First published in Great Britain in 2015 by
Pen & Sword Military
an imprint of
Pen & Sword Books Ltd
47 Church Street
Barnsley
South Yorkshire
S70 2AS
Copyright © Adrian Coombs-Hoar 2015
ISBN: 978 1 78159 088 1
EPUB ISBN: 978 1 47385 234 1
PRC ISBN: 978 1 47385 240 2
The right of Adrian Coombs-Hoar to be identified as the Author of
this Work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright,
Designs and Patents Act 1988.
A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the British
Library
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or
transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical
including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and
retrieval system, without permission from the Publisher in writing.
Typeset in Ehrhardt by
Mac Style Ltd, Bridlington, East Yorkshire
Printed and bound in the UK by CPI Group (UK) Ltd,
Croydon, CRO 4YY
Pen & Sword Books Ltd incorporates the imprints of Pen & Sword
Archaeology, Atlas, Aviation, Battleground, Discovery, Family
History, History, Maritime, Military, Naval, Politics, Railways, Select,
Transport, True Crime, and Fiction, Frontline Books, Leo Cooper,
Praetorian Press, Seaforth Publishing and Wharncliffe.
For a complete list of Pen & Sword titles please contact
PEN & SWORD BOOKS LIMITED
47 Church Street, Barnsley, South Yorkshire, S70 2AS, England
E-mail: [email protected]
Website: www.pen-and-sword.co.uk
Contents
Maps & Diagrams
Acknowledgements
Introduction
Chapter 1
The Goths: Their Origins, Tribal Structure, Home Life and Warlike Ability
Chapter 2
The Goths’ Part in the ‘Crisis of the Third Century’: And Roman-Gothic Relations Up To the Reign of Valens
Chapter 3
Valens, Procopius, and the Goths
Chapter 4
Valens’ Gothic Campaigns AD 367–369
Chapter 5
Crisis Beyond the Danube AD 369–376
Chapter 6
AD 367–376 – Friends and Enemies
Chapter 7
AD 376 – The Beginning of the End
Chapter 8
The Battle of the Willows: A Blueprint for Disaster?
Chapter 9
The Roman Offensives AD 377–378
Chapter 10
The Calm Before the Storm: The Last Fateful Days Before the Battle of Adrianople, the Decisions Made and Why
Chapter 11
9 August AD 378: ‘The Day the Eagles Fell’
Chapter 12
Aftermath
Chapter 13
‘What If …’
Chapter 14
The Location of the Battle of Adrianople
Chapter 15
The Roman Empire and its Army During the Reign of Valens
Chapter 16
Biographies
Chapter 17
The Sources
Abbreviations
Notes
Bibliography
Maps & Diagrams
Map 1:
Edirne (Adrianople) with distances to probable battlefield locations
Diagram 1:
Gothic wagon laager in single ring
Diagram 2:
Gothic wagon laager in concentric rings
Diagram 3:
Gothic wagon laager in spiral formation
Diagram 4:
Gothic wagon laager in group formation
Diagram 5:
Roman deployment in front of Goth wagons with direction of Gothic cavalry attacks displayed
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank all those people who have inspired me to undertake this work, and also those who provided me with the encouragement and support to be able to complete it.
I would like to thank Pavel Simak for his excellent cover art ‘Eagles in the Dust – The Fall of Valens’. I would also like to thank John Hills for supplying the map and diagrams plus his thoughtful comments.
I would like to thank Michael King Macdona for helping me with translations where needed, for his knowledge of the Battle of Adrianople, and for the many interesting conversations we have had in connection with the Late Roman Empire. I would also like to thank Francis Hagan for similar reasons and for the insights he has provided.
Further mention must be made to Chris Richards and David Mather for their comments and suggestions.
I would like to thank all those historians, academics and researchers whose invaluable work I have been able to consult during my own research for this book. And I would like to thank Ammianus Marcellinus for providing me with many hours of entertaining reading.
Due to the amount of material that is available concerning the Late Roman Empire, its army and its enemies, it would be difficult to give acknowledgment to all those whose works I have consulted and so I apologize to those who I have not done so.
Finally I would like to thank Ann for putting up with piles of books and papers lying around the house and for supplying me with endless cups of tea and other beverages upon demand!
To all those I have loved and lost
Introduction
The annals record no such massacre of a battle except the one at Cannae, although the Romans more than once, deceived by trickery due to an adverse breeze of Fortune, yielded for a time to ill-success in their wars, and although the storied dirges of the Greeks have mourned over many a contest.
So wrote Ammianus Marcellinus, Roman Tribune and historian who wrote one of the more graphic accounts of the Battle of Adrianopole. At approximately 6.00 am on 9 August AD 378, a Roman army led by Valens, the Emperor of the Eastern Roman Empire, marched from the city of Adrianople to meet a Gothic army led by Fritigern, a Gothic Chieftain at a distance of between eight and twelve miles from that city. By 8.00 pm that evening two thirds of Valens’ army lay dead or dying on the battlefield, including Valens himself who perished fighting alongside his army on that day.
This book not only examines that battle in depth, but also discusses the events leading up to it, the causes of the Roman and Gothic conflict leading up to the battle, and its aftermath. It will pose questions such as how Valens’ war against the Goths may have been prevented, how the disaster at Adrianople may have been averted etc.
I will also discuss the Roman Empire’s relationship with the Goths from when they first entered into the Roman histories up to the time of Valens’ first campaigns against them and on to the battle and its immediate aftermath.
The most important ancient historical sources, several by those contemporary with the battle, have been included as have biographies of the main characters that featured before and during the battle.
I have also included a chapter concerning a number of ‘what if’ scenarios that may have changed not only the course of the battle but may ultimately have changed the course of history itself.
The completion of this book is culmination of thirty years’ interest and research into not only the battle but the events leading up to the battle during the previous one hundred years. This was a time of transition for the Roman Empire, from when it almost fell during the Crisis of the third century, the rebuilding during the early to mid fourth century and then to the Empire having to make an accommodation with
a ‘barbarian’ tribe that they could not eject from within their frontiers. The wealth of literary material concerning the Late Roman Empire that has appeared over the last fifteen years or so has been astounding, almost every month a new article or book appears discussing aspects of the Roman Empire that the time frame of this book covers. There were so many excellent works to choose from whilst carrying out research for this book that I must apologize if some of them do not get a mention.
By looking at the whole picture of the Romano/Gothic relationship I have chanced upon some aspects of this relationship that I believe have been overlooked and which had a bearing on the Battle of Adrianople. I will be discussing these and more in the relevant chapters.
Chapter One
The Goths
Their Origins, Tribal Structure, Home Life and Warlike Ability
The Goths, who were they and where did they come from?
If you were to ask the vast majority of people about ‘Goths’ they would more than likely tell you about those rather morose young people who have a penchant for wearing black, listening to sombre music and a strange fascination with vampires!
A much smaller number would probably remember something about some ‘barbarians who sacked the city of Rome a long time ago’.
It is a sad reflection of these modern times that a group of peoples that had so much influence over European history have almost disappeared from the memory of those who live in those lands that felt their influence.
The origins of the Goths are still very much a matter of debate. The earliest surviving account of the origins of the Goths is that contained within De Origine Actibusque Getarum, better known as The Origin and Deeds of the Goths. Written in the AD ‘550s’ by an Eastern Roman bureaucrat by the name of Jordanes, who himself claimed Gothic descent; it was an abbreviation of a much larger work, now sadly lost, by Cassiodorus. Jordanes stated that the Goths originated from ‘Scandza’, which was ‘a great island situated in the surge of the northern Ocean’, and that this ‘island’ was ‘in the shape of a juniper leaf with bulging sides that taper down to a point at a long end’. The location of Scandza was in the Baltic Sea at the mouth of the Vistula River in northern Poland, putting it off the eastern coast of Sweden.
According to Jordanes, the Goths left Scandza in a fleet of boats under their king, Berig, and where they landed was then known afterwards as ‘Gothiscandza’. This was in all likelihood in the vicinity of the area of northern Poland where the Vistula River flowed into the Baltic. Although Jordanes’ work no doubt contains much fantasy and myth, there is probably an element of truth in it; it’s just dividing the fact from fiction that is the main problem. This area of Poland was the location of the Wielbark culture. This culture stretched south-eastwards, following the course of the Vistula until it encountered the Prezeworsk culture which stretched further south/south eastwards. It’s believed that the expansion of the Wielbark culture into the Prezeworsk culture led to the creation of the Satana-de-Mures/Cernjachov culture further east around the region north and west of the Black Sea including the Danube, the Carpathians and the northern shore of the Black Sea itself. This version of the origin of the Goths is roughly that espoused by authors such as Wolfram (1990, 1997) and Heather (1991, 1998, and 2009), although not shared by all historians, notably Kulikowski (2009).
Gothic tribal structure was headed by the Iudex or King, like Athanaricus, or often just a very powerful or charismatic chieftain such as Fritigern. Beneath the ruler were the lesser but still powerful chieftains, such as Alavivus and Fritigern initially were, then the chieftain’s retainers, then came the common peoples and then finally the slaves. Men were the dominant members of their society; the role of women appeared to be nothing more than to keep house and rear children.
The Goths themselves were broken up into a number of tribal groupings, each with a variety of names. However, by the fourth century the Goths were divided into two dominant tribal groupings, these were the Tervingi and the Greuthungi Goths. The transition from a number of Gothic tribal groupings to two larger dominant groups was probably as a result of several powerful Gothic leaders assimilating most of the other Gothic tribes through a series of military campaigns, as Jordanes’ history suggests. The Tervingi were in the main settled around the area of the Carpathians whilst the Greuthungi lived in the more steppe-like area to the east of the Tervingi, roughly in the area to the north of the Caspian Sea. The main differences between the two tribal groupings appear to have been that the Tervingi warriors were mostly infantry, with a smaller number of cavalry formed by the richer nobles, whilst the Greuthungi appear to be mostly cavalry warriors with a smaller number of foot bowmen.1 This is not an unreasonable view as the terrain both tribes were located in would have dictated the nature and style of their warfare, i.e. the more rough and hilly/mountainous terrain in the Carpathians was more conducive to warriors who fought on foot, whilst the more open steppes north of the Caspian Sea would have favoured mounted warfare.
There are very few indications of the style of clothing the Goths favoured. Their clothing did not appear to merit any real comment by contemporary historians. The best we can say is that the clothing would have been simple, probably tunic and long trousers for the men and a basic dress for the women. Clothing colour would have been natural colours, such as browns, greens and off-white.
Literary references coupled with grave finds indicate that at least before AD 376 most Gothic warriors would have been unarmoured, only the nobles, chieftains and kings would have worn body armour and helmets. The Tervingi infantry would have mostly been armed with a spear and shield, usually round or oval although some may have had a more ‘traditional’ hexagonal, almost coffin-shaped one. All the Goths would have had in addition a long knife, and some would have been armed with a bow, very similar to their Greuthungi counterparts. Swords would have been rare and before the crossing of the Danube in AD 376 only the kings, chieftains and nobles would have possessed them. The Tervingi noble cavalry, and the main bulk of the Greuthungi cavalry would likely have been mostly unarmoured and armed either with a long spear (contus), held with both hands or a pair of shorter spears that could be thrown as the later Goths were described as doing so by Procopius.2 All the warriors, both foot and mounted, appeared to have worn a knee length tunic and long trousers that reached the ankles, with shoes as shown in pen and ink drawings of the now almost destroyed Column of Arcadius and the destroyed Column of Theodosius, both located in the Beyazit area of Istanbul.3 However, by the time of the Battle of Adrianople itself it is highly likely that most of the Goths would have been almost as well equipped as their Roman counterparts, having had ample opportunity to strip the arms and armour from the bodies of the Romans killed or captured in the various skirmishes and battles between AD 376 and 378.
Both tribes formed mobile ‘cities’ made from the wagons they travelled in. Whilst no contemporary account exists that details exactly what these Gothic wagons looked like, there is a description in Ammianus that details the Alans, and their wagons. As the Alans’ territory bordered that of the Greuthungi, it not unreasonable to assume their wagons would have been very similar to that of the Gothic ones. This is the description of the Alan wagons:
For they have no huts and care nothing for using the plowshare, but they live upon flesh and an abundance of milk, and dwell in wagons, which they cover with rounded canopies of bark and drive over the boundless wastes. And when they come to a place rich in grass, they place their carts in a circle and feed like wild beasts. As soon as the fodder is used up, they place their cities, as we might call them, on the wagons and so convey them: in the wagons the males have intercourse with the women, and in the wagons their babes are born and reared: wagons form their permanent dwellings, and wherever they come, that place they look upon as their natural home. Driving their plow-cattle before them, they pasture them with their flocks, and they give particular attention to breeding horses.4
There is a contradiction in this passage in that
whilst Ammianus indicates those using the wagons lived in them, and performed most human functions in them, he also stated that the Alans (and presumably the Goths as well) placed their ‘cities’ back on the wagons when they were ready to move on. This suggests that the bark wagon canopies could be placed on the ground and be used like tents, and then put back on the wagons when they were preparing to travel. This would be the natural thing to do as these canopies could then be the places where other family members or even slaves could sleep. Unfortunately Ammianus does not indicate what the draft animals used to pull the wagons were, but they could well have been the ‘plow-cattle’, i.e. oxen, he referred to.
The wagons themselves are a mystery, although it’s fairly certain they had four wheels and were pulled by a team of animals, such wagons are shown in the pen and ink drawings of the Column of Arcadius and in a number of medieval manuscripts and artworks. The only sources we can really draw on concerning wagons and their contents in a similar situation to the Goths are those drawn from diaries and books written by travellers during the Great Migration period in the United States between 1840 and 1860. The wagons used by the migrants during that period were constructed from hard woods such as oak, poplar, ash etc. They had to be constructed as strongly as possible in order to survive the punishing conditions they were going to face. The bed or base of a typical wagon was 9 or 10ft long, 2ft wide with sides that were 2ft high. The width does not appear very wide at all but contemporary American records state that this was wide enough for the occupants to sleep in, even with the boxes in the base containing the tools and supplies needed for the journey (the occupants then sleeping on top of the boxes themselves). The boxes would contain food supplies, tools, cooking utensils, spare clothing, weapons, rope and a shovel. There would also be water kegs which could also be kept in hoops on the sides of the wagon. There was a single pole which the draft animals could be yoked to. These wagons were pulled either by a team of six horses/mules or a yoke of four oxen. The wagons could potentially carry as much as 6,000 pounds in weight but this was very extreme, the normal maximum was 2,500 pounds whilst the recommended maximum was 1,600 pounds. A surviving supply list for a family of four from this period had the wagon carrying 800 pounds of flour, 200 pounds of lard, 700 pounds of bacon, 200 pounds of beans, 100 pounds of fruit, 75 pounds of coffee and 25 pounds of salt. A Gothic list would have exchanged the bacon for mutton or horse flesh and of course no coffee!5 In 1847 a wagon train travelling to Oregon to California was composed of 1,336 males, 789 females, and 1,384 children of both sexes. They travelled in 941 wagons and took with them 469 sheep, 7,846 cattle, and 929 horses and mules.6
Eagles in the Dust Page 1