PRIMAL MYTHS
Creation Myths around the World
Barbara C. Sproul
Dedication
For Herb
CONTENTS
DEDICATION
PREFACE
INTRODUCTION
ONE: AFRICAN MYTHS
Bushman: Cagn Orders the World
Hottentot: The Supreme Being
Barotse: God Retreats to the Sky
Yao: The Chameleon Finds
Swahili: Making the World and Man
Bushongo: Bumba Vomits the World
Bulu: How Zambe Created Man, the Chimpanzee, and the Gorilla
Ngombe: The Quarrelsomeness of Man and How the Earth Was Peopled
Nandi: When God Came to Earth
Dogon: The First Words
Mande: The Creation
Krachi: The Separation of God from Man
Fon: The Great Gods
TWO: NEAR EASTERN MYTHS
Ancient Egyptian Myths
Theology from Memphis
History of the Creation of the Gods and of the World
Myth of Ptah from Memphis
The Repulsing of the Dragon and Creation
Incantation from the Myth of the Primeval Lotus
Sumerian, Babylonian, and Assyrian Myths
The Enuma Elish
Creation of Man by the Mother Goddess
When Anu Had Created the Heavens
The Worm and the Toothache
Another Version of the Creation of Man
The Eridu Story of Creation
From Berossus’ Account of the Babylonian Genesis
Old and New Testament Myths
Genesis 1–2:3
Genesis 2:4–23
Psalm 33:6–15
Psalm 104
From the Book of Job
From Proverbs
From the Gospel According to John
Zoroastrian Myths
From the Exegesis of the Good Religion
Speaking of the World
On the Mixing of the Bounteous Spirit and the Destructive Spirit
Answer of the Spirit of Wisdom
Gnostic Myths
From the Poimandres of Hermes Trismegistus
The Creation According to Mani
Myths of Islam
The Koran, Sura XLI—The Made Plain
The Koran, Sura XVI—The Bee
From the Koran
THREE: EUROPEAN MYTHS
Ancient Greek and Roman Myths
The Pelasgian Creation Myth
Hesiod: From the Theogony
Hesiod: The Five Ages of Man
The Orphic Creation Myth
Ovid: From the Metamorphoses
Northern European Myths
Earliest (Inferred) Creed of the Celts
From the Soothsaying of the Vala
Kalevala: The Birth of Väinämöinen
FOUR: MYTHS OF INDIA
Hindu Myths
Rig-Veda X, XC: The Sacrifice of Primal Man
Rig-Veda X, CXXI: Prajapati (The Golden Embryo)
Rig-Veda X, CXXIX: In the Beginning
Brahmanas: Creation from an Egg
From the Chandogya Upanishad
From the Kena Upanishad
From the Laws of Manu
From the Vishnu Purana
A Jain Myth
Jinasena: There Is No Creator
A Buddhist Myth
The Buddha: How the World Evolved
Tribal Myths
Dhammai: Before There Was Earth or Sky
Minyong: The Separation of Earth and Sky
FIVE: MYTHS OF CHINA AND JAPAN
Myths of China
Creation Out of Chaos
Four Versions of the Myth of P’an Ku
Lao Tzu: From the Tao Te Ching
The Huai-Nan Tzu: The Creation of the Universe
Kuo Hsiang: Nature and Nonexistence
Chou Tun-Yi: An Explanation of the Diagram of the Great Ultimate
Myths of Japan
From the Kojiki
From the Nihongi
Ainu: In the Beginning the World Was Slush
SIX: SIBERIAN AND ESKIMO MYTHS
Tungus: God Triumphs Over the Devil
Mongolian: A Lama Came Down from Heaven
Alarsk Buryats: When Burkhan Came Down from Heaven
Altaic: God and First Man
Eskimo: The Creation
Chuckchi Eskimo: Creator Makes Men and Animals
SEVEN: NORTH AMERICAN MYTHS
Joshua: Xowalaci and His Companion
Salinan: After the Flood
Wyot: The Origin of Man
Maidu: In the Beginning
Cupeno: A Bag Hung in Space
Okanagon: Origin of the Earth and People
Salishan/Sahaptin: Making the World and People
Blood: The Creation of Man
Huron: The Making of the World
Mandan: First Creator and Lone Man
Assiniboine: The Making of Men and Horses
Cherokee: How the World Was Made
Yuchi: Creation of the Earth
Four Apache Creation Myths
Chiricahua Apache: When the Earth Was New
White Mountain Apache: The Earth Is Set Up
Lipan Apache: The Way of the Indian
Jicarilla Apache: In the Beginning Nothing Was Here
Hopi: The Emergence
Zuni: The Beginning of Newness
EIGHT: CENTRAL AND SOUTH AMERICAN MYTHS
Quiché Maya: From the Popol Vuh
Maya: Our Father God
Inca: Ordering the World
Yaruro: Eight Versions of the Creation Legend
Jivaro: The Nuhiño or Earth Story
Mundurucu: The People Climbed Out
NINE: MYTHS OF AUSTRALIA AND THE PACIFIC
Wulamba: The Origin of the Aborigines
Aranda: Myth of the Great Father
Kakadu: Imberombera and Wuraka
Yami: The Outbursters
Negritos: Dreaming People
West Ceram: The Myth of Hainuwele
Melanesia: Four Creation Myths
Banks Islands: The Myth of Qat
Marshall Islands: Long, Long, Long Ago
Maiana Island: Making Things
Four Maori Cosmologies
A Genealogy
Po
The Creation
Heaven and Earth
Maori: The Myth of lo
Samoa: Tangaroa and the Rock
Three Tahitian Cosmologies
Taaroa
Shells Within Shells
The Mitigator of Many Things
Tuamotu Islands: Cosmic Chant
Tuamotu Islands: The Dwelling Places of Kiho
Hawaii: The Kumulipo (A Creation Chant)
SEARCHABLE TERMS
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
CREDITS
COPYRIGHT
ABOUT THE PUBLISHER
PREFACE
In many cultures, creation myths form only the first part of an extended mythological tradition which recounts social and cultural as well as natural foundations of present reality. Such cultures make no firm distinctions between creation myths and socio-cultural ones insofar as they understand no gross separation between themselves and the rest of nature. Therefore many of the myths included in this anthology are somewhat arbitrarily truncated—cut off from the more historical myths which follow them—so that in subject matter they might match more closely those explicitly cosmological myths which deal directly with the creation of being, the gods, the universe, and people.
In each case, I have sought the most authentic translation—the version which, even though it might not be as smooth or as easily availabl
e to Western readers as another, most authentically evokes its cultural and religious source. For the most part, diacritical marks and footnotes have been omitted as unnecessary for the general reader, but each myth has been introduced with basic information concerning its setting, date, authorship, and main symbols.
To maintain consistency, only book titles have been italicized; the titles of individual myths have not. Partly for the same reason, but also to be clear, the terms “God,” “Being—Itself,” “Not-Being-Itself,” and the “Holy” have been capitalized when they refer to absolute reality. Generic terms for divinities and principles which seem to symbolize only a partial aspect of that reality appear in lower case.
This is only a partial collection of the creation myths of the world: given the limits of one volume, I have tried to choose the most powerful myths, offering examples from each religious tradition and yet avoiding duplication of themes or attitudes. I hope that, by its range, this collection still provides an introduction to the cosmological and theological thinking of the world’s religions.
Among those to whom I am particularly grateful are teachers whose passion for their own subjects has inspired me in pursuit of my own. Isabel Stevens, David Bailey, Joseph Campbell, Ada Bozeman, Maurice Friedman, Roy Finch, Rudolf Arnheim, Tom Driver, and Theodor Gaster have each taught me a great deal—not so much by virtue of the answers they gave but by the questions they asked—and I am in their debt.
Barbara C. Sproul
New York City
February 1979
INTRODUCTION
THE MOST PROFOUND human questions are the ones that give rise to creation myths: Who are we? Why are we here? What is the purpose of our lives and our deaths? How should we understand our place in the world, in time and space? These are central questions of value and meaning, and, while they are influenced by issues of fact, they are not in themselves factual questions; rather, they involve attitudes toward facts and reality. As such, the issues that they raise are addressed most directly by myths.
Myths proclaim such attitudes toward reality. They organize the way we perceive facts and understand ourselves and the world. Whether we adhere to them consciously or not, they remain pervasively influential. Think of the power of the first myth of Genesis (1–2:3) in the Old Testament. While the scientific claims it incorporates, so obviously at odds with modern ones, may be rejected, what about the myth itself? Most Westerners, whether or not they are practicing Jews or Christians, still show themselves to be the heirs of this tradition by holding to the view that people are sacred, the creatures of God. Declared unbelievers often dispense with the frankly religious language of this assertion by renouncing God, yet even they still cherish the consequence of the myth’s claim and affirm that people have inalienable rights (as if they were created by God). And, further, consider the beliefs that human beings are superior to all other creatures and are properly set above the rest of the physical world by intelligence and spirit with the obligation to govern it—these beliefs are still current and very powerful. Even the notion that time is properly organized into seven-day weeks, with one day for rest, remains widely accepted. These attitudes toward reality are all part of the first myth of Genesis. And whether people go to temple or church, whether they consider themselves religious, to the extent they reflect these attitudes in their daily behavior, they are still deeply Judeo-Christian.
But the power of a specific myth is not as important to realize as the power of myth itself. Indeed, each of the claims made by the first Genesis myth has been attacked from some quarter. What is essential to understand is that they have been challenged not by new facts but by new attitudes toward facts; they have been challenged by new myths.
There is no escaping our dependence on myth. Without it, we cannot determine what things are, what to do with them, or how to be in relation to them. The fundamental structures of understanding that myths provide, even though in part dictated by matter and instinct, are nevertheless essentially arbitrary because they describe not just the “real” world of “fact” but our perception and experience of that world.
This is true even when we try to understand our “selves.” How do we approach the most basic question of personal identity? Who is the “I” who is perceiving and experiencing the world? Initially, we presume identity is a physiological reality evident in a body’s ability to distinguish between “me” (affirmed and protected by my body’s defenses) and “not-me” (denied, attacked, and rejected, as happens in transplant operations). But, even though it rests on so firm a physical foundation and is so settled in instinct, the “fact” of identity is still variously determined by people. With growing intelligence and the progressive freedom that results from it, people construct other than purely reactive, physical ways of responding to and interacting with their environments. “I” is no longer synonymous with body. Indeed, the question is instantly complicated as time enters into consciousness with memory and imagination and you ask which body you identify with. Today’s? Yesterday’s? The body you will have a month from now if you go on a diet? The body you had as a child? And, as people add more factors to the structural grid of understanding, identity grows to include other matters. Gender, race, profession, nationality, age, position, and the like all become relevant as the “I” in all those bodies comes to think of itself as something constant and essentially connected to larger social realities. In many cases, such identifications are so powerful that they overcome the initial one of “‘I’ equals ‘body.’” People begin to make distinctions between various aspects of a complex “I”; they value some as “higher selves” and others as “lower,” and they make choices emphasizing one at the expense of another. This is what happens in wartime when people who have come to identify themselves not only physically but also nationally willingly sacrifice their “body selves” to their “citizen selves.”
Where does identity really lie? How should we understand the simple world of “fact” in this situation? Is the “real fact” the physical autonomy of the individual? The autonomy of the state of which individuals are only a temporary part? The autonomy of the universe in which both states and their generations of members are only temporary constituents? Or, moving from macrocosm to microcosm, is “reality” the autonomy of the atom or quark, of which the individual, state, and universe are only temporary configurations? Even in this matter, we need myths to determine and then evaluate the various facts presented to us. We need myths to answer the questions, “Who am I? How do I fit into the worlds of society and nature? How should I live?”
While all cultures have specific myths through which they respond to these kinds of questions, it is in their creation myths that the most basic answers are to be found. Not only are creation myths the most comprehensive of mythic statements, addressing themselves to the widest range of questions of meaning, but they are also the most profound. They deal with first causes, the essences of what their cultures perceive reality to be. In them people set forth their primary understanding of man and the world, time and space. And in them cultures express most directly, before they become involved in the fine points of sophisticated dogma, their understanding of and awe before the absolute reality, the most basic fact of being.
It is no accident that cultures think their creation myths the most sacred, for these myths are the ground on which all later myths stand. In them members of the group (and now outsiders) can perceive the main elements of entire structures of value and meaning. Usually, we learn only covertly and piecemeal of the attitudes these myths announce openly and wholly. Watch any parent with a small child, and you will see such attitudes being transmitted and received almost unconsciously. Values derived from the myths are virtually integral to speech itself. “What’s that?” asks the child. “And this? How does that smell? How does it feel? How does this taste?” “Be gentle, that’s a daisy,” her mother answers. “And that’s a puddle. Watch out, that’s a piece of glass; and look, there’s a shiny new penny.” And, along w
ith her mother’s words, the little girl hears her tone and acquires from both the basic blocks for a whole structure of value and meaning. Only when she understands how to place and esteem each of the things can she make her own decisions about them. Only then can she know which is good to sniff, which to jump and splash in, and which to put away in a treasure box. And, while many of these attitudes toward reality are conveyed by parents, others come from the culture at large, from education, laws, entertainment, and ritual. In a society as diverse and rapidly changing as ours, attitudes from different and occasionally conflicting myths are promulgated simultaneously. Even so, they are often accepted without question, by adults as well as by children, as “the way things are,” as “facts.”
Thus, because of the way in which domestic myths are transmitted, people often never learn that they are myths; people become submerged in their viewpoints, prisoners of their own traditions. They readily confuse attitudes toward reality (proclamations of value) with reality itself (statements of fact). Failing to see their own myths as myths, they consider all other myths false. They do not understand that the truth of all myths is existential and not necessarily theoretical. That is, they forget that myths are true to the extent they are effective. (In a sense, myths are self-fulfilling prophecies: they create facts out of the values they propound. Thinking we are superior to other creatures, for instance, we set ourselves up as such and use them ruthlessly. Peoples that think of themselves as brothers to the beasts live with them in harmony and respect.)
As circumstances change and perceptions alter (often, as is the case with our feelings about the ecosystem, because an old myth has been so successful that it produces a new reality and thereby engenders a new attitude toward it), cultures constantly revise their myths. This practice is evident in several of the myths in this collection as well as in our own modern culture. Such revision is accomplished with remarkable ease if only the meaning of specific myths, not the words themselves, is altered. Our belief that “all men are created equal,” for example, is still firm, even though we have come to include black men and all womeny in an originally more restrictive claim. Although much changed, the “fact” of equality is still considered to be unchallenged. When words as well as meanings are altered, people respond with more hesitation. Sometimes they live for a while with two different attitudes toward the same reality. Conflicting views of the proper attitude toward women, for example, can be seen side by side not only in any newspaper but also in the first book of the Old Testament. The myth of Adam and Eve (Genesis 2:4–23, c. 900 B.C.) speaks of the first woman as dependent on (and derivative of) the first man, while the myth of creation in six days (Genesis 1–2:3, c. 400 B.C.) describes the genders as of equal origin.
Primal Myths Page 1