Book Read Free

Randal Marlin

Page 61

by Propaganda


  enormous pressure on the Pentagon to back off from their PR spinning.9

  The field is wide open for independent journalists to set up their own Web pages.

  Indeed, Boyce Richardson, a retired journalist and filmmaker, has done just that;

  “Boyce’s Paper”10 provides regular insightful commentaries on the media, books, poli-

  tics, sports, and whatever else captures his attention. What is special about this pub-

  lication, updated every few days, is that it gives an unapologetic socialist viewpoint

  unobtainable, at least on any regular basis, in any Canadian mainstream publication

  that I know. However, without an advertising budget, how many know of its exis-

  tence? Long ago, Albert Camus dreamed of a critical journalism that would outline

  the biases of writers, owners, news sources, and so on and that would give the reader

  the benefit of the journalist’s experienced judgment as to the likelihood of their verac-

  ity. This form of meta-journalism would draw attention to contradictory accounts

  rather than suppressing them, thus putting the reader on guard against credulity. He

  was optimistic about the technical possibility of such journalism, without going into

  further detail.11 Today, various websites, such as FAIR,12 can be found that approximate

  the function Camus described. All that is lacking, for many people, is awareness of

  where such sites are to be found. Can we expect a new era of democratic involvement?

  Or is this new technology likely to follow in the footsteps of the telephone, radio, and

  television, all touted in similar ways but fal ing far short of the promises made by some

  on their behalf?

  CHAPTER 8: PRoPAgAnDA , DEMoCR ACy, AnD THE InTERnET 311

  BV-Propaganda-Interior-04.indd 311

  9/5/13 4:52 PM

  That we are in a new era of communications is undeniable. However, it is impossible to predict with confidence how the new technology will be developed. What

  seems limitless at first runs up against the fact of human boredom. Already news

  accounts have reported that, after a spurt of across-the-field experimentation, people

  tend to settle on a few websites that they visit with regularity, until they step out of

  the virtual world into the real one with its full human interaction. The Web is full of

  outdated, because not maintained, sites. After the initial discovery of cyberspace’s

  potential, some more sober assessment is in order. Jacques El ul, long before the arrival

  of the Web, made some comments on information technology that seem likely also to

  apply with poignancy to the Internet:

  The technical possibilities of a wide variety of benefits [of a computerized society] are

  there, but it is illusory to suppose that the benefits will necessarily come about. The

  computer and other information devices enter an existing social order. .. Inevitably,

  information systems will become concentrated and centralized.... The ordinary citi-

  zen will be given access to information, but how will he know where to look for what

  he wants, which data bank to tap? Social privilege will flow even more than now to

  the big administrators, intellectuals, and pressure groups or unions, whoever has the

  resources to get pertinent information. . Secrecy will also be favored, inasmuch as

  there will eventually develop two levels of information. The first will be what goes

  into the data banks. The second, and more important, will be the information not

  provided by the banks but known to those who fed the data into the computer, who

  decided what to put in and what to leave out. This will be one of the gravest threats

  to our future freedom.13

  This prediction, made in 1980, about the difficulty of getting new technology

  to support grassroots democracy against established commercial interests, seems to

  be verified by contemporary developments. According to Donald Gutstein, a com-

  munications professor at Simon Fraser University, the development of the Internet

  is repeating what happened with previous communications technologies. As long as

  the technology is in its infancy, it is promoted as a public good, and public money

  is demanded and obtained for its development. Then, when the big cost hurdles are

  overcome, pressure is put on the government to allow private corporations to use the

  new technologies for commercial purposes. CA*net, the Internet in Canada in the

  early 1990s, was funded through universities and the National Research Council.

  An industry-dominated organization was formed—the Canadian Network for the

  Advancement of Research, Industry, and Education (CANARIE)—and financed

  by the Mulroney and Chrétien governments to “upgrade CA*net and turn it over

  to the private sector—Bell Canada as it turned out.” However, some of the compa-

  nies involved in this organization, Bell included, stood to benefit from the demise of

  CA*net, since they planned to set up private Internet access companies. “CANARIE

  312 PROPAGANDA AND THE ETHICS OF PERSUASION

  BV-Propaganda-Interior-04.indd 312

  9/5/13 4:52 PM

  made no provision in its programs for public information access. Nonprofit and community projects were specifically excluded from support unless they had private sector

  partners.”14

  Currently the Internet has plenty of space for independent voices. These appear

  either on commercial websites or on sites hosted by nonprofit organizations such as

  National Capital Freenet in Canada’s capital.15 Freenet has provided e-mail and specific

  interest discussion groups since the early 1990s and now hosts a large number of sites.

  It survives on donations and a low monthly fee for high speed Internet access, leasing

  Bell Canada’s lines. What is worrying, however, is the idea that BCE (Bell Canada

  Enterprises) or other Internet-involved conglomerates might use their enormous tech-

  nical, financial, and political capital to undermine the potential of the Web to become

  an effective counterculture voice. Although BCE has divested itself of the Globe and

  Mail, it is still Canada’s largest vertically integrated broadcaster, including the CTV

  and CTV Two networks, and the largest telecommunications provider in Canada.

  It is the largest provider of Internet access and the second largest wireless services

  provider.16 Will it also end up dominating the Internet? One way this could happen

  is through the “synergy” of the different media outlets it controls. One media outlet

  discusses what is going on in a sister publication, carefully directing the reader to a

  relevant paper, program, or website. These in turn repay the favour by citing material

  from the first.

  Something comparable happened in the newspaper-television synergy that devel-

  oped in 2001 less than a month after the CRTC declined to impose segregation of

  business from editorial interests in the cases of both BCE and CanWest Global. For

  example, the Ottawa Citizen carried a banner headline “Global Newscast Aims to Be

  Different” over a full page of copy highlighting the new newscast season of CanWest

  Global Communications. There was not even the pretence of impartiality between

  Global Television and its competitor CTV.17 The CRTC’s October 18, 2012 decision

  involved rejecting a bid by BCE to take over Astral Media Inc., which operates 24 spe-

  cialty and pay-television channels inclu
ding HBO Canada and The Movie Network.

  The bid was opposed by, among others, OpenMedia.ca, Professor Dwayne Winseck

  of Carleton University, and BCE rival Quebecor Media, which engaged in extensive

  advertising on its Sun Media newspaper chain to enlist public support for its opposi-

  tion to the takeover. At the time of writing, BCE had re-submitted its proposals for

  new CRTC hearings in Montreal in May 2013. An analysis of the issues was prepared

  by Winseck on behalf of the Public Interest Advocacy Centre and four other groups

  and filed April 5, 2013.18

  Those with money can arrange to have their own websites posted higher in the

  lists delivered by the different search engines. Furthermore, one of the central features

  of the Web are links, which can be arranged in such a way as to direct the surfer onto

  the pages that the company or organization desires rather than those the surfer wants.

  For example, in researching the Ottawa Citizen’s archive for September 2001, I found CHAPTER 8: PRoPAgAnDA , DEMoCR ACy, AnD THE InTERnET 313

  BV-Propaganda-Interior-04.indd 313

  9/5/13 4:52 PM

  that when I clicked to go back to what I thought would be the Citizen’s home page, I was linked to CanWest Global’s page instead. The use of pop-ups is another way of

  constraining the user. Pioneered mainly by the porn industry, it provides an endless

  linking of one site to another; each time a site is closed, another similar one pops open

  in its place, providing a high level of meaningless “hits” for the trade. The only way to

  break the chain in some cases is to shut down the computer.

  UnCERTAInTIES AnD nEgATIVE FEATURES

  Currently, the Internet is treated in the media as a big question mark. I have been

  speaking of the World Wide Web, but in fact we need to bear in mind that there are

  many different things referred to by the word “Internet.” First is electronic mail—e-

  mail—by which written messages are conveyed through computer hookups to any

  part of the globe, virtually instantaneously. Users number now in the billions and

  growth continues. Second are listservs, or simply lists, which used to be called bulletin

  boards. These are places where ideas are floated, questions asked, debates pursued, etc.

  They can be moderated, meaning that someone reads them to ensure that a contribu-

  tion is on topic, or unmoderated. To some extent, the success of these will depend on

  the willingness of discussants to show restraint and tolerance as well as patience. New

  lists are started all the time, and some disappear as people become tired of “flame

  wars” (insulting exchanges) and the like. It is a democratic form of communication,

  since everyone gets to contribute in those sites that are unmoderated, but it also shows

  the limitations of unfiltered democracy. Those with the largest egos can dominate the

  space with endless arguments directed against some equal and opposite obtuse and

  unyielding mind.

  Second is the creation of specialty forums. Organizations have a need for com-

  munications from the top, and some members may not want to read through messages

  from other members riding hobby horses. For that reason, pressures are sometimes

  placed on moderators to hive off discussions to special forums for each topic, so that

  important news will get through to people who otherwise might choose to delete

  messages unopened. These mainly one-way circular mailing lists can be a powerful

  mobilizing force.

  Third are the websites already mentioned, which operate like a shop window with

  posted messages. A growing number of writers and thinkers have their own websites

  where they post their ideas in “blogs,” as they have come to be known. These are espe-

  cially useful to those whose ideas are outside the mainstream to the point where pub-

  lication in a mass circulation media would be rare.

  Fourth are the search engines, which provide ready access to a huge range of

  information. The most prominent of these is Google, and its effect on modern life

  has been transformative. Sometimes a searcher is in the position of Ali Baba in the

  314 PROPAGANDA AND THE ETHICS OF PERSUASION

  BV-Propaganda-Interior-04.indd 314

  9/5/13 4:52 PM

  Arabian Nights tale. A wealth of information is accessible, if one can only remember the recondite terms of the subject one wants to investigate. Among the issues relating

  to search engines is the nature of the algorithms used to order the search results, an

  ordering called “PageRank.” When thousands or millions of search results come up, an

  individual will not have time to look at them al , so it is important which ones make

  it to the top of the list. Google does not announce its algorithms, though it says it has

  over 200 “signals” or indicators that contribute to prioritization. These are supposed

  to be based on factors that in some objective way designate what is most worthy of a

  searcher’s attention. But because people can pay to have a higher place in the listings,

  the goal of objectivity is diminished.19 There is an old lesson to be learned from the

  experience of Robert Moses as mayor of New York, related to the social implications

  of architecture. In his case, it was the design of Long Island parkways with low over-

  passes that meant buses carrying African Americans and poor people were effectively

  excluded from certain parks and beaches. Some have implied that deliberate racism

  was involved, but whether or not this is so, the lesson is that architecture of roads

  can have social implications.20 The same is likely true of the choice of algorithms that

  govern the information accessed through search engines.

  Fifth are the social media made possible by the Internet: Facebook, Twitter,

  LinkedIn, etc. Each of these has its own special features that take it beyond e-mail.

  For example, Facebook provides room for people to post numerous photographs and

  to “chat” to more than one friend at a time. What is called a “social graph” involves

  algorithms that determine what to show on your homepage when you log in and what

  to suggest to you in terms of things you might like to explore or people you might like

  to know. Twitter is the most open of platforms, but also the least intimate, unless users

  specifically set themselves “private.” Messages are limited to 140 characters, making

  them more likely to be read by people in a hurry. The size of one’s network affects

  search capabilities. One can contact more people, but the less you know people in the

  network the less you can use other features such as asking for introductions to other

  people.21

  Sixth are the developments allowing voice to be carried over the Internet, that is,

  VoIP, or Voice over Internet Protocol. The advantage is the equivalent of telephone

  connectivity, but it is free and is connected virtually everywhere on the globe. Skype

  has the additional feature that one can see the person to whom one is talking in his

  or her immediate surroundings. The disadvantage is that when there is heavy traffic

  on the Internet, the connectivity may be in jeopardy and the communications may be

  less reliable in terms of audibility and steadiness than the old land-line connections.

  Further Internet developments are produced on a regular basis as new applica-

  tions give added serviceability to
“smart phones,” hand-held devices that function as

  computers and telephones with text-messaging, search engine capability, etc. Google

  maps help people find their way. Software designed to “crawl the Web,” seeking infor-

  mation about Internet users, can be helpful in building profiles on those users for

  CHAPTER 8: PRoPAgAnDA , DEMoCR ACy, AnD THE InTERnET 315

  BV-Propaganda-Interior-04.indd 315

  9/5/13 4:52 PM

  marketing, political, or forensic purposes. As people reveal more of themselves to

  “friends” on Facebook, they may also be stripping themselves of their privacy. Former

  “friends” may become disaffected, and law enforcers find it easy in times of emergency

  to get approval for Internet searches without requiring a warrant, democracy or no

  democracy. As others have pointed out, our Internet activities leave electronic traces

  that get recorded. This can be a threat to privacy and freedom, but it also has a positive

  side, as I recently found Amazon notifying me of a new book that did indeed interest

  me, one that would otherwise likely have escaped my attention.

  A major obstacle to the maximization of the potential for information access

  through the Web is cost. Who will pay? People buy computers to access the Web,

  but they are not rushing to buy from many of the businesses set up there. In 2001,

  the money did not come in fast enough to meet expectations, and a huge loss of

  confidence in the high-tech industry resulted. Nortel, the electronics giant, saw its

  stock drop from $122.75 to less than $9 in a year. (It later folded.) Some businesses

  have done well. Secondhand booksellers have profited from this service, which links

  buyers with books so much more efficiently than before. Judging from the prolifera-

  tion of pornography sites, that particular business appears to profit as well. One theory

  is that the Internet will challenge the huge corporate structure by allowing smal -scale

  entrepreneurs to interact with clients and with each other, avoiding major overhead

  costs and intermediaries. But there is still the problem of how to inform the public

  about one’s website and how to keep them checking in. Recent studies of British shop-

  ping habits indicate that online shopping has started to overtake spending in physical

 

‹ Prev