Henry Sidgwick- Eye of the Universe

Home > Other > Henry Sidgwick- Eye of the Universe > Page 160
Henry Sidgwick- Eye of the Universe Page 160

by Bart Schultz


  –; and Piper case, –; and

  understanding, ; S on significance of for

  Myers’s work on the subliminal self,

  religion, –; Green sniffs at, ; S’s as

  –; and S’s experiments with Cowell,

  modelled on Apostles, –; O. Browning

  –; larger epistemological

  and, ; Cowell and, ; S on, and deepest

  significance of, , –; S to Myers

  problems, ; linked to S’s ethics and

  on time wasted in, ; and S, Myers, and

  theology, ; and psychological

  posthumous letter test, –; and

  experiments, ; S and Myers in, –;

  cross-correspondence communications

  and S’s reformism, –; and S’s

  from Myers, Gurney, S, –; Balfour

  reserve, ; ME and, ; and S’s

  on EMS and, ; see also death; deepest

  reconciliation project, –; and S’s

  problems; Society for Psychical

  belief in power of egoism, –; and

  Research

  P: GCV

  ind.xml

  CY/Schultz

  

  February , 

  :

  

  Index

  psychology: and philosophy, S on, , ;

  desert, –; of male love, Crompton

  S’s support of, ; ME not concerned

  on, –

  with, –, ; ME’s account of moral

  purity, S, ME on, –

  maturation and, –; and S’s

  Pusey, E., –

  reconciliation project, –;

  inconclusiveness of, for S, –;

  queer theory, see Sedgwick, Eve

  contributions of psychical research to, ;

  Gurney’s contributions to, ; and

  race/racism: questions of, –; and

  telepathy, –; Congress of

  Victorian worldview and imperialism, ;

  Experimental supports Census, ;

  and Indian Mutiny, ; as masked by

  significance of Symonds for S’s work in,

  philosophizing, , –; in psychical

  ; and S’s life project, –; and

  research, ; of S and Myers, –; of

  Kant, idealism, –; S and Jamesian,

  S and Mill, ; and S’s epistemology, ;

  –; Symonds on ancient Greeks and,

  of Tennyson, , ; S, EP and, ; and

  –; and Symonds and emergence of

  S, EP on exclusion from franchise, ; S’s

  medical discourse on homosexuality, ;

  politics and questions of, –; S’s

  Ward on S’s account of good and, –;

  comparative reticence about, ; and

  S on Locke and empirical, ; Symonds

  Seeley’s imperialism, –;

  on ignorance of, –; S and Symonds

  Viswanathan on Maine’s, ; in S’s letter

  make innovations in, –; and S’s

  to Lytton, –; in ME’s account of the

  work for women’s higher education, ,

  circle of sympathy, –; and S’s

  –; EP on individualistic, –;

  cosmopolitan ideal, –; and S’s

  and Myers’s work on the subliminal self,

  account of relations with “uncivilized”

  –; S’s work on depth psychological

  peoples, –; in Bryce’s American

  phenomena and, ; see also Greek love;

  Commonwealth, –; Bryce’s work as

  psychical research; Society for Psychical

  key to S’s, –; S to Bryce on, ;

  Research

  and S’s offensive slang, ; and Twain’s

  Ptolemy, 

  Huckleberry Finn, –; and eugenics,

  publicity: Rawls/Kant on, , –;

  –; of Pearson’s work, –;

  Williams on S, ME and, –;

  Harvie on Pearson and, –; S and

  theosophy and, ; psychical research

  Pearson and, –; S, Bryce, Pearson

  and, –; and Oxford Hellenism,

  and, ; Balfour on future of civilization

  Pater, ; and Symonds’s homoerotic

  and, –; T. Roosevelt’s, ; and

  poetry, –, –, –; the

  Anglo-Saxon Confederation, ; S on B.

  Habermasian account of, –; versus

  Kidd on, –; Balfour’s Lamarckian

  Apostolic secrecy, –, ; and S’s

  notion of, ; Bryce’s incoherent notion

  handling of Symonds’s posthumous

  of, ; Dicey to Bryce on, –; S,

  reputation, –; see also Greek love;

  DEP on, –; S’s insufficient

  utilitarianism

  skepticism and, ; and Bryce on South

  public morality, ; Williams on S, ME and,

  Africa, –; and working-class

  –; in S’s utopia, –; S on

  socialist movement, ; of Whitman, ;

  stupidity of, –; Collini on S and

  see also evolution/evolutionism;

  public moralists, –, –; S, EP

  imperialism; politics

  on promotion of, –; and S’s handling

  Railton, Peter, on Moore’s Principia Ethica, 

  of Symonds’s posthumous reputation,

  Raleigh, Walter, Harvie cites on contest of

  –; see also publicity; utilitarianism

  faith and reason, 

  public reason: Rawls/Kant on, ; S on, 

  Rashdall, Hastings: shared orientation with

  public sphere, growth of, ; S fails to

  Moore and Sidgwick, ; on comparison

  theorize completely, –; Habermas

  between S and Moore, –; on S, ME,

  on, –

  and moral schizophrenia, –; S on

  Pufendorf, Samuel, 

  perfectionism of, ; Hurka defends

  Puller, Chomley, with Symonds on reading

  perfectionism of, –; on S, Moore,

  party, 

  and dualism, , ; rejects egoism, ;

  punishment: and issue of free will, S on,

  and
meaning of ME, ; S’s critique of,

  –; and S on Kantian notion of

  on dualism, ; S on promise of

  P: GCV

  ind.xml

  CY/Schultz

  

  February , 

  :

  Index

  

  perfectionist program of, ; anticipates

  of different editions of ME, –,

  criticisms of S, ; on best parts of EP,

  –; S on Socrates as man of,

  ; on S and irrationality, 

  –; and personal identity, Parfit on S

  rationalism: and theology, , ; and

  and, –; Frankena on S and history

  intellectual progress, –; Donagan

  of ethical, –; in post-Christian era,

  on Kant, Whewell and, 

  ; S on limiting dictation of, –;

  Rawls, John (Rawlsianism): on significance of

  Moore on, –; Rashdall on, ;

  S in comparison to Mill and Bentham, ;

  Skorupski on agent-neutral/relative,

  Eye of Universe engages, ; silent on S and

  –; conflicts among agent-neutral,

  issues of sexuality and race, –; takes

  –; Hurka on S, Moore and

  too-narrow view of utilitarianism, ; links

  agent-relative, ; K. Baier on S and

  S to Bentham’s hedonism, ; and

  permissive, –; Crisp defends

  publicity, ; praises ME’s approach,

  dualistic account of, –; Schneewind

  –; and separateness of persons, ;

  on dualism and, –; Phillips on

  and ME and independence thesis, ; and

  dualism and, ; S on Rashdall’s

  interpretation of S’s philosophical

  perfectionism, dictation of, ; S on

  intuitionism, –, , ; rejects

  dualism and limits of, –; Rashdall

  egoism, ; and post-positivist reception

  on S and dualism of, ; S wants results

  of ME, ; misses S’s reconciliaton

  from, –; Gore on S’s belief in, ;

  project, ; and Schneewind’s reading of

  S on, and evolution of ME, –; pain

  ME, –; and Kant on publicity,

  of service to, for S, ; Green on ME on,

  –; misses S’s social epistemology,

  –; S’s professed commitment to,

  –; see also Kant, Immanuel; justice;

  ; and feminist critique of S, ; S’s

  publicity

  anxiety over, summary of, ; PPE on

  Rayleigh, John William Strutt (third Baron),

  myth of consumer sovereignty and,

  ; estate at Terling Place, ; as S’s

  –; and political argument, –,

  brother-in-law, ; and birth of S group,

  –; and political promotion of

  –; connections to S, ; and

  morality, –; S on discussion societies

  collaboration with EMS, –, ;

  and, –; and S’s “Unreasonable

  and honorary degree from Cambridge,

  Action,” ; S on authority and, –;

  

  S’s later epistemological work on, –;

  Rayleigh, Lady (Evelyn Balfour), –;

  S on theism and, –; S on practical

  connections to S group, ; family

  deliberation and, , ; S on work of

  background of, –

  ethical societies and, –; see also

  Rayleigh, Robert John Strutt (fourth Baron),

  epistemology; intuition/intuitionism;

  on S and Boer War, militarism, –

  philosophy

  realism, see empiricism; epistemology;

  received opinion, see commonsense morality;

  intuition/intuitionism

  ethical theory

  reason/reasonableness: dualism of practical,

  reconciliation project: S’s belief in, –,

  ; dualism of, S on M. Arnold on,

  ; varieties of, ; Crisp and, ;

  –; Plato on, ; L. Stephen on S’s,

  Schneewind versus Shaver on S and,

  ; S to Dakyns on limits of, ; and

  –; S’s vision of, –;

  methods of ethics, –; Schneewind

  significance of, for Williams’s reading of

  on role of in ME, ; Hayward on S’s

  ME, –; S’s pessimism about, ,

  Kantian, ; and basic moral notion, ;

  ; and S’s exchanges with Noel,

  and right versus good, –;

  –; and S’s midlife crisis exchanges

  determinateness of, –, –; and

  with Symonds, –; in S’s politics,

  moral schizophrenia in ME, –; and

  –, –; and S’s

  four conditions for self-evidence in ME,

  anti-Machiavellianism in international

  –; S’s ideal of practical in ME, ;

  politics, –; and S’s later writings on

  Crisp on S and, –; S to Symonds on

  epistemology, theism, –, –

  morality and, ; S on plan of ME, debt

  and S’s concession to aesthetics, , ;

  to Butler and, –; and precise

  see also deepest problems of human life;

  statement of dualism, –; Maitland

  dualism of practical reason; reason/

  on S’s commitment to, ; and conclusion

  reasonableness; theism

  P: GCV

  ind.xml

  CY/Schultz

  

  February , 

  :

  

  Index

  reform/reformism, see academic liberals;

  revolution, fear of, , , , –, ,

  academic reform; utilitarianism

  ; see also politics; socialism

  Reid, Thomas: influence of, on S, , ; S

  Rhodes, Cecil, –

  on Hume and, ; and conclusion of ME,

  Rhodes, Elizabeth: as member of Initial

  –

  Society, –; S agrees with, about

  relations: S on Green’s metaphysics on,

  potential of women, �
�, –

  –; Russell on idealism and internal,

  Ricardo, David, S compares to Jevons on

  –

  value, –

  relativism, S opposes, , ; see also

  Richet, Charles, , ; and the SPR

  epistemology; intuition/intuitionism

  investigation of Palladino, –

  religion: S agrees with Comte on need for, ;

  Richter, Jean-Paul, Symonds compares

  and philosophy, ; S on role of in human

  Dakyns to, 

  life, ; S on views of Maurice and Hutton

  Richter, Melvin: on Green’s faith, ; on

  on, –; and experiments in ethics and

  Green’s background, character, ; on

  intuitive theism, ; S on essence of,

  Jowett’s tutoring of Green, –;

  –; S and Millian, –; S on

  on Green and Church of England, 

  class and, ; Clough on, –; versus

  right/rightness: Chapter  passim, ;

  free inquiry, S, CS on, –; Mill’s

  objective versus subjective, Mill on, ;

  versus Maurice’s, ; and morality,

  and good, S on, ; and maximal good,

  Chadwick on S on, ; Mill on, –;

  Schneewind on, –; S, EP on politics

  S on need for, to overcome dualism,

  and, –, –; and S’s later

  –; S’s reluctance to openly attack,

  epistemology, –; S on theism and,

  –; and science and political

  –; see also basic moral notion; ethical

  prophecy, S on, ; versus science, in

  theory; good/goodness

  founding of SPR, S on, ; and Myers’s

  rights: and orthodox political economy,

  final faith, ; A. Balfour on, ; Myers

  –; natural, S versus Spencer on,

  on, and SPR’s work, –; Myers on

  –

  possible sources of, ; S on impact of

  Ritchie, David G., review of EP, –

  Phantasms and, –; and Jamesian

  Rochdale, 

  psychology, –; of ancient Greece,

  Rohart, Madam, 

  Symonds on, –; Symonds on,

  Romanticism: in Apostles, ; and

 

‹ Prev