Book Read Free

The SAGE Handbook of Persuasion

Page 89

by James Price Dillard


  affect and, 154–155, 154 (table)

  reasoned action theory and, 132

  supportive communication and, 238–239, 240 (table)

  Message effects, 239, 241, 297

  Message evaluations, 239, 241

  Message features, 20–32

  about, 20–21

  advertisement versus non-advertisement, 23–24

  affect and, 154–157, 154 (table)

  audience favorability, 23

  climax versus anti-climax, 24

  conclusion explicitness, 24–25

  evidence, type of, 21–22

  framing, 28–30

  metaphor, 26–28

  powerful versus powerless language, 26

  sidedness, 22–24, 287

  structure, 20, 24–25

  style, 20, 26–31, 155–156

  See also Message content

  Message framing. See Framing

  Message-induced affect, 156–157

  Message interactivity, 394–395

  Message-irrelevant affect, 157

  Message outcomes, 241

  Message perspectives, 262–264, 271

  Messages:

  advice, 238–239

  in courtrooms, 332–343

  explicit, 204

  exposure to, 279

  gain-framed, 28, 29–30, 155–156, 160, 285, 286

  implicit, 204

  influence of presumed influence and, 380, 383–384

  in interaction, 241–246, 249–250

  loss-framed, 28–30, 155–156, 160, 285, 286

  media influence and, 39–40

  nature and effects of, 248–249

  one-sided, 22, 23–24, 287

  order of, 89–90

  person-centered, 239, 240 (table)

  processing of, 144, 244–246

  production of, 242–244

  qualities of, 287–288

  refutational two-sided, 22

  repetition of, 87–88, 87 (figure), 88 (figure)

  sources of, 288–290

  structure of, 20, 24–25

  tailoring, 116–117, 290, 392, 393

  two-sided, 22–24, 287

  variations in, 230–231

  Message style, 20, 26–31, 155–156

  Metacognitive processing, 319

  Metaphor, 26–28

  Michigan State University football players, 80

  Minorities, influence of, 359–362, 365–366

  Modality interactivity, 394

  Modeling, 173, 173 (table)

  MODE model. See Motivation and Opportunities as DEterminants model

  Moderation-elasticity theory, 356

  Modern rhetorical tradition, 6–7

  Moore, Michael, 41

  Motivated attention, 160

  Motivated processing, 160

  Motivation:

  effectance, 244

  elaboration, 137–138

  emotions and, 152

  goal, 244

  normative, 244

  protection, 190–191

  for supportive message production, 244

  Motivation and Opportunities as DEterminants (MODE)

  model, 55–56, 59, 60–61

  Multiple appeals, 286–287

  Music in commercial establishments, 323–324

  Narrative persuasion, 200–215

  about, 200–201

  argument versus, 200

  awareness of persuasive intent and resistance, 204–205

  counterarguing, 205–208

  defining narrative in light of persuasion, 201–202

  elaboration and inference, 208–211

  elaboration likelihood model and, 208

  imagery, 211–212

  integration of narrative and persuasive content, 203–204

  mechanics of, 205

  non-narrative persuasion versus, 202–203

  in political persuasion, 262

  in psychological reactance theory, 175

  research, future, 213–215

  self-referencing, 210–211

  vicarious experience, 212–213

  National Youth Anti-drug Mass Media Campaign, 297–298, 299, 300

  Needs, relational, 247–248

  Negative appeals, 286

  Negative campaign ads, 269, 270

  Negativity bias, 28

  Neoclassical tradition, 10–11

  Neofunctional approach, 108–109

  Networks, associative, 230

  Neurological activity, 152

  Neuroscience, social cognitive, 325–326

  New rhetoric, 7–8

  New Rhetoric (Perleman & Olbrechts-Tyteca), 9

  News coverage, framing of, 155

  News websites, 40

  Nixon, Richard, 261, 264–265

  Nonconscious processing, 322–324, 324–325

  Nonevaluative beliefs, 84

  Non-refutational two-sided messages, 22

  Normative motivation, 244

  Norms:

  accessible, 62–63

  descriptive, 128

  drug prevention and, 300–301

  focus theory of, 62–63

  implicit, 62–63

  injunctive, 127–128

  as outcome of persuasion, 61–63

  perceived, 127–129

  political persuasion and, 269–270, 273

  social, 61–62, 280, 300–301

  subjective, 127–128

  Nuclear power, 74, 75

  Nuclear warfare, 74, 75

  Objective coherence markers, 30–31

  Old media heuristic, 390–391

  One-sided messages, 22, 23–24

  Opening statements, 334–335, 344(n2)

  Opinion climate, 42

  Opinion leadership, 362–363

  Organization, superior, 28

  Oscillation, 98–99

  Outcomes of persuasion, 53–65

  about, 53–54

  attitudes as, 56–61

  behavior as, 54–56

  deliberative approaches to, 61–62

  dynamic view of, 63–64

  norms as, 61–63

  research, future, 64–65

  spontaneous approaches to, 62–63

  Overpromising, 305–306

  Parallel processing models, 170, 191–192, 194, 196

  Parallel response model, 188–190, 194

  Particle kinematics, 85

  PAT. See Persuasive arguments theory

  Paterno, Joe, 371

  Perceived norms, 127–129

  Perceptual acuity, 354

  Peripheral-route persuasion, 138–141, 144–146

  Personality, 109–110

  Person-centered messages, 239, 240 (table)

  Perspectives:

  health behavior, 280–281

  message, 262–264, 271

  Persuasion:

  conviction versus, 72–73

  defined, 36, 388

  framing versus, 263–264

  See also specific topics

  Persuasion knowledge model, 319–322, 320 (figure)

  Persuasive arguments theory (PAT), 357, 359

  Physical models, 85

  Physiological domain, 152

  PIT. See Post-inoculation talk

  Planned behavior theory. See Reasoned action theory

  Plato, 4

  Pleasure-arousal models, 151

  Pleasure or relief explanation, 27

  Policy makers, societal, 283–284

  Politeness, 247–248

  Political persuasion, 258–273

  about, 258–259

  campaign ads, 41, 262, 269, 270

  channel factors, 264–265, 271–272

  credibility in, 261–262

  elaboration likelihood model and, 265–267, 271

  evidence in, 262

  expertise in, 261

  framing in, 262–264

  good will in, 261

  historical narratives and, 260

  influence of presumed influence and, 376


  inoculation theory and, 224

  message perspectives, 262–264, 271

  methodological problems of studying, 260

  narrative in, 262

  normative and empirical issues, 273

  normative conundrums, 269–270

  priming in, 43–44, 49(n2)

  radio and, 39–40

  receivers, 265–268, 272

  research, future, 270–273

  scholarly study of, 259–261

  selective exposure in, 267, 269

  source approaches, 271

  source effects, 261–262

  technology and, 393–394

  television and, 41, 264–265

  theoretical perspectives on, 261–268

  trustworthiness in, 261

  values and, 260–270

  Positional discrepancy, 94

  Positive appeals, 286

  Post-inoculation talk (PIT), 228–229, 231–232

  Postman, Neil, 15

  Postmodernism, 9

  Postscripts, choice-enhancing, 176–177

  Powerful versus powerless language, 26

  Pre-attitude, 226, 227

  Prediction, 125–126, 131–132

  Presumed influence, 378–379

  See also Influence of presumed influence

  Pretreatments, 230–231

  Pretrial phase, 331–332

  Prevention behavior, 29, 284–285

  Price, Raymond K., 261

  Primary appraisals, 152

  Primes and priming, 43–44, 49(n2), 323–325

  Processing:

  message, 144, 244–246

  metacognitive, 319

  motivated, 160

  nonconscious, 322–324, 324–325

  Product involvement, role of, 318

  Progressive Era, 13–14

  Promoting healthy behavior, 284–285

  Proof, burden of, 333

  Propaganda effects, 259

  Proportional change model. See Linear discrepancy model

  Protection, umbrella of, 232

  Protection motivation explanation, 190–191

  Protest, social, 42–43

  Proteus Effect, 396

  PRT. See Psychological reactance theory

  Psychological discrepancy, 94–95

  Psychological-discrepancy-discounting model, 95, 99

  Psychological reactance theory (PRT), 167–179

  about, 167

  choice-enhancing postscripts, 176–177

  conclusion explicitness and, 24–25

  corollaries of, 168–169

  diminishing reactance, 176–178

  domineering language, 174

  drug prevention and, 299

  empathy, 177

  framing and, 29

  inducing reactance, 174–176

  intent to persuade, 174–175

  magnitude of request, 175

  measuring reactance, 171

  modeling reactance process, 173, 173 (table)

  narrative, 175

  nature of reactance, 169–170

  progress in refining, 169–173, 172 (table), 173 (table)

  reactance as individual difference, 171–173, 172 (table)

  reactance as persuasive strategy, 178

  reactance proneness as audience segmentation variable, 175–176

  research, classic, 167–169

  research, contemporary, 174–178

  research, future, 178–179

  sensation value, 177–178

  Push-with-pullback model, 96

  Quintilian, 5

  Race, in trial persuasion, 335, 345(n3)

  Racial attitudes, 61

  Radio, 39–40, 41

  Radio campaign ads, 41

  RAM. See Resistance appraisals model Reactance:

  defined, 168, 170

  diminishing, 176–178

  as individual difference, 171–173, 172 (table)

  inducing, 174–176

  measuring, 171

  nature of, 169–170

  as persuasive strategy, 178

  proneness as audience segmentation variable, 175–176

  See also Psychological reactance theory

  Reagan, Ronald, 15, 262

  Realities, alternative, 395–397

  Reasoned action theory, 120–133

  about, 120–121, 315

  attitude and behavioral beliefs, 126–127

  background factors and sufficiency, 130–131

  behavior, 123–124

  behavioral intention, 124–126, 130

  components and their relations, 121 (figure), 123–131

  drug prevention and, 297

  health campaigns and, 280, 281

  historical context, 122–123

  influence of presumed influence versus, 383

  marketplace persuasion and, 315–316

  message content, moving beyond, 132

  moderators of intention effects on behavior, 126

  perceived behavioral control and control beliefs, 129–130

  perceived norm and normative beliefs, 127–129

  persuasion, perspective on, 121–122

  predicting behavior from intention, 125–126

  prediction, predicting, 131–132

  prediction, testing, 125–126

  research, future, 131–132

  tests of, 315–316

  Receivers/recipients, 41–42, 265–268, 272

  Recovered memory cases, 336–337

  Rectification, 378

  Reducing counter-arguments explanation, 27

  Refutational two-sided messages, 22

  Reinforcement. See Response reinforcement

  Rejection, latitude of, 90, 91

  Relational needs, 247–248

  Relevance, 393

  Reputational preemption, 231

  Request, magnitude of, 175

  Rereading the Sophists (Jarratt), 3

  Resistance, 204–205, 229–230

  Resistance appraisals model (RAM), 300

  Resistance enhancement, 300

  Resolute nonusers of drugs, 304

  Resource matching, 27

  Response change:

  about, 37

  channel and, 40–41

  context and, 42–43

  message and, 40

  persuasion as, 77–80

  recipient and, 41–42

  source and, 39

  Response efficacy, 186

  Response reinforcement:

  about, 37

  being persuaded as, 76–77

  channel and, 40

  context and, 42

  message and, 39–40

  recipient and, 41

  source and, 39

  Response shaping, 37, 74–76

  Restoration of freedom, 168

  Revisionist scholars, 3

  Rhetoric:

  aestheticization of, 6, 7

  attack on, 6

  belletristic, 6–7

  defined, 4

  social movement, 8

  women’s liberation, 8

  Rhetorical tradition, 2–17

  about, 2–3

  American, 9–15

  ancient, 4–5

  contemporary rhetorical theory and, 7–9

  founders’ vision of deliberative democracy, 10–11

  golden age of, 11–13

  modern era, 6–7

  persuasion in rhetorical theory, 3–9

  Progressive Era, 13–14

  television, age of, 14–15

  Rome, ancient, 4–5

  Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, 6

  Salespeople, flattery by, 321–322

  Salience-imbalance theory, 27

  Salience transfer, 43–44

  Science communication, 42

  Scientific evidence, 340

  Scientific theory, discrepancy models in, 85

  SCT. See Social comparison theory

  S-curves, 47

  Secondary appraisals, 152

  Selective exposure, 76, 267, 269 />
 

‹ Prev