Book Read Free

The Forgetting Machine

Page 14

by Rodrigo Quian Quiroga


  5For more details, refer to, among many others, the original paper in which H.M.’s case was first described: William Scoville and Brenda Milner. “Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesion.” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 20 (1957): 11–21.

  For a more recent review, see: Larry Ryan Squire. “The legacy of patient H.M. for neuroscience.” Neuron 61 (11) (2009): 6–9.

  Chapter 8

  1For a comprehensive description of how visual information is processed along the ventral visual pathway, see: N. K. Logothetis and D. L. Sheinberg. “Visual object recognition.” Annual Review of Neuroscience 19 (1996): 577–621.

  And: K. Tanaka. “Inferotemporal cortex and object vision.” Annual Review of Neuroscience 19 (1996): 109–139.

  2Beside Christof and Itzhak, this work also involved Gabriel Kreiman, Leila Reddy, and, later, Alexander Kraskov.

  3Of course, a horizontal line or a face are also concepts, so depending on what we mean by “concept” one can argue that neurons in V1 and IT respond to concepts as well. Semantics aside, I hope it’s clear what I mean when I say that we found for the first time a neuron firing to a concept—I am referring to the concept of a specific person.

  4For more details, see: Rodrigo Quian Quiroga, Leila Reddy, Gabriel Kreiman, Christof Koch, and Itzhak Fried. “Invariant visual representation by single neurons in the human brain.” Nature 435 (2005): 1102–1107.

  5The fact that there are more neurons encoding familiar concepts was proved in: I. Viskontas, Rodrigo Quian Quiroga, and Itzhak Fried. “Human medial temporal lobe neurons respond preferentially to personally relevant images.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 (2009): 21329–21334.

  6For more details about neuron response to photographs and names (either written or spoken) of people, see: Rodrigo Quian Quiroga, Alexander Kraskov, Christof Koch, and Itzhak Fried. “Explicit encoding of multimodal percepts by single neurons in the human brain.” Current Biology 19 (2009): 1308–1313.

  7The neuron in Figure 8.4 responded not only to my photos, but also to photos of three of my colleagues performing experiments at UCLA; another neuron responded to both the Tower of Pisa and the Eiffel Tower; the Jennifer Aniston neuron, when tested the next day, responded also to Lisa Kudrow (another actress from the sitcom Friends); a neuron that responded to Jerry Seinfeld also responded to Kramer (both were characters in the same sitcom); and so on.

  More recently, we showed quantitatively that these neurons tend to encode meaningful associations and that they can modify their response patterns to encode new associations on the fly. For more details, see: Emanuela de Falco, Matias Ison, Itzhak Fried, and Rodrigo Quian Quiroga. “Longterm coding of personal and universal associations underlying the memory web in the human brain.” Nature Communications 7 (2016): 13408.

  And: Matias Ison, Rodrigo Quian Quiroga, and Itzhak Fried. “Rapid encoding of new memories by individual neurons in the human brain.” Neuron 87 (2012): 220–230.

  8The description and implications of how little we remember is the central theme of my 2012 book, Borges and Memory.

  9In this formulation of the model, I will set aside technical details and will also refrain from describing the considerable amount of scientific evidence that is consistent with it. For more details, see: Rodrigo Quian Quiroga. “Concept cells: the building blocks of declarative memory functions.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 13 (2012): 587–597.

  10In line with this argument, patients with injuries in the medial temporal lobe have not only a memory deficit but also a shortfall at imagining new situations, since they are able only to envision isolated facts, devoid of context. For more details, see: D. Hassabis, D. Kumaran, S. Vann, and E. Maguire. “Patients with hippocampal amnesia cannot imagine new experiences.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (2007): 1726–1731.

  Chapter 9

  1The topic of personal identity has been widely explored in philosophy. See, for example, Chapter 6 of: J. Hospers. An Introduction to Philosophical Analysis. London: Routledge, 1956.

  2Aristotle. On the Soul. Translated by J. A. Smith. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1928, 412b.

  3Aristotle. On the Soul, 408b.

  4The rejection by medieval scholastic philosophy of Aristotle’s thought was mostly a consequence of the interpretation of his ideas given by the twelfth-century Muslim philosopher Averroës, who denied the immortality of the individual soul. According to Averroës, at the moment of death the soul loses its individuality and becomes part of a universal soul, like drops in the ocean. Thomas Aquinas, on the other hand, took up Aristotle’s distinction between active intellect (the one exclusive to humans that allows reasoning) and receptive intellect (the one we share with animals, which allows sensation) and stated that it is the receptive intellect, both in humans and animals, that disappears upon death, while the active intellect, the individual soul, is indeed immortal as such.

  For a discussion on different interpretations of Aristotle’s position on this subject, see: Anthony Kenny. A New History of Western Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005, Chapters 4 and 7.

  And: Bertrand Russell. A History of Western Philosophy. London: Routledge Classics, [1946] 2004, Chapter 19.

  5Turing proposed his famous test in: Alan Turing. “Computing machinery and intelligence.” Mind 59 (1950): 433–460.

  6For a critical discussion of the Chinese room argument, refer to Searle’s original paper and subsequent commentary by several authors in: J. Searle. “Minds, brains, and programs.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (1980): 417–457.

  7For a popular discussion of Nicky Clayton’s work, see: V. Morell. “Nicky and the jays.” Science 315 (2007): 1074–1075.

  For a more detailed and technical discussion, see: U. Grodzinski and N. Clayton. “Problems faced by food-caching corvids and the evolution of cognitive solutions.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 365 (2010): 977–987.

  8For a summary of these works, see: Larry Squire and Stuart Zola-Morgan. “The medial temporal lobe memory system.” Science 253 (1991): 1380–1386.

  9For an overview of these works, see: John O’Keefe. “A review of the hippocampal place cells.” Progress in Neurobiology 13 (1979): 419–439.

  And: Edvard Moser, Emilio Kropff, and May-Britt Moser. “Place cells, grid cells and the brain’s spatial representation system.” Annual Reviews of Neuroscience 31 (2008): 69–89.

  As well as: K. Nakazawa, T. McHugh, M. Wilson, and S. Tonegawa. “NMDA receptors, place cells and hippocampal spatial memory.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 5 (2004): 361–372.

  10For more details, see: Rodrigo Quian Quiroga. “Concept cells: the building blocks of declarative memory functions.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 13 (2012): 587–597.

  11For more details, see, for example: Gordon Gallup, Jr. “Chimpanzees: selfrecognition.” Science 167 (1970): 86–87.

  And: Gordon Gallup, Jr. “Self-recognition in primates: a comparative approach to the bidirectional properties of consciousness.” American Psychologist 32 (1977): 329–338.

  As well as: J. Plotnik, F. de Waal, and D. Reiss. “Self-recognition in an Asian elephant.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103 (2006): 17053–17057.

  12Lev Vygotsky. Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1986.

  13Daniel Dennett. Kinds of Minds. New York: Basic Books, 1997, 150–151.

  14Temple Grandin, a professor at Colorado State University and an expert in animal behavior, asserts that animals are able to see details that human beings overlook by virtue of our abstraction- and inference-based thought. Interestingly, she is autistic, and claims that the attention to detail that she shares with many other autists (and savants) allows her to better understand the way animals think. In her 2006 book Animals in Translation: The Woman Who Thinks Like a Cow (London: Bloomsbury), Grandin in fact makes an interesting parallel between the thought processes of animals and those of people with autism.

 
; 15Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey Hinton. “Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks.” Advances in neural information processing systems 25 (2012): 1097–1105.

  INDEX

  A

  abstraction, and language, 151–153, 154

  action potentials, 6

  Alhazen, 41

  amygdala, 113

  Andersen, Richard, 98

  animals

  consciousness and, 150

  memory capacity and, 146–148, 150

  self-awareness and, 148–150

  antiquity, importance of memory in, 74–75, 97

  Aquinas, Thomas, 41, 51, 116, 137

  Aristotle, 40–41, 51, 100, 116, 137

  art, 29–31

  artificial intelligence, 142

  association agnosia, 48

  associations, 100

  formation of, 127–131

  importance of, 73

  Astonishing Hypothesis, The (Crick), 138–139

  Atkinson-Shiffrin model, 108

  axons, 6

  B

  Bartlett, Frederic, 56, 57–58, 62, 65, 68, 155

  Berkeley, George, 41, 45

  Besson, Luc, 86

  bits, 21–22

  Blade Runner (film), 1–2, 3, 3–4, 10, 142

  blindness, followed by sight, 43–46

  Bliss, Tim, 13

  Borges, Jorge Luis, 51, 52, 81, 152

  brain

  basics of, 5. See also neurons

  percent used, 86, 87

  relation with mind, 138

  storage capacity of, 64–65

  training, 86

  transmission of visual information to, 23, 25, 32

  vision and, 36, 42, 47

  Bruno, Giordano, 77

  bytes, 21–22

  C

  Camillo, Giulio, 76–77

  capacity, for memory. See memory capacity

  Cartesian dualism, 137, 140, 142, 145

  Center of Gaze (Molina), 31

  center-surround organization, 37–38, 39, 47

  cerebral cortex, 39

  Chinese room, The, 144–145

  Cicero, 51, 73, 74

  Clayton, Nicky, 146

  color, 37–38, 116

  combinatorial explosion, 17

  comprehension. See also understanding

  internet and, 95

  vs. memory, 82–84, 96–98, 102

  computational neuroscience, 9

  computers

  consciousness and, 140–145

  self-awareness and, 134, 142–145

  concept neurons, 120–128, 147–148, 153

  concepts, 120–131

  and language, 153

  place as, 148

  cones, 36

  consciousness, 134. See also self-awareness

  animals and, 150

  computers/robots and, 140–145

  Crick’s study of, 138–139

  degrees of, 150

  consolidation, 54–55, 59, 99

  associations and, 100

  context, 56–57, 94

  Cotton, Ronald, 60–61

  Crick, Francis, 138–139

  Critias (Plato), 75

  D

  declarative memory, 111–113, 125

  Deep Blue, 142

  deep neural networks, 155

  delay match to sample, 146

  delay no-match to sample, 147

  dendrites, 7

  Dennett, Dan, 153

  Descartes, René, 41, 136, 137, 140

  Dick, Philip K., 3

  Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? (Dick), 3

  dopamine, 7

  Down, John Langdon, 82–83

  dualism, 136, 137–138, 139, 140. See also Cartesian dualism

  E

  Ebbinghaus, Hermann, 53–55, 57, 62, 99, 106

  education, 97–99, 101–102, 103

  emotional memory, 113

  entorhinal cortex, 123–124

  epilepsy, 87, 109, 118

  epileptic focus, 118

  episodic memory, 112–113, 130–131

  Essay Concerning Human Understanding (Locke), 135

  Essay Towards a New Theory of Vision (Berkeley), 45

  excitatory neurons, 8

  expectations, 66–67

  experience, 42, 43–46, 67

  explicit memory, 111–113, 125

  eye. See also vision; visual information

  center-surround organization, 37–38, 39, 47

  fovea, 25–26, 36, 39, 47

  retina, 35–38, 39

  eye tracking, 26

  eyewitness testimony, 59–62

  F

  fabulation, 59

  flashbulb memory, 113

  Florida scrub jay, 146

  forgetting

  benefits of, 50–52

  importance of, 154–155

  lack of capacity for, 79–82

  fovea, 25–26, 36, 39, 47

  Fried, Itzhak, 119

  functionalism, 142

  “Funes the Memorious” (Borges), 51, 52, 81, 88

  G

  Gallup, Gordon Jr., 148

  Galton, Francis, 53

  Gea, Miguel Ángel, 65

  Gedankenexperiment

  Chinese room, 144–145

  zombie of the philosophers, 140–142

  Gregory, Richard, 45–46

  Gutenberg, Johannes, 93

  H

  Haraguchi, Akira, 88

  Hebb, Donald, 13, 128

  Hebbian cell assemblies, 13

  Helmholtz, Hermann von, 41–44, 58, 65–67, 154

  hippocampus, 109, 111, 114, 118, 125, 130, 147

  Hitchcock, Alfred, 66

  H.M (Henry Molaison), 109–111, 118, 123, 125, 147

  Hopfield, John, 9

  Hopfield networks, 9–12, 15, 16

  Hubel, David, 117

  humanity, 156

  Hume, David, 41

  I

  Ibn-al-Haytham, 41

  identity, 135–136, 139

  images, 116

  implicit memory, 111

  In Search of Lost Time (Proust), 49–50

  inferences, unconscious, 42–43, 59, 65–67, 154

  inferior temporal cortex (IT), 117

  information

  measuring, 20, 21–22

  organization of, 76

  information, visual. See visual information

  information overload, 94–95, 102

  information theory, 20–21, 23

  inhibitory neurons, 8

  intelligence, vs. memory, 96–98

  interference effects, 15

  internet, 92, 93–95, 102

  intracranial electrodes, 118–119

  iPhone, 24, 32

  IT (inferior temporal cortex), 117

  J

  James, William, 51, 100

  Jennifer Aniston neuron, 120. See also concept neurons

  Jobs, Steve, 24, 32

  K

  Kafka, Franz, 135

  Kant, Immanuel, 41

  Kasparov, Garry, 142

  Koch, Christof, 119, 138

  Kuffler, Stephen, 37

  L

  Landauer, Thomas, 62, 64

  language, 151–154

  learning, 97–99, 101–102, 103

  Locke, John, 41, 44–45, 135

  Loftus, Elizabeth, 59

  Lømo, Terje, 13

  long-term memory, 54–55, 57, 106, 111

  long-term potentiation (LTP), 13

  Lucy (film), 86

  Luria, Alexander, 79–82, 153

  M

  manipulation, 59–62

  materialism, 139, 141

  meaning, 43–46, 48, 56–57, 65, 155. See also schema

  medial temporal lobe, 118

  memories, false, 68

  memory, 108

  definitions of, 2–3

  as illusion, 17

  importance of in antiquity, 97

  improving, 91

  as movie, 16

 
persistence of, 54

  types of, 105–114. See also long-term memory; short-term memory

  memory capacity, 53–56, 62–63

  animals and, 146–148, 150

  Shereshevskii’s, 81

  memory champions, 88–89

  memory training, 88–91

  Metamorphosis, The (Kafka), 135

  method of loci, 70–73, 75, 76–79, 80–81, 96–97

  Metrodorus of Scepsis, 75

  Mill, John Stuart, 151–152

  Milner, Brenda, 111

  mind, 3

  as activity of brain, 139–140

  relation with body, 137–138

  relation with brain, 138

  mirror test, 149–150

  mnemonics

  importance of in antiquity, 74–75

  method of loci, 70–73, 75, 76–79, 80–81, 96–97

  in Renaissance, 76–79

  mnemonists, 88, 89

  Molaison, Henry (H.M), 109–111, 118, 123, 125, 147

  Molina, Mariano, 31

  monism, 136, 140

  Moser, Edvard, 147

  Moser, May-Britt, 147

  motor-skill memory, 113

  movies

  expectations and, 66

  memories as, 16

  multitasking, 91

  music theory, 65–66

  N

  neural connectivity, memory and, 12

  neural networks, 8–12

  neural networks, deep, 155

  neural plasticity, 12, 13, 128

  neurons, 3, 5–16

  concept neurons, 120–128, 147–148, 153

  epilepsy and, 87

  excitatory neurons, 8

  firing of, 6–8

  functions of, 14

  Hopfield networks, 9–12, 15, 16

  inhibitory neurons, 8

  involvement in memory, 15–16

  number of, 14, 64

  place cells, 147

  reinforcement of wiring between, 13

  retinal ganglion neurons, 36–38

  neuroscience, 4

  neurotransmitters, 7

  nondeclarative memory, 113, 130–131

  O

  O’Brien, Dominic, 88, 89

  off-center neurons, 37–38

  O’Keefe, John, 147

  On the Soul (Aristotle), 40–41

  on-center neurons, 37–38

  optical illusions, 43

  oratory, 97

  in antiquity, 74–75

 

‹ Prev