The Art of Flight

by Sergio Pitol

  Xalapa, June 1996

  TRANSLATOR’S NOTE

  Translating an author of Sergio Pitol’s stature is a humbling task. Translating his first major work into English is both humbling and terrifying. The feelings of humility and terror are compounded by the fact that Pitol, in his own right, is a celebrated translator of, among others, James, Conrad, Woolf, Austen, Graves, Chekhov, Gombrowicz, and Andrzejewski.

  I discovered Pitol in graduate school, where his “Carnival” triptych (the novels El desfile del amor, Domar la divina garza, and La vida conyugal) were required reading. Between 1996 and 2005, Pitol penned three literary memoirs, of which El arte de la fuga, translated here as The Art of Flight, was the first. Known collectively as the “Trilogy of Memory,” these three autobiographical volumes, comprised of diary entries, personal musings, travel writing, and literary essays, are reminiscent of Elias Canetti’s Memoirs.

  About two years ago, Michelle Johnson of World Literature Today sent me an article written by Mexican novelist Valeria Luiselli for Granta that named Pitol a “best untranslated writer.” The article was somewhat of a misnomer as Pitol had in fact been translated into over a dozen major languages—but notably not into English. How, I wondered, was it possible that a writer of Pitol’s stature—one of four Mexican authors at the time to have won the Cervantes Prize, the most prestigious prize given to an author writing in the Spanish language—had not been translated into English? This translation is an attempt to right that wrong.

  Already in the title I have failed. Failure is something that every translator must live with. But how does one fail before really starting? Like many words, the Spanish word fuga is ambiguous, meaning both fugue and flight. Ever the careful wordsmith and ironist, Pitol’s use of ambiguity in the title is intentional. Not only does the title refer to a life spent in constant flight, it is also meant to invoke, as in music, the use of the interwoven repetitive elements in his writing. Also intentional is the allusion to Bach’s Die Kunst der Fuge, known in English as The Art of the Fugue. Unfortunately, it was not possible maintain either the semantic ambiguity or the musical allusion. To the extent that I have failed, here or anywhere else in the translation, I offer a heartfelt apology.

  In The Art of Flight, Pitol writes, “Translating allows one to enter fully into a work, to know its bones, its structure, its silences.” Pitol alludes here to translation as an act of reading. First and foremost, the translator is a critical reader. Through this act of critical reading, he becomes a mediator of meaning for readers in another language. While reading/translating the text, the translator discovers meaning at every level—lexical, semantic, and syntactic. And, as Pitol states, in the text’s silences. In other words, the translator must not only listen to what the writer says, but also to what he doesn’t.

  Some of the features of The Art of Flight include Pitol’s at times labyrinthine prose (the opening sentence is sixty-two words long), interspersed with short parenthetical phrases that create a staccato-like rhythm, as in the following sentence: “In my case, plain and naked exposition, without flourishes, without detours, without echoes or shadows, fatally diminishes the efficiency of the story, converts it into a mere anecdote; a vulgarity, when all is said and done.”

  Throughout the translation, I have striven to be faithful to Pitol’s style. To that end, and because of its potential to enrich the receptor language and culture, I have adopted a foreignizing strategy. Foreignization goes beyond leaving occasional words in the target language, especially those words that are already familiar to the reader. Doing so would render the translation a parody or, to borrow one of Pitol’s favorite words, a vulgarity. The translator, then, must listen for the words that call out to remain untranslated, words that express concepts that are either foreign to, or by their use will enrich, the receptor language and culture, words like capillas (Mexico’s literary coteries), coletos (white elites), (paramilitary) guardias blancas, and tertulia (the uniquely Spanish version of the salon). As noted, these loanwords appear in italics and have been explicated as naturally as possible and to the extent necessary to give them meaning.

  Foreignization may also occur at the syntactic level, that is, so that the syntactic features present in the source language remain intact in the translation. To that end, I have attempted to intervene as little as possible in Pitol’s syntax. At the lexical level, in most cases, I have chosen Latinate and Greek cognates rather than Anglo-Germanic synonyms. In doing so, I endeavored to honor Pitol’s style and vocabulary, both of which tend toward the baroque, an effect I strove to retain or, at least, echo in the translation At times, however, it was necessary to change Pitol’s punctuation, especially colons and semicolons, which he uses generously, and at times completely contrary to American usage. In some cases, but few, laboriously long and subordinated sentences either had to be broken up or the clauses reordered lest the reader become lost in a maze of subordination.

  Because The Art of Flight is a multigeneric text, written in multiple voices, styles, and literary forms, over a period of three decades, it was important to not resort to a single, unifying voice. In the case of the numerous quotations, translated from a variety of languages into Spanish, I chose to incorporate, where available, existing English translations. For the sake of consistency, I have also used extant English translations for quotations of Spanish texts, many of which are considered canonical and will be familiar to English readers.

  Translating in general is an agonizing process. It is acknowledging defeat in the face of unavoidable cultural loss. Consider the word campechano, which can be a gentilic that refers to inhabitants of the Mexican state of Campeche as well as an adjective meaning “good-natured” with a hint of indifference. For Mexicans, it is impossible to separate one meaning from the other. To describe someone as campechano is to say he possesses the same carefree bonhomie as the inhabitants of Campeche. This kind of cultural loss is inevitable, but the careful translator, especially the one who sees himself as a custodian of culture, will strive to minimize it. Such is translating every writer, but especially translating Pitol.

  Translating Pitol means catching a parodic reference to The Communist Manifesto; it means reading The Sound and the Fury in order to translate Caddy’s calzoncitos as “drawers.” It is knowing that “in the beginning was the Word,” and that inmundicia, in order to maintain the biblical reference, is best translated as “uncleanness” not “dirt” or “filth.” It is tracking down un-cited quotes by Galdós and Paz and Cortázar and Bobbio and Gide and James and Woolf and Duras and Beckmann. It is studying Beckmann’s tryptic The Departure to be able to translate Pitol’s painstaking description. It is reading not only the diaries of Mann but also those of his son Klaus and those of Lezama Lima. It is reading Berenson’s The Venetian Painters of the Renaissance.

  Translating Pitol is learning that “will of reason” comes from Aquinas’s Summa Theologica and that “people of reason” is a reference to the culturally Hispanized. It is tracing idioms back to the Quixote and to The Celestina, and deciding if or how they can be retained. It is discovering titles to novels embedded in sentences. One example is “la princesita negra de los brezos” (“the little black princess of the heaths”), an arcane reference to a nineteenth-century novel, Das Heideprinzeβchen, by Eugenie Marlitt, translated into English as The Princess of the Moor, and Spanish as La princesita de los brezos. Pitol, however, modifies the title by adding the adjective negra (black) in order to describe an effeminate young black man of high rank whom he observes in a two-bit dive in Barcelona’s gothic quarter. Although Pitol employs the metaphor to great effect, it demands much of the reader and poses a herculean challenge for the translator. Ultimately, I had to determine to what end Pitol was employing such an esoteric literary reference. Was Pitol, as he is wont to be, simply in conversation with himself? In other words, was it nothing more than a recondite inside joke? Or was he providing an insight into the infinite ways literature lives inside all of us at all times?r />
  Translating Pitol, then, requires being—or becoming—familiar not only with such arcane literary references but also the breadth of Mexican and Spanish culture, as well as American, British, Polish, German, and Russian literatures. Translating Pitol requires reading philosophy, theology, drama theory, and the Italian Renaissance.

  Translating—and reading—Pitol provides an incomparable humanistic education.

  In the end, translation is about making choices and having trust. A reader must accept that a translator has made good-faith decisions about how to render a word, a pair of words, an idiom, or a metaphor. Once that is done, the translation should stand on its own weight.

  No translation happens in a vacuum, nor is it a solitary endeavor. Ideally, a translator enjoys the opportunity of collaborating or, at the very least, consulting with the author during the translation process. But in recent years Pitol has suffered from a cognitive disorder that has resulted in a progressive loss of language, making it impossible to consult with him on this translation. I cannot express to you how distressing this news was. Not only because of the effect that my inability to consult with Pitol would have on the translation but also knowing that he had lost the one thing that had meant the most to him in life, as he expresses throughout The Art of Flight, where we also learn how much Pitol valued the collaborative process, both as translator and translated writer. Finally, I recall with fondness the email he sent almost two years ago: “Your interest in my work fills me with happiness and gratitude. I would love nothing more than to see my Trilogy of Memory translated into English, a language that I adore and in which none of my books exists.”

  Absent, then, the opportunity to consult with Pitol, I relied heavily on those secondary resources to which translators routinely recur: writers, other translators, and editors, all of whom are intimately familiar with Pitol’s work, and who graciously made themselves available throughout the process. My eternal thanks go out to Elena Poniatowska, Alberto Chimal, Raquel Castro, Beatriz Meyer, María Rosa Suárez, Luis Jorge Boone, Omar Villasana, Rodrigo Figueroa, Rodolfo Mendoza, Gregorio Doval, and Miguel Kimball-Santana.

  I am also indebted to Charles Hatfield and Rainer Schulte at the Center for Translation Studies at the University of Texas at Dallas for their mentorship, to Michelle Johnson and Daniel Simon at World Literature Today for their unfailing support, and to Scott Esposito, whose thoughtful reading of the text and many suggestions made this translation better. A special thanks to my publisher, Will Evans, for his unwavering patience and commitment to publishing not only this translation, but also The Journey and The Magician of Vienna, which along with The Art of Flight make up Pitol’s “Trilogy of Memory.”

  More than anyone, however, I am indebted to maestro Sergio Pitol, for serving as my guide and tutor through the literary and linguistic worlds that were formerly unknown to me, for his erudition, for his boundless imagination, and, finally, for his infinite and inextinguishable spirit.

  George Henson

  Dallas, Texas, 2015

  BIBLIOGRAPHY OF TRANSLATED TEXTS

  ANDRZEJEWSKI, JERZY. Trans. James Kirkup. The Gates of Paradise. Weidenfeld & Nicolson. 1962.

  BAKHTIN, MIKHAIL. Trans. Hélène Iswolsky. Rabelais and His World. Indiana University Press, 2009.

  BAKHTIN, MIKHAIL. Trans. Caryl Emerson. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. University of Minnesota Press, 1984.

  BOBBIO, NORBERTO. Trans. Teresa Chataway. In Praise of Meekness: Essays on Ethnics and Politics. Polity, 2000.

  BORGES, JORGE LUIS. Trans. Harold Morland. “In Memoriam: Alfonso Reyes.” Dreamtigers. University of Texas Press, 1967.

  BORGES, JORGE LUIS. Trans. James E Irby. “Story of the Warrior and the Captive.” Labyrinths. New Directions, 1962.

  BORGES, JORGE LUIS. Trans. Norman Thomas Di Giovanni. “The Aleph.” The Aleph and Other Stories. E.P. Dutton, 1970.

  CHEKHOV, ANTON. Trans. Ronald Hingley. “The Steppe.” The Steppe and other Stories. Oxford World’s Classics, 2009.

  CHEKHOV, ANTON. Trans. Constance Garnett. The Letters of Anton Chekhov. The McMillan Co., 1920.

  DURAS, MARGUERITE. Trans. Mark Polizzotti. Writing. University of Minnesota Press, 2011.

  HAŠEK, JAROSLAV. Trans. Paul Selver. The Good Soldier Švejk. Penguin Classics, 1995.

  HERZEN, ALEXANDER. Trans. Katherine Parthé. “A Letter Criticizing the Bell.” A Herzen Reader. Northwestern University Press, 2012.

  IBSEN, HENRIK. Trans. William and Charles Archer. Peer Gynt. New York Heritage Press, 1957.

  KUNDERA, MILAN. Trans. Linda Asher. Testaments Betrayed: Essay in Nine Parts. Harper Perennial. 1996.

  KUNDERA, MILAN. Trans. Linda Asher. The Art of the Novel. Harper Perennial. 2003.

  MANN, THOMAS. “The Stature of Anton Chekhov.” The New Republic. May 16, 1955.

  MANN, THOMAS. Trans. Richard and Clara Winston. Diaries: 1918–1939. Robin Clark Ltd., 1984.

  MANN, THOMAS. Trans. David Luke. Tonio Kröger and Other Stories. Bantam, 1970.

  MARTÍN GAITE, CARMEN. Trans. María G. Tomsich. Love Practices in Eighteen-century Spain. University of California Press, 1972.

  PÉREZ GALDÓS, BENITO. Trans. Robert Russell. Our Friend Manso. Columbia University Press, 1987.

  PÉREZ GALDÓS, BENITO. Trans. Clara Bell. The Court of Charles IV. New York, W. S. Gottsberger, 1888.

  TABUCCHI, ANTONIO. Trans. Tim Parks. Flying Creatures of Fra Angelico. Archipelago, 2012.

  TABUCCHI, ANTONIO. Trans. Patrick Creagh. Pererira Declares. New Directions. 1997.

  TABUCCHI, ANTONIO. Trans. Margaret Jull Costa. Requiem: A Hallucination. New Directions, 1984.

  SERGIO PITOL, one of the leading Mexican writers of his generation, was born in the city of Puebla in 1933. He studied law and philosophy in Mexico City before beginning an intellectual career that included writing and translation while working in the promotion of Mexican culture abroad, which he achieved during his long service as a cultural attaché in Mexican embassies and consulates across the globe. He has lived perpetually on the run: he was a student in Rome, a translator in Beijing and Barcelona, a university professor in Xalapa and Bristol, and a diplomat in Warsaw, Budapest, Paris, Moscow, and Prague. One of the most versatile, well-respected, and influential authors of the twentieth century, Pitol began publishing novels, stories, criticism, and translations in the 1960s. Elected to the Mexican Academy of Language in 1997, he has received his nation’s most important literary awards, as well as the internationally recognized Herralde Prize, which has also been awarded to Javier Marías, Roberto Bolaño, and Álvaro Enrigue. He is also one of the Spanish language’s most accomplished translators, having brought into Spanish works by Jane Austen, Joseph Conrad, Lewis Carroll, Henry James, and Witold Gombrowicz. In recognition of the importance of his entire canon of work, Pitol has been awarded the two most important literary prizes in the Spanish language world given to an author for a lifetime’s body of literature: the Juan Rulfo Prize in 1999 (now known as the FIL Literary Award in Romance Languages), and the 2005 Cervantes Prize, known as the most prestigious literary prize in the Spanish language world, often called the “Spanish language Nobel.” Though Pitol’s works have been translated into a dozen languages, Deep Vellum will publish Pitol’s “Trilogy of Memory” in full in 2015-2016 (The Art of Flight; The Journey; The Magician of Vienna), marking the first publication of any of Pitol’s books in the English language.

  GEORGE HENSON is a senior lecturer of Spanish at the University of Texas at Dallas, where he is completing a Ph.D. in literary and translation studies. His translations, including works by Andrés Neuman, Miguel Barnet, and Leonardo Padura, have appeared previously in World Literature Today. His translations of Elena Poniatowska’s The Heart of the Artichoke and Luis Jorge Boone’s The Cannibal Night were published in 2012 by Alligator Press.

  ENRIQUE VILA-MATAS is one of the most accomplished writers in the Spanish language. His novels have been translated into 30 languages, and he has received numero
us international honors and literary prizes.

  PUBLISHER’S NOTE

  Dear readers,

  Deep Vellum is a not-for-profit publishing house founded in 2013 with the threefold mission to publish international literature in English translation; to foster the art and craft of translation; and to build a more vibrant book culture in Dallas and beyond. We seek out works of literature that might otherwise never be published by larger publishing houses, works of lasting cultural value, and works that expand our understanding of what literature is and what it can do.

  Operating as a nonprofit means that we rely on the generosity of donors, cultural organizations, and foundations to provide the basis of our operational budget. Deep Vellum has two donor levels, the LIGA DE ORO and the LIGA DEL SIGLO. Members at both levels provide generous donations that allow us to pursue an ambitious growth strategy to connect readers with the best works of literature and increase our understanding of the world. Members of the LIGA DE ORO and the LIGA DEL SIGLO receive customized benefits for their donations, including free books, invitations to special events, and named recognition in each book.

  We also rely on subscriptions from readers like you to provide an invaluable ongoing investment in Deep Vellum that demonstrates a commitment to our editorial vision and mission. Subscribers are the bedrock of our support as we grow the readership for these amazing works of literature. The more subscribers we have, the more we can demonstrate to potential donors and bookstores alike the diverse support we receive and how we use it to grow our mission in ever-new, ever-innovative ways.