“Villain! you do not escape me this time,” said Major Mowbray, interposing himself between Turpin and the outlet.
“Major Mowbray, I would not have your blood upon my head,” said Dick. “Let me pass,” and he levelled a pistol.
“Fire, if you dare!” said the major, raising his sword. “You pass not. I will die rather than allow you to escape. Barricade the door. Strike him down if he attempts to pass. Richard Turpin, I arrest you in the king’s name. You hear, my lads, in his majesty’s name. I command you to assist me in this highwayman’s capture. Two hundred pounds for his head.”
“Two hundred devils!” exclaimed Dick, with a laugh of disdain. “Go, seek your mother and sister within yon vault, Major Mowbray; you will find employment enough there.”
Saying which, he suddenly forced Bess to back a few yards; then, striking his heels sharply into her sides, ere his purpose could be divined by the spectators, charged, and cleared the lower part of the mouldering priory walls. This feat was apparently accomplished with no great effort by his admirable and unequalled mare.
“By the powers!” cried Titus, “and he’s given us the slip after all. And just when we thought to make sure of him, too. Why, Mr. Coates, that wall must be higher than a five-barred gate, or any stone wall in my own country. It’s just the most extraordinary lepp I ever set eyes on!”
“The devil’s in the fellow, certainly, or in his mare,” returned Coates; “but if he escapes me, I’ll forgive him. I know whither he’s bound. He’s off to London with my bill of exchange. I’ll be up with him. I’ll track him like a bloodhound, slowly and surely, as my father, the thief-taker, used to follow up a scent. Recollect the hare and the tortoise. The race is not always to the swift. What say you? ’Tis a match for five hundred pounds; nay, for five thousand: for there is a certain marriage certificate in the way — a glorious golden venture! You shall go halves, if we win. We’ll have him, dead or alive. What say you for London, Mr. Tyrconnel? Shall we start at once?”
“With all my sowl,” replied Titus. “I’m with you.” And away this par nobile scoured.
Ranulph, meantime, plunged into the vault. The floor was slippery, and he had nigh stumbled. Loud and deep lamentations, and a wailing sound, like that of a lament for the dead, resounded in his ears. A light at the further extremity of the vault attracted his attention. He was filled with terrible forebodings; but the worst reality was not so terrible as suspense. He rushed towards the light. He passed the massive pillars, and there, by the ruddy torch flame, discovered two female figures. One was an old woman, fantastically attired, wringing her hands, and moaning, or gibbering wild strains in broken, discordant, yet pathetic tones. The other was Mrs. Mowbray. Both were images of despair. Before them lay some motionless object. He noticed not that old woman; he scarcely saw Mrs. Mowbray; he beheld only that object of horror. It was the lifeless body of a female. The light fell imperfectly upon the face; he could not discern the features, but the veil in which it was swathed: that veil was Eleanor’s! He asked no more.
With a wild cry he rushed forward. “Eleanor, my beloved!” shrieked he.
Mrs. Mowbray started at his voice, but appeared stunned and helpless.
“She is dead,” said Ranulph, stooping towards the body. “Dead — dead!”
“Ay,” echoed the old woman, in accents of equal anguish— “dead — dead!”
“But this is not Eleanor,” exclaimed he, as he viewed the features more closely. “This face, though beautiful, is not hers. This dishevelled hair is black. The long lashes that shade her cheek are of the same hue. She is scarce dead. The hand I clasp is yet warm — the fingers are pliant.”
“Yet she is dead,” said the old woman, in a broken voice, “she is slain.”
“Who hath slain her?” asked Ranulph.
“I — I — her mother, slew her.”
“You!” exclaimed Ranulph, horror-stricken. “And where is Eleanor?” asked he. “Was she not here?”
“Better she were here now, even though she were as that poor maid,” groaned Mrs. Mowbray, “than where she is.”
“Where is she, then?” asked Ranulph, with frantic eagerness.
“Fled. Whither I know not.”
“With whom?”
“With Sir Luke Rookwood — with Alan Rookwood. They have borne her hence. Ranulph, you are too late.”
“Gone!” cried Ranulph, fiercely springing to his feet. “How escaped they? There appears to be but one entrance to this vault. I will search each nook and cranny.”
“’Tis vain,” replied Mrs. Mowbray. “There is another outlet through yon cell. By that passage they escaped.”
“Too true, too true,” shouted Ranulph, who flew to examine the cell. “And wherefore followed you not?”
“The stone rolled to its mouth, and resisted my efforts. I could not follow.”
“Torture and death! She is lost to me for ever!” cried Ranulph, bitterly.
“No!” exclaimed Barbara, clutching his arm. “Place your trust in me, and I will find her for you.”
“You!” ejaculated Ranulph.
“Even I,” replied Barbara. “Your wrongs shall be righted — my Sybil be avenged.”
BOOK IV. — THE RIDE TO YORK
Then one halloo, boys! one loud cheering halloo!
To the swiftest of coursers, the gallant, the true,
For the sportsman unborn shall the memory bless
Of the horse of the highwayman, bonny Black Bess.
— Richard Turpin.
CHAPTER I. — THE RENDEZVOUS AT KILBURN
Hind. Drink deep, my brave boys, of the bastinado;
Of stramazons, tinctures, and slié passatas;
Of the carricado, and rare embrocado;
Of blades, and rapier-hilts of surest guard;
Of the Vincentio and Burgundian ward.
Have we not bravely tossed this bombast foil-button?
Win gold and wear gold, boys, ’tis we that merit it.
— Prince of Prigs’ Revels.
An excellent Comedy, replete with various conceits and Tarltonian mirth.
THE present straggling suburb at the north-west of the metropolis, known as Kilburn, had scarcely been called into existence a century ago, and an ancient hostel, with a few detached farmhouses, were the sole habitations to be found in the present populous vicinage. The place of refreshment for the ruralizing cockney of 1737 was a substantial-looking tenement of the good old stamp, with great bay windows, and a balcony in front, bearing as its ensign the jovial visage of the lusty knight, Jack Falstaff. Shaded by a spreading elm, a circular bench embraced the aged trunk of the tree, sufficiently tempting, no doubt, to incline the wanderer on those dusty ways to “rest and be thankful,” and to cry encore to a frothing tankard of the best ale to be obtained within the chimes of Bow bells.
Upon a table, green as the privet and holly that formed the walls of the bower in which it was placed, stood a great china bowl, one of those leviathan memorials of bygone wassailry which we may sometimes espy — reversed in token of its desuetude — perched on the top of an old japanned closet, but seldom, if ever, encountered in its proper position at the genial board. All the appliances of festivity were at hand. Pipes and rummers strewed the board. Perfume, subtle, yet mellow, as of pine and lime, exhaled from out the bowl, and, mingling with the scent of a neighboring bed of mignonette and the subdued odor of the Indian weed, formed altogether as delectable an atmosphere of sweets as one could wish to inhale on a melting August afternoon. So, at least, thought the inmates of the arbor; nor did they by any means confine themselves to the gratification of a single sense. The ambrosial contents of the china bowl proved as delicious to the taste as its bouquet was grateful to the smell; while the eyesight was soothed by reposing on the smooth sward of a bowling-green spread out immediately before it, or in dwelling upon gently undulating meads, terminating, at about a mile’s distance, in the woody, spire-crowned heights of Hampstead.
At the left of
the table was seated, or rather lounged, a slender, elegant-looking young man, with dark, languid eyes, sallow complexion, and features wearing that peculiarly pensive expression often communicated by dissipation; an expression which, we regret to say, is sometimes found more pleasing than it ought to be in the eyes of the gentle sex. Habited in a light summer riding-dress, fashioned according to the taste of the time, of plain and unpretending material, and rather under than overdressed, he had, perhaps, on that very account, perfectly the air of a gentleman. There was, altogether, an absence of pretension about him, which, combined with great apparent self-possession, contrasted very forcibly with the vulgar assurance of his showy companions. The figure of the youth was slight, even to fragility, giving little outward manifestation of the vigor of frame he in reality possessed. This spark was a no less distinguished personage than Tom King, a noted high-tobygloak of his time, who obtained, from his appearance and address, the sobriquet of the “Gentleman Highwayman.”
Tom was indeed a pleasant fellow in his day. His career was brief, but brilliant: your meteors are ever momentary. He was a younger son of a good family; had good blood in his veins, though not a groat in his pockets. According to the old song —
When he arrived at man’s estate,
It was all the estate he had;
and all the estate he was ever likely to have. Nevertheless, if he had no income, he contrived, as he said, to live as if he had the mines of Peru at his control — a miracle not solely confined to himself. For a moneyless man, he had rather expensive habits. He kept his three nags; and, if fame does not belie him, a like number of mistresses; nay, if we are to place any faith in certain scandalous chronicles to which we have had access, he was for some time the favored lover of a celebrated actress, who, for the time, supplied him with the means of keeping up his showy establishment. But things could not long hold thus. Tom was a model of infidelity, and that was the only failing his mistress could not overlook. She dismissed him at a moment’s notice. Unluckily, too, he had other propensities which contributed to involve him. He had a taste for the turf — a taste for play — was well known in the hundreds of Drury, and cut no mean figure at Howell’s, and the faro tables there-anent. He was the glory of the Smyrna, D’Osyndar’s, and other chocolate houses of the day; and it was at this time he fell into the hands of certain dexterous sharpers, by whom he was at first plucked and subsequently patronized. Under their tuition he improved wonderfully. He turned his wit and talent to some account. He began to open his eyes. His nine days’ blindness was over. The dog saw. But, in spite of his quickness, he was at length discovered, and ejected from Howell’s in a manner that left him no alternative. He must either have called out his adversary, or have gone out himself. He preferred the latter, and took to the road; and in his new line he was eminently successful. Fortunately, he had no scruples to get over. Tom had what Sir Walter Scott happily denominates “an indistinct notion of meum and tuum,” and became confirmed in the opinion that everything he could lay hands upon constituted lawful spoil. And then, even those he robbed, admitted that he was the most gentlemanlike highwayman they had ever the fortune to meet with, and trusted they might always be so lucky. So popular did he become upon the road, that it was accounted a distinction to be stopped by him; he made a point of robbing none but gentlemen, and — Tom’s shade would quarrel with us were we to omit them — ladies. His acquaintance with Turpin was singular, and originated in a rencontre. Struck with his appearance, Dick presented a pistol, and bade King deliver. The latter burst into a laugh, and an explanation immediately ensued. Thenceforward they became sworn brothers — the Pylades and Orestes of the road; and though seldom seen together in public, had many a merry moonlight ride in company.
Tom still maintained three mistresses, his valet, his groom — tiger, we should have called him,— “and many a change of clothes besides,” says his biographer, “with which he appeared more like a lord than a highwayman.” And what more, we should like to know, would a lord wish to have? Few younger sons, we believe, can boast so much; and it is chiefly on their account, with some remote view to the benefit of the unemployed youth of all professions, that we have enlarged so much upon Tom King’s history. The road, we must beg to repeat, is still open; the chances are greater than they ever were; we fully believe it is their only road to preferment, and we are sadly in want of highwaymen!
Fancy Tom lounging at D’Osyndar’s, carelessly tapping his boots on the steps; there he stands! Is he not a devilish good-looking, gentlemanlike sort of fellow? You could never have taken him for a highwayman but for our information. A waiter appears — supper is ordered at twelve — a broiled chicken and a bottle of Burgundy — his groom brings his nags to the door — he mounts. It is his custom to ride out on an evening — he is less liable to interruption. At Marylebone Fields — now the Regent’s Park, — his groom leaves him. He has a mistress in the neighborhood. He is absent for a couple of hours, and returns gay or dispirited, as his luck may have turned out. At twelve he is at supper, and has the night before him. How very easy all this seems. Can it be possible we have no Tom Kings?
To return to Tom as he was in the arbor. Judging from his manner, he appeared to be almost insensible to the presence of his companions, and to be scarcely a partaker in their revelry. His back was towards his immediate neighbor; his glass sparkled untouched at his elbow; and one hand, beautifully white and small, a mark of his birth and breeding — crede Byron — rested upon the edge of the table, while his thin, delicate digits, palpably demonstrative of his faculty of adaptation — crede James Hardy Vaux — were employed with a silver toothpick. In other respects, he seemed to be lost in reverie, and was, in all probability, meditating new exploits.
Next to King sat our old friend Jerry Juniper; not, however, the Jerry of the gipsies, but a much more showy-looking personage. Jerry was no longer a gentleman of “three outs” — the difficulty would now have been to say what he was “without.” Snakelike he had cast his slough, and rejoiced in new and brilliant investiture. His were “speaking garments, speaking pockets too.” His linen was of the finest, his hose of the smartest. Gay rings glittered on his fingers; a crystal snuff-box underwent graceful manipulation; a handsome gold repeater was sometimes drawn from its location with a monstrous bunch of onions — anglicè, seals — depending from its massive chain. Lace adorned his wrists, and shoes — of which they had been long unconscious, — with buckles nearly as large as themselves, confined his feet. A rich-powdered peruke and silver-hilted sword completed the gear of the transmogrified Jerry, or, as he now chose to be designated, Count Albert Conyers. The fact was, that Jerry, after the fracas, apprehensive that the country would be too hot for him, had, in company with Zoroaster, quitted the ranks of the Canting Crew, and made the best of his way to town. A lucky spice on the road set them up; and having some acquaintance with Tom King, the party, on their arrival, sought him out at his customary haunt, D’Osyndar’s, and enlisted under his banners.
Tom received them with open arms, gave them unlimited use of his wardrobe, and only required a little trifling assistance in return. He had a grand scheme in petto, in the execution of which they could mainly assist him. Jerry was a Greek by nature, and could land a flat as well as the best of them. Zoroaster was just the man to lose a fight; or, in the language of the Fancy, to play a cross. No two legs could serve Tom’s purposes better. He welcomed them with fraternal affection.
We will now proceed to reconnoitre Jerry’s opposite neighbor, who was, however, no other than that Upright Man,
The Magus Zoroaster, that great name.
Changed as was Juniper, the Magus was yet more whimsically metamorphosed. Some traces of Jerry still remained, but not a vestige was left of the original Dimber Damber. His tawny mother had not known her son. This alteration, however, was not owing to change of dress; it was the result of the punishment he had received at the “set-to” at the priory. Not a feature was in its place; his swollen lip trespassed upon
the precincts of his nose; his nose trod hard upon his cheek; while his cheek again, not to be behind the rest, rose up like an apple-dumpling under his single eye, — single, we say — for, alas! there was no speculation in the other. His dexter daylight was utterly darkened, and, indeed, the orb that remained was as sanguinary a luminary as ever struggled through a London fog at noonday. To borrow a couplet or so from the laureate of the Fancy:
—— One of his peepers was put
On the bankruptcy list, with his shop windows shut,
While the other made nearly as tag-rag a show,
All rimmed round with black like the Courier in woe.
One black patch decorated his rainbow-colored cheek; another adorned his chin; a grinder having been dislodged, his pipe took possession of the aperture. His toggery was that of a member of the prize-ring; what we now call a “belcher” bound his throat; a spotted fogle bandaged his jobbernowl, and shaded his right peeper, while a white beaver crowned the occiput of the Magus. And though, at first sight, there would appear to be some incongruity in the association of such a battered character as the Upright Man with his smart companions, the reader’s wonder will rapidly diminish, when he reflects that any distinguished P. C. man can ever find a ready passport to the most exclusive society. Viewed in this light, Zoroaster’s familiarity with his swell acquaintance occasioned no surprise to old Simon Carr, the bottle-nosed landlord of the Falstaff, who was a man of discernment in his way, and knew a thing or two. Despite such striking evidences to the contrary, the Magus was perfectly at his ease, and sacrificing as usual to the god of flame. His mithra, or pipe, the symbol of his faith, was zealously placed between his lips, and never did his Chaldean, Bactrian, Persian, Pamphylian, Proconnesian, or Babylonian namesake, whichever of the six was the true Zoroaster — videBayle, — respire more fervently at the altar of fire, than our Magus at the end of his enkindled tube. In his creed we believe Zoroaster was a dualist, and believed in the co-existence and mystical relation of the principles of good and ill; his pipe being his Yezdan, or benign influence; his empty pouch his Ahreman, or the devil. We shall not pause to examine his tenets; we meddle with no man’s religious opinions, and shall leave the Magus to the enjoyment of his own sentiments, be they what they may.
The Works of William Harrison Ainsworth Page 52