US-China Relations (3rd Ed)

Home > Other > US-China Relations (3rd Ed) > Page 1
US-China Relations (3rd Ed) Page 1

by Robert G Sutter




  US-China Relations

  Perilous Past, Uncertain Present

  Third Edition

  Robert G. Sutter

  George Washington University

  ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD

  Lanham • Boulder • New York • London

  Executive Editor: Susan McEachern

  Assistant Editor: Rebeccah Shumaker

  Senior Marketing Manager: Kim Lyons

  Published by Rowman & Littlefield

  A wholly owned subsidiary of

  The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc.

  4501 Forbes Boulevard, Suite 200, Lanham, Maryland 20706

  https://rowman.com

  Unit A, Whitacre Mews, 26-34 Stannary Street, London SE11 4AB,

  United Kingdom

  Copyright © 2018 by Rowman & Littlefield

  Second edition 2013. First edition 2010.

  All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means, including information storage and retrieval systems, without written permission from the publisher, except by a reviewer who may quote passages in a review.

  British Library Cataloguing in Publication Information Available

  Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

  Names: Sutter, Robert G., author.

  Title: U.S.-China relations : perilous past, uncertain present / Robert G. Sutter, George Washington University.

  Description: Third edition. | Lanham, Maryland : Rowman & Littlefield, 2018. | Includes bibliographical references and index.

  Identifiers: LCCN 2017039755 (print) | LCCN 2017043456 (ebook) | ISBN

  9781538105351 (electronic) | ISBN 9781538105337 (cloth : alk. paper) | ISBN

  9781538105344 (pbk. : alk. paper)

  Subjects: LCSH: United States—Foreign relations—China. | China—Foreign relations—

  United States.

  Classification: LCC E183.8.C5 (ebook) | LCC E183.8.C5 S884 2018 (print) | DDC

  327.73051—dc23

  LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017039755

  TM The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992.

  Printed in the United States of America

  Contents

  1 Introduction

  1

  2 Patterns of US-China Relations Prior to World War II

  13

  3 Relations during World War II, Civil War, Cold War

  37

  4 Rapprochement and Normalization

  61

  5 Tiananmen, Taiwan, and Post–Cold War Realities, 1989–2000

  91

  6 Pragmatism amid Differences during the George W. Bush

  Administration

  119

  7 Barack Obama, Donald Trump, and Xi Jinping: Pragmatism

  Falters amid Acrimony and Tensions

  145

  8 Security Issues in Contemporary US-China Relations

  165

  9 Economic and Environmental Issues in Contemporary US-

  China Relations

  185

  10 Taiwan and East Asian Maritime Disputes in Contemporary US-

  China Relations

  213

  11 Issues of Human Rights in Contemporary US-China Relations

  237

  12 Outlook

  265

  Notes

  283

  Selected Bibliography

  317

  Index

  323

  About the Author

  331

  iii

  2

  Chapter 1

  and environmental issues was prominently featured, and bilateral discussion

  on human rights continued amid mixed reviews on progress in China toward

  accepting US-backed international norms. US-China differences over Tai-

  wan subsided with the coming to power of Taiwan President Ma Ying-jeou

  (2008–16), who sharply shifted Taiwan toward a more cooperative stance in

  relations with China. In broad terms and with some reservations, the US

  government accepted and supported the Chinese Communist government as

  a leading actor in world affairs; the Chinese government seemed to tacitly

  accept, at least for a time, the existing international order in which the United States exerted leading power in Asian and world affairs. 2

  The Chinese and American governments had strong reasons to emphasize

  the positive aspects of their relationship and to minimize public discussion of negative aspects. Sino-American differences were dealt with through private

  conversations among senior leaders and channels of diplomacy called di-

  alogues. The number of these dialogues grew to more than ninety by the end

  of the Obama administration. The most important was the US-China strategic

  and economic dialogue, which held its first meeting in July 2009.

  During this seemingly positive period, students, media commentators,

  and other readers inexperienced with the complicated background and con-

  text of the Sino-American relationship had a tendency to be misled by the

  benign image of US-China relations that had flowed from the public dis-

  course of US and Chinese officials in the previous decade. Adding to the mix

  was the point of view of some commentators, particularly in the United

  States, that emphasized the convergence of interests between the United

  States and China. At the outset of the Obama administration, some argued for

  an international order determined chiefly by cooperation between the two

  governments, what is called a G-2 world order, for the twenty-first century. 3

  The first edition of this book took issue with what it saw as an overly benign

  image of Sino-American cooperation; it concurred more with scholarly and

  other assessments in the United States, China, and elsewhere that viewed

  Sino-American relations as more complicated and conflicted than official

  discourse and arguments by commentators who favored a Sino-American

  international condominium led many to expect.

  The second edition came in 2013 amid the increasing competition and

  public acrimony evident in Sino-American relations since 2010. It depicted a

  fragile balance between converging and diverging interests in the relation-

  ship, notably with China’s newly appointed party leader and president Xi

  Jinping (2012– ) pursuing assertive and often bold initiatives at home and

  abroad that seriously challenged key American security, economic, and polit-

  ical interests. Though registering sometimes strong public opposition to Chi-

  na’s advances at the expense of its neighbors and the United States and

  taking some military, economic, and diplomatic moves in response, the Oba-

  ma government on the whole continued to rely on private summit talks and

  Introduction

  3

  other dialogues to manage tensions. The Xi Jinping government also avowed

  support for such diplomatic managing of key differences, but China’s actions

  on sensitive territorial disputes, trade and investment matters, international

  governance issues, and restrictive treatment in China of Chinese citizens and

  of US and other foreign businesses and nongovernment organizations under-

  mined the previous benign image of co
operation with the United States. 4

  The Obama government remained positive about the status of US-China

  relations to the end of its tenure in January 2017. However, sharply critical

  treatment of China in the 2016 US election campaign came from the leading

  Democratic Party candidate, Hillary Clinton, the secretary of state in the first term of the Obama government (2009–13). Clinton’s negative assessment of

  Chinese policies and practices complemented criticisms by Republican front-

  runner and later President Donald Trump. 5 Together, the two candidates reinforced a broad trend seen among American experts, specialists, members

  of Congress, and the media that the previous moderate and forthcoming US

  engagement of China was failing; a new, tougher approach would be re-

  quired to deal with the rising challenges posed by Xi Jinping’s government. 6

  For their part, Chinese specialists and media were on guard in the face of

  these negative trends. They claimed that China would seek to work construc-

  tively with the president-elect. Hillary Clinton was viewed negatively as an

  official who was familiar with Sino-American differences and determined to

  push Beijing on these matters. Trump was depicted as a newcomer and much

  less committed to key differences with China; a prevailing view in China saw

  him as a pragmatic businessman turned political leader who could be

  “shaped” to accord to Chinese interests through bargaining and negotia-

  tions. 7

  The third edition was written against this background after five months of

  the Trump presidency in 2017. US-China relations were tense at first, as

  President-elect Trump in December 2016 took a controversial step in accept-

  ing a congratulatory phone call from Taiwan’s president. When China com-

  plained, President-elect Trump replied by criticizing Chinese economic poli-

  cies and military advances in disputed islands in the South China Sea, and he

  later went on to repeatedly question why the United States needed to support

  a position calling for one China and avoiding improved contacts with Tai-

  wan. 8

  These rapid-fire actions upended Chinese forecasts of smoother sailing

  with Trump than with Hillary Clinton. In a few gestures and blunt messages

  to the media and on Twitter, the president-elect showed President Xi and his

  lieutenants that the new US leader would be capable of a wide range of

  actions that could be done easily and would surprise Chinese counterparts

  with serious negative consequences. During the long US election campaign,

  President Trump made clear that he preferred unpredictability and did not

  place the high value President Obama did on policy transparency, carefully

  4

  Chapter 1

  measured responses, and avoidance of dramatic actions. He has been much

  less constrained than the previous US administration by a perceived need to

  sustain and advance US-China relations. Like President Xi and unlike Presi-

  dent Obama, President Trump has been characterized as (1) not averse to

  conflict, (2) presumably willing to seek advantage in tensions between the

  two countries, and (3) prepared to seek leverage through linking his policy

  preference in one area of the relationship with policies in other areas of the

  relationship. 9

  In June 2017 the outlook for US-China relations seemed heavily influ-

  enced by one bold leader interacting with another bold leader. President

  Trump eventually was persuaded to publicly reaffirm support for the

  American one-China policy during his first phone conversation with Presi-

  dent Xi on February 9. Xi reportedly refused to speak with President Trump

  until he did so.

  The informal summit meeting with President Xi at the Trump resort Mar-

  a-Lago in early April 2017 went well, though it sandwiched President

  Trump’s surprise announcement of fifty-nine US cruise missiles striking a

  Syrian airfield that was being used to carry out a widely condemned chemi-

  cal weapons attack. After the summit, the Trump government kept strong

  political pressure on China to use its economic leverage to halt North Ko-

  rea’s nuclear weapons development. While stoking widespread fears of con-

  flict on the peninsula, President Trump stressed his personal respect for

  President Xi. He promised Beijing easier treatment in negotiations on the two

  countries’ massive trade imbalance and other economic issues.

  The crisis over North Korea put a premium on US interaction with China.

  Planned arms sales to Taiwan, freedom-of-navigation exercises in the South

  China Sea, and other US initiatives that might complicate America’s search

  for leverage to stop North Korea’s nuclear weapons development were put on

  hold. 10

  Overall, the US leader put his Chinese counterpart on the defensive,

  compelling Beijing to prepare for a wide range of contingencies from the

  American president. Gone was the Obama government’s commitment to

  positive ties with China. It became clear that Beijing could no longer rely on

  the policy transparency, measured responses, and avoidance of dramatic ac-

  tion or spillovers among competing interests that characterized the previous

  administration. As discussed in chapter 7, in the view of American critics,

  “no-drama” Obama enabled Xi to expand in the South China Sea and carry

  out other bold moves at American expense without the danger that the result-

  ing tensions would lead to serious US retaliation.

  China’s new uncertainty over the American president added to reasons

  for Beijing to avoid—at least temporarily—controversial moves at US ex-

  pense, such as expansionist actions in the disputed South China Sea and

  Introduction

  5

  especially sensitive Chinese interchange with North Korea. How long this

  discretion would last would be a guessing game.

  Meanwhile, the respective interests of the two countries in pragmatic

  cooperation over common concerns amid serious differences remained im-

  portant determinants; they are assessed in the following chapters. The incen-

  tives to avoid serious US-China confrontation or even war have been enor-

  mous11 and seemed obvious to all; but the differences have been growing in importance. The evolution and influence of incentives to cooperation versus

  differences are treated in the following chapters.

  ENDURING DIFFERENCES:

  DIVERGING INTERESTS AND VALUES

  The lessons of history over US relations with China and especially relations

  with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) provide the basis for findings of

  lasting importance in determining the course of Sino-American relations.

  The following chapters show that on balance the historical trajectory has not

  been positive, with tensions reaching a high point of conflict and confronta-

  tion during the first two decades of the Cold War. A major breakthrough took

  place under the leadership of President Richard Nixon (1969–74) and Chair-

  man Mao Zedong. After that historic thaw, major turning points over the next

  forty years showed that without powerful, practical reasons for pragmatic

  accommodation and cooperation, strong and often deeply rooted and endur-

  ing differences between the two govern
ments and their broader societies

  were likely to emerge. Even in the best of times, those differences tended to

  obstruct improvement in Sino-American relations.

  The differences between the United States and China in the early twenty-

  first century are summarized in the sections that follow.

  China

  China’s many disagreements with the United States can be grouped into four

  general categories of disputes that have complicated US-China relations for

  years. Based on Chinese statements and commentary in official Chinese

  media, the four categories are (1) opposition to US support for Taiwan and to

  US diplomatic and other involvement with other sensitive sovereignty issues,

  including Tibet, Xinjiang, and Chinese territorial disputes with neighbors

  along China’s eastern and southern maritime borders; (2) opposition to actual

  or perceived US efforts to change China’s political system; (3) opposition to

  the United States playing the dominant strategic role along China’s periphery

  in Asia, including US military involvement in Taiwan and military activities

  in disputed and other territory along China’s rim; and (4) opposition to many

  aspects of US leadership in world affairs. Some specific issues in the latter

  6

  Chapter 1

  two categories include US policy in Iraq, Iran, Syria, and the broader Middle

  East; aspects of the US-backed security presence in the Asia-Pacific, seen

  notably in the Obama government’s so-called pivot or rebalance policy in the

  region; US and allied ballistic missile defenses; periodic US pressure on such

  governments as Myanmar (Burma), North Korea, Sudan, Zimbabwe, Cuba,

  and Venezuela; US pressure tactics in the United Nations and other interna-

  tional forums, and at times the US position on global climate change. 12

  United States

  US differences with China continue to involve clusters of often contentious

  economic, security, political, sovereignty, and foreign policy issues. Eco-

  nomic issues center on inequities in the US economic relationship with China

  that include a massive trade deficit, Chinese currency policies and practices,

  US dependence on Chinese financing American budget deficits, and China’s

  lax enforcement of intellectual property rights and wide use of industrial

 

‹ Prev