The Man in the Brown Suit

Home > Mystery > The Man in the Brown Suit > Page 3
The Man in the Brown Suit Page 3

by Agatha Christie


  I folded up the paper carefully and put it in my bag. I walked home slowly and did a good deal of thinking.

  I explained to Mrs. Flemming that I had witnessed a nasty accident in the Tube and that I was rather upset and would go to my room and lie down. The kind woman insisted on my having a cup of tea. After that I was left to my own devices, and I proceeded to carry out a plan I had formed coming home. I wanted to know what it was that had produced that curious feeling of unreality whilst I was watching the doctor examine the body. First I lay down on the floor in the attitude of the corpse, then I laid a bolster down in my stead, and proceeded to duplicate, so far as I could remember, every motion and gesture of the doctor. When I had finished I had got what I wanted. I sat back on my heels and frowned at the opposite walls.

  There was a brief notice in the evening papers that a man had been killed in the Tube, and a doubt was expressed whether it was suicide or accident. That seemed to me to make my duty clear, and when Mr. Flemming heard my story he quite agreed with me.

  “Undoubtedly you will be wanted at the inquest. You say no one else was near enough to see what happened?”

  “I had the feeling someone was coming up behind me, but I can’t be sure—and, anyway, they wouldn’t be as near as I was.”

  The inquest was held. Mr. Flemming made all the arrangements and took me there with him. He seemed to fear that it would be a great ordeal for me, and I had to conceal from him my complete composure.

  The deceased had been identified as L. B. Carton. Nothing had been found in his pockets except a house agent’s order to view a house on the river near Marlow. It was in the name of L. B. Carton, Russell Hotel. The bureau clerk from the hotel indentified the man as having arrived the day before and booked a room under that name. He had registered as L. B. Carton, Kimberley, S. Africa. He had evidently come straight off the steamer.

  I was the only person who had seen anything of the affair.

  “You think it was an accident?” the coroner asked me.

  “I am positive of it. Something alarmed him, and he stepped backwards blindly without thinking what he was doing.”

  “But what could have alarmed him?”

  “That I don’t know. But there was something. He looked panic-stricken.”

  A stolid juryman suggested that some men were terrified of cats. The man might have seen a cat. I didn’t think his suggestion a very brilliant one, but it seemed to pass muster with the jury, who were obviously impatient to get home and only too pleased at being able to give a verdict of accident as opposed to suicide.

  “It is extraordinary to me,” said the coroner, “that the doctor who first examined the body has not come forward. His name and address should have been taken at the time. It was most irregular not to do so.”

  I smiled to myself. I had my own theory in regard to the doctor. In pursuance of it, I determined to make a call upon Scotland Yard at an early date.

  But the next morning brought a surprise. The Flemmings took in the Daily Budget, and the Daily Budget was having a day after its own heart.

  EXTRAORDINARY SEQUEL

  TO TUBE ACCIDENT

  WOMAN FOUND STRANGLED

  IN LONELY HOUSE

  I read eagerly.

  “A sensational discovery was made yesterday at the Mill House, Marlow. The Mill House, which is the property of Sir Eustace Pedler, MP, is to be let unfurnished, and an order to view this property was found in the pocket of the man who was at first thought to have commited suicide by throwing himself on the live rail at Hyde Park Corner Tube Station. In an upper room of the Mill House the body of a beautiful young woman was discovered yesterday, strangled. She is thought to be a foreigner, but so far has not been identified. The police are reported to have a clue. Sir Eustace Pedler, the owner of the Mill House, is wintering on the Riviera.”

  Four

  Nobody came forward to identify the dead woman. The inquest elicited the following facts.

  Shortly after one o’clock on January 8th, a well-dressed woman with a slight foreign accent had entered the offices of Messrs Butler and Park, house agents, in Knightsbridge. She explained that she wanted to rent or purchase a house on the Thames within easy reach of London. The particulars of several were given to her, including those of the Mill House. She gave the name of Mrs. de Castina and her address at the Ritz, but there proved to be no one of that name staying there, and the hotel people failed to identify the body.

  Mrs. James, the wife of Sir Eustace Pedler’s gardener, who acted as caretaker to the Mill House and inhabited the small lodge opening on the main road, gave evidence. About three o’clock that afternoon, a lady came to see over the house. She produced an order from the house agents, and, as was the usual custom, Mrs. James gave her the keys to the house. It was situated at some distance from the lodge, and she was not in the habit of accompanying prospective tenants. A few minutes later a young man arrived. Mrs. James described him as tall and broad-shouldered, with a bronzed face and light grey eyes. He was clean-shaven and was wearing a brown suit. He explained to Mrs. James that he was a friend of the lady who had come to look over the house, but had stopped at the post office to send a telegram. She directed him to the house, and thought no more about the matter.

  Five minutes later he reappeared, handed back the keys and explained that he feared the house would not suit them. Mrs. James did not see the lady, but thought that she had gone on ahead. What she did notice was that the young man seemed very much upset about something. “He looked like a man who’d seen a ghost. I thought he was taken ill.”

  On the following day another lady and gentleman came to see the property and discovered the body lying on the floor in one of the upstairs rooms. Mrs. James identified it as that of the lady who had come the day before. The house agents also recognized it as that of “Mrs. de Castina.” The police surgeon gave it as his opinion that the woman had been dead about twenty-four hours. The Daily Budget had jumped to the conclusion that the man in the Tube had murdered the woman and afterwards committed suicide. However, as the Tube victim was dead at two o’clock and the woman was alive and well at three o’clock, the only logical conclusion to come to was that the two occurrences had nothing to do with each other, and that the order to view the house at Marlow found in the dead man’s pocket was merely one of those coincidences which so often occur in this life.

  A verdict of “Wilful Murder against some person or persons unknown” was returned, and the police (and the Daily Budget) were left to look for “the man in the brown suit.” Since Mrs. James was positive that there was no one in the house when the lady entered it, and that nobody except the young man in question entered it until the following afternoon, it seemed only logical to conclude that he was the murderer of the unfortunate Mrs. de Castina. She had been strangled with a piece of stout black cord, and had evidently been caught unawares with no time to cry out. The black silk handbag which she carried contained a well-filled notecase and some loose change, a fine lace handkerchief, unmarked, and the return half of a first-class ticket to London. Nothing much there to go upon.

  Such were the details published broadcast by the Daily Budget, and “Find the Man in the Brown Suit” was their daily war cry. On an average about five hundred people wrote daily to announce their success in the quest, and tall young men with well-tanned faces cursed the day when their tailors had persuaded them to a brown suit. The accident in the Tube, dismissed as a coincidence, faded out of the public mind.

  Was it a coincidence? I was not so sure. No doubt I was prejudiced—the Tube incident was my own pet mystery—but there certainly seemed to me to be a connexion of some kind between the two fatalities. In each there was a man with a tanned face—evidently an Englishman living abroad—and there were other things. It was the consideration of these other things that finally impelled me to what I considered a dashing step. I presented myself at Scotland Yard and demanded to see whoever was in charge of the Mill House case.

  My request took
some time to understand, as I had inadvertently selected the department for lost umbrellas, but eventually I was ushered into a small room and presented to Detective Inspector Meadows.

  Inspector Meadows was a small man with a ginger head and what I considered a peculiarly irritating manner. A satellite, also in plain clothes, sat unobtrusively in a corner.

  “Good morning,” I said nervously.

  “Good morning. Will you take a seat? I understand you’ve something to tell me that you think may be of use to us.”

  His tone seemed to indicate that such a thing was unlikely in the extreme. I felt my temper stirred.

  “Of course you know about the man who was killed in the Tube? The man who had an order to view this same house at Marlow in his pocket.”

  “Ah!” said the inspector. “You are the Miss Beddingfeld who gave evidence at the inquest. Certainly the man had an order in his pocket. A lot of other people may have had too—only they didn’t happen to be killed.”

  I rallied my forces.

  “You didn’t think it odd that this man had no ticket in his pocket?”

  “Easiest thing in the world to drop your ticket. Done it myself.”

  “And no money.”

  “He had some loose change in his trousers pocket.”

  “But no notecase.”

  “Some men don’t carry a pocketbook or notecase of any kind.”

  I tried another tack.

  “You don’t think it’s odd that the doctor never came forward afterwards?”

  “A busy medical man very often doesn’t read the papers. He probably forgot all about the accident.”

  “In fact, inspector, you are determined to find nothing odd,” I said sweetly.

  “Well, I’m inclined to think you’re a little too fond of the word, Miss Beddingfeld. Young ladies are romantic, I know—fond of mysteries and suchlike. But as I’m a busy man—”

  I took the hint and rose.

  The man in the corner raised a meek voice.

  “Perhaps if the young lady would tell us briefly what her ideas really are on the subject, inspector?”

  The inspector fell in with the suggestion readily enough.

  “Yes, come now, Miss Beddingfeld, don’t be offended. You’ve asked questions and hinted things. Just straight out what it is you’ve got in your head.”

  I wavered between injured dignity and the overwhelming desire to express my theories. Injured dignity went to the wall.

  “You said at the inquest you were positive it wasn’t suicide?”

  “Yes, I’m quite certain of that. The man was frightened. What frightened him? It wasn’t me. But someone might have been walking up the platform towards us—someone he recognized.”

  “You didn’t see anyone?”

  “No,” I admitted. “I didn’t turn my head. Then, as soon as the body was recovered from the line, a man pushed forward to examine it, saying he was a doctor.”

  “Nothing unusual in that,” said the inspector dryly.

  “But he wasn’t a doctor.”

  “What?”

  “He wasn’t a doctor,” I repeated.

  “How do you know that, Miss Beddingfeld?”

  “It’s difficult to say, exactly. I’ve worked in hospitals during the war, and I’ve seen doctors handle bodies. There’s a sort of deft professional callousness that this man hadn’t got. Besides, a doctor doesn’t usually feel for the heart on the right side of the body.”

  “He did that?”

  “Yes, I didn’t notice it specially at the time—except that I felt there was something wrong. But I worked it out when I got home, and then I saw why the whole thing had looked so unhandy to me at the time.”

  “H’m,” said the inspector. He was reaching slowly for pen and paper.

  “In running his hands over the upper part of the man’s body he would have ample opportunity to take anything he wanted from the pockets.”

  “Doesn’t sound likely to me,” said the inspector. “But—well, can you describe him at all?”

  “He was tall and broad-shouldered, wore a dark overcoat and black boots, a bowler hat. He had a dark-pointed beard and gold-rimmed eyeglasses.”

  “Take away the overcoat, the beard and the eyeglasses, and there wouldn’t be much to know him by,” grumbled the inspector. “He could alter his appearance easily enough in five minutes if he wanted to—which he would do if he’s the swell pickpocket you suggest.”

  I had not intended to suggest anything of the kind. But from this moment I gave the inspector up as hopeless.

  “Nothing more you can tell us about him?” he demanded, as I rose to depart.

  “Yes,” I said. I seized my opportunity to fire a parting shot. “His head was markedly brachycephalic. He will not find it so easy to alter that.”

  I observed with pleasure that Inspector Meadows’s pen wavered. It was clear that he did not know how to spell brachycephalic.

  Five

  In the first heat of indignation, I found my next step unexpectedly easy to tackle. I had had a half-formed plan in my head when I went to Scotland Yard. One to be carried out if my interview there was unsatisfactory (it had been profoundly unsatisfactory). That is, if I had the nerve to go through with it.

  Things that one would shrink from attempting normally are easily tackled in a flush of anger. Without giving myself time to reflect, I walked straight to the house of Lord Nasby.

  Lord Nasby was the millionaire owner of the Daily Budget. He owned other papers—several of them, but the Daily Budget was his special child. It was as the owner of the Daily Budget that he was known to every householder in the United Kingdom. Owing to the fact that an itinerary of the great man’s daily proceedings had just been published, I knew exactly where to find him at this moment. It was his hour for dictating to his secretary in his own house.

  I did not, of course, suppose that any young woman who chose to come and ask for him would be at once admitted to the august presence. But I had attended to that side of the matter. In the card tray in the hall of the Flemmings’ house, I had observed the card of the Marquis of Loamsley, England’s most famous sporting peer. I had removed the card, cleaned it carefully with bread crumbs, and pencilled upon it the words: “Please give Miss Beddingfeld a few moments of your time.” Adventuresses must not be too scrupulous in their methods.

  The thing worked. A powdered footman received the card and bore it away. Presently a pale secretary appeared. I fenced with him successfully. He retired in defeat. He again reappeared and begged me to follow him. I did so. I entered a large room, a frightened-looking shorthand typist fled past me like a visitant from the spirit world. Then the door shut and I was face to face with Lord Nasby.

  A big man. Big head. Big face. Big moustache. Big stomach. I pulled myself together. I had not come here to comment on Lord Nasby’s stomach. He was already roaring at me.

  “Well, what is it? What does Loamsley want? You are his secretary? What’s it all about?”

  “To begin with,” I said with as great an appearance of coolness as I could manage, “I don’t know Lord Loamsley, and he certainly knows nothing about me. I took his card from the tray in the house of the people I’m staying with, and I wrote those words on it myself. It was important that I should see you.”

  For a moment it appeared to be a toss up as to whether Lord Nasby had apoplexy or not. In the end he swallowed twice and got over it.

  “I admire your coolness, young woman. Well, you see me! If you interest me, you will continue to see me for exactly two minutes longer.”

  “That will be ample,” I replied. “And I shall interest you. It’s the Mill House Mystery.”

  “If you’ve found ‘The Man in the Brown Suit,’ write to the editor,” he interrupted hastily.

  “If you will interrupt, I shall be more than two minutes,” I said sternly. “I haven’t found ‘The Man in the Brown Suit,’ but I’m quite likely to do so.”

  In as few words as possible I put the
facts of the Tube accident and the conclusions I had drawn from them before him. When I had finished he said unexpectedly, “What do you know of brachycephalic heads?”

  I mentioned Papa.

  “The Monkey man? Eh? Well, you seem to have a head of some kind upon your shoulders, young woman. But it’s all pretty thin, you know. Not much to go upon. And no use to us—as it stands.”

  “I’m perfectly aware of that.”

  “What d’you want, then?”

  “I want a job on your paper to investigate this matter.”

  “Can’t do that. We’ve got our own special man on it.”

  “And I’ve got my own special knowledge.”

  “What you’ve just told me, eh?”

  “Oh, no, Lord Nasby. I’ve still got something up my sleeve.”

  “Oh, you have, have you? You seem a bright sort of girl. Well, what is it?”

  “When this so-called doctor got into the lift, he dropped a piece of paper. I picked it up. It smelt of moth balls. So did the dead man. The doctor didn’t. So I saw at once that the doctor must have taken it off the body. It had two words written on it and some figures.”

  “Let’s see it.”

  Lord Nasby stretched out a careless hand.

  “I think not,” I said, smiling. “It’s my find you see.”

  “I’m right. You are a bright girl. Quite right to hang on to it. No scruples about not handing it over to the police?”

  “I went there to do so this morning. They persisted in regarding the whole thing as having nothing to do with the Marlow affair, so I thought that in the circumstances I was justified in retaining the paper. Besides, the inspector put my back up.”

  “Shortsighted man. Well, my dear girl, here’s all I can do for you. Go on working on this line of yours. If you get anything—anything that’s publishable—send it along and you shall have your chance. There’s always room for real talent on the Daily Budget. But you’ve got to make good first. See?”

 

‹ Prev