What Intelligence Tests Miss

Home > Other > What Intelligence Tests Miss > Page 38
What Intelligence Tests Miss Page 38

by Keith E Stanovich


  Wolf, F. M., Gruppen, L. D., & Billi, J. E. (1985). Differential diagnosis and the competing hypothesis heuristic—a practical approach to judgment under uncertainty and Bayesian probability. Journal of the American Medical Association, 253, 2858–2862.

  Wolford, G., Miller, M. B., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (2000). The left hemisphere’s role in hypothesis formation. Journal of Neuroscience, 20(RC64), 1–4.

  Wonderlic Personnel Test (2002). Wonderlic Personnel Test and Scholastic Level Exam User’s Manual. libertyville, IL: Wonderlic, Inc.

  Woodward, B. (2006). State of Denial. New York: simon & Schuster.

  Wright, G., & Ayton, P. (Eds.) (1994). Subjective Probability. Chichester: John Wiley.

  Wu, G., Zhang, J., & Gonzalez, R. (2004). Decision under risk. In D. J. Koehler & N. Harvey (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (399–423). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

  Yamagishi, K. (1997). When a 12.86% mortality is more dangerous than 24.14%: Implications for risk communication. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 495–506.

  Yates, J. F., Lee, J., & Bush, J. G. (1997). General knowledge overconfidence: Cross-national variations, response style, and “reality.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 87–94.

  Zacks, R. T., Hasher, L., & Sanft, H. (1982). Automatic encoding of event frequency: Further findings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 106–116.

  Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 224–228.

  Zajonc, R. B., & Markus, H. (1982). Affective and cognitive factors in preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 123–131.

  Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. (2000). Intelligence and personality. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (581–610). New York: Cambridge University Press.

  Zelazo, P. D. (2004). The development of conscious control in childhood. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 12–17.

  Zimmerman, C. (2007). The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle school. Developmental Review, 27, 172–223.

  Zweig, J. (2002, June). What fund investors really need to know. Money Magazine, 110–124.

  Zweig, J. (2007, February). Winning the home run hitter’s game. Money Magazine, 102.

  INDEX

  Abelson, Robert, 161

  accessibility, 75–78

  addiction, and intelligence, 191–192

  ADHD, 54

  affect heuristic, 74–75, 181

  affective forecasting, 184–185, 200–201

  affirmative action, and framing, 97

  Ainslie, George, 115, 127

  Albanian financial crisis, 152–155

  algorithmic mind, 29–32, 38–41, 51, 122–123, 173–177, 190–192

  and intelligence, 31–32, 195–196

  alternative hypothesis, ignoring, 136–140

  anchoring, and adjustment, 79–81

  argument evaluation, 36

  Ariely, Dan, 207

  attribute substitution, 23, 72–75, 122, 147–148, 181–182

  Austin, Elizabeth, 192

  autism, 130–131

  autonomous mind, 32–33, 39–41, 171–177, 188–192

  defects of, 185–188

  Baron, Jonathan, 86–87, 195, 196

  base rates, 144–146

  Bayes, Thomas, 134

  Bayes’ formula, 134–136

  Bayesian reasoning, 133–139, 144–146

  belief bias, 120–123, 159, 182–183

  belief identification, 149

  beliefs: irrational, 152–160

  and social Psychology, 163

  Benartzi, Shlomo, 204–205

  bias blind spot, 109–110, 183

  biased self–assessments, 109

  Blair, Tony, 43

  Block, Jack, 191

  Boring, E. G., 50

  Boyd, Robert, 59

  Bruine de Bruin, Wandi, 37

  Bush, George W.: cognitive characteristics of, 1–2, 42–44

  fluid intelligence of, 43

  intelligence of, 1–2, 6–7, 43–44

  thinking dispositions of, 44

  Camerer, Colin, 172

  Cattell/Horn/Carroll theory of intelligence, 40–42, 50–51, 172

  chance, over–reacting to, 61–62

  cognitive ability, versus thinking dispositions, 31–32

  cognitive miser, 23, 63–66, 176–179

  and attribute substitution, 72–75

  and belief bias, 122

  and defaults, 202–205

  and disjunctive reasoning, 70–72

  environmental fixes for, 202–208

  evolutionary origins, 64–66

  and falsifiability, 143

  hostile and benign environments, 82–85

  loss of autonomy, 79–81, 84–85

  and mindware gaps, 147–148

  and vividness, 75–78

  cognitive science, levels of analysis, 29–31

  “cold” cognition, 119–120, 191

  conditional probabilities, 148

  conjunction error, 147–148

  covariation detection, 140

  critical thinking, 48, 114, 122

  crystallized intelligence (Gc), 13, 40–42, 172

  cultural replicator theory, 161–165

  Damasio, Antonio, 185–187

  D’Antonio, Michael, The State Boys Rebellion, 53

  Dawes, Robyn, 148

  Dawkins, Richard, 64–65, 162, 165

  Deary, Ian, 192

  decontextualization, and modernity, 123–124

  decoupling, cognitive, 24–25, 28, 40, 50–51, 173–177, 188–192

  default heuristic, 82, 202–205

  delay of gratification, 125–127

  Denby, David, 9–10

  Dennett, Daniel, 20

  Kinds of Minds, 30

  denominator neglect, 120, 182–183

  descriptive invariance, 88, 93

  diets, and portion size, 206–207

  disjunctive reasoning, 70–72

  Doherty, Michael, 139

  dominance relationship, in decision theory, 72–73

  dual process theory, 21–28, 173–177

  and intelligence, 26–28

  and override function, 22–23, 38–39, 41, 71, 173–174

  Type 1 processing, 21–25

  Type 2 processing, 21–25

  Duckworth, Angela, 37

  Dunning, David, 109

  dysrationalia, 10–12, 48–50, 188–193

  analogy with other cognitive disabilities, 17–19

  and contaminated mindware, 157–160

  definition, 18; in folk psychology, 55–57

  as intuition pump, 17–19

  and mindware gaps, 150–151, 159–160

  prevalence, 66–68

  pseudoscience and, 170–171

  within tripartite model, 34–35

  egocentrism, 111–113, 179–180, 184

  emotions, 117–119

  impairment in, 186–188

  Epley, Nicholas, 95–96

  Epstein, Seymour, 120

  equality heuristic, 90–92

  Evans, Jonathan, 159

  evolution, and rationality, 64–66, 160–161

  executive function, 23

  and cognitive decoupling, 28

  faith, 168–169

  falsifiability, 141–144, 167–170, 201

  Fenton-O’Creevy, Mark, 110

  Fine, Cordelia, 101

  fluid/crystallized (Gf/Gc) theory, 13, 40–42, 50–51, 172

  fluid intelligence (Gf), 40–41, 50–51

  and cognitive decoupling, 28, 50–51

  Flynn, James, 52

  Flynn effect, 51–52

  focal bias, 173–177, 181–185, 190

  Fogelin, Robert, 152

  four-card selection task, 141–143, 175–176, 183

  framing, 183, 190

  classic research on, 92–95

  and fairness decisions, 9
0–91

  and intelligence, 98–100

  and medical decisions, 91–92

  and personal autonomy, 89–92

  and perspective taking, 93

  and public policy, 97–98

  and tax policy, 86–89, 96

  Frankfurt, Harry, 152

  Frederick, Shane, 72–73, 190

  Friedman, Richard, 206

  Friedrich, James, 97

  Frum, David, 2, 43

  Funder, David, 191

  Galton, Francis, 53

  Gardner, Howard, 45–47

  Gigerenzer, Gerd, 83, 205–206

  Gilbert, Dan, 200–201

  Gladwell, Malcolm, 115–116

  Goldstein, Daniel, 203

  Gollwitzer, Peter, 200

  Greene, Joshua, 117–119

  Harris, Sam, 165

  Heath, Chip, 113

  Herrnstein, Richard, The Bell Curve, 20

  heuristic processing, 22–23, 63–64, 78–79

  hostile and benign environments for, 82–85

  heuristics and biases tasks, 181–185

  “hot” cognition, 119–120, 191

  Hsee, Christopher, 74

  Hull, David, 70

  hypothetical thinking, 23–25, 39–40, 51

  illusion of control, 110

  implementation intentions, 200

  impulsively associative thinking, 181–182

  informal reasoning tasks, 38

  intellectual disability (mental retardation), 53–54

  intelligence:

  as adaptive functioning, xi, 12, 51–52, 54

  and algorithmic mind, 31–32

  broad versus narrow definitions, 12–15, 45–47, 54, 208–209

  and contaminated mindware, 157–160

  critics of, 20–21, 45–50

  debate about, 20–21

  deification of, 54

  and dual process theory, 26–28

  and dysrationalia, 48–50

  fluid/crystallized (Gf/Gc) theory, 13, 40–42, 50–51, 172

  in folk psychology, 55–57

  and framing, 98–100

  heritability, 20

  as imperialist concept, 47–50

  malleability, 197, 208–209

  and mindware gaps, 150–151

  and myside processing, 113–114

  overvaluing of, 195–199, 208–212

  and pseudoscientific beliefs, 170–171

  and reflective mind, 31–32

  relation to rationality, 2–3, 12, 16, 32–33, 48–50, 98–100, 113–114, 171, 188–193

  and thinking errors, 188–193

  and Type 1 processes, 26–28, 71–72

  vernacular definitions, 12

  intelligence tests:

  cognitive processes missing from, x-xii, 5–6, 171, 193–194, 196–197, 209–211

  ubiquity of, 3, 32

  intertemporal preference reversal, 125–127

  investing, 59–63, 75

  irrationality, 68–69, 160–161

  caused by contaminated mindware, 160–167

  and delayed rewards, 125–127

  as descriptive invariance, 88, 93

  environmental fixes for, 202–208

  and memes, 160–167

  and mindware gaps, 130–133, 138–144

  relation to intelligence, 188–193

  social costs of, 197–199

  in stock market investing, 59–63, 75

  types of, 177–185

  irrational thinking, taxonomy of, 177–185

  Johnson, Eric, 202–203

  Kahneman, Daniel, ix–xi, 62, 72–73, 79–80, 86, 92–95, 107–108, 129, 185

  Kennedy, John F. Jr., 115–116

  Klaczynski, Paul, 38, 104

  knowledge, 40–42

  knowledge calibration, 105–108

  knowledge projection, 159–160

  Kruger, Justin, 109, 111

  Lagerfeld, Steven, 170

  Lakoff, George, 97–98

  Langer, Ellen, 110

  Larrick, Richard, 129

  lay psychology theory, 180

  learning disabilities, discrepancy definitions of, 17–18

  Leslie, Alan, 24–25

  Levesque, Hector, 70

  libertarian Paternalism, 204–205

  Linda problem, 147–148

  Loewenstein, George, 91

  loss aversion, 62

  Mackie, Gerry, 169

  Macpherson, Robyn, 104

  MAMBIT (mental abilities measured by intelligence tests), 13–15, 45–51

  maximal performance situations, 31

  McCaffrey, Edward, 86–87

  McCain, John, 43

  McCallum, Ronald, 43

  meme, 161–167

  definition of, 162

  faithbased, 168–169

  memetics, 161–167

  fundamental insight of, 162

  mindware, 40–42, 67–68, 179–180

  adversative, 169–170

  avoiding contamination in, 167–170

  contaminated, 67, 152–171

  counterintuitive assumption of contamination, 166–167

  definition of, 40, 129

  epidemics, 152–157

  and falsifiability, 167–170

  and intelligence, 192–193

  motivational force of, 127–128

  strategic, 148–149

  survival strategies, 164–165

  mindware gaps, 67, 130–149, 182–183

  and intelligence, 150–151

  Mischel, Walter, 191

  money illusion, 77–78

  moral dilemmas, 117–119

  Mr. Spock problem, 185–188

  multiple intelligences, 46–48

  multiple personality disorder, 155–157

  Murray, Charles, The Bell Curve, 20

  myside bias:

  measures of, 38

  property of cognitive miser, 104

  myside processing, 101–104, 183–184

  and communication, 111–112

  and intelligence, 113–114

  and product design, 112–113

  need for cognition, 149

  Neisser, Ulric, 52

  Newton, Elizabeth, 112

  Nozick, Robert, 8

  organ donation, 202–204

  overconfidence, 61, 105–110

  override:

  cognitive neuroscience of, 117–119

  of cold heuristics, 119–124

  of emotions, 117–119

  failure, 115–117, 180–183, 190–192

  of Type 1 processing, 22–23, 38–39

  paranormal phenomena, 170–171

  Paulos, John, 8–9

  pensions, 204–205

  Perkins, David, 11–12, 40

  personal finance, 59–63, 84–85

  perspective taking, 93

  Pinker, Steven, How the Mind Works, 21

  planning fallacy, 107–108

  Ponzi schemes, 152–155

  possible world box, 25

  Postman, Neil, 68–69

  practical intelligence, 46

  preattentive processes, 26, 177

  prior knowledge, decoupling from, 123–124, 159

  probabilistic reasoning, 42, 120, 132–136, 144–148

  Pronin, Emily, 109

  prospect theory, 95

  pseudoscience, 170–171, 198–199

  psychometric g, 172

  pyramid schemes, 152–155

  Rachlin, Howard, 127

  Rachlinski, Jeffrey, 150–151

  rationality:

  and contaminated mindware, 167–170

  definition of, 15–17

  epistemic, 16, 105–106

  and evolution, 64–66, 160–161

  in folk psychology, 55–57

  fostering via environmental change, 202–208

  instrumental, 16

  and intelligence, 32–33, 48–50

  malleability, 197, 202, 208–209

  measures of, 36–38

  mindware of, 41–42
, 67–68

  taxonomy of failures of, 177–185

  teaching, 199–202

  tests of, 4, 209–211

  thinking dispositions of, 44

  three requirements of, 42, 52

  and tripartite model, 32–33

  undervaluing of, 195–199, 208–212

  rationality quotient (RQ), 4, 209–211

  recognition heuristic, 83–85

  recovered memories, 155–157

  reflective mind, 30–32, 38–41, 51, 122–123, 149, 173–177, 188–191

  and intelligence, 31–32

  and intelligence tests, 195–196

  reflectivity/impulsivity, 149

  retirement savings, 204–205

  Richerson, Peter, 59

  Rokeach, Milton, 35

  Rozin, Paul, 207–208

  Ryan, Desmond, 157

  SAT test, as an IQ test, 3

  Schelling, Thomas, 86–87

  Schkade, David, 185

  scientific reasoning, 42

  scientific thinking, 130–131, 139–144

  self-control, 124–128, 182–183

  and intelligence, 191–193

  and precommitment, 206–207

  Seligman, Martin, 37

  serial associative cognition, 173–177, 181–182, 190

  Showalter, Elaine, 155–156

  simulation, cognitive, 23–25, 39–41, 51, 174

  Sinaceur, Marwan, 85

  Slovic, Paul 77

  Spearman, Charles, 172

  status quo bias, 82

  Sternberg, Robert, Why Smart People Can Be So Stupid, 11, 45–47, 53, 209

  Sunstein, Cass, 204

  Surowiecki, James, 113

  syllogistic reasoning, 120–123

  Taleb, Nassim Nicholas, 59

  tax policy, 86–89

  temporal discounting, 125–127

  Tetlock, Philip, 37

  Thaler, Richard, 96, 204

  thinking dispositions, 2, 31–32, 148–149, 173

  and belief bias, 122–123

  as predictors of rational thought and action, 36–38

  within tripartite model, 34, 38–40

  “think of the opposite,” as reasoning strategy, 136–140, 199–200

  Thomas, Evan, 43

  Toplak, Maggie, 38, 104, 188

  tripartite model of mind, 32–35, 38–40, 116–117, 171–177

  and dysrationalia, 34–35

  expanded, 38–40

  trolley problem, 117–119, 183

  Tversky, Amos, ix–xi, 62, 79–80, 93–95, 129

  Tweney, Ryan, 144

  Type 1 Processing, 63–64, 78–79, 115–116, 119, 174–180, 190–192

  and intelligence, 26–28

  Type 2 Processing, 70–72, 115–116, 119, 174–180, 190–192

  typical performance situations, 31

  Ubel, Peter, 91–92

  Universal Darwinism, 162, 167

  ventromedial prefrontal cortex, 186–187

  visceral responses, 124–127

  vividness, 75–78, 85, 181

  Wanger, Ralph, 79

 

‹ Prev