The Falsification of History: Our Distorted Reality

by John Hamer

  This story incidentally, would have remained a secret, but for Peter Grolig, an Austrian journalist on the Kurier newspaper. He reported what happened and established that when le Winter’s hotel room was searched, four documents, two of them in code were found and appeared to be genuine CIA documents. The CIA has since admitted tapping Diana’s phone calls in and to America and passing the contents to British Intelligence. Le Winter was arrested and held in custody and Grolig’s story forced Fayed to admit that it was true. Another intelligence insider also insists the crash was not an accident. Richard Tomlinson, a former agent of Britain’s MI6, gave evidence to the French enquiry into Diana’s death. In 1997 Tomlinson served a six month jail sentence under the official secrets act for trying to sell his memoirs and in 1998 he was arrested again, at gun point, in Paris at the request of the British government who were concerned at his association in that city with MI5 whistle-blower, David Shayler, (now a painted as a madman) who was also arrested and jailed in Paris. Tomlinson apparently told Herve Stephan, the judge in charge of the ‘inquiry’ that Diana was murdered and according to a report on the BBC’s teletext news service, Ceefax, on 29th August 1998, he told the judge that Henry Paul was an asset of British Intelligence as was one of the bodyguards who remained un-named. However, despite all this information being freely given to the inquiry, Herve Stephan an obvious Elite placeman concluded, ‘it was an accident’.

  In the words of the Roman writer Seneca; “He who most benefits from the crime is the one most likely to have committed it”.

  The Windsors as a family certainly benefitted the most. No longer is there an inside threat to their secrets and actions. No longer is Diana there to continue her inevitable destruction of the Monarchy as a credible force able to own and influence the path of this nation and most of the rest of the world. No longer is she there to exert her own influence in the upbringing of her sons, William and Harry. The Windsors now have full and total control in the moulding of these two Princes, giving them the total ability to form them into their own sick image. Her death also cleared the way for Charles to marry Camilla.

  Of course as we know, the House of Windsor is simply the public face of a much larger power structure, ‘The Crown Temple.’ which now no longer suffers from Diana publicly exposing its secret war against the populations of the world with landmines. She was almost certainly planning an escalation of that particular battle.

  Susan Barrantes, the mother of Sarah ‘Fergie’ Ferguson, the Duchess of York and former wife of Prince Andrew, had been telling anyone who would listen that she thought Diana had been murdered. She however, was fatally injured herself in an extremely dubious car crash in Argentina on the 19th September 1998. Just a coincidence though, I’m sure. Confidential mail for Diana was delivered to Christine Fitzgerald and this included packages from a former member of the Elite-controlled SAS who was concerned for Diana’s safety. He was warning her of what was going on behind her back. “Half of MI6 were on Diana’s side too you know”, Christine said. One day, a client who had involvement with the security agencies, saw some of these packages being delivered. Christine described what followed:

  “She said I’m really worried for you, you don’t know what you’re getting involved in here. Diana’s basically mad, she’ll drop you in it, she will hang you out to dry, you’ll end up dead, your kids will end up dead, your cats, and your business will be ruined. I couldn’t believe how she was carrying on. She was so full of hate. Diana came in the next day and I gave her the mail. I said not everyone who bows to you has your best interests at heart. I told her what had happened and she went purple with rage. When she died, everybody came in and said ’they bumped her off didn’t they’? But that client was the only one who was outraged at the suggestion. I was checked out by MI6, my phones were tapped, my house was burgled, the royal family kept a big check on me while I was dealing with Diana.”

  Christine and her contacts have no doubt about what happened in Paris: “She was bumped off; she was left to die at the roadside. Those responsible were above the elite of the army”, she said. “It was not the secret squirrels (British intelligence) it was above that. Mohammed Fayed ‘in his tortured little sense’ wants to be part of the reptilian power because ‘he likes all that’.” Christine believes that Diana’s romance with Dodi was engineered. She further said:

  “Diana fell in love quite easily and he’s a master of the smile. She was unfortunate in her love affairs because she rescued others in her own distress. So the men she went for were all emotional cripples because she was a healer, too. Most people who went with Diana used her and I think Dodi did also. He would have used her for his ego, the contacts and his dad. The Royal Family killed her for her light energy, especially when she was pregnant. I don’t believe she was as badly injured as they say. If they checked her body they would see that the scar the surgeons made starts at her pubis and goes right up to her throat. They’ve even taken her thymus gland, the way we make interstellar communication. I know from the best sources that she was pregnant and they took the baby. Pieces of that foetus will have been delivered everywhere. They can make babies from the cells. Parts of her body will have been used in their rituals as well. (Just to give insight, hope you are not eating! When children are sacrificed with their throat cut from left to right, the blood is drained and drank from their goblets, and specific body parts are eaten. The fat is scraped from the intestines and they rub it on their skin or scales. This is the mesa fat, or the anointing oil, this also is within the Jesus story the anointing of their Messiah. Sick aren’t they). Diana was always having Kensington Palace swept for bugs, but they had Dodi bugged and they knew exactly what was going on. This was not the first time she thought she was pregnant and this nearly happened before, but she was not pregnant. That was with Hewitt.”

  Christine Fitzgerald shared the most intimate details of Diana’s life and knew her in ways and at levels that very few others did. The incredible revelations of the Windsor’s treatment of Diana over many years, the threats made to her by Prince Charles’ personal detective, the ritual sacrifices and the confirmation that they were responsible for the murder of Barry Mannakee, should not pass without note. There should be a campaign to press the Windsors to face these matters and for Al Fayed, Trevor Rees-Jones, Earl Spencer and the others I have named, to answer the questions that have to be addressed. Power must be stripped from the Windsors, their royal dynasty dismantled and their crimes against humanity publicly exposed. More than that, however, those in the political, security and medical professions, who are also involved, must be equally exposed. The Royal Family, Earl Spencer, and the Satanic, former British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, have all dismissed claims that Diana was murdered and called for such suggestions to cease ‘for the sake of the boys’. These questions must not be allowed to be ignored or another Elite assassination will have been promulgated whilst those responsible go free.

  Earl Spencer even went to the extent of issuing a statement on behalf of the Spencer family in February 1998 in which he asked: “Is there any good in all this speculation? I ask that because there is clearly a lot of harm in it. All we, her family, ask is that Diana’s memory be respected and the sensational speculation be left out of the public arena, where it undermines our aims to come to terms with her loss”.

  Had Diana been your sister would you not be determined to find out what happened? If you were Prime Minister when such a famous and loved Princess had been killed, would you not insist that the truth be established? So why don’t they? I think we all know the answer to that particular question,

  Diana had a profound effect on millions of people as was apparent after her death and most people did not know the full extent of her suffering once the Windsors got hold of her. In many ways Diana was a mirror of Marilyn Monroe, used by the establishment and then cast aside and murdered when her usefulness was at an end. Marilyn had affairs with John Kennedy and also it seems, his brother, Bobby and when she became dangerous
because of her inside knowledge she was killed because of what she knew. In another of those remarkable examples of synchronicity there are many ‘coincidences’ that connect her life and that of Diana’s. They were both born on the first of the month and died at the age of 36 in August. They both married on the 29th of the month to men twelve years older. Marilyn called herself the Queen of Diamonds and Diana the Queen of Hearts and both were subjects of the Elton John song, Candle in the Wind, which he sang at Diana’s funeral.

  Since Christine Fitzgerald first spoke out about her relationship with Diana, the threat to destroy her business has been implemented. Suddenly the phone stopped ringing and she was seeing as many clients in a week as she had been in a day. This is unexplainable when you consider that she is one of Britain’s most gifted and effective healers working in the centre of London. Unexplainable that is, unless one is aware of the story. But she is nevertheless determined that the truth shall be known, whatever the authorities seek to do to her: “I don’t want a war, I just want to end the bullshit”, as she puts it. Looking back on Diana’s life and their conversations together she reflects:

  “Poor cow, she was in a house where no one gives a damn and it’s a terrible state of affairs. She was all alone in a nest of vipers. I used to just patch her up. She just found me and came to me. I made her wait a fortnight until I checked it out. They used to say that I was giving her anger therapy. I didn’t. I used to just listen to her, take it all in and think Jesus Christ! But I didn’t think they would kill her. I can’t believe that this information is so close to home and yet they are still managing to keep it at bay. My room is the truth room and it’s a real place of safety and I don’t judge anyone on their s**t and that’s why I haven’t spoken about any of this in the past. She was as screwed up as anyone you know and if you’re going to tell the truth, you have to tell the whole truth. She wasn’t crazy, she was mentally and physically abused, I feel, from a little girl. Her father was a nasty piece of work and her stepmother (Raine), too.

  The Royal Family was very afraid. She would have taken the public away from them; she would have taken the world from them gradually. They recognised her worth and fed off her in a psychic vampire way for a long time. All she wanted was to get married and have children you know, bless her little heart. She wanted to live out what she had never had. The world would have come to rights with Diana because as f****d up as she was, she was a light being and wherever she went she manifested love. It was amazing. The sad thing was that she didn’t know she was doing that and she needed proof of her worth and she was looking in the wrong quarters for that. But when she tried to break away, we went out and did normal things. She did Kung Fu with my husband for five years. She wanted to be normal, to link arms and walk down the street. She knew where her heart lay. She really and truly did amazing things.”

  Diana said she could not believe how cold the Windsors were and the public were shown a graphic example of this in the days after her death. They stayed out of sight in Balmoral in Scotland while the people mourned Diana in their tens of millions with an unprecedented explosion of grief. It was only the pressure from the public through the media that forced the Queen, kicking and screaming, to make a cold, emotionless and pathetic ‘tribute’ to Diana on TV the night before the funeral. Cold is a word constantly used about the Queen, Phillip and Charles and that’s the mental and emotional profile of the Brotherhood and its networks. William (Bill) Cooper said that the Initiates that he met in his work for US Naval Intelligence had “No conscience, no morals, no regrets, no feelings, and no emotion”. This is precisely the same psychopathic character profile as the Windsors and indeed most of the Elite that control our lives.

  We have all been hoodwinked for thousands of years. Hoodwinked about our history, hoodwinked about whom we really are and the true nature of life. Hoodwinked about the true background and agenda of those we have allowed to rule us. How apt, therefore, that this word should also derive from Freemasonry. Dr. Albert MacKey, the 33rd degree Freemason and foremost Freemason historian of the 19th century, defined the term ‘hoodwinked’ in his Encyclopaedia of Freemasonry as: ‘A symbol of secrecy, silence and darkness, in which the mysteries of our art should be preserved from the unhallowed gaze of the profane’.

  Diana’s tragic death is but one of a long, long line of others whose lives have been cut brutally short to serve the agenda of these monsters who rule us with an iron fist, encased in a velvet glove.

  PART 3 – The World of Today – Our Distorted Reality

  The distorted reality under which we all exist today is a direct result of the falsification of much of what we regard as our true historical heritage. In the first two sections of this book, I have attempted to provide evidence for and examples of the numerous ways in which we have been distracted and diverted from the real truth in order that a tiny minority of people may benefit from that lack of knowledge and thus maintain the status quo heavily in their favour. Maintaining this ‘edited’ view of the past is essential in their control of the vast majority of humanity and this is sustained by all the methods already covered, including but not exclusive to, the media, the entertainment industry, the medical profession, politics, law and the subtle utilisation of a group of people that have come to be known by the ‘truth movement’ as ‘useful idiots’. However, more of this important group very shortly.

  We have been lied to and deceived on a truly epic scale by those who rule over us, ever since human society first saw the light of day, regardless of whether, like mainstream history and archaeology you believe that to be ten thousand years ago – or even ten million years ago. As a timely reminder, here is a reprise of the quote from the first page of the introduction, by Dr. Henry Makow, who like myself has been researching these issues for many years and sums up this conspiracy succinctly, thus…

  “In fact, ‘conspiracy’ is very plausible. People who control a grossly disproportionate share of the world's wealth will take extreme measures to consolidate their position.” [My emphasis – JH]

  This is the entire nub of the issue in two short sentences and summarises neatly the reason that humankind is now in the situation in which we find ourselves today. Everything else is just a means to this end, a method by which we can be controlled, indeed the ‘extreme measures’, to which Dr. Makow refers.

  So, let us now move into the very recent past and from thence to the present day and examine the issues which confront us daily and which have as a result of the falsification of past events now become pertinent to our everyday struggle to survive. But firstly, let us examine the prominent role played by a group of people who are very important to the Elite’s plans for keeping us all in a state of ignorance of the truth.

  Useful Idiots

  What do I mean by this term? ‘Useful idiots’, as distinct from ‘shills’ – people who are knowingly setting-out to deceive us, are those among us who are unknowingly furthering the agenda of the Elite by acting as unwitting purveyors of falsehoods and naysayers of the real truth.

  For example, when confronted with the facts, they will ask lots of questions, but never wait to hear an answer. To their minds, questions are not a search for information, but rather a tool of disruption. In this way, the useful idiot never has to expose his ignorance because he never has to enter into a meaningful dialogue with anyone who has an opposing view. All he has to do is maintain an attacking stance and this perpetuates a useless, circular argument, usually ending in utter stalemate.

  Another of the most common tactics used is the injection of ‘humour’. He will turn everything into a joke, whether it is funny or not. Laughing at that which we do not understand often makes things appear less daunting, but it also makes us more passive and accepting.

  The comedians that are most successful (and popular) are those that follow mainstream thinking and encourage us to laugh at anything that challenges these norms. A good example being the ridicule to which David Icke was subjected for many years in the early 1990s
when he made the now self-acknowledged mistake of trying to bring his views to an unthinking majority by the very medium which would seek to destroy him (television). This made him an easy target for the ‘comedians’ of the day and even the mention of his name alone, would be guaranteed to raise a cheap laugh. In Medieval times, even the most tyrannical of rulers would allow a court jester to make jokes at his expense because the jester was an inconsequential figure, a powerless and non-threatening entity. A jokester can verbally undermine anyone to his heart’s content, but will never really change the world because although he may make us laugh, ultimately no-one really cares what figures of fun have to say about anything of consequence. It is not too difficult to imagine a whole subsection of society emulating this dynamic; millions of people deluding themselves into thinking that being a slave is not all that bad, just as long as we are funny slaves.

  Whenever the useful idiot is confronted with a truth that threatens his established world-view, he will do anything to distract or derail the argument. Making poor jokes, resorting to childish ridicule, ignoring cold hard logic and facts, making threats or denying that you are qualified to present the facts, even though the facts speak for themselves no matter who is relaying them. The list goes on and on and very seldom will he confront the truth presented on its own terms, instead, he will often make a point of making the ‘messenger’ the issue at hand and not the information being presented. For example, I have lost count of the times when in trying to present an argument that I have been cut-off in full flow by a mocking statement such as... ‘You must have too much time on your hands’. As though ‘having too much time’ somehow is an actual impediment to seeking the truth and not the opposite ie. not having enough time on one’s hands!