Are We Boiling Frogs?

Home > Other > Are We Boiling Frogs? > Page 25
Are We Boiling Frogs? Page 25

by Home home


  Harbour.' This reveals the motivation for the 9/11 false flag.

  Following the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991, the U.S. found

  itself practically unopposed on the world's stage. Realising

  this, and wishing to capitalise on what they saw as an

  unprecedented opportunity for global dominance, a new

  breed of American power broker emerged.

  200

  A Dangerous Ideology

  Called neoconservatives (neocons,) their declared world view

  placed the United States at the centre of a global empire. As

  the sole superpower, or “unipower,” their primary concern

  was that no rival should ever be allowed to rise to challenge

  U.S. hegemony. One of their chief strategist was the

  Pentagon Undersecretary Paul Wolfowitz.

  In 1993, then Defense Secretary and fellow neocon Dick

  Cheney published Wolfowitz' strategy document 'Defense

  Strategy for the 1990s: The Regional Defense Strategy.'[170]

  Often referred to as the 'Wolfowitz Doctrine,' this document

  advocated the U.S. should make good use of their military

  supremacy:

  “We must not stand back and allow a new

  global threat to emerge or leave a vacuum in

  a region critical to our interests.......

  …........ we should expect future coalitions to

  be ad hoc assemblies, often not lasting

  beyond the crisis being confronted, and in

  many cases carrying only general

  agreement over the objectives to be

  accomplished.........

  …......Certain situations like the crisis

  leading to the Gulf War are likely to

  engender ad hoc coalitions. We should plan

  to maximize the value of such coalitions.

  This may include specialized roles for our

  forces as well as developing cooperative

  practices with others...........

  …......we will retain the preeminent

  responsibility for addressing selectively

  those wrongs which threaten not only our

  interests, but those of our allies or

  friends...........

  …......In the Middle East and Southwest

  Asia, our overall objective is to remain the

  predominant outside power in the region

  and preserve U.S. and Western access to the

  region's oil.........

  201

  A Dangerous Ideology

  Following its publication, throughout the 1990s, the U.S.

  administrations continued the process of creating the “ad

  hoc coalitions” and perfected the use of “specialized roles” in

  conflicts in Bosnia, Kosovo, Somalia and elsewhere. Many

  U.S. backed Islamist extremists fought in these conflicts.

  In 1998, inspired by the 'Wolfowitz Doctrine,' the neocons,

  including Wolfowitz, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Jeb Bush (the

  brother of George. W. Bush,) formed a think tank called ‘The

  Project for the New American Century (PNAC.)'[171] Ten

  members of PNAC went on to form the backbone of the 2001

  Bush administration, filling the majority of the top positions.

  They were responsible for managing the 9/11 crisis and were

  the driving force behind the decision to instigate the 'war on

  terror.'

  Just before 9/11, in 2000, PNAC published a document

  called 'Rebuilding American Defences' (RAD.)[172] This

  document's influence upon the Bush administration, say the

  conspiracists, was obvious. Bush's concept of 'Homeland

  Defense,' the countries he named in his 'Axis of Evil' (Iran,

  Iraq and North Korea,) and even his defence budget

  commitments, were all lifted directly from RAD.

  The Wolfowitz Doctrine proposed the idea of “preemption” .

  This broadly meant the use of military force as a preventative

  measure if the U.S. had intelligence that a military or

  terrorist threat was imminent. However, RAD took this

  further and advocated the use of force simply if U.S.

  interests were at risk, no imminent threat required.[173]

  RAD was essentially a manifesto for U.S. imperial

  expansionism. It promoted sweeping changes to defence

  structures and operational practices, increased investment

  in technology, expanded use of civilian contractors, a

  restructuring and modernisation of all armed services and

  more.

  It was the need to fund this policy initiative which led PNAC

  member, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, to request the

  additional $50Bn annual tax payer investment. His difficulty

  in obtaining budget approval came as no surprise to

  Rumsfeld and his fellow neocons.

  202

  A Dangerous Ideology

  PNAC members had already identified the funding problem

  they faced. In order to secure the money for their global

  military empire, they recognised the necessity of unwavering

  American tax payer support. PNAC required some form of

  justification to convince the public that huge increases in

  military spending were essential.

  They addressed this issue in Rebuilding American Defenses.

  In doing so, say the conspiracy theorists, they exposed their

  motive for the crimes they committed on 9/11:

  “…the process of transformation, even if it

  brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a

  long one, absent some catastrophic and

  catalysing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.”

  President Bush' statement on the day of the attack itself,

  “The Pearl Harbor of the 21st century took place today. . .”

  was not another 'coincidence'. He was part of the neocon

  cabal who were actively seeking their casus belli. This was a

  triumphant nod to his fraternity, he may as well have said

  “we've done it.”

  On September the 12th 2001, 12 months after the

  publication of RAD, for the first time in history, the United

  States of America invoked Article 5 of the NATO 'Washington

  Treaty.'

  'An attack on one is an attack on all.'

  NATO was at war with an enemy it couldn't find and the

  neocons had the all funds they would ever need to fight the

  never ending global war they craved. The bankers, venture

  capitalists, weapons manufacturers, intelligence and military

  contractors who had supported PNAC’s objectives and

  persistently lobbied to advance their agenda, were all poised

  to profit handsomely. In this regard, the neocon 'hawks' and

  their investors, were in a unique position after 9/11.

  They were the only people on Earth who benefited from it.

  ************************

  So what should we make of all this? Should we believe the

  conspiracy theorists?

  203

  A Dangerous Ideology

  Oddly, a large number of them say not. Generally, they don't

  want people to simply 'believe' them. In fact, they don't really

  want people to believe anything at all.

  They persistently advocate that people stop 'believing' what

  they are told and start researching and questioning the

  evidence themselves. Perhaps we may then start to erode the

  power of the deception our 'leaders' employ to convince us

  we need to kill each other.

  C
onversely, those who accept the official story of 9/11, the

  politicians, the academics, the media and probably most

  people you know, tell you not to believe the conspiracists.

  The establishment tells you to reject every word they say. A

  message constantly reinforced with rigid uniformity across

  the entire Western mainstream media. No dissent or

  deviation from this unshakable conviction is ever mentioned,

  let alone discussed.

  Stupid conspiracy theorists are clueless, impotent social

  outcasts, incapable of reason and riven by mental health

  problems. At the same time they are dangerous pedlars of a

  powerful ideology. Potentially strong enough to overturn our

  concept of reality and destroy the basis of our whole

  democratic way of life.

  They are dangerous subversives and hopeless fools in equal

  measure. They are wrong. Don't look at the 'evidence.' Ignore

  it and never, under any circumstances, think about it.

  There's nothing to see here, move along! Stay away!

  Keep out!

  ************************

  “Our enemies are innovative and resourceful,

  and so are we. They never stop thinking

  about new ways to harm our country and our

  people, and neither do we.”

  [George W. Bush 2004]

  ************************

  204

  A Dangerous Ideology

  Sources:

  [1]:https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm51

  SPa6.htm

  [2]:https://www.theguardian.com/us-

  n

  ews/2016/sep/11/9-11-illnesses- death-toll

  [3]:http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0

  1

  40- 6736%2811%2960989-6/fulltext

  [4]:https://www.vcf.gov/pdf/VCFProgramStatistics0721201

  7.pdf

  [5]:https://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report.pdf

  [6]:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?

  doi=10.1.1.526.5976&rep=rep1&type=pdf

  [7]:http://www.worldhistory.biz/sundries/27978-the-

  impact-of-9-11-on-u-s-public-opinion.html

  [8]:https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/20/world/asia/tru

  m

  p- a

  fghanistan- strategy-mattis.html

  [9]:https://www.nist.gov/engineering-laboratory/final-

  r eports-nist- w

  orld- trade-center-disaster-investigation

  [10]:https://www.iraqbodycount.org/

  [11]:http://www.psr.org/assets/pdfs/body-count.pdf

  [12]:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1567815.

  stm

  [13]:http://911research.wtc7.net/cache/disinfo/deceptions/

  telegraph_stolenids.html

  [14]:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/15591

  51.stm

  [15]:http://articles.latimes.com/2001/sep/21/news/mn-

  48189

  [16]:http://911truth.org/mission/

  [17]:http://www.nytimes.com/2001/10/09/us/a-nation-

  205

  A Dangerous Ideology

  c hallenged-the- investigation-preventive-steps.html

  [18]:https://www.justice.gov/archive/ag/speeches/2001/ag

  c risisremark s10_08.htm

  [19]:http://911myths.com/images/f/fd/FBI-Summary-

  PENTTBOMB.pdf

  [20]:https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/news/testimony/pent

  tbom

  [21]:https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-war-on-waste/

  [22]:https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-308-911-

  t rillions-follow-the- money/

  [23]:https://www.c-span.org/video/?165947-1/defence-

  b

  usiness- practices

  [24]:https://news.brown.edu/articles/2011/06/warcosts

  [25]:https://www.reuters.com/investigates/pentagon/#articl

  e/part2

  [26]:https://www.metabunk.org/debunked-rumsfeld-says-2-

  3

  -trillion- missing-from-the-pentagon.t165/

  [27]:http://www.rense.com/general24/spent.htm

  [28]:http://www.panynj.gov/press-room/press-item.cfm?

  headLine_id=81

  [29]:http://web.archive.org/web/20041217043635/http://t

  h

  erealdeal.ne t /issue s/January_2004/1073516221.php

  [30]:http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/24/nyregion/24ins

  u

  re.html ? _r=2&ref=nyregion&oref=slogin&

  [31]:https://www.scribd.com/document/39061668/911insi

  der-Richard-Andrew-Grove-Project-Constellation-Transcript

  [32]:http://www.baselinemag.com/c/a/Past-News/Ellen-

  C

  larke-former- C

  IO- of-Marsh

  [34]:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_J3qyDQU7ic

  [35]:https://www.cbsnews.com/news/profiting-from-

  disaster/

  206

  A Dangerous Ideology

  [36]:http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2010/06/sec-

  g overnment- destroyed-documents-regarding-pre-911-put-

  options.html

  [37]:http://www.911myths.com/html/selling_amr.html

  [38]:https://9-11commission.gov/report/911Report.pdf

  [39]:http://physics911.net/noradfaa-hijack-intercept-

  protocols/

  [40]:http://911research.wtc7.net/cache/planes/attack/pres

  relNORADTimelines.htm

  [41]:http://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/analysis/anomalie

  s.html#military

  [42]:http://www.xavius.com/080198.htm

  [43]:https://digwithin.net/2011/04/27/wall-street-lawyer-

  a

  nd-the- special-ops-hijack-coordinator/

  [44]:http://911blogger.com/node/9017

  [45]:“Secretary Rumsfeld Interview With Larry King”; Torie

  Clarke, Lipstick on a Pig, pp. 217-218

  [46]:http://tarpley.net/docs/drills_of_911.pdf

  [47]:http://www.gangstalkingmindcontrolcults.com/inside-

  jo

  b-the-46-drills- operations-war-games-and-exercises-of-

  911-tarpley-interview/

  [48]:https://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/PSEUDOSC/911NutPh

  y sics1.H T

  M

  [49]:https://www.nist.gov/engineering-laboratory/final-

  reports-nist-world-trade-center-disaster-investigation

  [50]:https://www.nist.gov/topics/disaster-failure-

  studies/world-trade-center-disaster-study/about-

  investigation#_ftn1

  [51]:https://www.nist.gov/el/faqs-nist-wtc-7-investigation

  [52]:http://911review.com/coverup/fantasy/progressive.ht

  ml

  207

  A Dangerous Ideology

  [53]:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqqelDq4P48

  [54]:https://www.nist.gov/pba/questions-and-answers-

  a

  bout-nist-wtc- 7-investigation

  [55]:http://www.jensenhughes.com/wp-

  content/uploads/2014/02/White_Paper_Historical_Survey_

  B

  uilding_C ollapse_NIST_JBeitel-NIwankiw_OCT-2006.pdf

  [56]:http://journalof911studies.com/articles/Article_6_Panc

  a

  ke_theory _false_by_NIST_WorldTradeCenter.pdf

  [57]:http://www1.ae911truth.org/faqs/655-faq-9-were-the-

  twin-towers-designed-to-survive-the-impact-of-the-

  airplanes.html

  [58]:http://www.911myths.com/WTCREPORT.pdf

  [59]:http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/Journal_

  5

  _PTransferRoss .p

  df

  [60]:http://www.ae911truth.org/signatures/ae.html

  [61]:http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a6384/de

  b

  unking-911- myths-world-trade-cent
er/

  [62]:https://www.prisonplanet.com/nists-wtc7-collapse-

  m

  odels-some- observations.html

  [63]:http://911blogger.com/news/2010-07-12/nist-denies-

  a

  ccess- w

  tc- collapse-data

  [64]:http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/buy/

  [65]:https://www.prlog.org/10481408-911-qui-tam-case-

  filed-in-us-supreme-court.html

  [66]:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/

  [67]:http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/s

  ilv

  erstei n

  _pullit .html

  [68]:http://www.ae911truth.org/signatures/ae.html

  [69]:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UW62q8XiVp4

  [70]:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/p4t/Radar_Data_Impact_S

  peed_Study--AA11,_UA175.pdf

  208

  A Dangerous Ideology

  [71]:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHHghW4Pg5k

  [72]:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/pentagon.html

  [73]:http://shoestring911.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/shanksv

  ill

  e- pennsylvania-on-911.html

  [74]:https://www.nist.gov/el/faqs-nist-wtc-towers-

  investigation

  [75]:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rWdcVo6zIYI

  [76]:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bin_Laden_Issue_Station

  [77]:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqQwnqjA-6w

  [78]:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lLHVQUTrgvM

  [79]:http://humansarefree.com/2015/08/bill-cooper-was-

  k

  illed-shortly- after.html

  [80]:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophi

  %C3%A6_Naturalis_Principia_Mathematica

  [81]:https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/ma

  g azine/2002/05/12 /hallowed-ground/0c7b4753-ecca-48bd-

  8267-f11d2fc43a4f/?utm_term=.363c954fc3a9

  [82]:http://humansarefree.com/2015/03/shanksville-

  coroner-no-bodies-found-at.html

  [83]:https://www.cbsnews.com/news/flight-93-remains-

  returned/

  [84]:http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/

  u

  nanswe r ed- questions-the-mystery-of-flight-93-173206.html

  [85]:https://vrijewereld.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/john-

  lear-911-affidavit.pdf

  [86]:http://thematrixhasyou.org/Affidavit-IRS-

  complete/Summons-affidavit/attachment-p.html

  [87]:http://pilotsfor911truth.org/pentagon.html

  [88]:http://911truth.org/hani-hanjour-evidence-

  suppressed-fbi-commission/

  209

  A Dangerous Ideology

  [89]:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVUfN7RlgoQ

  [90]:http://web.archive.org/web/20070108233707/http://

  w

  ww.cbc.ca/s u

  n day/911hamilton.html

  [91]:http://www.history.com/topics/9-11-commission

 

‹ Prev