they’re majority. So what if other students are stupid. That’s none of my business.
The same way, so what if so many women are getting bad deals in prostitution? If force or fraud is involved, then just charge whoever did it with normal laws against rape and fraud.
Why should the fact that some people untalented on their job don’t get good deals should affect those from getting huge money from their talent?
Another obvious sign is to look at legal jobs that are similar to prostitution. Did you ever think that no porn stars can possibly do this consensually? C’mon. It’s a big industry. The only different between prostitution and porn is the camera right?
What about strippers? How many women are forced or tricked to get naked on night clubs?
According to the same study, strippers reported very high levels of job satisfaction. The researchers found the women were overwhelmingly motivated by "career and economic choices" rather than drug addiction or coercion. "These young women do not buy the line that they are being exploited, because they are the ones making the money out of a three-minute dance and a bit of a chat," says study author Teela Sanders. - https://theweek.com/article/index/206640/5-surprising-facts-about-strippers
Another issue is that having sex is not such a bad thing. In fact, more and more humans want sex more than children. When I said humans want to maximize their reproductive success, I do not mean that most humans actually think that they want children. I am simply taking a behaviorist approach and observe that humans do make babies. What humans want is actually the sex, not the baby.
In fact, many women would do it for free for their boyfriend. It’s hard to imagine people can’t consensually be paid to do something that many would do for free. When a Catarina Migliorini https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/28/catarina-migliorini-virginity-auction_n_2018957.html sells her virginity for millions of dollars the feminazi would call that exploitation. Well, ask your girl friend how much she got paid to lose her?
That’s the problem with our overlords the libtards. You pay some workers too little they scream exploitation. You pay more they scream exploitation. Last time I check, if you pay the same they’ll charge you with collusion or something.
Then, historically, the idea that prostitution is not consensual is a brand new idea despite prostitutes being the oldest occupation in history.
Before people do not think that prostitution is not consensual. People know it’s consensual, however, they said it’s immoral. Immoral is usually a code word for doing something I do not like.
Another telltale sign is bizarre definitions of consent feminazis use to justify that prostitution is not consensual.
Feminazi would claim that a woman is not consenting to prostitution if she would starve if she doesn’t prostitute her self.
Well well…. I too would starve if I stop making program and work 18 hours away for my start up. Nobody would claim that I am forced to do so right?
Also, the idea that women would starve if she doesn’t prostitute herself or doesn’t work at all is simply not factual in most developed countries. Don’t they have welfare checks?
C’mon. Name one prostitute that would starve if she quits prostitution in US. Even if she would starve if she doesn’t put up doesn’t mean that the act is not consensual. We do not think that those who work at McDonald from pay check to pay check do that non consensually.
This is just too damn obvious.
Feminazis and Religious Bigots Have Strong Incentive to Prohibit Prostitution
However, there is one thing that truly drive the nail on the obvious.
People have very strong incentive to prohibit prostitution.
Prohibit is just the code word for control. People want power. Women are valuable. Those who are happy are not those own the women but those who control them.
By prohibiting prostitution, feminazis and religious bigots control what hotter babes can choose. They can decide, for example, that marriage is okay, but straightforward sex for cash is not. Single males can decide, for example, that women can only marry, well, singles.
It’s not a surprise then that those who want to prohibit prostitution are those that want to ensure that the women’s choices do not matter.
Think about it. Prostitutes and porn star allow males to get women without having to sell their soul in marriage altar or letting government be the pimp of their relationship.
Under prostitution
There Are a Few Simple Relations between Desire, Sex, and Power
Here are the relations
All advance creatures' desire lead to sex and procreation, which is the central theme of evolutionary psychology. It's just biological laws. Chimps, monkeys, cats, dogs, and humans are not exception.
For example, we hunt food so we can eat food. We eat food to be strong. We become strong so we can work. We work so we make money. We make money so we can attract babes. We attract babes so we can copulate with them. We copulate with them so we have children.
Some would say, “But I just want to have sex for fun.” Well, you are not just your conscious thought. Your genes want to reproduce and they do so by making sex fun. Your genes are part of you.
The best way to get laid is through power. Look at the number of women in emperor's harem. Compare that to the number of women Bill Gates enjoys. Wealth alone is not enough. You need power. The reason is simple. Sex is so valuable that people won’t just accept losing to competitors that have more money. So a male need power to tell all other males to fuck off.
The best way to gain power is to control what people want. That means sex because all desire leads to sex. That is what every religious leaders, politicians, and voters try to control sex. All of them basically tell us that this kind of sex is okay and that one is not irrelevant of consent.
The more “free” the sex is, like prostitution, the more everybody will say it's nonconsensual.
That's because free, in a sense that you can choose whoever you want under terms you prefer, is so valuable and people want to control it. Controlling is usually done through prohibiting, and then gives "special" exception on cases where you are in control.
For example, all outcomes where men get laid and women end up getting paid is illegal except within marriage.
Marriage is a huge control transfer from the couple to government, society, religious leaders, or ruling class. Under prostitution, you decide terms of your coupling. Under marriage, governments decide the rules.
Marriage rules are designed to alter sexual selection. Basically it’s almost as direct as telling, “Jane, you can’t choose Tom, you should choose Charlie instead.” Anyone deciding that will have Charlie agree to commit jihad or vote for him.
For example, monogamy means women can only pick singles. Most single voters will agree. In Muslim countries, muslim women can only pick muslim men and sex outside marriage is illegal. Huge child support payment will make women less desirable for rich men. This make women pick the rich. Basically it’s whoever in power, rather than the women, that decide who she can pick.
Many Popular Illegal Drugs are NOT Harmful
And that’s why they’re very illegal.
This is actually too obvious. Just look at Wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabis_%28drug%29
When governments declare that drugs are dangerous they pick heroin or cocaine as samples. However, cocaine and heroin is actually a schedule 2 drugs. It’s not very illegal.
The one truly illegal are cannabis and ecstasy. Both are saver than alcohol and tobacco, that’s legal.
So, millions of people can just check Wikipedia. Yet they still regurgitate nonsense that ganja is dangerous.
Guess how many people died due to ganja overdoses? None.
Millions of people use ecstasy in 1980 when it was legal. Now those people are still alive with no obvious impairment whatsoever.
Not even the drug tzars deny the lack of danger on drugs. They just keep giving misleading answers when confro
nted about it.
Number of Children a Man Have Depends a Lot on Welfare and Child Support
Imagine if government say, every Chultu worshipers that produces baby will have to pay $50k per month child support like Charlie Seen. Every flying spagethy monster worshiper that produces baby will get $2k per month allowance.
Are you going to say that it doesn't have any effect on number of child produced at all?
Then libtards will say, well, FSM worshippers don't want children because they're smarter.
Now, replace the word Chultu worshippers with rich men and the word FSM worshipers with poor men.
You see, government does practice discrimination against the rich. If rich men want to produce baby they get slapped with tons of child support. If poor people produce babies they got subsidies. You think that does not affect number of children produced?
It'll work the same way whether government discriminates based on race or based on income. The affect is the same. Those who got subsidy will have more children. Duh?
Show me a sample of a millionaire with 10+ kids that are not bankrupted by child support? Actually show me a sample of a millionaire with 10+ kids.
I can think of Osama bin Laden kind of males. It seems that you do need to kill or be violent if you want to win in gene pool game.
Here is another thing about gene pool survival. 1000 years from now, your wealth would have been gone. It'll be redistributed to your children or seized by government or thieves. All that's left, 1000 years from now, is how many descendants you
Welfare Parasites Can Support More Children than Billionaires: Big pink elephants 1 - How Governments Plan to Pimp Out Your Daughters and Enslave Your Sons to Voters. Page 7