The Falsification of History: Our Distorted Reality
Page 90
Bob Lazar worked at Area 51 in the late 1980s on a back-engineering programme that he claims began there in 1979. He says that an ‘exchange’ program with ETs occurred in the 1970s, which resulted in the acquisition of nine UFOs so that their technologies could be researched. That there were indeed strange craft at Area 51 seems to be corroborated by several other sources spanning several decades.
Here is Bob Lazar’s own take on what he discovered…
“Assuming they‘re in space, they will focus the three gravity generators on the point they want to go to. Now, to give an analogy: If you take a thin rubber sheet, say, lay it on a table and put thumbtacks in each corner, then take a big stone and set it on one end of the rubber sheet and say that’s your spacecraft, you pick out a point that you want to go to - which could be anywhere on the rubber sheet, pinch that point with your fingers and pull it all the way up to the craft. That’s how it focuses and pulls that point to it. When you then shut off the gravity generators, the stone (or spacecraft) follows that stretched rubber back to its point. There’s no linear travel through space; it actually bends space and time and follows space as it retracts. In the first mode of travel, around the surface of a planet, they essentially balance on the gravitational field that the gravity generators put out, and they can ride a ‘wave’, like a cork does in the ocean. In that mode they’re very unstable and are affected by the weather. In the other mode of travel, where they can travel vast distances, they can’t really do that in a strong gravitational field like Earth, because to do that, first of all, they need to tilt on their side, usually out in space, then they can focus on the point they need to with the gravity generators and move on. If you can picture space as a fabric, and the speed of light is your limit, it’ll take you so long, even at the speed of light, to get from point A to point B. You can’t exceed it, not in this universe anyway. Should there be other parallel universes, maybe the laws are different, but anyone that’s here has to abide by those rules.”
Interestingly, recent research into Bose-Einstein condensate has found that by slowing down a body of atoms, to within a fraction of one degree Kelvin (near absolute zero), they coalesce into a ‘super-atom’ and when suitably excited by an oscillating field this BEC super-atom propagates matter waves. It is at a very early stage of development at present but it is hoped that one day this technology will produce a tightly focused ‘matter wave beam’ (much like that of the laser light beam) and what is so interesting, is that elements of the gravity generators described and drawn by Lazar, look exactly like the rings of optical lasers and magnetic traps used in BEC technology to slow down the atoms and that these generators emit a beam, one of which is enough for the craft to ride upon, it could mean that the ETs use a system closely related to the propagation of such matter waves.
All highly speculative, granted, but nevertheless strong rumours that this technology exists and is being suppressed by the US government, do not seem to want to go away.
In addition to the above list of examples, there are dozens of other inventions that have been omitted due to space constraints. Many of them are just as viable and well tested as the ones listed, but this short list is sufficient to prove the point; free energy technology is here, now. It offers the world pollution-free, energy abundance for everyone, everywhere for next to nothing at all.
It is now possible to halt the production of greenhouse gases and shut down all of the nuclear power plants. We can now desalinate unlimited amounts of seawater at an affordable cost and bring adequate fresh water to even the most remote habitats. Transportation costs and the production costs for just about everything could decrease dramatically and food can even be grown in heated greenhouses in the winter, anywhere at virtually zero cost. All these possibilities provide wonderful benefits that could make life on this planet so much easier and better for everyone, yet have been suppressed and covered-up for many decades. Why should this be? Whose purposes are served by this action and what forces are impeding the availability of free-energy?
In the western world and as discussed in a previous section, there is a money-monopoly in place. This money-monopoly is solely in the hands of a small number of privately-owned banks, and these banks are owned by the wealthiest families in the world, Elite bloodlines. Their future plan is to eventually control 100% of all of the capital resources of the world, and thereby control everyone's life through the availability (or non-availability) of all goods and services. Therefore an independent source of wealth (free energy device) within the reach of every person in the world ruins this plan for world domination of the money supply, permanently.
Currently, a nation's economy can be either slowed-down or speeded-up by the raising or lowering of interest rates, but if an independent source of capital via free energy were present in the economy and any business or person could raise more capital without borrowing it from a bank, this centralised strangulation of interest rates would simply not have the same effect. Free energy technology changes the value of money, simply put. The Elite do not want any competition, they understandably wish to maintain their current monopoly control of the money supply and so for them, free energy technology is not just something to suppress, it must be permanently deleted from history if at all possible.
Their motivations, as we discuss throughout this book are their imagined divine right to rule us all, greed and their insatiable need to control everything except themselves. The weapons they have used to enforce the permanent suppression of technology beneficial to mankind include intimidation, ‘expert’ debunkers, the covert buying-up and shelving of competitive technology, and often murder or attempted murder of the inventors, character assassination, arson and a wide variety of financial incentives and disincentives to manipulate possible supporters. They have also promoted and supported the general acceptance of a scientific principle that states that free energy is impossible, via Newton’s laws of thermodynamics.
The second force in operation against free energy technology is national governments. The problem is not so much related to competition in the printing of currency, but in the maintenance of national security. The fact is, the world out there is a dog-eat-dog world and humans can be counted upon to be very cruel, dishonest, devious and sneaky and it is government's job to provide for the common defence. For this, police powers are delegated by the executive branch of government to enforce the rule of law. Most of us who consent to the rule of law do so because we believe it is the right thing to do, for our own benefit. There are always a few individuals, however, that believe that their own benefit is best served by behaviour that does not voluntarily conform to the generally agreed-upon social order. These people choose to operate outside of the rule of law and are considered outlaws, criminals, subversives, traitors, revolutionaries and often now, terrorists.
Most national governments have discovered, by trial and error that the only foreign policy that really works, over time, is a policy of ‘tit for tat’. What this really means to us all is that governments treat each other the way they are being treated. There is a constant jockeying for position and influence in world affairs and the strongest party wins. In economics, the golden rule states: ‘The one with the gold makes the rules’. So it is with politics also, but its appearance is more Darwinian. It is simply the survival of the fittest. However, in politics the fittest has come to mean the strongest party who is also willing to fight the dirtiest. Absolutely every means available is used to maintain an advantage over the adversary and everyone else is the adversary regardless of whether they are considered friend or foe. This includes outrageous psychological posturing, lying, cheating, spying, stealing, the assassination of world leaders, proxy wars, alliances and shifting alliances, treaties, foreign aid and the presence of military forces wherever possible.
Like it or not, this is the psychological and actual arena national governments operate within. No national government will do anything that simply gives an adversary an advantage for free, it is national s
uicide. An activity by any individual, inside or outside the country that is interpreted as giving an adversary an edge or advantage will be deemed a threat to ‘national security’.
So therefore, free energy technology is a national government's worst nightmare. Openly acknowledged, free energy technology sparks an unlimited ‘arms race’ by all governments in a final attempt to gain absolute advantage and domination. For example would Japan not feel intimidated if China gets free energy? And would Israel sit by quietly as Iran acquires free energy?
Unlimited energy available in the current state of affairs on this planet would lead to an inevitable reshuffling of the balance of power. This could become an all-out war to prevent the ‘other’ from having the advantage of unlimited wealth and power. Everybody will covet it and at the same time, want to prevent everyone else from getting it.
There is also the credible argument that governments will suppress alternate technology for the reason of preserving income streams derived from taxing energy sources currently in use. Their weapons include the preventing of the issuance of patents based on national security grounds, the legal and illegal harassment of inventors with criminal charges, tax audits, threats, phone-taps, arrest, arson, theft of property during shipment and a host of other intimidations which make the business of building and marketing a free energy technology practically impossible.
The third force operating in an attempt to postpone the public availability of free energy technology consists of a group of deluded inventors and outright charlatans and con-men. On the periphery of the extraordinary scientific breakthroughs that constitute the real free energy technologies, lies a shadow-world of unexplained anomalies, marginalised inventions and unscrupulous promoters. The first two forces have constantly used the media to promote the worst examples of this group, to distract the public's attention and to discredit the real breakthroughs by associating them with the obvious frauds.
Over the last hundred years, dozens of stories have surfaced about unusual inventions. Some of these ideas have so captivated the public's imagination that a mythology about these systems continues to this day. There may possibly be real technologies behind these names, but there simply isn't enough technical data available in the public domain to make a determination. These ideas remain associated with free-energy mythology however and are cited by debunkers as examples of fraud.
So, the third force postponing the public availability of free energy technology is delusion and dishonesty within the movement itself. The motivations are self-aggrandisement, greed, desire for power over others and a false sense of self-importance. The weapons used are lying, cheating, the ‘bait and switch’ con, self-delusion and arrogance combined with fake science.
The fourth force operating to postpone the public availability of free energy technology is ‘all of the rest of us’. It may be easy to see how narrow and selfish the motivations of the other forces are, but actually, these motivations are still very much alive in each of us as well. As with the Elite, don't we each secretly harbour illusions of false superiority and the desire to control others instead of ourselves? Also, would anyone of us not ‘sell out’ if the price was right, say, a million pounds cash, today, in our hands? Or like governments, do we not all wish to ensure our own survival? If caught in the middle of a full, burning theatre, would we panic and push all of the weaker people out of the way in a mad, scramble for the door? Or like the deluded inventor, would we not trade a comfortable illusion once in a while for an uncomfortable fact and do we not still fear the unknown, even if it promises a great reward?
All four forces are just different aspects of the same process, operating at different levels in our society. There is really only one force preventing the public availability of free energy technology, and that is the non-spiritually motivations of we humans, but in the final analysis, free energy technology is an outward manifestation of divine abundance. It is the engine of the economy of an enlightened society, where people voluntarily behave in a respectful and civil manner toward each other, where each member of society has everything they need and does not covet his neighbour’s possessions, where war and physical violence has become socially unacceptable behaviour and people's differences are at least tolerated, if not enjoyed.
The appearance of free energy technology in the public domain represents the dawning of a truly civilised age. It is an epochal event in human history and no one individual can take credit for it. No-one can become rich on it, no-one can rule the world with it, it is simply a gift from the ‘gods’. It forces us all to take responsibility for our own actions and for our own self-discipline and self-restraint when needed. The world as it is currently ordered cannot have free energy technology without being totally transformed by it into something else and this civilisation, imperfect though it undoubtedly is, has reached the pinnacle of its development because it has birthed the seeds of its own transformation. Un-spiritualised humans cannot be trusted with free energy, they will only do what they have always done, which is to take merciless advantage of each other or kill each other and themselves in the process.
Upon reading Ayn Rand's work, ‘Atlas Shrugged’ or the Club of Rome Report, it becomes obvious that the Elite families have understood this for decades. Their plan is to live in a world of free energy, but permanently freeze-out everyone else. However this is not new, for example, royalty has always considered the general population to be its subjects. However, what is new is that we can communicate with each other now better than at any time in the past. The Internet offers us all an opportunity to overcome the combined efforts of the other three forces preventing free energy technology from spreading.
Health and Nutrition and the false medical paradigm in which we all live
Health
“Our current system of drugs-and-surgery conventional medicine will bankrupt any state or nation foolish enough to depend on it. No nation that bets its future on pharmaceuticals and chemotherapy is going to win that bet. They will all collapse in the end because you can’t create a healthy nation by drugging your population into a state of health. As long as Big Pharma dominates health care and it currently runs the medical journals, medical schools, hospitals, and even the FDA so you will never have a health care system that has any interest whatsoever in teaching people how to be healthy. When profits come from sickness, the corporations always find new ways to keep people sick.” Mike Adams
Medical fascism is undoubtedly with us and has permeated our entire mainstream health regime.
Probably one of the most callous and insidious ways by which we are being covertly attacked as a species is not only via the food we eat, but also through our totally corrupt healthcare system which has been infiltrated and is largely controlled by ‘Big Pharma’ the large pharmaceutical cartels and to a lesser but nevertheless significant extent, ‘Big Food’ the giant food conglomerates.
To say that our healthcare system has failed us in the past, continues to fail us in the present and is constantly being manipulated to fail us in the future, is a contender for understatement of the millennium. Make no mistake about it, general human health is not improving one iota, despite the so-called ‘medical advances’ of the last century or more. It is an undisputable fact that the incidence of all the newer, major destructive diseases is increasing exponentially as time goes by, despite the near-eradication of certain formerly ‘killer’ diseases.
Fifty years ago, one person in 50 would have been expected to contract cancer during their lifetimes and now that situation has deteriorated to the point where we are lucky if it is as low as 1 in 3 and decreasing yearly. This is also true of many diseases such as Diabetes types 1 and 2, Alzheimer’s, Multiple Sclerosis, AIDS / HIV and the many invented ‘mental’ syndromes that have only been prevalent for a decade or so, ADHD, Bipolar Disorder and the like.
Why should this be? Does anyone ever really try to answer that question? I believe that this question is side-stepped and avoided at all costs by the Elite-ru
n medical establishment because they know the answer to the question already, but would very much rather that you did not, if at all possible.
For example, consider this for a moment; a typical medical doctorate takes about 4 to 6 years of study to achieve, depending on the exact course undertaken, at any Western medical education establishment or University. One would naturally expect that any education or teaching programme about the workings of the human body should include a rather finely detailed study of human nutrition, its effects on all the bodily organs and functions and how to help prevent disease and other ailments by way of a balanced diet and vitamin consumption. Is it not more than a little strange then that our standard medical education does not include one single lecture in six whole years of study, on the subject of nutrition or disease prevention?
‘Surely not’, you may say. ‘How can that be possible?’ I was absolutely stunned when I first investigated this issue myself and actually made a spurious visit to my GP (General Medical Practitioner) just to find an excuse to ask him the question myself.
‘Can you recommend any good nutrition programmes that will help me recover from the bad bout of general tiredness and lethargy I have been experiencing?’ I asked him. His reply did not surprise me knowing what I now know about the issue. Without embarrassment or even hesitation, he actually replied that nutrition was not the answer. He mumbled something along the lines of as long as my diet was reasonably OK then it is not a problem. Instead he began without asking whether or not I wanted it, to write out a prescription for some drug or other, which I politely declined. ‘It’s quite harmless’ he said and ‘it will make you feel better and more energetic’. After again declining his kind offer, I then asked why he did not believe that good healthy natural nutrition was the answer. Again without any embarrassment he simply stated that nutrition was not an area of his expertise and therefore he could not suggest anything to help. I thanked him and left (without the prescription).