Delphi Complete Works of Walter Pater

by Walter Pater

  Lo! the new-moon winter-bright!

  And overspread with phantom light

  (With swimming phantom light o’erspread,

  But rimmed and circled with a silver thread)

  I see the old moon in her lap, foretelling

  The coming on of rain and squally blast.

  He has a like imaginative apprehension of the silent and unseen processes of nature, its “ministries” of dew and frost, for instance; as when he writes, in April —

  A balmy night! and though the stars be dim,

  Yet let us think upon the vernal showers

  That gladden the green earth, and we shall find

  A pleasure in the dimness of the stars.

  Of such imaginative treatment of landscape there is no better instance than the description of The Dell, in Fears in Solitude —

  A green and silent spot amid the hills,

  A small and silent dell! O’er stiller place

  No singing skylark ever poised himself —

  But the dell,

  Bathed by the mist is fresh and delicate

  As vernal cornfield, or the unripe flax

  When, through its half-transparent stalks, at eve,

  The level sunshine glimmers with green light: —

  The gust that roared and died away

  To the distant tree —

  heard and only heard

  In this low dell, bowed not the delicate grass.

  This curious insistence of the mind on one particular spot, till it seems to attain actual expression and a sort of soul in it — a mood so characteristic of the “Lake School” — occurs in an earnest political poem, “written in April 1798, during the alarm of an invasion”; and that silent dell is the background against which the tumultuous fears of the poet are in strong relief, while the quiet sense of the place, maintained all through them, gives a true poetic unity to the piece. Good political poetry — political poetry that shall be permanently moving — can, perhaps, only be written on motives which, for those they concern, have ceased to be open questions, and are really beyond argument; while Coleridge’s political poems are for the most part on open questions. For although it was a great part of his intellectual ambition to subject political questions to the action of the fundamental ideas of his philosophy, he was nevertheless an ardent partisan, first on one side, then on the other, of the actual politics proper to the end of the last and the beginning of the present century, where there is still room for much difference of opinion. Yet The Destiny of Nations, though formless as a whole, and unfinished, presents many traces of his most elevated manner of speculation, cast into that sort of imaginative philosophical expression, in which, in effect, the language itself is inseparable from, or essentially a part of, the thought. France, an Ode, begins with a famous apostrophe to Liberty —

  Ye Clouds! that far above me float and pause,

  Whose pathless march no mortal may control!

  Ye Ocean-waves! that wheresoe’er ye roll,

  Yield homage only to eternal laws!

  Ye Woods! that listen to the night-bird’s singing,

  Midway the smooth and perilous slope reclined,

  Save when your own imperious branches swinging,

  Have made a solemn music of the wind!

  Where like a man beloved of God,

  Through glooms which never woodman trod,

  How oft, pursuing fancies holy,

  My moonlight way o’er flowering weeds I wound,

  Inspired, beyond the guess of folly,

  By each rude shape and wild unconquerable sound!

  O ye loud Waves! and O ye Forests high!

  And O ye Clouds that far above me soar’d!

  Thou rising Sun! thou blue rejoicing Sky!

  Yea, everything that is and will be free!

  Bear witness for me, wheresoe’er ye be,

  With what deep worship I have still adored

  The spirit of divinest liberty.

  And the whole ode, though, after Coleridge’s way, not quite equal to that exordium, is an example of strong national sentiment, partly in indignant reaction against his own earlier sympathy with the French Republic, inspiring a composition which, in spite of some turgid lines, really justifies itself as poetry, and has that true unity of effect which the ode requires. Liberty, after all his hopes of young France, is only to be found in nature: —

  Thou speedest on thy subtle pinions,

  The guide of homeless winds, and playmate of the waves!

  In his changes of political sentiment, Coleridge was associated with the “Lake School”; and there is yet one other very different sort of sentiment in which he is one with that school, yet all himself, his sympathy, namely, with the animal world. That was a sentiment connected at once with the love of outward nature in himself and in the “Lake School,” and its assertion of the natural affections in their simplicity; with the homeliness and pity, consequent upon that assertion. The Lines to a Young Ass, tethered —

  Where the close-eaten grass is scarcely seen,

  While sweet around her waves the tempting green,

  which had seemed merely whimsical in their day, indicate a vein of interest constant in Coleridge’s poems, and at its height in his greatest poems — in Christabel, where it has its effect, as it were antipathetically, in the vivid realisation of the serpentine element in Geraldine’s nature; and in The Ancient Mariner, whose fate is interwoven with that of the wonderful bird, at whose blessing of the water-snakes the curse for the death of the albatross passes away, and where the moral of the love of all creatures, as a sort of religious duty, is definitely expressed.

  Christabel, though not printed till 1816, was written mainly in the year 1797: The Rhyme of the Ancient Mariner was printed as a contribution to the Lyrical Ballads in 1798; and these two poems belong to the great year of Coleridge’s poetic production, his twenty-fifth year. In poetic quality, above all in that most poetic of all qualities, a keen sense of, and delight in beauty, the infection of which lays hold upon the reader, they are quite out of proportion to all his other compositions. The form in both is that of the ballad, with some of its terminology, and some also of its quaint conceits. They connect themselves with that revival of ballad literature, of which Percy’s Relics, and, in another way, Macpherson’s Ossian are monuments, and which afterwards so powerfully affected Scott —

  Young-eyed poesy

  All deftly masked as hoar antiquity.

  The Ancient Mariner, as also, in its measure, Christabel, is a “romantic” poem, impressing us by bold invention, and appealing to that taste for the supernatural, that longing for le frisson, a shudder, to which the “romantic” school in Germany, and its derivations in England and France, directly ministered. In Coleridge, personally, this taste had been encouraged by his odd and out-of-the-way reading in the old-fashioned literature of the marvellous — books like Purchas’s Pilgrims, early voyages like Hakluyt’s, old naturalists and visionary moralists, like Thomas Burnet, from whom he quotes the motto of “The Ancient Mariner, Facile credo, plures esse naturas invisibiles quam visibiles in rerum universitate, etc.” Fancies of the strange things which may very well happen, even in broad daylight, to men shut up alone in ships far off on the sea, seem to have occurred to the human mind in all ages with a peculiar readiness, and often have about them, from the story of the stealing of Dionysus downwards, the fascination of a certain dreamy grace, which distinguishes them from other kinds of marvellous inventions. This sort of fascination The Ancient Mariner brings to its highest degree: it is the delicacy, the dreamy grace, in his presentation of the marvellous, which makes Coleridge’s work so remarkable. The too palpable intruders from a spiritual world in almost all ghost literature, in Scott and Shakespeare even, have a kind of crudity or coarseness. Coleridge’s power is in the very fineness with which, as by some really ghostly finger, he brings home to our inmost sense his inventions, daring as they are — the skeleton ship, the polar spirit, the inspiriting of the de
ad corpses of the ship’s crew. The Rhyme of the Ancient Mariner has the plausibility, the perfect adaptation to reason and the general aspect of life, which belongs to the marvellous, when actually presented as part of a credible experience in our dreams. Doubtless, the mere experience of the opium-eater, the habit he must almost necessarily fall into of noting the more elusive phenomena of dreams, had something to do with that: in its essence, however, it is connected with a more purely intellectual circumstance in the development of Coleridge’s poetic gift. Some one once asked William Blake, to whom Coleridge has many resemblances, when either is at his best (that whole episode of the re-inspiriting of the ship’s crew in The Ancient Mariner being comparable to Blake’s well-known design of the “Morning Stars singing together”) whether he had ever seen a ghost, and was surprised when the famous seer, who ought, one might think, to have seen so many, answered frankly, “Only once!” His “spirits,” at once more delicate, and so much more real, than any ghost — the burden, as they were the privilege, of his temperament — like it, were an integral element in his everyday life. And the difference of mood expressed in that question and its answer, is indicative of a change of temper in regard to the supernatural which has passed over the whole modern mind, and of which the true measure is the influence of the writings of Swedenborg. What that change is we may see if we compare the vision by which Swedenborg was “called,” as he thought, to his work, with the ghost which called Hamlet, or the spells of Marlowe’s Faust with those of Goethe’s. The modern mind, so minutely self-scrutinising, if it is to be affected at all by a sense of the supernatural, needs to be more finely touched than was possible in the older, romantic presentment of it. The spectral object, so crude, so impossible, has become plausible, as

  The blot upon the brain,

  That will show itself without;

  and is understood to be but a condition of one’s own mind, for which, according to the scepticism, latent at least, in so much of our modern philosophy, the so-called real things themselves are but spectra after all.

  It is this finer, more delicately marvellous supernaturalism, fruit of his more delicate psychology, that Coleridge infuses into romantic adventure, itself also then a new or revived thing in English literature; and with a fineness of weird effect in The Ancient Mariner, unknown in those older, more simple, romantic legends and ballads. It is a flower of medieval or later German romance, growing up in the peculiarly compounded atmosphere of modern psychological speculation, and putting forth in it wholly new qualities. The quaint prose commentary, which runs side by side with the verse of The Ancient Mariner, illustrates this — a composition of quite a different shade of beauty and merit from that of the verse which it accompanies, connecting this, the chief poem of Coleridge, with his philosophy, and emphasising therein that psychological interest of which I have spoken, its curious soul-lore.

  Completeness, the perfectly rounded wholeness and unity of the impression it leaves on the mind of a reader who fairly gives himself to it — that, too, is one of the characteristics of a really excellent work, in the poetic as in every other kind of art; and by this completeness, The Ancient Mariner certainly gains upon Christabel — a completeness, entire as that of Wordsworth’s Leech-gatherer, or Keats’s Saint Agnes’ Eve, each typical in its way of such wholeness or entirety of effect on a careful reader. It is Coleridge’s one great complete work, the one really finished thing, in a life of many beginnings. Christabel remained a fragment. In The Ancient Mariner this unity is secured in part by the skill with which the incidents of the marriage-feast are made to break in dreamily from time to time upon the main story. And then, how pleasantly, how reassuringly, the whole nightmare story itself is made to end, among the clear fresh sounds and lights of the bay, where it began, with

  The moon-light steeped in silentness,

  The steady weather-cock.

  So different from The Rhyme of the Ancient Mariner in regard to this completeness of effect, Christabel illustrates the same complexion of motives, a like intellectual situation. Here, too, the work is of a kind peculiar to one who touches the characteristic motives of the old romantic ballad, with a spirit made subtle and fine by modern reflection; as we feel, I think, in such passages as —

  But though my slumber had gone by,

  This dream it would not pass away —

  It seems to live upon mine eye;

  and —

  For she, belike, hath drunken deep

  Of all the blessedness of sleep;

  and again —

  With such perplexity of mind

  As dreams too lively leave behind.

  And that gift of handling the finer passages of human feeling, at once with power and delicacy, which was another result of his finer psychology, of his exquisitely refined habit of self-reflection, is illustrated by a passage on Friendship in the Second Part —

  Alas! they had been friends in youth;

  But whispering tongues can poison truth;

  And constancy lives in realms above;

  And life is thorny; and youth is vain;

  And to be wroth with one we love,

  Doth work like madness in the brain.

  And thus it chanced, as I divine,

  With Roland and Sir Leoline.

  Each spake words of high disdain

  And insult to his heart’s best brother

  They parted — ne’er to meet again!

  But never either found another

  To free the hollow heart from paining —

  They stood aloof the scars remaining,

  Like cliffs which had been rent asunder;

  A dreary sea now flows between;

  But neither heat, nor frost, nor thunder,

  Shall wholly do away, I ween,

  The marks of that which once hath been.

  I suppose these lines leave almost every reader with a quickened sense of the beauty and compass of human feeling; and it is the sense of such richness and beauty which, in spite of his “dejection,” in spite of that burden of his morbid lassitude, accompanies Coleridge himself through life. A warm poetic joy in everything beautiful, whether it be a moral sentiment, like the friendship of Roland and Leoline, or only the flakes of falling light from the water-snakes — this joy, visiting him, now and again, after sickly dreams, in sleep or waking, as a relief not to be forgotten, and with such a power of felicitous expression that the infection of it passes irresistibly to the reader — such is the predominant element in the matter of his poetry, as cadence is the predominant quality of its form. “We bless thee for our creation!” he might have said, in his later period of definite religious assent, “because the world is so beautiful: the world of ideas — living spirits, detached from the divine nature itself, to inform and lift the heavy mass of material things; the world of man, above all in his melodious and intelligible speech; the world of living creatures and natural scenery; the world of dreams.” What he really did say, by way of A Tombless Epitaph, is true enough of himself —

  Sickness, ’tis true,

  Whole years of weary days, besieged him close,

  Even to the gates and inlets of his life!

  But it is true, no less, that strenuous, firm,

  And with a natural gladness, he maintained

  The citadel unconquered, and in joy

  Was strong to follow the delightful Muse.

  For not a hidden path, that to the shades

  Of the beloved Parnassian forest leads,

  Lurked undiscovered by him; not a rill

  There issues from the fount of Hippocrene,

  But he had traced it upward to its source,

  Through open glade, dark glen, and secret dell,

  Knew the gay wild flowers on its banks, and culled

  Its med’cinable herbs. Yea, oft alone,

  Piercing the long-neglected holy cave,

  The haunt obscure of old Philosophy,

  He bade with lifted torch its starry walls

  Sparkle, as
erst they sparkled to the flame

  Of odorous lamps tended by saint and sage.

  O framed for calmer times and nobler hearts!

  O studious Poet, eloquent for truth!

  Philosopher! contemning wealth and death,

  Yet docile, childlike, full of Life and Love.

  The student of empirical science asks, Are absolute principles attainable? What are the limits of knowledge? The answer he receives from science itself is not ambiguous. What the moralist asks is, Shall we gain or lose by surrendering human life to the relative spirit? Experience answers that the dominant tendency of life is to turn ascertained truth into a dead letter, to make us all the phlegmatic servants of routine. The relative spirit, by its constant dwelling on the more fugitive conditions or circumstances of things, breaking through a thousand rough and brutal classifications, and giving elasticity to inflexible principles, begets an intellectual finesse of which the ethical result is a delicate and tender justice in the criticism of human life. Who would gain more than Coleridge by criticism in such a spirit? We know how his life has appeared when judged by absolute standards. We see him trying to apprehend the “absolute,” to stereotype forms of faith and philosophy, to attain, as he says, “fixed principles” in politics, morals, and religion, to fix one mode of life as the essence of life, refusing to see the parts as parts only; and all the time his own pathetic history pleads for a more elastic moral philosophy than his, and cries out against every formula less living and flexible than life itself.

  “From his childhood he hungered for eternity.” There, after all, is the incontestable claim of Coleridge. The perfect flower of any elementary type of life must always be precious to humanity, and Coleridge is a true flower of the ennuyé, of the type of René. More than Childe Harold, more than Werther, more than René himself, Coleridge, by what he did, what he was, and what he failed to do, represents that inexhaustible discontent, languor, and homesickness, that endless regret, the chords of which ring all through our modern literature. It is to the romantic element in literature that those qualities belong. One day, perhaps, we may come to forget the distant horizon, with full knowledge of the situation, to be content with “what is here and now”; and herein is the essence of classical feeling. But by us of the present moment, certainly — by us for whom the Greek spirit, with its engaging naturalness, simple, chastened, debonair, tryphês, habrotêtos, khlidês, kharitôn, himerou, pothou patêr+, is itself the Sangrail of an endless pilgrimage, Coleridge, with his passion for the absolute, for something fixed where all is moving, his faintness, his broken memory, his intellectual disquiet, may still be ranked among the interpreters of one of the constituent elements of our life.