by Bart Schultz
Bentham/Benthamism; Mill, J. S.
P: GCV
ind.xml
CY/Schultz
February ,
:
Index
philosophy: S’s vision of, , –, –;
Moore and, –; in Williams’s
study of, at Cambridge, ; and M.
interpretation of S, ME, ; Myers on S’s,
Arnold’s perfectionism, –; as better
; Myers on, –; in Myers’s work,
than orientalist studies, ; Apostles and
–; and S’s metaphysically inclined
capital “P,” ; L. Stephen on Cambridge
friends, ; and Jowett’s Balliol, ; S’s
dons and, ; S’s expectations for Mill’s,
allusion to in last lecture, ; Dowling on
–; and limits of reason, ; S and J.
Oxford Greats and, –; and Victorian
S. Mill on, –; and epistemology, S
worldview, ; and Symonds’s
on, –; appeal to, in conclusion of
development, ; revival of comes to
ME, –, –; S on J. Grote and
fruition with Pater, Symonds, –;
aims of, ; S’s as a comprehensive
Tyrwhitt on Symonds on, –;
practical, ; and S’s intimate friends,
Jowett’s as an alternative to orthodoxy, ;
–; Green’s vision of, and religion,
Jowett’s Millian interpretation of, –;
; James versus Bradley on, –; S
Symonds on sexuality in, –;
on teaching of, –; S, Green and role
Symonds’s conversion to, –; in
of professional, ; Green and canon
English education, ; S to Noel on, ;
formation for, –; S, pragmatism,
and S’s sexuality, ; versus Saint Paul,
and capital “P,” –; and Pater’s
; and “A Problem in Greek Ethics,”
aestheticism, ; Wordsworth on Pater’s,
–; and Greek love in Symonds’s
–; versus poetry, Green versus S on,
“Eudiades,” ; S on egoism of, ;
–; Symonds dethroned, ; S, PSR
Symonds on Whitman and, –; S on
on, versus ethics and politics, –; S
Greek love and, ; and S and dreams,
on Plato, Descartes and, ; and S’s
; Crompton on Mill, Greek love and,
Socraticism, ; S on impartiality of, ;
; S, ME on Republic on marriage, ,
S on special characteristics of his, –;
; S on myths in, ; see also Greek
S on primary aim of, –; see also
love; intuition/intuitionism;
epistemology; ethical theory; metaphysics;
Socrates/Socratic method
reason/reasonableness
pleasure/pain, see good/goodness; hedonism
Pinel, Phillipe, on “moral insanity,” –
Plutarch,
Piper, Leonora, baffles SPR researchers,
Podmore, Frank: on S’s talk, ; on psychical
–, –
research, ; and work on phantoms, ;
Plancus,
on S’s pursuit of truth, , ; final
Plato/Platonism, ; quest for certainty of, ;
letter to S, ; suicide of,
and utilitarianism, –; and S’s model of
poetry: S’s early love of, ; Benthamite
critical inquiry, ; versus Socrates, ; J.
dismissal of, ; Mill emphasizes, –;
Hare’s, ; Maurices on, versus Socrates,
and Apostolic soul, ; Apostolic use of, ,
; versus Socrates, Nussbaum on, –;
; as defining trait of Apostles, ; and
and elitism of Apostles, ; Maurice and
S’s mind, ; S on Clough’s skeptical,
Hare on, ; and Victorian Platonic revival,
; Maurice on Hare’s teaching of, ;
, , ; as sexually loaded, ; in
and Myers’s sense of delight, ; S on
Maurice and Hutton, –; and Socrates,
Tennyson’s “In Memoriam,” –; and
–; and Sophists, –; T. Maguire
S’s friends, –; Symonds on
and, ; Benthamites and, ; S and
Tennyson’s and metaphysics, ; Green
Mauricean themes of, ; J. S. Mill and S
on philosophical significance of, –;
both part of revival of, –; and S and
Pater on passion for, ; Pater, Symonds,
constructive Socratic method, –; and
and Oxford professorship of poetry and,
S’s psychical research, ; and Symonds,
–, –; Symonds, Noel and,
; M. Arnold idealizes, ; and Great
; and Symonds’s Whitmania, ; S
Books, ; as part of S’s reformism,
versus Green on Tennyson’s, –;
–; revival of, and Symonds, ;
Symonds’s erotic, –; Symonds on
epigraph to ME from, , ; quest for
Noel and, –, ; S on Noel and,
certainty of, ; Rashdall on S, Moore
–; Symonds defends his, –;
and, ; S on debt to, circularity of, ; S
Symonds, Whitman and, –; S on
versus Moore and, ; Crisp on S versus
the publication of Symonds’s, –;
P: GCV
ind.xml
CY/Schultz
February ,
:
Index
poetry ( cont.)
versus, –; ME on utilitarianism and,
Symonds to Noel on Many Moods,
–; ME and S’s complex view of
–; S and “Rhaetica,” –;
justice and, –; S to Pearson on
Symonds complains about criticism from
teaching of, ; PSR on philosophy
S, Myers, –; and S’s political vision,
versus, –; and aims of EP, –;
–; Symonds on
return to Byronism
EMS on S and, –; and
in, ; S versus Noel as poets, ; see also
analytical/historical methods, –; EP
Clough, A. H.; literature; Noel, R.;
on fundamental standard in, –; S’s
Symonds, J. A.; Tennyson, A.
vision of, , –; W. Wilson on, ;
Polanyi, Karl, on English poor relief,
S, DEP on history, direction of, –; S
utilitarianism,
on right to labour and poor relief, ; S on
political economy: Chapter passim; as S’s
uncertainty of future and, ; see also
ballast, ; J. S. Mill’s, and working class,
democracy; imperialism; race/racism;
; S’s, on Ricardo rent and art patronage,
utilitarianism
; utility theory of modern, and S’s
poor relief, see charity; Charity Organisation
hedonism, ; S’s tentativeness
Society; socialism
concerning, ; and S’s ethical theory,
Poore, George,
reformism, –; S as president of
population, problems of: and total versus
economic section of British Association,
average utility, ; S, ME raise issue of,
, ; S and, ; S on Mill and
–; M. Singer on S on, –; J.
orthodox, ; and S, MEA on socialism
Ward on, –; S on political economy
and, –; S on English versus French,
and, –; S, EP on utilitarian duty to
; S’s “Scope and Method of Economic
colonize and, –; S on relations with
Science” and, –; and economic
“uncivilized” peoples and, –; see
downturn of s and s, –; S
also imperialism; utilitarianism
on individualism of orthodox, –,
positive morality, in S’s utopia, ;
–; S as completely versed in, ;
see also commonsense morality; public
art of, versus science of, ; versus
morality
economics, Marshall and, ; S, PPE on
positivism, see Comte, A.; empiricism;
demoralizing effect of, –; and
epistemology
principle of nonpaternalism in EP,
Powell, Baden, contributes to Essays and
–; S, EP on progress in, –; S
Reviews, –
on Spencer on, –; S’s expertise in
practical reason, see dualism of practical
taxation and, ; see also laissez faire;
reason; reason/reasonableness
politics; socialism
pragmatism: Kloppenberg highlights S’s, ,
Political Economy Club,
; author’s, ; and S and James on
political science: Chapter passim; and
Bradly, –; and S and James,
political prophecy, ; S’s tentativeness
–; S’s approximation to, –,
concerning, ; S’s talent for history of
; see also Dewey, J.; epistemology;
political ideas, ; S and, ; Seeley on
James, W.
inductive, ; versus aims of EP, –;
prayer: S on, , –, ; Lady Blanche
EMS on S and, –; and
Balfour on, ; Iphigenia’s, S on, ; S
analytical/historical methods, –;
on naturalism and, ; S to Ward on
EP on progress of, –; Seeley and,
physics, metaphysics and, –; S’s
–, –; and S’s DEP, ;
final, –; see also Christianity;
see also Bryce, J.; imperialism; politics;
religion
Seeley, J.; state
Pretor, Alfred: and Symonds, ; and
politics: Chapter passim; versus skepticism,
Vaughan affair, , –
S on, ; and democracy in nineteenth
Priapus,
century, ; and political prophecy, S on,
Prichard, H. A.: shared orientation with S,
; and practical side of dualism, –,
Moore, and Rashdall, ; rejects egoism,
; and S’s ethical theory/reformism,
–; S’s, and issues of gender, race,
Prichard, J. C., and Dr. Symonds, moral
; Green’s, –; ME on ethics
insanity, –
P: GCV
ind.xml
CY/Schultz
February ,
:
Index
Prince, Morton, on Piper case and Hodgson,
Victorian era, ; S’s early interest in,
–
–; and growth of S Group, SPR,
Pringle-Pattison, Seth, on S’s conclusion to
; and S’s philosophical and theological
ME, , –
concerns, –; and S’s Apostolic
Prins, Yopie, on Newnham, Harrison, and
inquiry, ; and contribution to depth
Victorian Maenads,
psychology, ; M. Gardner on, ;
priority, logical, see egoism; epistemology;
Amazing Randi on, ; and feminism,
intuition/intuitionism; Hegel, Georg
; S’s positive results with, ; and S’s
progress: S doubts, –; Seeley cannot
skepticism, , ; Myers’s early
explain doctrinal, ; and direction of
involvement with, –; and the
civilization, , ; Green’s metaphysics
English mind, Myers on, –;
and, –; S on Mill’s enthusiasm for,
Gurney’s contribution to, ; S on
–; of civilization, S on, ; and
Crookes, spiritualism and, ; S’s interest
historical method, –; as common
in spiritualism and, –; Crookes and,
problem of S, Maine, and Seeley, ; S on
; Gauld on tiresome pattern of,
cosmopolitan ideal and, –; Pearson
–; S to Dakyns about failures of,
doubts, –; Balfour and T. Roosevelt
; S’s investigations of Slade and
on decadence versus, ; see also dualism
Eglinton, –; and Myers’s personal
&nb
sp; of practical reason; politics; Victorian
problems, –; W. James on fraud
worldview
and, –; Gauld on Barratt’s work in,
promises, in Whewellian ethics, –; see
–; S on telepathy and, ; and
also commonsense morality
racism, –; Myers on significance of,
proportional representation, S, EP on,
–; Gauld on contribution of
–
Phantasms to, –; Peirce criticizes,
Prothero, George: on Seeley’s method,
; EMS as more talented at than S, ;
; on Seeley’s liberal imperialism,
and Apostolic inquiry, –; EMS on
–
complications of telepathy and personal
prudence: S, ME on rational principle of,
survival, –; S’s confidence in
versus benevolence, –; and S’s weak
shaken, ; Myers’s racism and canons of
defense of egoism in ME, –; and
evidence for, ; accomplishments of S
personal identity, Parfit on S on, –;
Group in, ; S group’s production of
K. Baier on, –; Crisp and, ; and
“Phantasms of the Dead” and Phantasms of
grounding of egoism, ; Schneewind on
the Living, ; S on significance of for
S on, –; Schneewind versus Shaver
religion, –; S on risk of reputation
on S on, –; and S’s reconciliation
in, –; Gurney on democratic nature
project, –; S, EP on analytical
of research in, ; S Group grows
method and, –; see also axioms;
pessimistic about, ; and S’s life project,
dualism of practical reason; egoism
–; and Symonds’s trance states,
psychiatry, , ; see also Greek love;
–, ; and S’s midlife crisis,
psychical research; psychology
–; in s, ; and death of
psychical research: Chapter passim; S on, as
Gurney, ; S on epistemology and, ;
solution to dualism, ; led S to depth
and S in s, ; and Palladino,
psychology, ; and sympathetic