-99 as required by the American Medical Isotopes Production Act of 2012. When I spoke to the president about this, he had been advised by the Swamp, presumably by DOE Obama holdovers, that there is plenty of the life-saving isotope. Notwithstanding, there are shortages reported by US hospitals while Russia has positioned Iran as the world producer.

  On its face, the Uranium One deal stunk. Not only were we off-loading one-fifth of the raw material used for life-saving medical work, we were sending weapons-grade uranium to a sworn enemy—Russia.

  The Clintons’ involvement in Uranium One goes all the way back to 2005. It was then that Bill Clinton met a man named Frank Giustra who wanted to buy uranium mines in Kazakhstan, a country that has 20 percent of the world’s supply of uranium. Clinton, who barely knew Giustra then, traveled with him to visit the president of Kazakhstan. Two days later, Giustra signed contracts that made him a partner in three of Kazakhstan’s uranium mines. Soon after, Giustra “donated” $31 million to the Clinton Foundation. A year later, Giustra sold his stake in the mines to a company called Uranium One. When the deal closed, he gave the Clintons another $100 million.27 Later, in 2010, the Chairman of Uranium One donated millions to the foundation, and Bill got $500,000 from a Russian bank for a twenty-minute speech.

  The Clintons’ influence peddling is massive—global in scale. Hillary set American foreign policy to coincide with the flow of hundreds of millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation. Bill was the fixer or bagman for the foundation.

  Try to find a real audit of this alleged charitable foundation. Good luck, because there isn’t one. This is astounding when you think of the money the Clinton Foundation spends on expenses, salaries, and airfare for mostly Clinton comrades and former Clinton campaign members.

  On November 14, 2017, Newsweek published an article titled: “Fox Host Told Trump to Appoint Special Counsel to Investigate Clinton at Private Meeting with President.” Here’s what they wrote:

  “Fox News host Jeanine Pirro told Donald Trump he should appoint a special counsel to investigate Hillary Clinton during a private meeting in the Oval Office.” Even though they had their facts wrong (no surprise there)—I’m keenly aware that a president doesn’t appoint a special counsel, the attorney general does—the reporter did manage to capture the essence of what happened.

  “At the November 1 meeting between Trump and Pirro, the TV host also hit out at Attorney General Jeff Sessions for failing to investigate the former secretary of state, including her role in the Uranium One deal,” the New York Times reported.

  “Shortly after the conversation Pirro and Trump had in the Oval Office, Sessions announced the Department of Justice would be looking to ‘evaluate certain issues’ outlined by Republicans, including the Uranium One deal.”28

  The House Judiciary Committee had already requested the Justice Department appoint a special counsel to investigate these matters. Under their chairman, Bob Goodlatte, R-VA, they made this request, twice, on July 27, 2017, and again on September 26, 2017. They never got a response.

  Then, I had my meeting with the president on November 1, 2017, when Jeff Sessions was due to give testimony to the committee, and “suddenly” he acquiesces.

  In other words, it took a lot of pressure for Sessions to even consider a special counsel was merited. What exactly is so difficult to understand here, Jeff? How many more fact patterns do you need to see? You certainly figured out quickly that you needed to recuse yourself from Russia, when all you did was sit across the table from a guy you barely knew, but you can’t figure out whether we need to look at the selling of our uranium to a foreign government?

  When Sessions did finally cave in and agree to investigate Uranium One, he said, “I’ll have my smartest lawyers take a look.” That’s nice talk, but a second-grader could make this case. And meanwhile, it’s July 2018, and LIAR Hillary is still out there and thumbing her nose at all of us.

  Now she’s out raising money to fund the “Resistance” and smugly thinking she’s gotten away with everything.

  CHAPTER SEVEN

  Lying, Leaking, Liberal Law Enforcement

  Of all the elements of the coordinated attack against our president, perhaps the part that infuriates me the most is the corruption that exists at the top in federal law enforcement. They did the lying, leaking, and spying necessary to cook up the dishonest investigation of nonexistent collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government. In addition to amounting to a coup attempt against the president, their actions represent a betrayal of all the men and women who dedicate their lives to fighting crime.

  Clean House at the FBI

  The FBI needs a complete overhaul. A complete cleansing. Cut off its head. When a company in the private sector stops serving its shareholders or is tainted by politics, the board of directors fires the CEO. Sometimes the shareholders fire the board of directors and the CEO. That’s what needs to happen at this government agency, whose leadership has become so corrupt and politicized that it has rendered the agency completely incapable of performing its core functions.

  Gone are Director James Comey, Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, General Counsel James Baker, FBI Chief of Staff James Rybicki, Assistant Director of Public Affairs Michael Kortan, and Lisa Page, FBI attorney and love interest of Peter Strzok (who has been demoted). The upper echelon of the FBI has become ground zero for LIARS, LEAKERS, and LIBERALS. Perhaps at no time and place in US history has this much lying and leaking occurred in so short a time, all for one nefarious purpose: to whitewash Hillary Clinton, nullify the election of Donald Trump, and see that nothing the voters elected Trump to do ever gets done. This is the Deep State and the heart of the Swamp; and it’s a heart of darkness.

  FBI agents, some of whom are on the Mueller special counsel team, chase Russians to create a nonexistent Trump-Russia collusion narrative and work the fake Hillary email investigation—or should I say “matter”?—while ignoring credible tips loaded with probable cause. As Peter Strzok and Lisa Page carry on their affair, thinking they’re going to change the course of history, Andrew McCabe, handling both the Clinton “matter” and the Trump “case,” collects hundreds of thousands of dollars from a Clinton political ally for his wife Jill’s campaign. Meanwhile, real justice is thwarted.

  The FBI made several major errors, many on James Comey’s watch. Jim, were you too busy trying to concoct a Russia collusion case? You screwed up the Boston Marathon bombers’ case. Four people died, and many others lost limbs or eyesight, thanks to your BS excuse that the threat wasn’t specific enough. The Fort Hood massacre, the Orlando Pulse nightclub shooting, the San Bernardino massacre, and the attacks of 9/11 are all among FBI spectacular failures.1 You were involved in most of them. But you’re so territorial, so selfish, so politicized, so focused on headlines, so full of yourself that you refused even to share information with other agencies.

  It’s not as though the Parkland, FL school shooting was the first time the FBI failed to prevent a mass shooting by an unstable person it had already investigated. It investigated Pulse nightclub shooter Omar Mateen prior to his mass shooting, with similar results. And just as in Nikolas Cruz’s case, the FBI had multipl
e warnings Mateen was dangerous and likely to harm others. For heaven’s sake, even his mosque had told the FBI he was dangerous!2

  All of this seemed to have slipped LIAR Jim Comey’s mind when he was questioned about the FBI’s previous investigations of Omar Mateen, going back years before the shooting. All we got from Comey was the usual set of excuses for why an obvious threat was ignored while the agency was busy rummaging around for Russians.

  The New York Times says that even pervert Dr. Larry Nassar was on Comey’s radar almost three years ago.3 And what did Comey do? Nothing. Whom did he notify? No one. As a result, an estimated forty more young women were victimized by Nassar. And when confronted with this atrocity and blatant disregard for our children, the FBI public relations team said, “The safety and well-being of our youth is a top priority.”

  Of course, there are good men and women in the FBI; I have worked with a lot of them. But they’re marginalized; they’re not advanced. The power is in the clique at the top. It was FBI leadership that handled the Hillary “matter,” not the field offices. This FBI has been stained and politicized by Comey.

  It’s time to stop this charade. It’s time to return the FBI to its original mission.

  In March 2018, FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe turned over notes he had kept on President Trump to Robert Mueller, just hours after he was officially fired from the FBI.4 He then claimed “victim status,” claiming his downfall was the result of a series of attacks designed to undermine his credibility and reputation.

  Andy, I don’t know how to break this to you, but the only reason you’re even in the news is because you’re a LIAR. And when you lie under oath or even to the FBI when not under oath, you’ve committed a crime, whether you’re convicted or not.