Book Read Free

MindStar

Page 28

by Michael A Aquino


  Once this point is understood, the philosophical

  teachings of the Pythagoreans become

  intelligible. A passage in lamblicus (which goes

  back to Aristoxenus) gives their point of view

  very clearly, and we must connect it with our

  previous discussion about the importance of the

  problem of justice:

  - 261 -

  Pythagoras thought that the most efficacious

  device for the establishment of justice was the

  rule of the gods, and beginning with that he

  established the state and the laws, justice and

  the just.

  In this interesting passage we have a long step

  forward in the theologizing of the concept of

  justice. The contemplation of divine things,

  thought the Pythagoreans, instructed by

  Pythagoras himself, was useful for mankind.

  The reason was that we need a master, some

  ruling principle against which we do not dare to

  rise in rebellion, and this is provided by the

  divinity. Our animal nature, he argued, is

  subject to hybris and is diverse and chaotic,

  subject to control by a variety of impulses,

  desires, and passions. There must be a power

  which by its superiority and its “threatening

  eminence ( epanastasis)” will introduce

  prudence and order into chaos. 136

  The Sphinx: Compare this notion of justice as a divine

  standard to the Egyptian concept of Maat which

  we discussed earlier. Here we find evidence of a

  Form discussed virtually identically by first the

  Egyptians, then Pythagoras, then Plato. It is

  something higher than law, higher than human

  reason or learned wisdom - it is a “god” itself.

  The Chimæra: The actual characteristics of what are

  generally known as the “Egyptian gods” are far

  closer to the notion of Forms than they are to the

  later pantheons of pagan cultures such as Greece,

  Rome, and Scandinavia. A reading of Egyptian

  texts translated directly from the hieroglyphic will

  substantiate this. In only a very few legends [such

  136 Winspear, Alban D., The Genesis of Plato’s Thought, pages 81-82.

  - 262 -

  as that of the death and rebirth of Osiris] do the

  gods assume human behavioral characteristics. In

  the vast bulk of the existing texts they are far more

  abstract, having “personalities” that seem to

  overlap one another and symbolic attributes that

  are difficult to identify in terms of purely-human

  desires. Consider the following inscription from

  the tomb of Rameses VI in this light, noticing the

  overlap between Truth ( Maat) and Ra:

  Adoration to Truth. Salutation to thee, this Eye

  of Ra through which he lives every day! They

  who are behind the chapel fear her, the Brilliant

  One, She who comes out from the head of him

  who made her. On the Head Serpent, who

  comes out in front of him! Thou art the brilliant

  eye who leads him, the word of judgment of the

  One Whose Name Is Hidden, the victorious one

  before the Ennead, Lady of Fear, great of

  respect, Truth, through whom Ra is glorified,

  she who appeases for him the Two Lands by her

  decrees, she who speaks to the gods and chases

  away evil, whose abomination is sin, she who

  appeases the hearts of the gods! Thou art the

  balance of the Lord of the Two Banks, whose

  face is beautiful when Ra comes to his Truth,

  being glorious through her. Those in Busiris

  praise him through her, litanies are sung to him

  by the great gods while she adores the powers of

  the Two Chapels. He is glorious through her,

  more than the gods, in this her name of the

  Brilliant One. Thoth brought her and reckoned

  her, the Established One, the Brilliant, the

  Reckoned One, in this her name of the Ipet

  Serpent. He made her live as a Uræus in this her

  name of Opener of the Ways, She who leads him

  on the ways of the horizon, in this her name of

  - 263 -

  Leader of Men. He erected her on his head in

  this her name of Very Great Crown. 137

  The Sphinx: A passage such as this is quite impossible

  to explain in terms of ordinary human conventions

  and values. It certainly bears scant resemblance to

  the light, allegorical adventures of later

  Mediterranean gods and goddesses. Yet to one

  versed in the language of the Egyptian

  priesthoods, its meanings are quite clear. If Plato

  were an Egyptian initiate, one can see why he

  would dismiss conventional means of reductionist

  logic as a means for comprehending the Forms.

  The Chimæra: We have seen definite evidence of

  Pythagorean doctrine in the Platonic writings, and

  at the beginning of this discussion we recounted

  Plato’s visit to the Pythagorean centers in Italy and

  Africa from 399 to 387 BCE. But are there any

  grounds to suppose that Plato received direct

  initiation at the hands of an Egyptian priesthood?

  The Sphinx: There are at least two indications that he

  did. First there is the following passage from the

  Prefaces of St. Jerome [circa 340-420 CE], placed

  by order of Popes Sixtus V [1585-1590] and

  Clement VIII [1592-1605] as introduction to the

  Bible:

  Pythagoras and Plato, those masters of the

  genius of Greece, visited as pilgrims seeking

  after knowledge and as humble disciples the

  sacerdotal college of the soothsayers at

  Memphis [ Memphiticos vates], preferring to be

  initiated with respect to the ancient doctrines of

  137 Piankoff, Alexandre (Ed.), The Tomb of Ramesses VI, page 321.

  - 264 -

  that distant land, rather than impose on their

  country the yoke of their own ideas. 138

  The Chimæra: At the risk of belaboring the point, I

  again note that this passage was written prior to

  the final destruction of the Alexandrian library and

  [possibly] such references to the matter as it may

  have contained for scholars of the time.

  The Sphinx: For that matter, there may have been other

  sources available to St. Jerome which, for one

  reason or another, have not survived to the present

  day. Our second bit of evidence comes from

  Proclus, who states that Plato was initiated in

  Egypt over a thirteen-year period by the priests

  Patheneitb, Ochoaps, Sechtnouphis, and Etymon

  of Sebennithis. 139

  The Chimæra: Again we can indulge in a little

  detective-work. The names of the first three priests

  can be rendered precisely in hieroglyphics; that

  argues for their authenticity. [The fourth can be

  rendered only approximately and thus is not

  conclusive.] The “thirteen-year period” happens to

  coincide with the normal training time for an

  Egyptian scribe [to achieve full fluency in the

  hieroglyphic language]. As for Sebennithis, it was

  the seat of the Egyptian government from 378 to

  360 BCE
under Nekht-Hor-heb I, first pharaoh of

  138 “Taceo de philosophis, astronomis, astrologis, quorum scientia

  mortalibus utilissima est, et in tres partes scinditur. to dogma

  thnmeqodon, thn empeirian. Ad minores artes veniam,” etc. [A.

  Hyeronomi, Prologus galateatus, in Bibl. saer.].

  139 Proclus, quoted in Christian, Paul, Histoire de la Magie, du

  Monde Surnaturel et de la Fatalité à travers les Temps et les

  Peuples, page 88.

  - 265 -

  the XXX Dynasty. Hence it would have been both

  relatively secure from a political standpoint and a

  logical place for Plato to seek Egyptian

  initiation. 140

  The Sphinx: Talk about last-minute timing! In 340

  BCE, after more than four thousand years of native

  national rule, Egypt finally fell to a Persian army

  [which in turn fell to Alexander the Great in 332].

  How sophisticated the Egyptian initiatory systems

  remained under purely-occupational governments

  is open to question - as would be the willingness of

  Egyptian priests to initiate foreigners under such

  circumstances. Even Pythagoras’ initiation many

  years earlier seems to have occurred only after

  some arm-twisting by Amasis, himself a native

  Egyptian pharaoh and thus an initiate in his own

  right. A Persian or a Ptolemaic ruler would not

  have had such leverage over the native

  priesthoods, nor the knowledge to judge whether

  forced-instruction were in fact genuine. After

  Pythagoras and Plato the link with the Egyptian

  priesthoods was broken. [This may very well

  account for the sharp distinctions between the

  Pythagorean/Platonic doctrines - with their

  apparent sophistication and seeming uniqueness -

  and the decidedly-diluted commentaries (such as

  those of Aristotle) which trailed along after them.]

  The Chimæra: Having come this far, what may we

  conclude concerning Plato’s legacy?

  140 Brugsch-Bey, Heinrich, Egypt Under the Pharaohs, pages

  450-451.

  - 266 -

  The Sphinx: He left two memorials: his writings and his

  Academy. The former contain discussions of

  Forms [or Egyptian “gods”, if you will!] on an

  initiatory level, although they are also useful as

  exercises in ordinary logic. The latter was, in

  effect, a Pythagorean school minus the strict

  personal and psychological discipline that

  Pythagoras thought important [and which

  contributed directly to the burning of Crotona and

  the slaying of Pythagoras himself - by outraged ex-

  students who had failed to withstand the

  pressure]. Evidently Plato thought that he could

  transmit the doctrines in an environment more

  suited to Greece than to Egypt. And he was

  successful, at least to the extent that the Academy

  enjoyed a long and productive existence - and to

  the extent that his own writings were preserved for

  our consideration at this point in the time-

  continuum. He may have failed to provide the

  Greece of his own day with the sort of enlightened

  government that he might have preferred, but he

  had seen Pythagorean domination of Sicily and

  Italy come to grief. So perhaps he was not so

  anxious as some might suppose to duplicate the

  Pythagorean experiment in Greece itself. Whereas

  Pythagoras died a violent death and left none of

  his personal works for posterity, Plato lived a full

  life and left a rich heritage for scholars - and

  Initiates - of the future. That, certainly, is

  testimony to his wisdom.

  The Chimæra: “The secret worship of the logos in the

  cosmos, the divine spark in every human form.” 141

  141 Incantation, Raghavan Iyer to M.A. Aquino, 1975.

  - 267 -

  Bibliography

  Alvarez, A., The Savage God: A Study of Suicide. New

  York: Random House, 1972.

  Aquino, Michael A., San Francisco: Barony of Rachane,

  FireForce, 1977, 1981, 2016.

  FindFar, 2017.

  IlluminAnX, 2017.

  MindWar, 2013, 2016.

  Morlindalë, 2003.

  Ode to Esmé, 2017.

  The Temple of Set, 1975-2016.

  We Break the Sword, 2016.

  Aristotle, De Cælo.

  Assmann, Jan & Jenkins, Andrew (Trans.), The Mind of

  Egypt: History and Meaning in the Time of the

  Pharaohs. New York: Metropolitan Books, 2002.

  Asimov, Isaac, Asimov’s Biographical Encyclopædia of

  Science and Technology. Garden City, New York:

  Doubleday and Company, 1972.

  Barker, Sir Ernest, Greek Political Theory: Plato and his

  Predecessors. London: Methuen and Company Ltd.,

  1918.

  Berlitz, Charles, Mysteries from Forgotten Worlds.

  Garden City, New York: Doubleday and Company,

  1972.

  - 268 -

  Becker, Robert O. M.D. & Seidon, Gary, The Body

  Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of

  Life. New York: William Morrow, 1985.

  Brandon, S.G.F., Religion in Ancient History. New York:

  Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1969.

  Breasted, James H., Development of Religion and

  Thought in Ancient Egypt. New York: Charles

  Scribner’s Sons, 1912.

  Brunes, Tons, The Secrets of Ancient Geometry.

  C o p e n h a g e n , D e n m a r k : “ T h e A n c i e n t

  Geometry” (Nygaardsvej 41, Copenhagen 0), 1968.

  Brugsch-Bey, Heinrich, Egypt Under the Pharaohs. New

  York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1891.

  Budge, Sir E.A. Wallis,

  - The Book of the Dead. 1960.

  - The Egyptian Heaven and Hell. La Salle, Illinois: Open

  Court, 1974.

  - An Egyptian Hieroglyphic Dictionary (two volumes).

  New York: Dover Publications, 1978.

  - Egyptian Language. New York: Dover Publications,

  1973.

  - From Fetish to God in Ancient Egypt. London: Oxford

  University Press, 1934.

  - The Gods of the Egyptians. London: Open Court, 1904

  - The Mummy. New York: Collier Books, 1973.

  Burr, Harold Saxon, M.D., The Fields of Life: Our Links

  with the Universe. New York: Ballantine Books

  #23559, 1972

  Carroll, David, The Magic Makers. New York: Signet

  #E-6556, 1974.

  Carus, Paul, The History of the Devil. New York: Land’s

  End Press, 1969.

  Casaubon, Meric., John Dee’s Actions With Spirits.

  London: Askin Publishers, 1974 (originally published

  1659).

  - 269 -

  Casson, Lionel, Ancient Egypt. New York: Time, Inc.,

  1965.

  Cavendish, Richard,

  - The Black Arts. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1968.

  - Encyclopedia of the Unexplained (Ed.). New York:

  McGraw-Hill, 1974.

  - The Powers of Evil. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons,

  1975.

  Chayefsky, Paddy, Altered States. New York: Harper &

  Row, 1978.

  Christian, Paul, Histoire de la Magie, du Monde

  Surnaturel et de la Fatalité à travers les Temps et les

  Peuples. Paris, 1
870 (translation - New York: Citadel

  Press, 1969).

  Colquhoun, Ithell, Sword of Wisdom: MacGregor

  Mathers and “The Golden Dawn” . New York: G.P.

  Putnam’s Sons, 1975.

  Cottrell, Leonard, Life Under the Pharaohs. New York:

  Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1960.

  Crow, W.B., A Fascinating History of Witchcraft, Magic,

  & Occultism. North Hollywood: Wilshire Book Co.,

  1970.

  Crowley, Aleister,

  - The Equinox (Volume I #1-10, Volume III #1). New

  York: Samuel Weiser, 1972.

  - The Magical Record of the Beast 666. Montreal: 93

  Publishing, 1972.

  - Magick. New York: Samuel Weiser, 1994.

  - The Vision and The Voice. Dallas: Sangreal Foundation,

  1972.

  Davis, Wade E., The Serpent and the Rainbow. New

  York: Warner Books #0-446-34387-0, 1987.

  Deacon, Richard, John Dee. London: Frederick Muller

  Ltd, 1967.

  de Lafforest, Roger, Houses That Kill. New York: Berkley

  Medallion Books #425-02620-125, 1972.

  - 270 -

  de León, Moses, Zohar.

  Drury, Nevill,

  - The Occult Experience. Garden City Park, New York:

  Avery Publishing Group, 1990.

  - & Tillett, Gregory, The Occult Sourcebook. London:

  Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978.

  Dunn, Marcel (Ed.), The Larousse Encyclopedia of

  Ancient and Medieval History. New York: Harper &

  Row, 1963

  Eckhart, Dietrich, Auf gut deutsch. 1919.

  Edwards, Michael, The Dark Side of History: Magic in

  the Making of Man. New York: Stein & Day, 1977.

  Eliade, Mircea, Occultism, Witchcraft, and Cultural

  Fashions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.

  Every, George, Christian Mythology. New York: Hamlyn

  Publishing Group, 1970.

  Fagan, Brian M., The Rape of the Nile. New York: Charles

  Scribner’s Sons, 1975.

  Fakhry, Ahmen, The Pyramids. Chicago: University of

  Chicago Press, 1961.

  Fairservis, Walter A. Jr., The Ancient Kingdoms of the

  Nile. New York: Mentor Books, 1962.

  Farr, Florence, Egyptian Magic. Wellingborough,

  Northamptonshire: The Aquarian Press, 1982.

  Fix, Wm. R.,

  - Pyramid Odyssey. New York: Mayflower Books, 1978.

  - Star Maps. London: Octopus Books, 1979.

  Flannery, M.C., Yeats and Magic: The Earlier Works.

  New York: Harper & Row (Barnes & Noble Import

  Division), 1978.

  Fleming, Ian, Goldfinger. New York: Signet, 1959.

  Flowers, Stephen E., Lords of the Left-Hand Path.

 

‹ Prev