Lebanon, though, as Samir Kassir said in an interview with Michael Young,32 showed “that political liberalism can be conjugated in Arabic.” Its people resisted Syrian soldiers not with improvised explosive devices but with peaceful demonstrations. What they called the Intifadat-al-Istiqlal—or Independence Uprising in English—and what Westerners dubbed the Cedar Revolution, was not at all like the Intifada in Palestine with its suicide bombers and bloodcurdling threats to destroy the enemy country. The Lebanese might even work out a permanent formula for coexistence of religions and cultures. They’d be the people to do it if anyone could. Lebanon, after all, is where the East meets the West, and it always has been.
The Levant, the Middle Eastern Mediterranean, has been more advanced and cosmopolitan than the interior since the time of antiquity. It has been exposed to the West and its liberal ideas for millennia.
The ancient Phoenicians weren’t exactly Westerners. The term as we use it today didn’t exist then, but they were, due to proximity, influenced in many ways by the Greeks and were partially Hellenized by Alexander the Great. What is now Lebanon was part of the Roman Empire for centuries. For almost 200 years it was ruled by Crusaders from Europe, and by France from the end of World War I until independence.
Its education system, at least for the middle and upper classes, was excellent. Much of it was built by missionaries in the nineteenth century who largely failed to convert Muslims to Christianity but managed to leave behind serious English- and French-language schools modeled on those in the West. The American University of Beirut, founded in 1866 by Daniel Bliss and the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions, was still considered the Harvard of the Middle East. And the American University was just one in a large network of primary and secondary institutions.
One of East Beirut’s main thoroughfares was named after Charles Malik, Lebanon’s ambassador to the United States in the late 1940s, who cowrote the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948 with Eleanor Roosevelt.
“Everything will be different after this,” University of Oklahoma Professor Joshua Landis wrote on his blog33 from Damascus after Hariri was killed. “There is genuine sadness for Lebanon here and even a bit of envy. Watching the demonstrations and real national fervor reminds Syrians how little they have of their own.”
Al-Assad could not take the pressure, and he ordered his men to withdraw. They left rapidly, in an orderly fashion, and were out of the country entirely by April 26, 2005. Not only did the soldiers leave, but the intelligence agents left, too—at least those who weren’t undercover. The government then called for an election on time in May.
Hariri’s young son Saad took his father’s place as the head of the Future Movement, and his parliamentary list easily swept Beirut. Fouad Siniora, a more experienced politician from the same party, took Najib Mikati’s place as prime minister.
I returned home a few days after the Syrians finished withdrawing and immediately made plans to return as soon as I could, to rent an apartment and live there a while. Beirut at that time looked and felt like the beginning of a new Middle East. There seemed no better place to cover the region as a foreign correspondent in 2005.
Beirut’s Spring, though, didn’t last.
The Cedar Revolution, the Independence Intifada, was only partially successful at best. It made little difference in the end that the Lebanese got a government that more or less reflected the will of its people. All I should have had to do was look at Iraq to see that that wasn’t enough.
Iraq had elected a representative government just a few months earlier yet was in the process of violently deconstructing itself. Active remnants of Saddam Hussein’s government melted away and fomented insurgency. Bashar al-Assad continued helping terrorists from all over the Middle East transit into Iraq from over his land border. Iran sponsored Shia terrorists and guerrillas who set up their own de facto statelets in the south and in parts of the capital.
Syrian soldiers were gone from Lebanon, sure, and the country’s civil society had made an impressive comeback after decades of dormancy, but the occupation regime left pieces of itself behind. That’s what always happened in Lebanon when foreign forces were ejected. “Each conqueror,” Sandra Mackey wrote in Lebanon: A House Divided,34 “has deposited something of itself with a segment of the population, creating a people fragmented into groups possessing no common identity with the whole.”
Many, if not most, of the highest-ranking officers in the army had been appointed by Damascus, and they still had their jobs. Syrian intelligence offices closed, but undercover mukhabarat agents hadn’t gone anywhere. Lebanese President Emile Lahoud, al-Assad’s most loyal yes-man in the country, still had three years left in his extended term. Amal movement leader Nabih Berri had long since reconciled with Hezbollah to boost the power of the Shia community, so he was a shoo-in as speaker of parliament, no matter that the anti-Syrians won the election in May.
By far the worst legacy of the Syrian occupation, though, was Hezbollah. Syrian soldiers had withdrawn to their side of the border, but the militia al-Assad helped supply with Iranian weapons hadn’t gone anywhere. Ousting the Baathists, then, produced the same result in Lebanon that it did in Iraq—a power vacuum that would soon be filled by the Islamic Republic regime in Iran.
CHAPTER ONE
state within a state
Pity the nation divided into fragments, each fragment deeming itself a nation.
—KAHLIL GIBRAN
In 1979 a coalition of Iranian liberals, leftists, and Islamists overthrew the tyrannical Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi—and a new regime more dangerous and brutal than the last took its place.
An alliance of liberals, leftists, and Islamists made sense at first. The Shah oppressed them all more or less equally. But the Iranian Revolution, like so many others before it, devoured its children. Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini and his Islamists emerged the strong horse in the post-revolutionary struggle for power, and they liquidated the liberals and leftists. Drunk on power and with the wind at its back, his new Islamic Republic regime exploded outward from the ancient Persian heartland into the Arab world with a campaign of imperialism and terrorism.
During the crucible of Lebanon’s civil war in 1982, when Christian, Sunni, Shia, Palestinian, and Druze militias were slugging it out with each other and with the Israelis, Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps commanders secretly organized disaffected members of Lebanon’s Shia community into militant cells of their own. They proved that their revolution wasn’t only exportable to Shia Muslims who were not Persian; they proved it was durable and resilient.
And it was devastating.
On October 23, 1983, a suicide bomber rammed a Mercedes-Benz truck packed with 12,000 pounds of explosives into the U.S. Marine barracks near Lebanon’s international airport, killing 241 American service members. It was the deadliest single attack against Americans since World War II and the deadliest against the Marine Corps since the Battle of Iwo Jima.
Just two minutes later, France suffered the worst single attack against its forces since the end of the Algerian War. In this attack, fifty-eight paratroopers were killed by another suicide truck bomber near the beach in West Beirut’s Ramlet el Baida.
The French and Americans were neither invaders nor occupiers of Lebanon. They were guests of the government on a peacekeeping mission. Both countries soon withdrew their armed forces, and Lebanon continued to burn for seven more years.
A mysterious group calling itself the Islamic Jihad Organization claimed credit for the attacks. You may never have heard of a terrorist group in Lebanon calling itself Islamic Jihad. That’s because it never really existed. Islamic Jihad was simply the nom de guerre of Hezbollah at the time.
Hezbollah’s name in Arabic—Hizb Allah—means “Party of God.” It also described itself on its logo and flag as the Islamic Revolution in Lebanon.
When the Iranian regime thrust itself into the Arab world, Hezbollah was the tip of its spear, and its leaders weren’t
shy about saying so. “We are,” according to Hezbollah’s 1985 Open Letter,1 “the Party of God (Hizb Allah) the vanguard of which was made victorious by God in Iran. . . . We obey the orders of one leader, wise and just, that of our tutor and faqih (jurist) who fulfills all the necessary conditions: Ruhollah Musawi Khomeini. God save him!” “Death to Israel” and “Death to America” became its rallying cries, just as they were for the Islamic Republic in Iran.
Hezbollah’s rhetoric was as brazen as its actions. “We combat abomination and we shall tear out its very roots,” the manifesto said, meaning “America, its Atlantic Pact allies, and the Zionist entity.” The struggle against Israel, Hezbollah said, “will end only when this entity is obliterated.”
Syria conquered and occupied most of Lebanon at the end of the civil war, but an Israeli occupation force stayed behind in a narrow strip of land in the south to prevent Hezbollah attacks from the Lebanese side of the border. But in 2000, after more than a decade of grinding counterinsurgency, the worn-out Israelis withdrew their armed forces. Hezbollah had proved itself to be the most powerful guerrilla army in the whole Middle East and the only Arab army of any kind that could plausibly claim victory against Israel.
By the time I moved to Beirut in 2005, Hezbollah was better armed, better trained, and better equipped than even the Lebanese army. With its own de facto state within a state in the suburbs south of Beirut and in South Lebanon along the border with Israel, it was the first and by far the most successful outpost of Khomeinist rule outside Iran.
Its very existence as a militia was illegal under the Taif Agreement 2 that ended the civil war in 1989, and it violated United Nations Security Council Resolution 1559, passed in 2004, that mandated the disarmament of every militia in Lebanon. Hezbollah tried to skirt this by declaring itself no longer a militia but a “resistance” army struggling against Israel.
But the Party of God faced enormous pressure to surrender its weapons, as Lebanon’s other militias had already done, and renounce its loyalty to a foreign power. Hezbollah Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah refused to even discuss it. He threatened3 to “cut off any hand that reaches out to our weapons” and to “fight them like the martyrs of Karbala.”
It’s obvious in hindsight that when I decided to relocate to Beirut, I was moving to a country in a state of prewar. It was not, however, obvious at the time. I was a bit more seduced than I should have been by the revolution that had recently forced the withdrawal of the Syrians, but the Cedar Revolution in Lebanon had yet to contend with the Iranian Revolution in Lebanon.
I stayed in a cheap hotel on the east side of the city while looking for an apartment. While I drove around with my real estate agent in his expensive red sports car, he asked me something out of the blue that I didn’t expect. “Do you think Lebanon will be okay?” His voice cracked when he said “okay.”
He seemed confident, even arrogant, most of the time, but all of a sudden he sounded choked up and frightened. It was the first time since I met him that he spoke to me as though I knew more than he did about Lebanon. I didn’t, of course. And he knew that. He just wanted me to make him feel better.
I moved to Lebanon partly because I thought his country would be okay, that it might even help the Middle East in general turn out okay in the long run. And I wanted to cover that story from the Arab world’s freest country.
“I think Lebanon will be okay,” I said.
He seemed to relax slightly, as though I were some sort of sage who had a better feel for the future than he did. But I was wrong.
Lebanese people are educated, talented, and industrious, and they take naturally to freewheeling capitalism. Unlike most Arab countries, Lebanon never went through a suffocating socialist phase where the state owned and controlled most major industries. Beirut’s central government was so weak in 2005 it couldn’t even police, let alone stifle, its people or its economy.
There were almost as many Lebanese people in America as there were in Lebanon then. There were even more in Brazil than there were in America. Like Jews and Armenians, they thrived in the Diaspora. Their homeland wasn’t as wealthy as it should have been at the time because it had been strangled and looted by Syria’s Soviet-style regime for so long.
Though less glamorous in the daytime, the port city of Jounieh and the suburbs north of Beirut looked a bit like Hong Kong at night. If Lebanon’s international airport were north of the capital, arriving visitors might have thought they had just landed in a country as modern and prosperous as Israel.
Instead, the airport is situated south of Beirut, where land is cheap and the snow-capped mountains rise less abruptly from the shoreline. Among the first things visitors saw in 2005, then, were madness and squalor. For the airport was built right next to territory Hezbollah controlled, and everyone had to drive through it to reach the city center.
Even so, the airport road was controlled by the Lebanese government. If you squinted hard enough or paid little attention to the ramshackle housing and billboards portraying Hezbollah’s grinning Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah, you wouldn’t necessarily realize what kind of place you were in. There were no checkpoints or militiamen on the sides of the road waving rifles. The hard Hezbollah-controlled core was a bit to the east and mostly out of sight.
Any travelers who ventured off the airport road, however, would quickly find themselves in the middle of the capital of a de facto Iranian satellite state inside Lebanon.
Charles Chuman took me down there. He is a Lebanese American from Chicago who had lived in Beirut for years, and he knew the country better than almost anyone I ever met.
“Hezbollah is only ten minutes from here,” he said one night while we walked along pleasant French-looking streets on the Christian side of the city.
I stopped in my tracks. Beirut was an attractive glittering bubble, and I had almost forgotten the stronghold of the Party of God was so close. It was hard to believe a place resembling Gaza was just ten minutes away from the Arab world’s answer to the French Riviera.
But it was true, and Charles said he would show it to me.
The Hezbollah-controlled suburb of Haret Hreik south of Beirut was known as the dahiyeh, which simply means “suburb.” There were many suburbs north, east, and south of the city, but everyone in Lebanon knew exactly which was meant by “the suburb”—it was the notorious one, the capital of Hezbollah’s state within a state, where the Party of God’s command and control center was located.
The U.S. State Department was right to warn American citizens to stay out of there. I had little choice, though, but to ignore the warning and go.
Charles didn’t own a car, but his friend Hassane did. And Hassane said he would be happy to drive me and Charles there if his girlfriend, Rama, could come with us.
I rode in the front seat. Rama and Charles sat in the back. We drove along the civil war-era Green Line dividing predominantly Sunni West Beirut from the mostly Christian east.
Hassane and Rama were Sunnis. Like most in their West Beirut community, they attended the anti-Syrian rally on March 14.
She wore a hijab, an Islamic headscarf, over her hair, and she wore it because she felt like it. Feminists who said she shouldn’t frustrated her as much as radical Islamists in Iran and Saudi Arabia who would use their power to force her.
As we drove farther south along the Green Line, Beirut looked less and less prosperous. Gone were the skyscraping steel and glass hotels, the gourmet restaurants where the rich and would-be rich hoped to be seen, and the fashionable clothing stores like those in Milan and Paris. Unassuming churches proliferated on the east side of the road, and the minarets of small community mosques gave the skyline some punch on the west side. Starbucks chains yielded to simpler cafés with plastic chairs. Very little architecture was recognizably French any longer. South Beirut was conservative and a bit hard-bitten, but it was still Beirut.
Then we crossed an invisible line into the dahiyeh, and everything changed.
Hezbol
lah propaganda was everywhere.
Portraits of suicide bombers and “martyrs” killed in battle with Israel hung from the sides of lampposts and electrical poles. A fresh one appeared every couple of feet. The entire urban area was blanketed with the ghostly faces of dead men.
Hassane squinted through the windshield, stuck out his jaw, and gripped the steering wheel hard. “This isn’t my country,” he said.
He had a point.
Lebanese army soldiers and police officers were forbidden from setting foot in the area, as though an invisible international boundary ringed the periphery. Beirut’s government wasn’t allowed to operate schools in the dahiyeh, build medical facilities there, or even collect garbage. Hezbollah ruled the roost, and that was final. If the Lebanese army and police tried to retake the area, it would mean war.
I saw hardly any evidence that we were still even in Lebanon. The national flag depicting one of the ancient cedars of Lebanon was nowhere to be seen. The green and yellow Hezbollah flag, with its upraised AK-47 assault rifle logo, had taken its place.
One poster after another portrayed Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeini as though he were the ruler of Lebanon. Portraits of Syria’s tyrant Bashar al-Assad also made several appearances. The dahiyeh looked, alternately, like a slum of Tehran or Damascus.
Laundry lines slashed across the facades of nondescript concrete apartment blocks that looked like smaller versions of Stalinist towers in communist countries. Large balcony curtains billowed in the wind like dirty ship sails. The tangled mess of electrical wires looked like cobwebs of cable between all the buildings. A few smaller structures heaved over the sidewalks toward the streets as though their fronts were slowly sinking.
The Road to Fatima Gate: The Beirut Spring, the Rise of Hezbollah, and the Iranian War Against Israel Page 4