Perls, F. The Gestalt Approach: Eyewitness to Therapy. Palo Alto, Calif.: Science and Behavior Books, Inc., 1973.
Polster, I. and M. Gestalt Therapy Integrated. New York: Bruner/Mazel, 1973.
Poloya, G. Patterns of Plausible Inference. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1954.
Pribram, Karl. Languages of the Brain. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1971.
Sapir, E. The Selected Writing of Edward Sapir. D. Mandelbaum (ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press, 1963.
Satir, Virginia. Conjoint Family Therapy. Palo Alto, Calif. : Science and Behavior Books, Inc., 1964.
Satir, Virginia. Peoplemaking. Palo Alto, Calif.: Science and Behavior Books, Inc., 1972.
Watzlawick, P.; Beavin, J.; and Jackson, D. Pragmatics of Human Communication. New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 1967.
Watzlawick, P.; Weakland, J.; and Fisch, R. Change. New-York: W. W. Norton and Company, 1974.
Whorf, B. "Grammatical Categories." In J. E. Carroll (ed.), Language, Thought and Reality. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1956.
Appendix A
SYNTACTIC ENVIRONMENTS FOR IDENTIFYING NATURAL LANGUAGE PRESUPPOSITIONS IN ENGLISH
Our purpose in presenting the material in this appendix is to indicate the scope and complexity of the natural language phenomenon of presuppositions. In addition, by listing some of the more common syntactic environments in which presuppositions occur, we provide an opportunity to practice for those students who are interested in sharpening their intuitions in recognizing presuppositions. The list of syntactic environments is not exhaustive, and we will not attempt to present any of the theories which have been proposed by different linguists, logicians, semanticists, or philosophers to account for presuppositions. Rather, our objective is more practical.
At the present time, presuppositions are a major focus of study for a number of linguists, especially linguists who consider themselves Generative Semanticists. In compiling this list of syntactic environments, we have borrowed heavily from the work of Lauri Kartunnen. See the Bibliography for sources.
1. Simple Presuppositions.
These are syntactic environments in which the existence of some entity is required for the sentence to make sense (to be either true or false).
a. Proper Names.
(George Smith left the party early.) -> (There exists someone named George Smith.) where -> means presupposes.
b. Pronouns: her, him, they.
(I saw him leave.) -> (There exists some male [i.e., him].)
c. Definite Descriptions.
(I liked the woman with the silver earrings.) -> (There exists a woman with silver
earrings.)
d. Generic Noun Phrases.
Noun arguments standing for a whole class. (If wombats have no trees in which to climb, they are sad.) -> (There are wombats.)
e. Some Quantifiers: all, each, every, some, many, few, none.
(If some of the dragons show up, I'm leaving.) -> (There are dragons.)
2. Complex Presuppositions.
Cases in which more than the simple existence of an element is presupposed,
a. Relative Clauses.
Complex noun arguments, with a noun followed by a phrase beginning with who, which, or that.
(Several of the women who had spoken to you left the shop.) -> (Several women had spoken to you.)
b. Subordinate Clauses of Time.
Classes identified by the cue words before, after, during, as, since, prior, when, while.
(If the judge was home when I stopped by her house, she didn't answer her door.) -> (I stopped by the judge's house.)
c. Cleft Sentence.
Sentences beginning with It wasis noun argument.
(It was the extra pressure which shattered the window.) -> (Something shattered the window.)
d. Pseudo-Cleft Sentences.
(Identified by the form What [Sentence] is [sentence].
(What Sharon hopes to do is to become well liked.) -> (Sharon hopes to do something.)
e. Stressed Sentences.
Voice stress (If Margaret has talked to THE POLICE, we're finished.) -> (Margaret has talked to someone.)
f. Complex Adjectives: new, old, former, present, previous.
(If Fredo wears his new ring, I'll be blown away.) -> (Fredo had/has an old ring.)
g. Ordinal Numerals: first, second, third, fourth, another.
(If you can find a third clue in this letter, I'll make you a mosquito pie.) -> (There are two clues already found.)
h. Comparatives: -er, more, less.
(If you know better riders than Sue does, tell me who they are.) -> (Sue knows [at least] one rider.)
(If you know better riders than Sue is, tell me who they are.) -> (Sue is a rider.)
i. Comparative As: As x as ... .
(If her daughter is as funny as her husband is, we'll all enjoy ourselves.) -> (Her husband is funny.)
j. Repetitive Cue Words: too, also, either, again, back.
(If she tells me that again, I'll kiss her.) -> (She has told me that before.)
k. Repetitive Verbs and Adverbs.
Verbs and adverbs beginning with re-, e.g., repeatedly, return, restore, retell, replace, renew.
(If he returns before I leave, I want to talk to him.) -> (He has been here before.)
l. Qualifiers: only, even, except, just.
(Only Amy saw the bank robbers.) ->(Amy saw the bank robbers.)
m. Change-of-Place Verbs: come, go, leave, arrive, depart, enter.
(If Sam has left home, he is lost.) -> (Sam has been at home.)
n. Change-of-Time Verbs and Adverbs: begin, end, stop, start, continue, proceed, already, yet, still, anymore.
(My bet is that Harry will continue to smile.) -> (Harry has been smiling.)
o. Change-of-State Verbs: change, transform, turn into, become.
(If Mae turns into a hippie, I'll be surprised.) -> (Mae is not now a hippie.)
p. Factive Verbs and Adjectives: odd, aware, know, realize, regret.
(It is odd that she called Maxine at midnight.) -> (She called Maxine at midnight.)
q. Commentary Adjectives and Adverbs: lucky, fortunately, far out, out of sight, groovy, bitchin'. . . innocently, happily, necessarily.
(It's far out that you understand your dog's feelings.) -> (You understand your dog's feelings.)
r. Counterfactual Conditional Clauses.
Verbs having subjunctive tense.
(If you had listened to me and your father, you wouldn't be in the wonderful position you're in now.) -> (You didn't listen to me and your father.)
s. Contrary-to-Expectation: should.
(If you should [happen to] decide you want to talk to me, I'll be hanging out in the city dump.) -> (I don't expect you to want to talk to me.)
t. Selectional Restrictions.
(If my professor gets pregnant, I'll be disappointed.) -> (My professor is a woman.)
u. Questions.
(Who ate the tapes?) -> (Someone ate the tapes.)
(I want to know who ate the tapes.) -> (Someone ate the tapes.)
v. Negative Questions.
(Didn't you want to talk to me?) -> (I thought that you wanted to talk to me.)
w. Rhetorical Questions.
(Who cares whether you show up or not?) -> (Nobody cares whether you show up or not.)
x. Spurious: not.
(I wonder if you're not being a little unfair.) -> (I Think that you're being unfair.)
Примечания
1
The term language assumption or presupposition refers to the things which the listener must assume to be true about the world of experience in order for the verbal communication to make any sense at all. For example, if I say to you, either:
(a) I ignored the ant on my plate.
Or
(b) I didn't ignore the ant on my plate.
in order for you to make sense out of what I have said, you must accept a world
of experience in which it is true that:
(c) There was an ant on my plate.
Each of us as speaker/listener of the language English (the same is true of every other natural language) is constantly using presuppositions in our verbal communications. Learning to understand and use this pattern will increase the effectiveness of your communication. In this volume, we include an appendix, A, which identifies some of the many English forms which carry presuppositions. We also recommend pages 52-53 and pages 9295 in Volume I of The Structure of Magic, Science and Behavior Books, 1975; pages 240-243 in Patterns of the Hypnotic Techniques of Milton H. Erickson, M.D., Volume I, Meta Publications, 1975; and Part II of The Structure of Magic, Volume II, Science and Behavior Books, 1976, for a fuller presentation of the various uses of this pattern.
(<< back)
2
The use of the pattern of verbal communication called embedded question in the context of hypnosis is presented on pages 237240 in Patterns of the Hypnotic Techniques of Milton H. Erickson, M.D.
(<< back)
3
The use of the pattern of verbal communication called conversational postulate or polite command in the context of hypnosis is presented on pages 241-246 of Patterns of the Hypnotic Techniques of Milton H. Erickson, M.D.
(<< back)
4
The term referential index refers to whether a language representation picks out a specific portion of the listener's world of experience. For example, the words and phrases:
. . . this page . . .
. . . the reader . . .
. . . Virginia Satir . . .
. . . the number on this page . . .
all pick out a specific part of the reader's ongoing experience, while words and phrases such as:
. . . that particular sensation . . .
. . . people who fail to understand this sentence ...
. . . someone, sometime, somewhere, somehow, something . . .
... no one, everybody, all the times I can remember . . .
do not pick out a specific part of the reader's experience. We recommend pages 47-48 and 80-88 in The Structure of Magic, Volume I; pages 160-177 in Conjoint Family Therapy, Science and Behavior Books, 1964; and pages 217-224 in Patterns of the Hypnotic Techniques of Milton H. Erickson, M.D., for a more extended presentation.
(<< back)
5
A fuller presentation of the use of this verbal pattern is available on pages 40-43, 49-51, and 59-73 in The Structure of Magic, Volume I; and pages 209-231 in Patterns of the Hypnotic Techniques of Milton H. Erickson, M.D.
(<< back)
6
The process of requesting that the family member specify his process descriptions — that is, specify verbs — is one of the ways in which the therapist insures that he or she is working with the coping pattern in the family member's model of the world and not in the therapist's own model projected onto the family member. A fuller presentation is available on pages 48-49 and 90-92 in The Structure of Magic, Volume I.
(<< back)
7
The therapist's (or hypnotist's) ability to identify and gracefully use the verbal patterns of nominalization is one of the most powerful verbal intervention patterns of which we are aware. A fuller presentation of the uses of this pattern is available on pages 43-44 and 74-80 in The Structure of Magic, Volume I; and pages 162-164 and 229-231 in Patterns of the Hypnotic Techniques of Milton H. Erickson, M.D.
(<< back)
8
This category of verbal patterning — Semantic Ill-formedness — is one of the most powerful verbal patterns available to therapists and hypnotists in their communication. See pages 51-53 and 95-107 in The Structure of Magic, Volume I; and pages 146-152 and 209-215 in Patterns of the Hypnotic Techniques of Milton H. Erickson, M.D. In the references cited, we distinguish three classes of semantic ill-formedness: Cause-Effect semantic ill-formedness, Mind Reading and Lost Performative.
(<< back)
9
Cause-Effect semantic ill-formedness embodies all of the cases in which one person claims that another person is causing him to experience some feeling or thought, some inner state, without there being any direct physical contact between the two people. Our point is that each of us can come to have a choice about how the words, tones, body postures, movements, etc., of others will affect us. The technique of identifying Cause-Effect semantic ill-formedness by the language form in which it is presented is discussed in detail in The Structure of Magic, Volume I, pages 51-52 and 95-98; Patterns of the Hypnotic Techniques of Milton H. Erickson, M.D., Volume I, pages 146-151 and 209-213; and The Structure of Magic, Volume II, Parts II, III, and V.
(<< back)
10
Mind-Reading semantic ill-formedness, along with Cause-Effect semantic ill-formedness, is the basis of much of the calibrated communication cycles which result in pain and dissatisfaction for family members. See The Structure of Magic, Volume I, pages 104-106, and Patterns of the Hypnotic Techniques of Milton H. Erickson, M.D., Volume I, pages 151-152 and 213-215.
(<< back)
11
Complex Equivalence is the relationship between a word or set of words and some experience which those words name. For example, for some people the word caring means always responding when help is requested; for others, it means knowing what the other person requires and supplying it without any need for the other to ask; for still others, it means touching gently; looking happy when the other person approaches, etc. Thus, the pattern of Complex Equivalence is roughly the same as the idea of the definition of the word(s) involved; however, Complex Equivalence is not of the standard dictionary definition, but must be relativized to the particular person's model of the world. See The Structure of Magic, Volume I, pages 88-90; Patterns of the Hypnotic Techniques of Milton H. Erickson, M.D., Volume II.
(<< back)
12
Modal operators are discussed in more detail in The Structure of Magic, Volume I, pages 69-73.
(<< back)
13
The Structure of Magic, Volume I, Chapter 1, includes a discussion of these three principles.
(<< back)
14
The notion of representational systems refers to the way in which each of us typically represents to ourselves the world of experience. An extended presentation of this pattern and the ways in which it can be usefully employed is given in The Structure of Magic, Volume II, Part I; and in Patterns of the Hypnotic Techniques of Milton H. Erickson, M.D., especially Volume II.
(<< back)
15
This technique — adding representational systems — is meta-tactic II, discussed in Part I of The Structure of Magic, Volume II.
(<< back)
16
Congruency is perhaps the single most important dimension of communication which each of us, as agents of change, can develop — both in being congruent in our own communication and in our ability to detect congruency and incongruency in the communication of others. See Part II, The Structure of Magic, Volume II; Peoplemaking, Science and Behavior Books, 1972, Chapters 4 and 5; and Patterns of the Hypnotic Techniques of Milton H. Erickson, M.D., Volume II.
(<< back)
17
We recommend that the reader read Parts II and IV of The Structure of Magic, Volume II, for an extended discussion of the development and utilization of incongruency in both individual and family therapy.
(<< back)
18
We intend to explore the notion of rules, their development and utilization in therapy, in Volume II of Changing with Families (forthcoming). We recommend R. D. Laing's discussion of rules in Politics of the Family and Other Essays, Tavistock, London; Peoplemaking, Chapter 7; and The Structure of Magic, Volume II, Part IV.
(<< back)
19
This phenomenon, in which changes occur in areas of behavior not expressly dealt with in the therapeutic session, is discussed in The Magic of Patterns/The Patterns of
Magic (forthcoming, Bandler and Grinder). The key concept is that of isomorphism, same-form pattern. Thus, if an individual makes a change in the area of the way he relates to his mother — that is, he gains new choices about how he relates to his mother — then, typically, he surprises himself with a change in his behavior about the way he relates to his wife, the women with whom he works at the office, etc. The specific principles by which such changes are generalized will be presented in the reference cited above.
Changing with Families - A Book About Further Education For Being Human Page 14