The Haunebu pictures strongly resemble the Adamski saucer pictures of the early 1950s. These saucers were seen and pictures of them taken world-wide. There were many different sources for both sighting of Adamski saucers and pictures of them. There were so many in the early 1950s that it is hard to believe that all of them are fakes. Mr. Ettl and Mr. Juergen-Ratthofer maintain that these “Adamski saucers” are really the German-designed Haunebu type saucers (28). Since they were flown after the war, certain questions as to their origin arise. These questions will be treated in an upcoming section of this book.
Besides the Vril and Haunebu designs mention is made by Mr. Juergen-Ratthofer of another type of field propulsion vehicle. This saucer uses a chemical engine to drive a field propulsion generator (29). The type of chemical engine involved is similar to the famous Walter (Walther) engine, which were to be installed on some types of German submarines.
The Walter process involved a closed circuit system activated by the thermal energy produced by the decomposition of a high concentration of hydrogen peroxide. This reaction occurred in the presence of a catalyst, potassium permanganate, in a decomposition chamber. This resulted in a 600 to 700 degree gas composed of steam and oxygen, under natural pressure sufficient to drive a turbine. After the gas had done its work if was fed into a reclamation chamber which recycled at least part of the gas back into the engine. Additional fuel, Juergen-Ratthofer mentions methanol, could be fed into the system for more heat. The system without additional fuel is called the “cold” system while with added fuel it is called the “hot” system. In fact, the cold system was used on the V-2 rocket to drive the turbo-fuel pumps since known pumps could not handle the volume of liquid necessary to feed this new type of rocket.
In the hybrid saucer Mr. Juergen-Ratthofer describes, the cold system drives a rotor-stator arrangement which doubles as a blade lifting wing similar to that of a helicopter. The rotor-stator-blade is internally housed in the cowling of the saucer. The output of the rotor-stator is a strong magnetic field which presumably frees the saucer of the constraints of gravity as claimed for the other field propulsion saucers (30). In addition, spaces within the saucer have all air removed by special vacuum pumps with increase the buoyancy of the craft within the atmosphere. Further, some of the hot oxygen-steam mixture is jetted out at the periphery of the saucer while being mixed with methanal for additional heat and therefore thrust. Again, we are reminded of Dr. Belluzzo. We are also reminded of Vesco since he hints at a similar engine (31) which he even vaguely links with “electromagnetic waves” (32). Have we come full-circle?
Tesla, Vril and Coler Devices
Top left: Pancake Tesla coil with the secondary coil inside the primary. Top right: The smaller of the Hans Coler free-energy machines. Bottom: Cut away showing Vril power plant. Was this related to the Schappeller device?
In the same vane, would be negligent not to mention that an atomic engine might easily be substituted for the Walter engine. The atomic engine might be one of three types. It might be the type which burned the atmosphere itself. This burning would produce hot air and steam from the water contained in the atmosphere. It might be one which produced steam using water carried in tanks. It might be one which super-heats and ejects a gas such as hydrogen or helium. Any of these mediums could be ejected through the rotor blades yielding the desired result. A device of this type would tie together many of the German saucers-plans so far discussed.
Dr. Freeman points out that Marconi “stole” Tesla’s inventions. Tesla also built a power-plant of spherical construction which contained vacuum tubes and so may have been superior to the device of Schappeller which we shall look at next. Surprisingly, some detail exists about this Tesla free energy device (33). Tesla used his engine to successfully power a Pierce Arrow automobile. This means that a spherical, working field propulsion device existed in the USA powering, not a flying saucer but an automobile. Dr. Freeman warns not to be confused by many spherical devices, all of which seem different. The fact is that they all work on the same principles (34).
Sources and References
1. X, Michael, 1960, pages 17, 33, We Want You Is Hitler Alive?, Futura Press, reprinted 1969 by Saucerian Books, Clarksburg, WV.
2. Barton, Michael X., 1968, pages 26-36, The German Saucer Story, Futura Press, Los Angeles
3. Zunneck, Karl-Heinz, 1998, pages 120-122, Geheimtechnologien, Wunderwaffen Und Irdischen Facetten Des UFO-Phaaenomens 50 Jahre Desinformaton und die Folgen, CTT-Verlag, Suhl
4. Zunneck, Karl-Heinz, 1998, page 122
5. Lyne, William R., 1999, page 48, Pentagon Aliens, Creatopia Productions, Lamy, New Mexico 87540
6. Lyne, William R., 1999, page 28
7. Lyne, Willaim R., 1999, page 38
8. Lyne, William R., 1999, page 21
9. Lyne, William R., 1999, pages 20, 41
10. Lyne, William R., 1999, page 42
11. Lyne, William R., 1999, pages 197-200
12. ibid
13. Trinkaus, George, 1988, pages 3-4, Tesla The Lost Inventions, High Voltage Press, Portland, OR.
14. Lyne, William R., 1999, page 215
15. Freeman, Gordon Dr., 3/18/01, personal letter to author
16. Stoll, Axel Ph.D., 2001, pages 15-20, Hochtechnologie im Dritten Reich Reichsdeutsche Entwicklungen und die vermutlich wahre Herkunft der “UFOs,” Amun-Verlag, Schleusesiedlung 2, D-98553 Schleusingen
17. Ettl, Ralf, 1999, page 11, “Notes To The Vril-Project” Ursprung und Quellen
18. Haarmann, D.H., 1983, Geheime Wunderwaffen, ll Geheime Wunderwaffen, lll Geheime Wunderwaffen, Hugin Gesellschaft Fuer Politisch-Philosophische Studien E.V., Postfach 23, D-48472, Hoerstel 3, Germany
19. Bergmann, O., 1988 and 1989, l Deutsche Flugscheiben und U-Boote Ueberwachen Die Weltmeere, ll Deutsche Flugscheiben und U-Boote Ueberwachen Die Wletmeere, Hugin Gesellschaft Fuer Politisch-Philosophische Studien E.V., Postfach 23, D-484772, Hoerstel 3, Germany
20. Dr. Michael Daemboeck Verlag, Markt 86, A-3321 Ardaggr, Austria
21. Video Film “UFOs Das Dritte Reich Schlaegt Zurueck?, available through Dr. Michael Daemboeck Verlag, see reference (18)
22. Video Film “UFO Secrets of the 3rd Reich” available through Total Solutions International, Las Vegas, NV.
23. van Helsing, Jan, 1993, page 129, Geheim Gesellschaften und ihre Macht im 20. Jahrhundret, Ewertverlag, Meppen, Germany
24. British Intelligence Objectives Sub-Committee Final Report No. 1043 Item No. 31, “The Invention Of Hans Coler, Relating To An Alleged New Source Of Power”
Haunebu 2 Test Flight
Ghostly image of a saucer, said to be a Haunebu 2, on a test flight. Photograph originally from collection ofNorbert-Juergen Ratthofer, courtesy of Vladimir Terziski.
25. Video Film “UFOs Das Dritte Reich Schlaegt Zurueck?, available through Dr. Michael Daemboeck Verlag, see reference (18)
26. Juergen-Ratthofer, Norbert and Ralf Ettl, 1992, page 51, Das Vril-Porjekt, Dr. Michael Daemboeck Verlag, Ardaggr, Austria
27. Juergen-Ratthofer, Norbert, date unknown, page 16, “Geheime UFO, 1. Folge: Flugscheibenprojekte aus verschiedenen Staaten der Erde,” this article was courtesy of Theo Paymans, Holland
28. Juergen-Ratthofer, Norbert, date unknown, pages 84,85, Flugscheiben und andere deutsche und japanische Geheimund Wunderwaffen im Zweiten Weltkrieg, self-published, available through reference (18)
29. Juergen-Ratthofer, Norbert, date unknown, pages 1 and 16, “Geheime UFO, 2. Folge So baut man fliegende Untertassen–und so funktioniernen sie,” this article was courtesy of Theo Paymans, Holland
30. ibid
31. Vesco, Renato, 1976, pages 163 and 164, Intercept UFO, Pinnacle Books, New York
32. Vesco, Renato, 1976, pages 135-136
33. Nieper, Hans A., 1985, pages 188-189, Conversion of Gravity Field Energy Revolution in Technology, Medicine and Society, MIT Verlag, Oldenburg
34. Freeman, Gordon Dr., 3/18/01, personal letter
; Atomic Saucers Again?
It is possible that all of the options for the field propulsion of German flying discs have not been presented or had a fair hearing. Two of these other possibilities are reviewed below. The first is the possibility that a world-shattering breakthrough in field propulsion occurred during the Third Reich involving atomic energy. This is plausible given the extensive and mostly still-secret atomic research done by the Germans coupled with the government’s attempt to down play UFO sightings immediately following the war. The second possibility is that a field propulsion device was developed out of the early work of the Austrian inventor, Karl Schappeller. This possibility is strengthened by the fact that individuals and organizations involved in this research openly acknowledged that one of their aims was to build an “ether ship.”
Hybrid Saucer Design
Chemical/Field Propulsion Saucer (N. Juergen-Ratthofer.) 1. Plexiglass pilot’s cabin. 2. Crew rooms. 3. Intake air slots (hermetically sealed in space.) 4. Vacuum ring retainers with high-performance vacuum pumps. 5. Lifting and steering jets connected to the Walter turbine system. 6. Walter turbines and electric generators with connected machine maintenance rooms. 7. Disc rotor wheel, rotating counter-clockwise. 9. Disc wheel, inner part of the electromagnet outer ring. 10. Segmented disc-rotor and wing screw with adjustable flight blades. 11. Asix of saucer with (a) two electric motors to drive the counter rotating disc motors: electro-gravitation plant, (b) various electrical connections, (c) fuel and water tanks. 12. Connection shaft between pilot’s cabin and machine room.
The German conventional saucer program culminating with atomic propulsion has been discussed. Evidence of German field propulsion saucers has been reviewed. We already know that each step in the conventional German saucer program was a logical development of the previous saucer design. The question is: did the power utilized in the German field propulsion saucers arise from nuclear power? Was there a breakthrough which has been kept secret for almost sixty years?
We have discussed the link between nuclear facilities and flying saucers. Is this evidence, in itself, that an association exists? The association could be for one of two reasons. First, these areas may simply have been the most secure facilities available. The two projects may not have been connected at all. For security reasons, both projects were simply run out of the same area.
The second possibility is that the two projects were run out of the same facility because they are connected somehow. If there is a connection between nuclear energy and field propulsion, what type of connection is this? The connection under discussion is a direct conversion from nuclear energy to field energy. This connection is on the order of the connection between electricity and magnetism or heat and electricity or nuclear energy and heat. Does such a connection exist?
The answer I got from everyone asked was a resounding “no.” The consensus seemed to be that the closest we could come to this was to convert nuclear energy to heat energy and then to electrical energy though the medium of a steam turbine. This is how nuclear power plants and atomic submarines work. This method seemed to have nothing to do with flight since the hardware involved is much too bulky and heavy.
We have already reviewed some other options for nuclear powered saucers. Klaus-Peter Rothkugel suggests that the atmosphere itself could be burnt using liquid air as a fuel and a nuclear reactor as a heat source. Friedrich Georg has documented some aircraft engine designs, apparently left on the drawing board, involving a propeller engine driven by steam heated by nuclear power. We have seen the enigmatic Messerschmitt design involving a small nuclear engine on a high-speed aircraft. We have also discussed the atomic rocket approach which involves heating and ejecting of liquid hydrogen using a nuclear reactor in the Lenticular Reentry Vehicle.
While there is no known direct connection between nuclear energy and field propulsion, Dr. Gordon Freeman has made me aware of an alternate method of production of electrical energy through the use of nuclear decay. This is important because with enough electrical energy both electrostatic and electromagnetic field propulsion are possible. Let me relate to you what Dr. Freeman told me as to how this process works. It is amazingly simple.
The simplest method involves the use of two solar cells which are the same size. A piece of paper, the thickness of a business card is cut to the same size as the solar cells. Radium chloride is painted onto both sides of the paper. The paper is then fitted between the solar cells. The radium chloride emits alpha and beta particles which activate the solar cell. The reader might ask, if this method works, why has it not been patented? The answer is, that in a slightly more efficient configuration, it has been patented (1).
There are other forms of this simple example. Imagine a simple circuit used for purposes of generating electromagnetic waves. This circuit would consist of a wire connecting a capacitor and then to a coil. An electrical input is given to this circuit whereby the capacitor is sufficiently charged in order for it to discharge. The electrical energy is carried by the wire to the coil where it is charged. Electrical energy is then carried back from the coil to the capacitor by another wire completing the circuit. Alternately, the capacitor (electrical field) and the coil (magnetic field) are charged and discharged. The output of this circuit are electromagnetic waves, such as fill the electromagnetic spectrum. The system works until electrical resistance in the three components converts enough electrical energy into heat to sufficiently degrade its output.
What is done using the new atomic decay system is to paint the capacitors with radium chloride. This unstable compound emits alpha and beta particles when magnetically or electrostatically pulsed. These particles are absorbed by the capacitors (as well as the other components), the end result of which is an increase in electrical energy in the circuit. If enough capacitors can be wired into the circuit in series to produce enough energy to offset the ohmic degradation, then the output can be maintained for a long time. Radium chloride has a half-life of 800 years. Of course, if an extra capacitor were wired in to the circuit, an excess of energy would result. Even if this excess energy is small, it can be very important. Devices using a similar method have also been patented (2) (3).
In the next step, the circuit described above is given an antenna and a tesla coil. The radium chloride doped capacitors are turned to one of the resonant frequencies for the tesla coil.
An antenna is used which is suitable for receiving this same frequency output. A feed back loop is set up whereby energy is being pulsed into the system in these resonant frequencies. It is estimated that an output of three thousand watts can be obtained from this “lifetime battery” with an input of only fifty watts (4). A transformer and other devices can be used to tailor the electrical output produced by this device according to the need. Details for construction and tuning of this “battery” are available commercially (4).
This whole device can be held in one’s hand. Imagine the power of one hundred or one thousand such units. Certainly a U-boat or a field propulsion saucer could be powered using this system.
Dr. Freeman believes this nuclear doping might be the missing link in several free energy devices. Dr. Freeman has evidence that both the Hubbard and Hendershot generators were doped with nuclear material. He has evidence that Hubbard actually worked for the Radium Company of America. Further, he has found evidence that it was radioactive material which was used to dope Moray’s germanium valve (5).
Even further, he has suggested that the initial starting energy necessary for the operation of the Schappeller device, which will be discussed shortly, was supplied by a radioactively doped electret (5). Bolstering Dr. Freeman’s claim is a U.S. patent using such a radioactive electret to maintain its charge (6). This is not the approach favored in this book, but the use of something like the “lifetime battery” to start the Schappeller device is not beyond the real of reason. In fact, there is some evidence that a very strange battery was being produced in wartime Germany.
During the war years, at least until
1943, none other than Professor. W. O. Schumann was engaged in building something called a “battery” at the Technical Institute at Munich. This battery was a project to itself and funded by the Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft, forerunner of the Reichsforschungrates, the Reich Research Council (7). The Reich Research Council coordinated high-priority war research between academic, industrial and military facilities.
This is the same Dr. Schumann who was brought to the United States after the war as part of Project Paperclip (8). This is also the same Dr. Schumann noted for the discovery of the Schumann Resonance. Dr. Schumann was no stranger to free energy devices since it was he who evaluated a working Hans Coler device in 1926 and could find no fault, hoax or bad faith, on the part of its inventor (9).
Rumor has it that Dr. Schumann’s specialty was antennas and that he was responsible for building or improving American submarine communication after the war. It is said this was done by employing extra low frequency radio equipment and mile-long antennae which were towed behind the submarines themselves. The radio waves employed for this communication were said to go directly through the earth’s center. Dr. Schumann also discovered something called the Schumann Resonance which deals with the resonant frequency of the planet earth itself.
Returning to wartime Munich, why would a full professor and world-class scientist be devoting years of research and government sponsorship to a battery while Germany was in the middle of a war? The answer is that this battery was something special. Was this similar to the “lifetime battery”? Could this type of energy production have been the promised means of freeing Germany from dependence of foreign oil? Was this battery an energy producing device, capable of powering or starting a field propulsion saucer?
The old problem arises. The question is not could this be the way it was done. The question is was this the way it was done. What proof is there that nuclear decay was used by the Germans to produce energy by any other means than is in practice today? Dr. Freeman provides one hint.
B00AY88OHE EBOK Page 13