An Autobiography or the Story of My Experiments with Truth

by M K Gandhi

  Even while speeches were being delivered, efforts to settle the difference were being made on the platform, and notes were being freely exchanged among the leaders for that purpose. Malaviyaji was leaving no stone unturned to bridge the gulf. Just then Jairamdas579 handed over his amendment to me and pleaded in his own sweet manner to save the delegates from the dilemma of a division. His amendment appealed to me. Malaviyaji’s eye was already scanning every quarter for a ray of hope. I told him that Jairamdas’s amendment seemed to me to be likely to be acceptable to both the parties. The Lokamanya, to whom it was next shown, said, ‘If C.R.580 Das approves, I will have no objection.’ Deshbandhu at last thawed, and cast a look towards Sjt. Bepin Chandra Pal581 for endorsement. Malaviyaji was filled with hope. He snatched away the slip of paper containing the amendment, and before Deshbandhu had even pronounced a definite ‘yes’, shouted out, ‘Brother delegates, you will be glad to learn that a compromise has been reached.’ What followed beggars description.M12 The pandal was rent with the clapping of hands, and the erstwhile gloomy faces of the audience lit up with joy.

  It is hardly necessary to deal with the text of the amendment.582 My object here is only to describe how this resolution was undertaken as part of my experiments with which these chapters deal.

  The compromise further increased my responsibility.

  XXXVIII

  CONGRESS INITIATION

  I must regard my participation in Congress proceedings at Amritsar as my real entrance into the Congress politics.M1 My attendance at the previous Congresses was nothing more perhaps than an annual renewal of allegiance to the Congress. I never felt on these occasions that I had any other work cut out for me except that of a mere private,M2 nor did I desire more.

  My experience of Amritsar had shown that there were one or two things for which perhaps I had some aptitude and whichM3 could be useful to the Congress. I could already see that the late583 Lokamanya, the Deshbandhu, Pandit Motilalji and other leaders were pleased with my work in connection with the Punjab inquiry. They used to invite me to their informal gatherings where, as I found, resolutions for the Subjects Committee were conceived.M4 At these gatherings only those persons were invited who enjoyed the special confidence of the leaders and whose services were needed by them. Interlopers also sometimes found their way to these meetings.

  There were, for the coming year, two things which interested me, as I had some aptitude for them. One of these was the memorial of the Jallianwala Bagh massacre. The Congress had passed a resolution for it amid great enthusiasm. A fund of about five lakhs had to be collected for it. I was appointed one of the trustees. Pandit Malaviyaji enjoyed the reputation of being the prince among beggars for the public cause.M5 But I knew that I was not far behind him in that respect. It was whilst I was in South Africa that I discovered my capacity in this direction. I had not the unrivalled magic of Malaviyaji for commanding princely donations from the potentates of India.M6 But I knew that there was no question of approaching the Rajas and Maharajas for donations for the Jallianwala Bagh memorial. The main responsibility for the collection thus fell, as I had expected, on my shoulders.584 The generous citizens of Bombay subscribed most liberally, and the memorial trust has at present a handsome credit balance in the bank. But the problem that faces the country today is what kind of memorial to erect on the ground, to sanctify which, Hindus, Mussalmans and Sikhs mingled their blood. The three communities,585 instead of being bound in a bond of amity and love, are, to all appearance, at war with one another, and the nation is at a loss as to how to utilize the memorial fund.586

  My other aptitude which the Congress could utilize was as a draftsman. The Congress leaders had found that I had a faculty for condensed587 expression, which I had acquired by long practice. The then existing constitution of the Congress was Gokhale’s legacy. He had framed a few rules which served as a basis for running the Congress machinery. The interesting history of the framing of these rules I had learnt from Gokhale’s own lips. But everybody had now come to feel that these rules were no longer adequate for the ever-increasing business ofM7 the Congress. The question had been coming up year after year. The Congress at that time had practically no machinery functioning during the interval between session and session, or for dealing with fresh contingencies that might arise in the course of the yearM8 The existing rules provided for three secretaries, but as a matter of fact only one of them was a functioning secretary, and even he was not a whole-timer. How was he, single-handed, to run the Congress office, to think of the future, or to discharge during the current year the obligations contracted by the Congress in the past? During that year, therefore, everybody felt that this question would assume all the more importance. The Congress was too unwieldy a body or the discussion of public affairs.M9 There was no limit set to the number of delegates in the Congress or to the number of delegates that each province could return.588 Some improvement upon the existing chaotic condition589 was thus felt by everybody to be an imperative necessity. I undertook the responsibility of framing a constitution on one condition. I saw that there were two leaders, viz., the Lokamanya and the Deshbandhu590 who had the greatest hold on the public. I requested that they, as the representatives of the people,M10 should be associated with me on the Committee for framing the constitution. But since it was obvious that they would not have the time personally to participate in the constitution-making work, I suggested that two persons enjoying their confidence should be appointed along with me on the Constitution Committee, and that the number of its personnel should be limited to three. This suggestion was accepted by the late591 Lokamanya and the late592 Deshbandhu, who suggested the names of Sjts. Kelkar593 and I.B. Sen594 respectively as their proxies. The Constitution Committee could not even once come together, but we were able to consult with each other by correspondence, and in the end presented a unanimous report.595 I regard this constitution with a certain measure of pride. I hold that, if we could fully work out this constitution, the mere fact of working it out would bring us swaraj.M11 With the assumption of this responsibility I may be said to have made my real entrance into the Congress politics.

  XXXIX

  THE BIRTH OF KHADI

  I do not remember to have seen handloom or a spinning-wheel when in 1908596 I described it in Hind Swaraj597 as the panacea for the growing pauperism of India. In that book I took it as understood that anything that helped India to get rid of the grinding poverty of her masses would in the same processM1 also establish swaraj. Even in 1915, when I returned to India from South Africa, I had not actually seen a spinning-wheel. When the Satyagraha Ashram was founded at Sabarmati,598 we introduced a few handlooms there. But no sooner had we done this than we found ourselves up against a difficulty. All of us belonged either to the liberal professions or to business;M2 not one of us was an artisan. We needed a weaving expert to teach us to weave before we could work the looms. One was at last procured from Palanpur,M3 but he did not communicate to us the whole of his art. But Maganlal Gandhi was not to be easily baffled. Possessed of a natural talent for mechanics, he was able fully to master the art before long, and one after another several new weavers were trained up in the Ashram.

  The object that we set before ourselves was to be able to clothe ourselves entirely in cloth manufactured by our own hands.M4 We therefore forthwith discarded the use of mill-woven cloth, and all the members of the Ashram resolved to wear hand-woven cloth made from Indian599 yarn only. The adoption of this practice brought us a world of experience. It enabled us to know, from direct contact, the conditions of life among the weavers, the extent of their production, the handicaps in the way of their obtaining their yarn supply, the way in which they were being made victims of fraud, and, lastly, their ever-growing indebtedness. We were not in a position immediately to manufacture all the cloth for our needs. The alternative therefore was to get our cloth supply from handloom weavers. But readymade cloth from Indian mill-yarn was not easily obtainable either from the cloth-dealers or600 from
the weavers themselves. All the fine cloth woven by the weavers was from foreign yarn, since Indian mills did not spin fine counts. Even today the outturn of higher counts by Indian mills is very limited, whilst highest counts they cannot spin at all. It was after the greatest effort that we were at last able to find some weavers who condescended to weave Swadeshi yarn for us, and only on condition that the Ashram would take up601 all the cloth that they might produce. By thus adopting cloth woven from mill-yarn as our wear, and propagating it among our friends, we made ourselves voluntaryM5 agents of the Indian spinning mills. This in its turn brought us into contact with the mills, and enabled us to know something about their management and their handicaps. We saw that the aim of the mills was more and more to weave the yarn spun by them; their co-operation with the handloom weaver was not willing, but unavoidable and temporary.602 We became impatient to be able to spin our own yarn. It was clear that, until we could do this ourselves, dependence on the mills would remain. We did not feel that we could render any service to the country by continuing as agents of Indian spinning603 mills.

  No end of difficulties again faced us.604 We could get neither spinning-wheel nor a spinner to teach us how to spin. We were employing some wheels for filling pearns and bobbins for weaving in the Ashram. But we had no idea that these could be used as spinning-wheels. Once Kalidas Jhaveri605 discovered a woman who, he said, would demonstrate to us how spinning was done. We sent to her a member of the Ashram who was known for his great versatility in learning new things. But even he returned without wresting the secret of the art.

  So the time passed on, and my impatience grew with the time. I plied every chance visitor to the Ashram who was likely to possess some information about hand-spinning with questions about the art. But the art being confined to women and having been all but exterminated,606 if there was some stray spinner still surviving in some obscure corner, only a member of that sexM6 was likely to find out her whereabouts.

  In the year 1917 I was taken by my Gujarati friends to preside at the Broach Educational Conference. It was here that I discovered that remarkable lady Gangabehn Majmundar. She was a widow, but her enterprising spirit knew no bounds. Her education, in the accepted sense of the term,607 was not much. But in courage and common sense she easily surpassed the general run of our educated women. She had already got rid of the curse of untouchability, and fearlessly moved among and served the suppressed classes.608 She had means of her own, and her needs were few. She had a well seasoned constitution, and went about everywhere without an escort. She felt quite at home on horseback.M7 I came to know her more intimately at the Godhra Conference.609 To her I poured out my grief about the charkha,610 and she lightened my burden by a promise to prosecute an earnest and incessant search for the spinning-wheel.611

  XL

  FOUND AT LAST!

  At last, after no end of wandering in Gujarat, Gangabehn found the spinning-wheel in Vijapur in the Baroda State. Quite a number of people there had spinning-wheels in their homes, but had long since consigned them to the lofts as useless lumber.612 They expressed to Gangabehn613 their readiness to resume spinning, if someone promised to provide them with a regular supply of slivers, and to buy the yarn spun by them. Gangabehn communicated the joyful news to me.M1 The providing of slivers was found to be a difficult task. On my mentioning the thing to the late Umar Sobani,614 he solved the difficulty by immediately undertaking to send a sufficient supply of slivers from his mill. I sent to Gangabehn the slivers received from Umar Sobani,615 and soon yarn began to pour in at such a rate that it became quite a problem how to cope with it.M2

  Mr. Umar Sobani’s generosity was great, but still one could not go on taking advantage of it forever. I felt ill at ease, continuously receiving slivers from him.M3 Moreover, it seemed to me to be fundamentally wrong to use mill-slivers. If one could use mill-slivers, why not use mill-yarn as well? Surely no mills supplied slivers to the ancients? How did they make their slivers then? With these thoughts in my mind616 I suggested to Gangabehn to find carders who could supply slivers. She confidently undertook the task. She engaged a carder who was prepared to card cotton. He demanded thirty-five rupees, if not much more, per month.M4 I considered no price too high at the time.617 She trained a few youngsters to make slivers out of the carded cotton. I begged for cotton in Bombay.618 Sjt. Yashvantprasad Desai619 at once responded. Gangabehn’s enterprise thus prospered beyond expectations. She found outM5 weavers to weave the yarn that was spun in Vijapur, and soon Vijapur khadi gained a name for itself.

  While these developments were taking place in Vijapur,620 the spinning-wheel gained a rapid footing in the Ashram. Maganlal Gandhi, by bringing to bear all his splendid mechanical talent on the wheel, made many improvements in it, and wheels and their accessoriesM6 began to be manufactured at the Ashram. The first piece of khadi manufactured in the Ashram cost 17 annas per yard. I did not hesitate to commend this very coarse khadi at that rate to friends, who willingly paid the price.

  I was laid up in bed at Bombay. But I was fit enough to make searches for the wheel there.M7 At last I chanced upon two621 spinners. They charged one rupee for a seer of yarn, i.e., 28 tolas or nearly three quarters of a pound.622 I was then ignorant of the economics of khadi. I considered no price too high for securing hand-spun yarn.M8 On comparing the rates paid by me with those paid in VijapurM9 I found that I was being cheated. The spinners refused to agree to any reduction in their rates. So I had to dispense with their services. But they served their purpose. They taught spinning to Shrimatis Avantikabai, Ramibai Kamdar, the widowed623 mother of Sjt. Shankarlal Banker and Shrimati Vasumatibehn.624 The wheel began merrily to hum in my room, and I may say without exaggeration that its hum had no small share in restoring me to health. I am prepared to admit that its effect was more psychological than physical. But then it only shows how powerfully the physical in man reacts to the psychological.M10 I too set my hand to the wheel, but did not do much with it at the time.

  In Bombay, again, the same old problem of obtaining a supply of hand-made slivers presented itself.M11 A carder twanging his bow used to pass daily by Sjt. Revashankar’s residence.625 I sent for him and learnt that he carded cotton for stuffing mattresses. He agreed to card cotton for slivers, but demanded a stiff price for it, which, however, I paid. The yarn thus prepared I disposed of to some Vaishnava friends for making from it the garlands for the pavitra Ekadashi. Sjt. Shivji started a spinning class in Bombay. All these experiments involved considerable expenditure. But it was willingly defrayed by patriotic friends, lovers of the motherland, who had faith in khadi.M12 The money thus spent, in my humble opinion, was not wasted. It brought us a rich store of experience, and revealed to us the possibilities of the spinning-wheel.M13

  I now grew impatient for the exclusive adoption of khadi for my dress. My dhoti was still of Indian mill-cloth. The coarse khadi manufactured in the Ashram and at Vijapur was only 30 inches in width. I gave notice to Gangabehn that, unless she provided me with a khadi dhoti of 45 inches width within a month, I would do with coarse, short khadi dhoti. The ultimatum came upon her as a shock. But she proved equal to the demand made upon her. Well within the month she sent me a pair of khadi dhotis of 45M14 inches width, and thus relieved me from what would then have been a difficult situation for me.M15 At about the same time Sjt. Lakshmidas brought Sjt. Ramji, the weaver,M16 with his wife Gangabehn, from Lathi to the Ashram and got khadi dhotis woven at the Ashram.M17 The part played by this couple in the spread of khadi was by no means insignificant. They initiated a host of persons in Gujarat and also outside into the art of weaving hand-spun yarn. To see Gangabehn at her loom is a stirring sight.626 When this unlettered but self-possessedM18 sister plies at her loom, she becomes so lost in it that it is difficult to distract her attention, and much more difficult to draw627 her eyes off her beloved loom.

  XLI

  AN INSTRUCTIVE628 DIALOGUE

  From its very inception the khadi movement,M1 Swadeshi movement as it was then ca
lled, evoked much criticism from the mill-owners. The late Umar Sobani, a capable mill-owner himself, not only gave me the benefit of his own knowledge and experience, but kept me in touch with the opinion of the other mill-owners as well. The argument advanced by one of these deeply impressed him. He pressed me to meet him. I agreed. Mr. Sobani arranged the interview.M2 The mill-owner opened the conversation.

  ‘You know that there has been Swadeshi agitation before now?’

  ‘Yes, I do,’ I replied.

  ‘You are also aware that in the days of the Partition629 we, the mill-owners, fully exploited the Swadeshi movement. When it was at its height, we raised the prices of cloth, and did even worse things.’