by Alan Sokal
Einstein, Albert. 1960 [1920]. Relativity: The Special and the General Theory. London: Methuen.
Epstein, Barbara. 1995. “Why poststructuralism is a dead end for progressive thought”. Socialist Review 25(2): 83–120.
Epstein, Barbara. 1997. “Postmodernism and the left”. New Politics 6(2) (Winter): 130–44.
Eribon, Didier. 1994. Michel Foucault et ses contemporains. Paris: Fayard.
Euler, Leonhard. 1997 [1761]. “Refutation of the idealists”. In: Letters of Euler to a German Princess, volume I, letter XCVII, pp. 426–30. Translated by Henry Hunter (originally published 1795). With a new introduction by Andrew Pyle. London: Thoemmes Press. [French original: Lettres à une princesse d’Allemagne, lettre 97. In: Leonhardi Euleri Opera Omnia, série III, volume 11, pp. 219–20. Turici, 1911–.]
Farouki, Nayla and Michel Serres. 1997. Interviewed by Fabienne Rubert. Enseignant Magazine (novembre/décembre): 12–14.
Ferguson, Euan. 1996. “Illogical dons swallow hoaxer’s quantum leap into gibberish”. The Observer (19 May): 1.
Feyerabend, Paul. 1975. Against Method. London: New Left Books.
Feyerabend, Paul. 1987. Farewell to Reason. London: Verso.
Feyerabend, Paul. 1988. Against Method, 2nd edn. London: Verso.
Feyerabend, Paul. 1992. “Atoms and consciousness”. Common Knowledge 1(1): 28–32.
Feyerabend, Paul. 1993. Against Method, 3rd edn. London: Verso.
Feyerabend, Paul. 1995. Killing Time: The Autobiography of Paul Feyerabend. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Feynman, Richard. 1965. The Character of Physical Law. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Fleury, Vincent and Yun Sun Limet. 1997. “L’escroquerie Sokal-Bricmont”. Libération (6 octobre): 5.
Foucault, Michel. 1970. “Theatrum philosophicum”. Critique 282: 885–908.
Fourez, Gérard. 1992. La Construction des sciences, 2ème édition revue. Brussels: De Boeck Université.
Fourez, Gérard, Véronique Englebert-Lecomte and Philippe Mathy. 1997. Nos savoirs sur nos savoirs: Un lexique d’épistémologie pour l’ensignement. Brussels: De Boeck Université.
Frank, Tom. 1996. “Textual reckoning”. In These Times 20(14) (27 May): 22–4.
Franklin, Allan. 1990. Experiment, Right or Wrong. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Franklin, Allan. 1994. “How to avoid the experimenters’ regress”. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 25: 97–121.
Fuller, Steve. 1993. Philosophy, Rhetoric, and the End of Knowledge: The Coming of Science and Technology Studies. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Fuller, Steve. 1998. “What does the Sokal hoax say about the prospects for positivism?” To appear in the Proceedings of the International Colloquium on “Positivismes” (Université Libre de Bruxelles and University of Utrecht, 10–12 December 1997), under the aegis of the Académie Internationale d’Histoire des Sciences.
Gabon, Alain. 1994. Review of Rethinking Technologies. SubStance #75: 119–24.
Ghins, Michel. 1992. “Scientific realism and invariance”. In: Rationality in Epistemology, pp. 249–62. Edited by Enrique Villanueva. Atascadero, Calif.: Ridgeview.
Gingras, Yves. 1995. “Un air de radicalisme: Sur quelques tendances récentes en sociologie de la science et de la technologie”. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 108: 3–17.
Gingras, Yves and Silvan S. Schweber. 1986. “Constraints on construction”. Social Studies of Science 16: 372–83.
Gottfried, Kurt and Kenneth G. Wilson. 1997. “Science as a cultural construct”. Nature 386: 545–7.
Granon-Lafont, Jeanne. 1985. La Topologie ordinaire de Jacques Lacan. Paris: Point Hors Ligne.
Granon-Lafont, Jeanne. 1990. Topologie lacanienne et clinique analytique. Paris: Point Hors Ligne.
Greenberg, Marvin Jay. 1980. Euclidean and Non-Euclidean Geometries: Development and History, 2nd edn. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
Gross, Paul R. and Norman Levitt. 1994. Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and its Quarrels with Science. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Gross, Paul R., Norman Levitt and Martin W. Lewis, eds. 1996. The Flight from Science and Reason. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 775.
Grosser, Morton. 1962. The Discovery of Neptune. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Guattari, Félix. 1988. “Les énergétiques sémiotiques”. In: Temps et devenir: A partir de l’œuvre d’Ilya Prigogine, pp. 83–100. Actes du colloque international de 1983 sous la direction de Jean-Pierre Brans, Isabelle Stengers et Philippe Vincke. Geneva: Patiño.
Guattari, Félix. 1995. Chaosmosis: An Ethico-Aesthetic Paradigm. Translated by Paul Bains and Julian Pefanis. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [French original: Chaosmose. Paris: Galilée, 1992.]
Harding, Sandra. 1996. “Science is ‘good to think with’”. Social Text 46/47 (Spring/Summer): 15–26.
Havel, Václav. 1992. “The end of the modern era”. New York Times (1 March): E15.
Hawkins, Harriett. 1995. Strange Attractors: Literature, Culture and Chaos Theory. New York: Prentice-Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Hayles, N. Katherine. 1992. “Gender encoding in fluid mechanics: Masculine channels and feminine flows”. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 4(2): 16–44.
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1989 [1812]. Hegel’s Science of Logic. Translated by A.V. Miller. Foreword by J.N. Findlay. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press International.
Henley, Jon. 1997. “Euclidean, Spinozist or existentialist? Er, no. It’s simply a load of old tosh”. The Guardian (1 October): 3.
Hobsbawm, Eric. 1993. “The new threat to history”. New York Review of Books (16 December): 62–4. [Reprinted 1997 in Eric Hobsbawm, On History, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, ch. 1.]
Holt, Jim. 1998. “Is Paris Kidding?” New York Times Book Review (15 November): 8.
Holton, Gerald. 1993. Science and Anti-Science. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Houellebecq, Michel and Philippe Sollers. 1998. “Réponse aux ‘imbéciles’”. Interviewed by Jérôme Garcin and Fabrice Pliskin. Le Nouvel Observateur 1770 (8–14 October): 54–58.
Hume, David. 1988 [1748]. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus.
Huth, John. 1998. “Latour’s relativity”. To appear in: A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths About Science, edited by Noretta Koertge. New York: Oxford University Press.
Irigaray, Luce. 1985a. “The ‘Mechanics’ of Fluids”. In: This Sex Which Is Not One. Translated by Catherine Porter with Carolyn Burke. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. [French original: L’Arc, no. 58 (1974). Reprinted 1977 in Ce sexe qui n’en est pas un, Paris: Éditions de Minuit.]
Irigaray, Luce. 1985b. Parler n’est jamais neutre. Paris: Éditions de Minuit. Irigaray, Luce. 1987a. “Le sujet de la science est-il sexué?/Is the subject of science sexed?” Translated by Carol Mastrangelo Bové. Hypatia 2(3): 65–87. [French original: Les temps modernes 9, no. 436 (November 1982): 960–74. Reprinted in Irigaray 1985b.]
Irigaray, Luce. 1987b. “Sujet de la science, sujet sexué?” In: Sens et place des connaissances dans la société, pp. 95–121. Paris: Centre National de Recherche Scientifique.
Irigaray, Luce. 1993. “A chance for life: Limits to the concept of the neuter and the universal in science and other disciplines”. In: Sexes and Genealogies, pp. 183–206. Translated by Gillian C. Gill. New York: Columbia University Press. [French original: “Une chance de vivre: Limites au concept de neutre et d’universel dans les sciences et les savoirs”. In: Sexes et parentés. Paris: Éditions de Minuit, 1987.]
Jeanneret, Yves. 1998. L’Affaire Sokal ou la querelle des impostures. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Johnson, George. 1996. “Indian tribes’ creationists thwart archeologists”. New York Times (22 October): A1, C13.
Jurdant, Baudouin, éd. 1998. Impostures scientifiques: Les Malentendus de
l’affaire Sokal. Paris: La Découverte/Alliage.
Kadanoff, Leo P. 1986. “Fractals: Where’s the physics?” Physics Today 39 (February): 6–7.
Kellert, Stephen H. 1993. In the Wake of Chaos. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kimball, Roger. 1990. Tenured Radicals: How Politics Has Corrupted Higher Education. New York: Harper & Row.
Kinoshita, Toichiro. 1995. “New value of the α3 electron anomalous magnetic moment”. Physical Review Letters 75: 4728–31.
Koertge, Noretta, ed. 1998. A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths About Science. New York: Oxford University Press.
Krige, John. 1998. “Cannon-fodder for the science wars”. Physics World 11(12) (December): 49–50.
Kristeva, Julia. 1969. Σημɛιϖτικη‵: Recherches pour une sémanalyse. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Kristeva, Julia. 1974. La Révolution du langage poétique. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Kristeva, Julia. 1977. Polylogue. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Kristeva, Julia. 1980. Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. Edited by Leon S. Roudiez. Translated by Thomas Gora, Alice Jardine and Leon S. Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kristeva, Julla. 1997. “Une désinformation”. Le Nouvel Observateur 1716 (25 septembre–1 octobre): 122.
Kuhn, Thomas. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lacan, Jacques. 1970. “Of structure as an inmixing of an otherness prerequisite to any subject whatever”. In: The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man, pp. 186–200. Edited by Richard Macksey and Eugenio Donato. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lacan, Jacques. 1971. “Position de l’inconscient”. In: Écrits 2, pp. 193–217. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Lacan, Jacques. 1973. “L’Étourdit”. Scilicet 4: 5–52.
Lacan, Jacques. 1975a. Le Séminaire de Jacques Lacan. Livre XX: Encore, 1972–1973. Texte établi par Jacques-Alain Miller. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Lacan, Jacques. 1975b. Le séminaire de Jacques Lacan (XXII). Texte établi par J.A. Miller. R.S.I. [Réel, Symbolique, Imaginaire] Année 1974–75. Séminaires du 10 et du 17 décembre 1974. Ornicar?: Bulletin périodique du champ freudien 2 (1975): 87–105.
Lacan, Jacques. 1975c. Le séminaire de Jacques Lacan (XXII). Texte établi par J.A. Miller. R.S.I. [Réel, Symbolique, Imaginaire] Année 1974–75. Séminaires du 14 et du 21 janvier 1975. Ornicar?: Bulletin périodique du champ freudien 3 (May): 95–110.
Lacan, Jacques. 1975d. Le séminaire de Jacques Lacan (XXII). Texte établi par J.A. Miller. R.S.I. [Réel, Symbolique, Imaginaire] Année 1974–75. Séminaires du 11 et du 18 février 1975. Ornicar?: Bulletin périodique du champ freudien 4 (autumn): 91–106.
Lacan, Jacques. 1975e. Le séminaire de Jacques Lacan (XXII). Texte établi par J.A. Miller. R.S.I. [Réel, Symbolique, Imaginaire] Année 1974–75. Séminaires du 11 et du 18 mars, du 8 et du 15 avril, et du 13 mai 1975. Ornicar?: Bulletin périodique du champ freudien 5 (winter): 17–66.
Lacan, Jacques. 1977a. “Desire and the interpretation of desire in Hamlet”. Translated by James Hulbert. Yale French Studies 55/56: 11–52.
Lacan, Jacques. 1977b. “The subversion of the subject and the dialectic of desire in the Freudian unconscious”. In: Écrits: A Selection, pp. 292–325. Translated by Alan Sheridan. New York: Norton. [French original: “Subversion du sujet and dialectique du désir dans l’inconscient freudien”. In: Écrits. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1966.]
Lacan, Jacques. 1988. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan. Book II: The Ego in Freud’s Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis, 1954–1955. Edited by Jacques-Alain Miller. Translated by Sylvana Tomaselli with notes by John Forrester. New York: Norton. [French original: Le Séminaire de Jacques Lacan. Livre II: Le Moi dans la théorie de Freud et dans la technique de la psychanalyse, 1954–1955. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1978.]
Lacan, Jacques. 1998. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XX, Encore 1972–1973. Edited by Jacques-Alain Miller. Translated with notes by Bruce Fink. New York: Norton. [French original: see Lacan 1975a.]
Lamont, Michèle. 1987. “How to become a dominant French philosopher: The case of Jacques Derrida”. American Journal of Sociology 93: 584–622.
Landsberg, Mitchell [Associated Press]. 1996. “Physicist’s spoof on science puts one over on science critics”. International Herald Tribune (18 May): 1.
Laplace, Pierre Simon. 1995 [5th edn. 1825]. Philosophical Essay on Probabilities. Translated by Andrew I. Dale. New York: Springer-Verlag. [French original: Essai philosophique sur les probabilités. Paris: Christian Bourgois, 1986.]
Lather, Patti. 1991. Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy With/in the Postmodern. New York and London: Routledge.
Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno. 1988. “A relativistic account of Einstein’s relativity”. Social Studies of Science 18: 3–44.
Latour, Bruno. 1995. “Who speaks for science?” The Sciences 35(2) (March/April): 6–7.
Latour, Bruno. 1997. “Y a-t-il une science après la guerre froide?” Le Monde (18 janvier): 17.
Latour, Bruno. 1998. “Ramsès II est-il mort de la tuberculose?”. La Recherche 307 (March): 84–5. See also erratum 308 (April): 85 and letters 309 (May): 7.
Laudan, Larry. 1981. “The pseudo-science of science?” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11: 173–98.
Laudan, Larry. 1990a. Science and Relativism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Laudan, Larry. 1990b. “Demystifying underdetermination”. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14: 267–97.
Lechte, John. 1990. Julia Kristeva. London and New York: Routledge.
Lechte, John. 1994. Fifty Key Contemporary Thinkers: From Structuralism to Postmodernity. London and New York: Routledge.
Le Monde. 1984a. Entretiens avec Le Monde. 1. Philosophies. Introduction by Christian Delacampagne. Paris: Éditions La Découverte and Le Monde.
Le Monde. 1984b. Entretiens avec Le Monde. 3. Idées contemporaines. Introduction de Christian Descamps. Paris: Éditions La Découverte and Le Monde.
Leplin, Jarrett. 1984. Scientific Realism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Leupin, Alexandre. 1991. “Introduction: Voids and knots in knowledge and truth”. In: Lacan and the Human Sciences, pp. 1–23. Edited by Alexandre Leupin. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Lévy-Leblond, Jean-Marc. 1997. “La paille des philosophes et la poutre des physiciens”. La Recherche 299 (June): 9–10.
Lévy-Leblond, Jean-Marc. 1997b. “Le cow-boy et l’apothicaire”. La Recherche 304 (décembre): 10.
Lodge, David. 1984. Small World. New York: Macmillan.
Lyotard, Jean-François. 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Translated by Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi. Foreword by Fredric Jameson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. [French original: La Condition postmoderne: Rapport sur le savoir. Paris: Éditions de Minuit, 1979.]
Maddox, John, James Randi and Walter W. Stewart. 1988. “‘High-dilution’ experiments a delusion”. Nature 334: 287–90.
Maggiori, Robert. 1997. “Fumée sans feu”. Libération (30 September): 29.
Markley, Robert. 1992. “The irrelevance of reality: Science, ideology and the postmodern universe.” Genre 25: 249–76.
Martin, Andy. 1998. “A Jacques Lacan of worms”. Daily Telegraph (27 June).
Matheson, Carl and Evan Kirchhoff. 1997. “Chaos and literature”. Philosophy and Literature 21: 28–45.
Maudlin, Tim. 1994. Quantum Non-Locality and Relativity: Metaphysical Intimations of Modern Physics. Aristotelian Society Series, vol. 13. Oxford: Blackwell.
Maudlin, Tim. 1996. “Kuhn édenté: incommensurabilité et choix entre théories.” [Original title: “Kuhn defanged: incommensurability and theory-choice.”] T
ranslated by Jean-Pierre Deschepper and Michel Ghins. Revue philosophique de Louvain 94: 428–46.
Maxwell, James Clerk. 1952 [1st edn. 1876]. Matter and Motion. New York: Dover.
Mermin, N. David. 1989. Space and Time in Special Relativity. Prospect Heights, Ill.: Waveland Press.
Mermin, N. David. 1996a. “What’s wrong with this sustaining myth?” Physics Today 49(3) (March): 11–13.
Mermin, N. David. 1996b. “The Golemization of relativity”. Physics Today 49(4) (April): 11–13.
Mermin, N. David. 1996c. “Sociologists, scientist continue debate about scientific process”. Physics Today 49(7) (July): 11–15, 88.
Mermin, N. David. 1997a. “Sociologists, scientist pick at threads of argument about science”. Physics Today 50(1) (January): 92–5.
Mermin, N. David. 1997b. “What’s wrong with this reading”. Physics Today 50(10) (October): 11–13.
Mermin, N. David. 1998. “The science of science: A physicist reads Barnes, Bloor and Henry”. To appear in Social Studies of Science.
Miller, Jacques-Alain. 1977/78. “Suture (elements of the logic of the signifier)”. Screen 18(4): 24–34.
Milner, Jean-Claude. 1995. L’œuvre claire: Lacan, la science, la philosophie. Paris: Seuil.
Moi, Toril. 1986. Introduction to The Kristeva Reader. New York: Columbia University Press.
Moore, Patrick. 1996. The Planet Neptune, 2nd edn. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Mortley, Raoul. 1991. French Philosophers in Conversation: Levinas, Schneider, Serres, Irigaray, Le Doeuff, Derrida. London: Routledge.
Nagel, Ernest and James R. Newman. 1958. Gödel’s Proof. New York: New York University Press.
Nancy, Jean-Luc and Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe. 1992. The Title of the Letter: A Reading of Lacan. Translated by François Raffoul and David Pettigrew. Albany: State University of New York Press. [French original: Le Titre de la lettre, 3ème éd. Paris: Galilée, 1990.]
Nanda, Meera. 1997. “The science wars in India”. Dissent 44(1) (Winter): 78–83.
Nasio, Juan-David. 1987. Les Yeux de Laure: Le concept d’objet “a” dans la théorie de J. Lacan. Suivi d’une Introduction à la topologie psychanalytique. Paris: Aubier.