Delphi Collected Works of Hugh Walpole (Illustrated)

by Hugh Walpole

  Nostromo is, for the reason that we never lose our confidence in the narrator, a triumphant vindication of these methods. That is not to deny that Nostromo is extremely confused in places, but it is a confusion that arises rather from Conrad’s confidence in the reader’s fore-knowledge of the facts than in a complication of narrations. The narrations are sometimes complicated — old Captain Mitchell does not always achieve authenticity — but on the whole, the reader may be said to be puzzled, simply because he is told so much about some things and so little about others.

  But this assurance of the author’s that we must have already learnt the main facts of the case comes from his own convinced sense of the reality of it. This time he has no Marlowe. He was there himself. “Of course,” he says to us, “you know all about that revolution in Sulaco, that revolution that the Goulds were mixed up with. Well, I happened to be there myself. I know all the people concerned, and the central figure was not Gould, nor Mitchell, nor Monyngham — no, it was a man about whom no one outside the republic was told a syllable. I knew the man well.... He ...” and there we all are.

  The method is, in this case, as I have already said, completely successful. There may be confusions, there may be scenes concerning which we may be expected to be told much and are, in truth, told nothing at all, but these confusions and omissions do, in the end, only add to our conviction of the veracity of it. No one, after a faithful perusal of Nostromo, can possibly doubt of the existence of Sulaco, of the silver mine, of Nostromo and Decoud, of Mrs Gould, Antonio, the Viola girls, of old Viola, Hirsch, Monyngham, Gould, Sotillo, of the death of Viola’s wife, of the expedition at night in the painter, of Decoud alone on the Isabels, of Hirsch’s torture, of Captain Mitchell’s watch — here are characters the most romantic in the world, scenes that would surely, in any other hands, be fantastic melodrama, and both characters and scenes are absolutely supported on the foundation of realistic truth. Not for a moment from the first page to the last do we consciously doubt the author’s word.... Here the form of narration is vindicated because it is entirely convincing.

  Not so with the third example, Chance. Here, as with Lord Jim, we may find one visualised moment that stands for the whole book and as in the earlier work we look back and see the degraded officers of the Patna waiting with Jim on the Esplanade, so our glance back over Chance reveals to us that moment when the Fynes, from the security of their comfortable home, watch Flora de Barrel flying down the steps of her horrible Brighton house as though the Furies pursued her. That desperate flight is the key of the book. The moment of the chivalrous Captain Anthony’s rescue of Flora from a world too villainous for her and too double-faced for him gives the book’s theme, and never in all the stories that preceded Flora’s has Conrad been so eager to afford us first-hand witnesses. We have, in the first place, the unquenchable Marlowe sitting, with fine phrases at his lips, in a riverside inn. To him enter Powell, who once served with Captain Anthony; to these two add the little Fynes; there surely you have enough to secure your alliance. But it is precisely the number of witnesses that frightens us. Marlowe, unaided, would have been enough for us, more than enough if we are to consider the author himself as a possible narrator. But not only does the number frighten us, it positively hides from us the figures of Captain Anthony and Flora de Barrel. Both the Knight and the Maiden — as the author names them — are retiring souls, and our hearts move in sympathy for them as we contemplate their timid hesitancy before the voluble inquisitions of Marlowe, young Powell and the Fynes. Moreover, the intention of this method that it should secure realistic conviction for the most romantic episodes does not here achieve its purpose, as we have seen that it did in the first half of Lord Jim and the whole of Nostromo. We believe most emphatically in that first narration of young Powell’s about his first chance. We believe in the first narration of Marlowe, although quite casually he talks like this: “I do not even think that there was in what he did a conscious and lofty confidence in himself, a particularly pronounced sense of power which leads men so often into impossible or equivocal situations.” We believe in the horrible governess (a fiercely drawn figure). We believe in Marlowe’s interview with Flora on the pavement outside Anthony’s room.

  We believe in the whole of the first half of the book, but even here we are conscious that we would prefer to be closer to the whole thing, that it would be pleasant to hear Flora and Anthony speak for themselves, that we resent, a little, Marlowe’s intimacy which prevents, with patronising complaisance, the intimacy that we, the readers, might have seemed. Nevertheless we are so far held, we are captured.

  But when the second half of the book arrives we can be confident no longer. Here, as in Lord Jim, it is possible to feel that Conrad, having surprised, seized upon, mastered his original moment, did not know how to continue it. The true thing in Lord Jim is the affair of the Patna; the true thing in Chance is Captain Anthony’s rescue of Flora after her disaster. But whereas in Lord Jim the sequel to Jim’s cowardice has its own fine qualities of beauty and imagination, the sequel to Captain Anthony’s rescue of Flora seems to one listener at any rate a pitiably unconvincing climax of huddled melodrama. That chapter in Chance entitled A Moonless Night is, in the first half of it, surely the worst thing that Conrad ever wrote, save only that one early short story, The Return. The conclusion of Chance and certain tales in his volume, Within the Tides, make one wonder whether that alliance between romance and realism that he has hitherto so wonderfully maintained is not breaking down before the baleful strength of the former of these two qualities.

  It remains only to be said that when credence so entirely fails, as it must before the end of Chance, the form of narration in Oratio Recta is nothing less than maddening. Suddenly we do not believe in Marlowe, in Powell, in the Fynes: we do not believe even in Anthony and Flora. We are the angrier because earlier in the evening we were so completely taken in. It is as though we had given our money to a deserving cause and discovered a charlatan.

  I have described at length the form in which the themes of these books are developed, because it is the form that, here extensively, here quite unobtrusively, clothes all the novels and tales. We are caught and held by the skinny finger of the Ancient Mariner. When he has a true tale to tell us his veritable presence is an added zest to our pleasure. But, if his presence be not true ...

  III

  If we turn to the themes that engage Joseph Conrad’s attention we shall see that in almost every case his subjects are concerned with unequal combats — unequal to his own far-seeing vision, but never to the human souls engaged in them, and it is this consciousness of the blindness that renders men’s honesty and heroism of so little account that gives occasion for his irony.

  He chooses, in almost every case, the most solid and unimaginative of human beings for his heroes, and it seems that it is these men alone whom he can admire. “If a human soul has vision he simply gives the thing up,” we can hear him say. “He can see at once that the odds are too strong for him. But these simple souls, with their consciousness of the job before them and nothing else, with their placid sense of honour and of duty, upon them you may loosen all heaven’s bolts and lightnings and they will not quail.” They command his pity, his reverence, his tenderness, almost his love. But at the end, with an ironic shrug of his shoulders, he says: “You see. I told you so. He may even think he has won. We know better, you and I.”

  The theme of Almayer’s Folly is a struggle of a weak man against nature, of The Nigger of the Narcissus the struggle of many simple men against the presence of death, of Lord Jim, again, the struggle of a simple man against nature (here the man wins, but only, we feel, at the cost of truth). Nostromo, the conquest of a child of nature by the silver mine which stands over him, conscious of its ultimate victory, from the very first. Chance, the struggle of an absolutely simple and upright soul against the dishonesties of a world that he does not understand. Typhoon, the very epitome of Conrad’s themes, is the struggle of McWhirr agai
nst the storm (here again it is McWhirr who apparently wins, but we can hear, in the very last line of the book, the storm’s confident chuckle of ultimate victory). In Heart of Darkness the victory is to the forest. In The End of the Tether Captain Whalley, one of Conrad’s finest figures, is beaten by the very loftiness of his character. The three tales in ‘Twixt Land and Sea are all themes of this kind — the struggle of simple, unimaginative men against forces too strong for them. In The Secret Agent Winnie Verloc, another simple character, finds life too much for her and commits suicide. In Under Western Eyes Razumov, the dreamer, is destroyed by a world that laughs at the pains and struggles of insignificant individuals.

  Of Conrad’s philosophy I must speak in another place: here it is enough to say that it is impossible to imagine him choosing as the character of a story jolly, independent souls who take life for what it gives them and leave defeat or victory to the stars.

  Whatever Conrad’s books are or are not, it may safely be said that they are never jolly, and his most devoted disciple would, in all probability, resent any suggestion of a lighter hand or a gentler affection. His art, nevertheless, is limited by this persistent brooding over the inequality of life’s battle. His humour, often of a very fine kind, is always sinister, because his choice of theme forbids light-heartedness.

  Tom Jones and Tristram Shandy would have found Marlowe, Jim and Captain Anthony quite impossibly solemn company — but I do not deny that they might not have been something the better for a little of it.

  I have already said that his characters are, for the most part, simple and unimaginative men, but that does not mean that they are so simple that there is nothing in them. The first thing of which one is sure in meeting a number of Conrad’s characters is that they have existences and histories entirely independent of their introducer’s kind offices. Conrad has met them, has talked to them, has come to know them, but we are sure not only that there is very much more that he could tell us about them if he had time and space, but that even when he had told us all that he knew he would only have touched on the fringe of their real histories.

  One of the distinctions between the modern English novel and the mid-Victorian English novel is that modern characters have but little of the robust vitality of their predecessors; the figures in the novel of to-day fade so easily from the page that endeavours to keep them.

  In the novels of Mr Henry James we feel at times that the characters fade before the motives attributed to them, in those of Mr Wells before an idea, a curse, or a remedy, in those of Mr Bennett before a creeping wilderness of important insignificances, in those of Mr Galsworthy before the oppression of social inequalities, in those of Mrs Wharton before the shadow of Mr Henry James, even in those of Mr Hardy before the omnipotence of an inevitable God whom, in spite of his inevitability, Mr Hardy himself is arranging in the background; it may be claimed for the characters of Mr Conrad that they yield their solidity to no force, no power, not even to their author’s own determination that they are doomed, in the end, to defeat.

  This is not for a moment to say that Joseph Conrad is a finer novelist than these others, but this quality he has beyond his contemporaries — namely, the assurance that his characters have their lives and adventures both before and after the especial cases that he is describing to us.

  The Russian Tchekov has, in his plays, this gift supremely, so that at the close of The Three Sisters or The Cherry Orchard we are left speculating deeply upon “what happened afterwards” to Gayef or Barbara, to Masha or Epikhadov; with Conrad’s sea captains as with Tchekov’s Russians we see at once that they are entirely independent of the incidents that we are told about them. This independence springs partly from the author’s eager, almost naïve curiosity. It is impossible for him to introduce us to any officer on his ship without whispering to us in an aside details about his life, his wife and family on shore. By so doing he forges an extra link in his chain of circumstantial evidence, but we do not feel that here he is deliberately serving his art — it is only that quality already mentioned, his own astonished delight at the things that he is discovering. We learn, for instance, about Captain McWhirr that he wrote long letters home, beginning always with the words, “My darling Wife,” and relating in minute detail each successive trip of the Nan-Shan. Mrs McWhirr, we learn, was “a pretentious person with a scraggy neck and a disdainful manner, admittedly lady-like and in the neighbourhood considered as ‘quite superior.’ The only secret of her life was her abject terror of the time when her husband would come home to stay for good.” Also in Typhoon there is the second mate “who never wrote any letters, did not seem to hope for news from anywhere; and though he had been heard once to mention West Hartlepool, it was with extreme bitterness, and only in connection with the extortionate charges of a boarding-house.” How conscious we are of Jim’s English country parsonage, of Captain Anthony’s loneliness, of Marlowe’s isolation. By this simple thread of connection between the land and the ship the whole character stands, human and convincing, before us. Of the sailors on board the Narcissus there is not one about whom, after his landing, we are not curious. There is the skipper, whose wife comes on board, “A real lady, in a black dress and with a parasol.”... “Very soon the captain, dressed very smartly and in a white shirt, went with her over the side. We didn’t recognise him at all....” And Mr Baker, the chief mate! Is not this little farewell enough to make us his friends for life?

  “No one waited for him ashore. Mother died; father and two brothers, Yarmouth fishermen, drowned together on the Dogger Bank; sister married and unfriendly. Quite a lady, married to the leading tailor of a little town, and its leading politician, who did not think his sailor brother-in-law quite respectable enough for him. Quite a lady, quite a lady, he thought, sitting down for a moment’s rest on the quarter-hatch. Time enough to go ashore and get a bite, and sup, and a bed somewhere. He didn’t like to part with a ship. No one to think about then. The darkness of a misty evening fell, cold and damp, upon the deserted deck; and Mr Baker sat smoking, thinking of all the successive ships to whom through many long years he had given the best of a seaman’s care. And never a command in sight. Not once!”

  There are others — the abominable Donkin for instance. “Donkin entered. They discussed the account ... Captain Allistoun paid. ‘I give you a bad discharge,’ he said quietly. Donkin raised his voice: ‘I don’t want your bloomin’ discharge — keep it. I’m goin’ ter ‘ave a job hashore.’ He turned to us. ‘No more bloomin’ sea for me,’ he said, aloud. All looked at him. He had better clothes, had an easy air, appeared more at home than any of us; he stared with assurance, enjoying the effect of his declaration.”

  In how many novels would Donkin’s life have been limited by the part that he was required to play in the adventures of the Narcissus? As it is our interest in his progress has been satisfied by a prologue only. Or there is Charley, the boy of the crew— “As I came up I saw a red-faced, blowzy woman, in a grey shawl, and with dusty, fluffy hair, fall on Charley’s neck. It was his mother. She slobbered over him:— ‘Oh, my boy! my boy!’— ‘Leggo me,’ said Charley, ‘leggo, mother!’ I was passing him at the time, and over the untidy head of the blubbering woman he gave me a humorous smile and a glance ironic, courageous, and profound, that seemed to put all my knowledge of life to shame. I nodded and passed on, but heard him say again, good-naturedly:— ‘If you leggo of me this minyt — ye shall ‘ave a bob for a drink out of my pay.’”

  But one passes from these men of the sea — from McWhirr and Baker, from Lingard and Captain Whalley, from Captain Anthony and Jim, with a suspicion that the author will not convince us quite so readily with his men of the land — and that suspicion is never entirely dismissed. About such men as McWhirr and Baker he can tell us nothing that we will not believe. He has such sympathy and understanding for them that they will, we are assured, deliver up to him their dearest secrets — those little details, McWhirr’s wife, Mr Baker’s proud sister, Charley’s mother, are
their dearest secrets. But with the citizens of the other world — with Stein, Decoud, Gould, Verloc, Kazumov, the sinister Nikita, the little Fynes, even the great Nostromo himself — we cannot be so confident, simply because their discoverer cannot yield them that same perfect sympathy.

  His theory about these men is that they have, all of them, an idée fixe, that you must search for this patiently, honestly, unsparingly — having found it, the soul of the man is revealed to you. But is it? Is it not possible that Decoud or Verloc, feeling the probing finger, offer up instantly any idée fixe ready to hand because they wish to be left alone? Decoud himself, for instance — Decoud, the imaginative journalist in Nostromo, speculating with his ironic mind upon romantic features, at his heart, apparently cynical and reserved, the burning passion for the beautiful Antonia. He has yielded enough to suggest the truth, but the truth itself eludes us. With Verloc again we have a quite masterly presentation of the man as Conrad sees him. That first description of him is wonderful, both in its reality and its significance. “His eyes were naturally heavy, he had an air of having wallowed, fully dressed, all day on an unmade bed.”

  With many novelists that would be quite enough, that we should see the character as the author sees him, but because, in these histories, we have the convictions of the extension of the protagonists’ lives beyond the stated episodes, it is not enough. Because they have lives independent of the covers of the book we feel that there can be no end to the things that we should be told about them, and they must be true things.