Henry Sidgwick- Eye of the Universe

Home > Other > Henry Sidgwick- Eye of the Universe > Page 148
Henry Sidgwick- Eye of the Universe Page 148

by Bart Schultz


  Venn on, ; S on negative inaction and,

  and S’s particular concerns, –; S

  , ; see also agents/agency;

  describes himself as, to J. S. Mill, –;

  utilitarianism

  and Oxford, ; Green as, on the state,

  Acton, H. B., Myers to, about psychical

  –; R. Symonds on, ; S, Green as,

  research and credible witnesses, 

  ; S, Symonds, and appeal to science of,

  Ad Eundem, , , , ; Lubenow on,

  ; and S’s work on General Board of

  

  Studies, ; and women’s higher

  Adams, Robert Merrihew, 

  education, ; and S’s political and

  Addams, Jane, , ; and Mary Ward,

  economic writings, ; S as elitist

  settlement movement, –, , ;

  Millian, ; Bryce as, ; Pearson as,

  inspired by Toynbee Hall, ; on aim of

  –; and new imperialism,

  settlement movement, ; see also ethical

  , ; see also academic reform;

  culture movement; settlement movement

  education

  adhesiveness, see Greek love; Whitman, Walt

  academic reform: Chapter  passim; , –,

  Adorno, Theodor, on occultism, 

  ; of Classical Tripos, S on, , ; Todd

  Aeschylus, Myers on, 

  on S’s, –, –; Brooke on S’s, ;

  aesthetic intuitionism, see

  and Apostles/Grote Club, –;

  intuition/intuitionism

  Rothblatt on S’s, ; S’s complex attitude

  aesthetics: S and Swinburne on, ; S and

  toward, –; the utilitarian reformer

  Mill on, ; S and aestheticism in, ;

  and, –; O. Browning and, –;

  and Goethe, Winckelmann, ; and

  Symonds on Essays on Liberal Education

  Symonds, ancient Greeks, –;

  and, ; and S’s worries about

  Symonds versus Wilde on, ; S on

  “Rhaetica,” ; Lidgett on S and,

  morality versus, ; see also beauty; Noel,

  –; S on General Board of Studies

  R.; Pater, W.; Swinburne, A.; Symonds,

  and, –; elitism of, , –; S’s

  J. A.

  many contributions to, ; S’s Millian

  Afghanistan, Lytton and, 

  ideal of, –; S’s diverse work in,

  Africa, realities of British imperialism in, ,

  –; S and Seeley on, ; Apostles

  

  

  P: GCV

  ind.xml

  CY/Schultz

  

  February , 

  :

  

  Index

  African Americans, racist stereotypes of, in

  Pater, Jowett, Hardinge, ; on

  Bryce’s American Commonwealth, –;

  O. Browning as educator, –

  and Bryce’s work as key to S’s on,

  Annas, Julia, on S, Stoics, and extended

  –; see also race/racism

  sympathy, –

  agents/agency: S’s concern with, and

  Anscombe, G. E. M., religious tirade against

  influence of J. Grote, –;

  S, 

  Schneewind on S on, 

  Antoninus, Marcus: Myers on, –;

  Albani, Cardinal, Winckelmann and, 

  Symonds on, , 

  Albee, Earnest, on changes across editions of

  “Apostles,” the Cambridge, ; and

  ME, , 

  Bloomsbury, ; upset by M, ; not

  Albert University, S helps to plan, 

  nostalgic, ; Apostolic ethic of, –; L.

  Allen, Peter, on Apostolic psychology,

  Woolf on, ; Platonism of, ; S always

  –; on Houghton and the Apostles,

  faithful to, ; most important

  

  development for S, –; history of, ;

  Allingham, Dr., –

  spirit of, ; and central problems, ;

  Almeder, Robert, on Piper case, 

  practices of, –; versus S’s Rugby ideal,

  Alpine Club, 

  ; versus E. W. Benson’s influence, ; S’s

  Alps, and Symonds’s religion, , 

  Apostolic quest, ; and S’s religious

  altruism: S admires Comtean principle of, ;

  attitude, ; vision of as key to S’s

  S versus Arnold on, –; and Millian

  development, ; crucial to understanding

  unity, –; and literature, ; trend

  S, ; importance of Maurice for, ;

  of S’s thought toward, ; and

  Hallam on Maurice’s role in, ; and

  perfectionism, –; and S’s defense of

  Maurice’s Mystics, ; Allen on, –;

  egoism, ; Broad on self-referential,

  and educational theory, ; and Socratic

  –; S on moral maturation and,

  method, –, , –; and Platonic

  –; and problems of utilitarianism, S

  elitism, ; better side of, ; Deacon on S

  on, –; Green on ME on, –; S

  and, ; and Mill’s “On Liberty,” ;

  versus Noel on, –, ; see also

  members of, during S’s active period, ;

  benevolence; charity; sympathy

  and love of poetry, ; Socratic method as

  “Amazing Randi,” and debunking of

  the foundation of, , ; and Noel’s

  paranormal, , 

  orientalism, , ; as model for S’s

  analytical method, S on limits of in

  psychical research, –; and dislike of

  economics, –, –; S’s

  Myers, –; V. Woolf on, , ;

  deployment of in EP, –, –;

  succession of, ; various ethical views of,

  see also historical method; science/

  from S’s diary, ; S’s later criticism of, ;

  scientific method

  Maurice as returning, –; compared to

  analytical philosophy, , ; see also Moore,

  Grote Club, –; and academic reform,

  G. E.; Russell, B.

  –; Lubenow on secrecy of and Lord

  ancients versus moderns, –; and right

  Houghton, ; compared to Freemaso
ns,

  versus good, –; and perfectionist

  ; and S’s use of literature, ; Noel on

  alternative, in ME, –; and S’s debt

  conceits of, ; and S’s paper on prayer,

  to Plato and Aristotle, ; S on

  ; and S’s Cloughian reserve, ; and S’s

  nonhedonistic egoism of ancients, –;

  reformism, ; and S’s CS, ; rejection

  Irwin on S, Schneewind and, –; and

  of Seeley, , ; and Lowes Dickenson,

  S’s defense of egoism, ; Pater on, ;

  Deacon on, ; and S’s soul searching,

  Symonds on, –; see also Greek love;

  , –; and friendship, ; inquiry

  Hellenism; Symonds, J. A.

  of given formal expression in ME, ,

  Andrews, Bishop, 

  ; S’s subversiveness and, ; and

  animals, ; Gurney and rights of, ; S,

  tensions in S’s utilitarianism, ; and S’s

  EP on prevention of cruelty to, ; see also

  moral maturation, –; and J. F.

  Singer, Peter; vivisection

  Stephen, ; and the epistemology of

  Annan, Noel: on education and friendship,

  ME, –, –; feminist critique

  ; on Pusey against Jowett, Jowett’s

  of, –; and S’s social epistemology,

  reading parties, jumbles, –; on

  –; and S’s psychical research, ,

  P: GCV

  ind.xml

  CY/Schultz

  

  February , 

  :

  Index

  

  ; rejection of Myers, ; and religious

  modernism versus, ; Symonds

  introspection, ; and appeal of

  compared to, ; S on pursuit of culture

  theosophy, , ; and psychical

  and, ; perfectionism of versus idealism,

  research, personal knowledge, ,

  ; Decade of, and Old Mortality,

  –, ; and S’s life project, –;

  –; Pater versus, –; and

  and Oxford context, ; compared to Old

  Oxford Professorship of Poetry, –;

  Mortality, –, ; compared to

  Tyrwhitt invoked against Symonds, ; S

  Symonds, Whitmania, ; Dickenson’s

  quotes, to Dakyns, ; see also culture;

  impact on, ; and O. Browning, –;

  perfection/perfectionism

  and S’s psychological research, ; and

  Arnold, Thomas: and Rugby, ; Clough as a

  Forster, ; ideal of, and Newnham, ;

  student of, –; Richter on Green

  ideal of, versus masculinism, ; Young on

  and, ; and gospel of work, ; see also

  arrogance of, –; elitism of, and S’s

  academic reform; Rugby

  socialism, ; and Maine, –; and

  art: better than historical/biblical criticism,

  S’s later epistemology, , , –;

  for S, ; and S’s political economy, ;

  secrecy controversy of, and Houghton,

  S’s view of similar to Swinburne’s, ;

  –; resemblance to Savile Club, ;

  and Goethe, Winckelmann, Italy, ; for

  and Metaphysical Society, –; S and

  its own sake, Pater on, ; Symonds on

  secrecy of, ; S and Bloomsbury

  Greek ethical ideal and, –; as love,

  generation and M, –; see also

  for Symonds, –; and S’s reformism,

  Bloomsbury; Maurice, F. W.; Sidgwick, H.

  –; versus morality on evil, S on,

  Apostle’s Creed: S to mother about, ;

  ; see also aesthetics

  Lightfoot on, ; and S’s problem with

  Arts and Crafts Movement, 

  Virgin Birth, ; S unable to utter, ;

  Asquith, Herbert, 

  see also Christ; Christianity; Church of

  associationism, ; versus psychology in

  England

  James, S, –; see also James, William;

  architecture, S and Queen Anne style in,

  Mill, John Stuart

  –

  Athanasian Creed, 

  aristocracy: S’s political economy and, ; as

  Athenaeum: the literary paper, ; on S and

  badly in need of education, ; and

  Jevons, Cairnes, ; the club, S and, 

  democracy, EP on, –; S and Seeley

  Audi, Robert, and revival of intuitionism,

  on need for, –; see also clerisy;

  –

  democracy; elitism; politics

  Austin, John, EP on theory of sovereignty of,

  Aristophanes, 

  

  Aristotle: significance of, for S, ; and S and

  authority, , –; religious, versus free

  constructive Socratic method, –;

  inquiry, S on, –; see also

  Arnold’s idealization of, ; Rashdall on

  reason/reasonableness; religion;

  S, Moore and, ; S on debt to, circularity

  science/scientific method

  of, –; Irwin on S and, –; S on

  autonomy: S on, –; Darwall on, ;

  method of and ME, –, –; and

  Rawls on publicity and, –

  S on logical priority, –; on

  axioms: and philosophical intuitions, ; S

  magnanimity, ; Brink on S and,

  allows existence of abstract, –; S’s

  –; and S’s defense of egoism, ;

  list of, –; Schneewind on S’s

  Schneewind compares S to, ; and

  arguments for, –; and precise versus

  Symonds, renaissance, –; Symonds

  simplified version of dualism, –; as

  on S and, ; Symonds on the happy man

  providing weak support for egoism,

  in, ; S to Noel about Green on, ;

  –; Schneewind on role of for S,

  Seeley and, ; see also commonsense

  –; and grounding of egoism, ;

  morality; ethical theory;

  Schneewind on S and prudence and,

  intuition/intuitionism

  –; Schneewind versus Shaver

>   Arnold, Matthew: ; compared to J. S. Mill,

  on S on egoism and, –; and

  –; compared to S, –; friend

  Schneewind’s Rawlsian interpretation of

  of Clough’s, Clough superior to, ; and S

  ME, –; and Skorupski’s

  on poetry and clerisy, –; S’s

  philosophical utilitarianism, ;

  P: GCV

  ind.xml

  CY/Schultz

  

  February , 

  :

  

  Index

  axioms ( cont.)

  Balfour, James Maitland, 

  see also dualism of practical reason;

  Banks, Olive, on feminism of S, EMS,

  intuition/intuitionism; reason/

  

  reasonableness

  Barratt, Alfred, S’s response to on dualism,

  –

  Bacon, F.: Maurice on spirit of, ; Maurice

  Barrett, William: and birth of SPR., –;

  admires, ; Macaulay on, ; influence on

  Gauld on research of, –; on S

  S, ; and S’s four conditions, –

  persona, 

  Bagehot, Walter, description of Clough, 

  basic moral notion, ; Schneewind on ME

  Baier, Kurt: on S’s dualism, –; on

  on, ; unique and irreducible, –;

  meaning of ME, 

  and right versus good in ME, –; S’s

  Bain, Alexander: S calls only honest

  Kantian interpretation of, –;

  utilitarian, ; S to, about conclusion of

  Schneewind on S on, ; Hurka on S on,

  ME, 

  –; see also good/goodness; ethical

  Baker, L., on S and Davies, 

  theory; right/rightness

  Baldwin, Thomas, on S and naturalistic

  Bastiat, F., versus English political economy,

  fallacy, 

  

  Balfour, Arthur J.: to Lady Elcho on death of

  beauty: S versus Arnold on, –; and

  S, –; as victim of S’s wit, ; on S as

  perfectionism versus hedonism, –;

  teacher, ; and psychical research, ;

  indirect pursuit of, –; S versus

  Pringle-Pattison on his influence on S’s

  Green on, –; Pater on Greek

  ME, ; Myers on his closeness to S, ;

 

‹ Prev