How the Mighty Fall_And Why Some Companies Never Give In

Home > Other > How the Mighty Fall_And Why Some Companies Never Give In > Page 19
How the Mighty Fall_And Why Some Companies Never Give In Page 19

by Jim Collins

Stage 2 in, 152

  stock price of, 52

  success-contrast candidates, 140

  and Vioxx, 51–53

  vision of, 53

  Merck, George II, 53, 54

  Merrill Lynch, xiv, 76

  missionary zeal, 148

  Morton Thiokol, 71–73

  motivation, 160

  Motorola, 8, 14, 128, 133

  arrogant neglect in, 29–30

  cultural shift in, 28–29, 152

  denial of risk, 65–68

  founding culture of, 28, 54

  and General Instruments, 92–93

  IBM contrast with, 140, 152

  and Iridium, 66–68, 70, 152

  jobs lost in, 29

  patent productivity in, 47

  Six Sigma at, 28, 152

  Stage 1 in, 27–30

  Stage 2 in, 152

  Stage 4 in, 157

  StarTAC cell phone, 28–29

  stock returns in, 30

  success-contrast candidates, 140

  TI contrast with, 92–94, 140, 141

  and undisciplined growth, 54

  and Zenith, 140, 141

  Mount Everest, 66, 118–19

  Mulcahy, Anne, 113–16

  NASA, 71–73

  NationsBank, 7, 14

  negative, discounting, 81

  negative inflection, 131

  neglect, arrogant, 29–36

  Nero, Roman Emperor, 59

  Newell Corporation, 49, 158

  Newsweek, 115

  Nordstrom, 128, 132

  core concept of, 175, 176–77

  culture of discipline in, 175–76, 176

  customer service in, 174, 175, 176–77

  decline and recovery case, 116, 117, 173–77, 173

  inverted-pyramid structure in, 174

  level 5 leadership in, 174

  right people in key seats, 174–75

  rule book of, 176

  Nordstrom, Blake W., 173, 174–76

  Norton, 128, 131

  Nucor, 128, 133

  acquisitions of, 172

  benchmarking in, 172

  confront brutal facts, 169–70

  consistency, 171

  core values, 171–72

  culture of discipline, 170–71

  customer focus of, 172

  decline and recovery case, 116, 117, 167–72, 167

  hedgehog concept, 170

  level 5 leadership in, 168–69

  right people in key seats, 169

  Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO), 146

  overreaching, 39, 46–50, 53, 61, 68

  Pacific Southwest Airlines, 17

  Packard, David, 54, 86

  Packard’s Law, breaking, 55–58

  Pandit, Vikram, 144–45

  panic, 96–99, 100

  passion, 160

  Pearlman, Jerry, 109–10

  performance divergence, 137–38

  performance fit, 137

  Peters, Thomas J., and Waterman, Robert H., Jr., In Search of Excellence, 118

  Pfizer, 128, 132, 140

  Philip Morris, 128, 132

  Picasso, Pablo, 36

  Pitney Bowes, 116, 128, 141

  Platt, Lew, 83–84, 151

  Porras, Jerry, 148, 179

  Porter, Michael E., 118

  positive, amplification of, 81

  power:

  and personal interests above organizational interests, 64

  succession of, see succession

  primary flywheel (core business), 32–34, 35, 43, 182

  Procter & Gamble (P&G), 25, 79, 105, 128, 132, 153

  public corporations, pressure on, 54

  Radio Shack, 139

  RCA, 108

  recovery, 25, 113–18, 120

  reorganization, obsessive, 79–80, 81, 91, 105, 158

  research process, 13–19

  candidacy criterion, 129–31

  companies in recovery, 14–15

  contrast methodology, 135

  correlations vs. causes, 16–17

  diagnostic tool, 179

  evidence table, 149–58

  exclusions, 132–33, 139

  Fannie Mae and other financial meltdowns (2008), 15

  historical analysis, 17–18

  matched-pair contrast method, 120, 135–41

  results of, 19–23

  selection criteria, 127–33

  success comparison set, 15–16, 16

  success-contrast selection criteria, 135–41

  responsibilities, 57, 160

  restructuring, chronic, 49, 80, 101, 105

  revolution, with fanfare, 100

  risk taking, 71–76

  on ambiguous data, 81

  “waterline” principle of, 74

  R.J. Reynolds, 128, 131

  RJR Nabisco, 95

  rock-climbing, 66, 75, 96

  Roman Empire, fall of, 59

  Rubbermaid, 14, 23, 128, 133, 140, 141

  jobs lost in, 49, 158

  overreaching, 47–49

  restructuring, 49

  Stage 2 in, 152–53

  Stage 4 in, 157–58

  salvation, grasping for, 22, 83–101, 83

  A&P, 155

  Addressograph, 97–99, 155–56

  Ames, 156

  Bank of America, 156

  behaviors that exemplify/reverse, 90

  chronic restructuring, 101

  Circuit City, 156–57

  confusion and cynicism, 101

  HP, 83–85, 157

  hype before results, 100

  IBM, 85–88, 95–96

  initial upswing, then disappointments, 100

  markers, 100–101

  Motorola, 157

  outside savior, 100

  panic and desperation, 96–99, 100

  revolution with fanfare, 100

  Rubbermaid, 157–58

  Scott Paper, 158

  search for silver bullet, 88–96, 100

  survival instinct, 96

  Zenith, 158

  Sanford, Shade H., 66

  San Francisco earthquake, 5

  Sarbanes-Oxley Act (2002), 146

  Sawyer, Diane, 85

  Schering-Plough, 140

  Schulze, Richard, 33–34

  Schumpeter, Joseph, 118

  Scott Paper, 14, 47, 128, 133, 135

  capitulation of, 111

  competition against, 79, 105

  debt-to-equity ratio, 105

  and Kimberly-Clark, 106, 141, 158

  obsessive reorganization in, 79–80, 91, 105, 158

  Stage 2 in, 153

  Stage 4 in, 158

  Seafirst Corp., 10

  self-managed employees, 56, 159–60

  Shackleton, Ernest, 115

  share price vs. value, 54

  Silo, 128, 131

  silver bullets, searching for, 22, 88–96, 100

  Six Sigma, 28, 152

  size fit, 136

  Sony Corporation, 128, 133

  Southwest Airlines, 17

  Speak & Spell, 68–69

  spin, positive, 22

  stakeholder engagement, 76

  Stalin, Joseph, 121

  StarTAC cell phone, 28–29

  Stockdale Paradox, 181

  strategic thinking, 117

  strategy, bold, 22

  success:

  comparison set, 15–16, 16

  deserving, 38–39, 43

  discounting, 38

  hubris born of, see hubris

  study of, 24–25

  underlying causes of, 38

  Wall Street’s definition of, 54

  succession:

  at HP, 85, 87–88

  at IBM, 85–88, 165

  modes of turmoil in, 60–61

  problematic, 58–61, 63–64

  Sun Microsystems, 93, 139

  survival instinct, 96

  team dynamics, erosion of, 81

  Teledyne, 128, 133

  Templeton, Richard
, 94

  Texas Instrumnts (TI), 128, 132

  and DSP technology, 68–70

  HP contrast with, 139

  Motorola contrast with, 92–94, 140, 141

  recovery of, 116

  succession in, 93–94

  Thoman, Richard, 114

  3M, 25, 48, 128, 132

  Titanic (film), 144

  Tolstoy, Leo, Anna Karenina, 19

  transformation, radical, 22

  Tufte, Edward, Visual Explanations, 72

  turbulence, 118–19

  UCLA Bruins, 4

  undisciplined pursuit of more, 21, 45–64, 45

  Addressograph, 149

  Ames, 45–46, 150

  Bank of America, 150

  breaking Packard’s Law, 55–58

  bureaucracy, 63

  Circuit City, 150–51

  declining percentage of key people, 55, 56, 63

  discontinuous leaps, 48, 63

  easy cash vs. cost discipline, 63

  HP, 54, 55, 84, 151

  markers, 63–64

  Merck, 50–54, 152

  Motorola, 152

  obsession with growth, 50–54, 63

  overreaching, 46–50, 61

  personal interests above organizational interests, 64

  problematic succession of power, 58–61, 63–64

  Rubbermaid, 152–53

  Scott Paper, 153

  Zenith, 153

  Upjohn, 128, 131

  upswing, initial, 100

  USA Today, 85, 87

  Vagelos, Roy, 50

  value:

  creating, 165

  share price vs., 54

  values, core, 55, 101, 111, 159, 166, 171–72, 182

  Vaughan, Diane, The Challenger Launch Decision, 72

  Verifone, 151

  Vioxx, 51–53

  Vogue, 85

  vulnerability, 8, 147, 148

  Walgreens, 128, 132

  Wall Street Journal, 10

  Wal-Mart, 128, 132

  Ames contrast with, 15–16, 16, 39–42, 46, 141

  Circuit City contrast with, 139

  core values of, 42, 46

  Walsh, William, The Rise and Decline of The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, 37

  Walt Disney, 116, 128, 133

  Walton, Sam, 40–42

  Warner-Lambert, 128, 132

  warning signs, 76

  Washington Mutual, xiv

  Washington Post, 52

  Waterman, Robert H., Jr., 118

  Watson, Thomas J., Jr., 162

  Watson, Thomas J., Sr., 162

  wealth creation, 83

  Wells Fargo, 128, 132, 141, 156

  Westinghouse, 128, 133

  what and why, confusing, 36–42, 43

  Williams, Elisa, 94

  “window and mirror” maturity, 160

  Winfrey, Oprah, 85

  W. L. Gore & Associates, 74

  Wooden, John, 4

  World War II, 121–23

  Wright, Joseph, 108–9

  Wurtzel, Alan, 31

  Wyeth Corporation, 140

  Xerox Corporation, 97, 98, 113–16, 149

  Yahoo!, 84

  Zander, Ed, 93

  Zayre, 45–46, 150, 156

  Zenith Corporation, 8, 14, 23, 128, 133, 135

  in bankruptcy, 110

  blaming others, 79, 109

  core business of, 32

  Data Systems Division, 109–10

  debt-to-equity, 108, 109

  failure to innovate, 47

  historical analysis of, 18

  jobs lost in, 111

  Motorola contrast with, 140, 141

  in Stage 1, 108

  in Stage 2, 108–9, 153

  in Stage 3, 109

  in Stage 4, 109–10, 158

  in Stage 5, 107–8, 111

  succession in, 108–9, 110

  Acknowledgments

  I owe a debt of gratitude to many people for their hand in helping this work come to life.

  I thank my ChimpWorks home team for their role in this project and for their ongoing effort to keep the system running: Susan Barlow Toll for her extensive fact checking and citations, Michael Lane for his superb editing and conceptual contributions, Taffee Hightower for her happy binders and management of the critical-reader process, Judi Dunckley for her making sure everything balances (and keeping us all very afraid), Vicki Mosur Osgood for her years of service turning the ChimpWorks flywheel, and Kathy Worland-Turner for her cheerful effectiveness serving as my right arm so that I can focus on creative work and teaching.

  I thank members of my research team for their contributions to this project: Robyn Bitner for her analyses and fact checking, Kyle Blackmer for his work on Merck, Brad Caldwell for his work on HP and IBM, Lauren Cujé for her work on Nordstrom, Terrence Cummings for his many projects and his contribution to the study-set selection, Todd Driver for his work on financial analyses and IBM and his fact checking, Ryan Hall for his study-set selection analyses and collection of key data, Lorilee Linfield for her work on Best Buy and Circuit City and her fact checking, Catherine Patterson for her analyses, Matthew Unangst for his study-set selection analyses and work on Xerox, and Nathaniel (Natty) Zola for ongoing analysis and criticism.

  I thank my editor, Deborah Knox, for her hundreds of hours of dedicated work to challenge, edit, fact check, polish, and improve the manuscript through dozens of iterations, and for her extensive examination into Merck and Fannie Mae.

  I thank my critical readers, whose intelligent critiques helped sharpen the concepts and writing immeasurably. Thank you to Bill Achtmeyer, Jerry Belle, Ed Betof, Ann S. Bowers, William P. Buchanan, Scott Cederberg, Dr. Alan G. Chute, Ken Coleman, Alan J. Dabbiere, Brian Deevy, Jeff Donnelly, Salvatore D. Fazzolari, Andrew Feiler, Claudio Fernández-Aráoz, Christopher Forman, Dick Frost, Denis Godcharles, Wayne H. Gross, Eric Hagen, Pamela Hemann, Liz Heron, John B. Hess, Frank Hightower, Phil Hodgkinson, Kimberley Hollingsworth Taylor, John A. Johnson, Alan Khazei, Betina Koski, Kevin McGarvey, Thomas W. Morris, Tom Nelson, Michael Prouting, Bobby Rao, Gloria A. Regalbuto Bentley, PhD, Jim Reid, Neville Richardson, Kevin Rumon, Kim Sanchez Rael, Dirk Schlimm, Roy Spence, Frank Sullivan, Kevin Taweel, Jean Taylor, Tom Tierney, Alan Webber, Jim Weddle, and Walter Wong. I thank Frank Sullivan also for suggesting the title How the Mighty Fall.

  I thank Betty Grebe and Carol Krismann at the University of Colorado William M. White Business Library for their able and enthusiastic assistance, helping all my research assistants with their death marches. I thank the Center for Research in Securities Pricing (CRSP) at the University of Chicago for its quality data and excellent service. I thank Dennis Bale and Lori Drawbaugh for their professionalism and for the roving office that allows me to keep doing creative work while in transit.

  I thank Frances Hesselbein and Dick Cavanagh for the invitation to speak at West Point that inspired me to dive deeply into this topic. I thank Breck England for coming up with the term “well-founded hope” as a way to describe our research findings. I thank Bob Buford for his continued insistence that I pursue questions that ignite my curiosity and for his belief that less is more. I thank Alan Wurtzel and David Maxwell for their helpful perspectives on the stages framework, and for their continued friendship and belief in our work.

  I thank Peter Ginsberg for his years of support, challenge, and professionalism, and for his extraordinary ability to come up with publishing ideas that have never been tried before—and to make them work. I thank Hollis Heimbouch for her editorial instincts, her advocacy, and her willingness to join me in an adventure.

  I thank Janet Brockett for her design genius and friendship.

  I thank Caryn Marooney for her extraordinary wisdom and creative perspective.

  I thank my friend and research colleague Morten T. Hansen, who continues to inspire and challenge me by providing critical feedback and helpful guidance.

  I thank my Personal Band of Brothers for their ongoing support and ins
piration, and my #1 brother, Michael Collins.

  Finally, and always, I thank Joanne Ernst, my life partner and best friend, for inspiring me, for being my most severe critic, and for her unyielding belief in me. After twenty-nine years, which I consider to be a nice start to an enduring marriage, I still feel lucky every single day.

  About the Author

  JIM COLLINS is a student of companies—great ones, good ones, weak ones, failed ones—from young start-ups to venerable sesquicentenarians. The author of the national bestseller Good to Great and coauthor of Built to Last, he serves as a teacher to leaders throughout the corporate and social sectors. His work has been featured in Fortune, BusinessWeek, The Economist, USA Today, and Harvard Business Review. You can find more information about Jim and his work at his e-teaching site, www.jimcollins.com.

  Visit www.AuthorTracker.com for exclusive information on your favorite HarperCollins authors.

  Copyright

  Copyright © 2009 by Itzy.

  All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. By payment of the required fees, you have been granted the nonexclusive, nontransferable right to access and read the text of this e-book on-screen. No part of this text may be reproduced, transmitted, downloaded, decompiled, reverse-engineered, or stored in or introduced into any information storage and retrieval system, in any form or by any means, whether electronic or mechanical, now known or hereinafter invented, without the express written permission of HarperCollins e-books.

  ISBN 978-0-9773264-1-9

  EPub Edition © 2010 ISBN: 9780061956461

  09 10 11 12 13 DIX/RRD 5 4 3 2 1

  About the Publisher

  Australia

  HarperCollins Publishers (Australia) Pty. Ltd.

  25 Ryde Road (P.O. Box 321)

  Pymble, NSW 2073, Australia

  www.harpercollins.com.au/ebooks

  Canada

  HarperCollins Canada

  2 Bloor Street East - 20th Floor

  Toronto, ON, M4W, 1A8, Canada

  http://www.harpercollins.ca

  New Zealand

  HarperCollins Publishers (New Zealand) Limited

  P.O. Box 1

  Auckland, New Zealand

  http://www.harpercollins.co.nz

  United Kingdom

  HarperCollins Publishers Ltd.

  77-85 Fulham Palace Road

  London, W6 8JB, UK

  http://www.harpercollins.co.uk

  United States

  HarperCollins Publishers Inc.

  10 East 53rd Street

  New York, NY 10022

  http://www.harpercollins.com

 

‹ Prev