social duty-these are among the themes which make the pattern of
   1883, the first year of his long residence in England, James was in
   The Princess Casamassima. It is a novel which has at its very center
   the habit of prowling the streets, and they yielded him the image
   the assumption that Europe has reached the full of its ripeness and
   "of some individual sensitive nature or fine mind, some small ob-
   -
   -
   --
   -�
   60
   THE LIBERAL IMAGINATION
   ·-··-··-·,-··-··-·-··-··-··-··-··-··-·--··-··-··-··-·-�·-··-··-·-·-··
   The Princess Casamassima
   6r
   .,_.,-,.-··-·-·-·-··-··-··-·-·-·-·-··-·-··-··-··-··-"·-··-··-··-··
   scure creature whose education should have been almost wholly
   Man be introduced into great houses and involved with large affairs
   derived from them, capable of profiting by all the civilization, all
   is essential to his story, which must not be confused with the cogthe accumu�tion to which they testify, yet condemned to see things nate story of the Sensitive Young Man. The provincial hero must
   only from outside-in mere quickened consideration, mere wistful.
   indeed be sensitive, and in proportion to the brassiness of the world;
   ness and envy and despair."
   he may even be an artist; but it is not his part merely to be puzzled
   Thus equipped with poverty, pride, and intelligence, the Young
   and hurt; he is not the hero of The Way of All Flesh or Of Human
   Man from the Provinces stands outside life and seeks to enter. This
   Bondage or Mooncalf. Unlike the merely sensitive hero, he is conmodern hero is connected with the tales of the folk. Usually his cerned to know how the political and social worlds are run and enmotive is the legendary one of setting out to seek his fortune, which joyed; he wants a share of �o�er and �leasure and in
   .
   _
   �onsequence
   is what the folktale says when it means that the hero is seeking
   he takes real risks, often of his life. The swarmmg facts that James
   himself. He is really the third and youngest son of the woodcutter,
   tells us Hyacinth is to confront are "freedom and ease, knowledge
   the one to whom all our sympathies go, the gentle and misunderand power, money, opportunity, and satiety."
   stood one, the bravest of all. He is likely to be in some doubt about
   The story of the Young Man from the Provinces is thus a strange
   his parentage; his father the woodcutter is not really his father.
   one, for it has its roots both in legend and in the very heart of the
   Our hero has, whether he says so or not, the common belief of
   modern actuality. From it we have learned most of what we know
   children that there is some mystery about his birth; his real parents,
   about modern society, about class and its strange rituals, about
   if the truth .;rere known, are of great and even royal estate. Julien
   power and influence and about money, the hard fluent fact in which
   Sorel of The Red and the Black is the third and youngest son of an
   modern society has its being. Yet through the massed social fact
   actual woodcutter, but he is the spiritual son of Napoleon. In our
   there runs the thread of legendary romance, even of downright
   day the hero of The Great Gatsby is not really the son of Mr. Gatz;
   magic. We note, for example, that it seems necessary for the novelist
   he is said to have sprung "from his Platonic conception of himto deal in transformation. Some great and powerful hand must self," to be, indeed, "the son of God." And James's Hyacinth Robreach down into the world of seemingly chanceless routine and pick inson, although fostered by a poor dressmaker and a shabby fiddler,
   up the hero and set him down in his complex and dangerous fate.
   has an English lord for his real father.
   Pip meets Magwitch on the marsh, a felon-godfather; Pierre Bezu
   It is the fate of the Young Man to move from an obscure position
   hov unexpectedly inherits the fortune that permits this uncouth
   into one of considerable eminence in Paris or London or St. Petersyoung man to make his tour of Russian society; powerful unseen burg, to touch the life of the rulers of the earth. His situation is as
   forces play around the proud head of Julien Sorel to make possible
   chancy as that of any questing knight of medieval romance. He is
   his astonishing upward career; Rastignac, simply by being one of
   confronted by situations whose meanings are dark to him, in which
   the boarders at the Maison Vauquer which also shelters the great
   his choice seems always decisive. He understands everything to be
   Vautrin, moves to the very center of Parisian intrigue; James Gatz
   a "test." Parsifal at the castle of the Fisher King is not more unrows out to a millionaire's yacht, a boy in dungarees, and becomes certain about the right thing to do than the Young Man from the
   Jay Gatsby, an Oxford man, a military hero.
   Provinces picking his perilous way through the irrationalities of
   Such transformations represent, with only slight exaggeration, the
   the society into which he has been transported. That the Young
   literal fact that was to be observed every day. From the late years
   - -·�
   ---
   THE LIBERAL IMAGINATION
   The Princess Casamassima
   -··-··-·-··--·-··-··-•-•t-·-··-··-·-··-··-··-·-·-··-·-·-·-··
   -·-·-··-··-·-··-··-·--·-·-··-·-·-··-·-··-·-··-··-•-11•-·-·-··
   of the eighteenth century through the early years of the twentieth,
   to be made that the special job of literature is, as Marianne Moore
   the social structure of the West was peculiarly fitted-one might
   puts it, the creation of "imaginary gardens with real toads in them."
   say designed-for changes in fortune that were magical and roman
   The reader who detects that the garden is imaginary should not be
   tic. The upper-class ethos was strong enough to make it remarkable
   Jed by his discovery to a wrong view of the reality of the toads. In
   that a young man should cross the borders, yet weak enough to
   settling questions of reality and truth in fiction, it must be remempermit the crossing in exceptional cases. A shiftless boy from bered that, although the novel in certain of its forms resembles the
   Geneva, a starveiing and a lackey, becomes the admiration of the
   accumulative and classificatory sciences, which are the sciences most
   French aristocracy and is permitted by Europe to manipulate its
   people are most at home with, in certain other of its forms the novel
   assumptions in every department of life: Jean Jacques Rousseau is
   approximates the sciences of experiment. And an experiment is
   the father of all the Young Men from the Provinces, including the
   very like an imaginary garden which is laid out for the express
   one from Corsica.
   purpose of supporting a real toad of fact. The apparatus of the re
   The Young Man's story represents an actuality, yet we may be
   searcher's bench is not nature itself but an artificial and extravagant
   sure that James took special delight in its ineluctable legendary
   contrivance, much like a novelist's plot, which is devised to force
   element. James w
as certainly the least primitive of artists, yet he
   or foster a fact into being. This seems to have been James's own
   was always aware of his connection with the primitive. He set great
   view of the part that is played in his novels by what he calls "rostore by the illusion of probability and verisimilitude, but he knew mance." He seems to have had an analogy with experiment very
   that he dealt always with illusion; he was proud of the devices of
   clearly in mind when he tells us that romance is "experience liberhis magic. Like any primitive storyteller, he wished to hold the ated, so to speak; experience disengaged, disembroiled, disencumreader against his will, to enchant, as we say. He loved what he bered, exempt from the conditions that usually attach to it." Again
   called "the story as story"; he delighted to work, by means of the
   and again he speaks of the contrivance of a novel in ways which
   unusual, the extravagant, the melodramatic, and the supernatural,
   will make it seem like illegitimate flummery to the reader who is
   upon what he called "the blessed faculty of wonder"; and he undercommitted only to the premises of the naturalistic novel, but which stood primitive story to be the root of the modern novelist's art.
   the intelligent scientist will understand perfectly.
   F. 0. Matthiessen speaks of the fairytale quality of The Wings of
   Certainly The Princess Casamassima would seem to need some
   the Dove; so sophisticated a work as The Ambassadors can be read
   such defense as this, for it takes us, we are likely to feel, very far
   as one of those tales in which the hero finds that nothing is what it
   along the road to romance, some will think to the very point of
   seems and that the only guide through the world must be the goodimpossibility. It asks us to accept a poor young man whose birth is ness of his heart.
   darkly secret, his father being a dissipated but authentic English
   Like any great artist of story, like Shakespeare or Balzac or Dicklord, his mother a French courtesan-seamstress who murders the ens or Dostoevski, James crowds probability rather closer than we
   father; a beautiful American-Italian princess who descends in the
   nowadays like. It is not that he gives us unlikely events but that he
   social scale to help "the people"; a general mingling of the very poor
   sometimes thickens the number of interesting events beyond our
   with persons of exalted birth; and then a dim mysterious leader of
   ordinary expectation. If this, in James or in any storyteller, leads to
   revolution, never seen by the reader, the machinations of an undera straining of our sense of verisimilitude, there is always the defense ground group of conspirators, an oath taken to carry out an assas-
   THE LIBERAL IMAGINATION
   The Princess Casamassima
   ..-.•-·-··-··-··-··-··-·•-11•-•·-··-··-·-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-··-·-··
   •-•11-.. -••-•-••-H-11-111-11-,11-••-•-••-••-••-11•-••-••-••-n-111-•-••-"
   sination at some unspecified future day, the day arriving, the hour
   to the novel he told us that he made no research into Hyacinth's
   of the killing set, the instructions and the pistol given.
   subterrane�n politics. He justified this by saying that "the value I
   Confronted by paraphernalia like this, even those who admire the
   wished most to render and the effect I wished most to produce were
   book are likely to agree with Rebecca West when, in her exuberant
   precisely those of our not knowing, of society's not knowing, but
   little study of James, she tells us that it is "able" and "meticulous"
   only guessing and suspecting and trying to ignore, what 'goes on'
   but at the same time "distraught" and "wild," that the "loveliness"
   irreconcilably, subversively, beneath the vast smug surface." And he
   in it comes from a transmutation of its "perversities"; she speaks of
   concludes the preface with the most beautifully arrogant and truest
   it as a "mad dream" and teases its vast unlikelihood, finding it one
   thing a novelist ever said about his craft: "What it all came back
   of the big jokes in literature that it was James, who so prided himto was, no doubt, something like this wisdom-that if you haven't, self on his lack of na'ivete, who should have brought back to fiction
   for fiction, the root of the matter in you, haven't the sense of life
   the high implausibility of the old novels which relied for their
   and the penetrating imagination, you are a fool in the very presence
   effects on dark and stormy nights, Hindu servants, mysterious
   of the revealed and assured; but that if you m·e so armed, you are
   strangers, and bloody swords wiped on richly embroidered handkernot really helpless, not without your resource, even before mysteries chiefs.
   abysmal." If, to learn about the radical movement of his time, James
   Miss West was writing in 1916, when the English naturalistic
   really did no more than consult his penetrating imagination-which
   novel, with its low view of possibility, was in full pride. Our notion
   no doubt was nourished like any other on conversation and the
   of political possibility was still to be changed by a small group of
   daily newspaper-then we must say that in no other novelist did
   quarrelsome conspiratorial intellectuals taking over the control
   the root of the matter go so deep and so wide. For the truth is that
   of Russia. Even a loyal Fabian at that time could consider it one of
   there is not a political event of The Princess Casamassima, not a
   the perversities of The Princess Casamassima that two of its lowerdetail of oath or mystery or danger, which is not confirmed by class characters should say of a third that he had the potentiality of
   multitudinous records.
   becoming Prime Minister of England; today Paul Muniment sits in
   the Cabinet and is on the way to Downing Street. In the thirties the
   III
   book was much admired by those who read it in the light of knowledge of our own radical movements; it then used to be said that We are inclined to flatter our own troubles with the belief that
   although James had dreamed up an impossible revolutionary group
   the late nineteenth century was a peaceful time. But James knew
   he had nonetheless managed to derive from it some notable insights
   its actual violence. England was, to be sure, rather less violent than
   into the temper of radicalism; these admirers grasped the toad of
   the Continent, but the history of England in the eighties was one
   fact and felt that it was all the more remarkably there because the
   of profound social unrest often intensified to disorder. In March of
   garden is so patently imaginary.
   1886, the year in which The Princess Casamassima appeared in
   Yet an understanding of James's use of "romance"-and there is
   book form, James wrote to his brother William of a riot in his
   "romance" in Hyacinth's story-must not preclude our understandstreet, of ladies' carriages being stopped and the "occupants hustled, ing of the striking literary accuracy of The Princess Casamassima.
   rifled, slapped, and kissed." He does not think that the rioters were
   James himself helped to throw us off the scent when in his preface
   unemployed workingmen, more likely that they were "the great
   -- -�
   66
   THE LIBERAL IMAGINATION
   -··-··-··-··-·-··-··-··
-··-·--,·-·-··-·-··-··-·-··-··-··-·-·-··-··
   The Princess Casamassima
   --·--·--·-··--·-··-·-·-·--··-··-·-·-··-··-··-·-·-·-·-··
   army of roughs and thieves." But he says that there is "immense
   acter of a police spy, and Kropotkin or the late Carlo Tresca, who
   destitution" and that "everyone is getting poorer-from causes
   were known for their personal sweetness; or to resolve the contrawhich, I fear, will continue." In the same year he wrote to Charles diction between the violence of its theory and action and the gentle
   Eliot Norton that the state of the British upper class seems to be
   world toward which these are directed. It will have to be enough
   "in many ways very much the same rotten and collapsible one of
   to say that anarchism holds that the natural goodness of man is
   the French aristocracy before the revolution."
   absolute and that society corrupts it, and that the guide to anarchist
   James envisaged revolution, and not merely as a convenience for
   action is the desire to destroy society in general and not merely a
   his fiction. But he imagined a kind of revolution with which we
   particular social form.
   are no longer familiar. It was not a Marxian revolution. There is
   When, therefore, Hyacinth Robinson is torn between his desire
   no upsurge of an angry proletariat led by a disciplined party which
   for social justice and his fear lest the civilization of Europe be
   plans to head a new strong state. Such a revolution has its conservadestroyed, he is dealing reasonably with anarchist belief. "The untive aspect-it seeks to save certain elements of bourgeois culture chaining of what is today called the evil passions and the destruction
   for its own use, for example, science and the means of production
   of what is called public order" was the consummation of Bakunin's
   and even some social agencies. The revolutionary theory of The
   aim which he defended by saying that "the desire for destruction is
   Princess Casamassima has little in common with this. There is no
   at the same time a creative desire." It was not only the state but all
   organized mass movement; there is no disciplined party but only a
   social forms that were to be demolished according to the doctrine of
   
 
 KM_364e-20181205115548 Page 10