Book Read Free

Women in the Ottoman Balkans: Gender, Culture and History

Page 37

by Amila Buturovic

Matkovski, Aleksandar. Kreposnishtvoto vo Makedonija vo vreme na turskoto

  vladeenje [Serfdom in Macedonia during the period of Turkish domination]

  (Skopje: Institut za natsionalna istorija, 1978).

  196

  Women in the ottoman Balkans

  Meriwether, Margaret Lee. The Kin who Count: Family and Society in Ottoman

  Aleppo, 1770–1840 (Austin: The University of Texas Press, 1999).

  Meron, Ya’akov. “The Development of Legal Thought in Hanafi Texts,” Studia

  Islamica 30 (1969): 73–118.

  Milash, Nikodim. Pravoslavno tsarkovno pravo [Orthodox canon law]. (Sofia:

  Duhovna akademia, 1904).

  Milev, Nikola I. Katolishkata propaganda v Balgaria prez XVII vek [Catholic

  propaganda in Bulgaria during the seventeenth century]. (Sofia: TSarska

  pridvorna pechatnitsa, 1914).

  Mujic, Muhamed A. Sidzil Mostarskog kadije, 1632–1634 [ Sicil of the kadı of

  Mostar] (Mostar: Prva knjizevna komuna 1987).

  el-Nahal, Galal H. The Judicial Administration of Ottoman Egypt in the

  Seventeenth Century (Minneapolis: Bibliotheca Islamica, 1979).

  Novakovic, Stojan, ed. Matije Vlastara Sintagmat: azbucni zbornik vizantijskih

  crkvenih i drzavnih zakona i pravila slovenski [The great syntagma of Matija

  Vlastar: alphabetical collection of Byzantine church and state laws and

  slavic customs] (Belgrade: Stampano u Drzavnoj stampariji kraljevine srbije,

  1907).

  Ongan, Halit. Ankara’nın İki Numaralı Şer’iye Sicili, 1 Muharrem 997–8

  Ramazan 998 (20 Kasım 1588–11 Temmuz 1590) (Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu

  Basımevi, 1974).

  Ortaylı, İlber. “Anadolu’da XVI. Yüzyılda Evlilik İlişkileri Üzerine Bazı

  Gözlemler,” Journal of Ottoman Studies 5, 3 (1982a).

  Ortaylı, İlber. “Some Observations on the Institution of Qadi in the Ottoman

  Empire,” Bulgarian Historical Review 1 (1982b).

  Ortaylı, İlber. “The Family in Ottoman Society,” in Family in Turkish Society, ed.

  Türköz Erder (Ankara: Turkish Social Science Association, 1985).

  Pantazopoulos, Nikolaos. Church and Law in the Balkan Peninsula During the

  Ottoman Rule (Thessaloniki: Institute for Balkan Studies, 1967).

  Papadopoullos, Theodore. “Orthodox Church and Civil Authority,” Journal of

  Contemporary History 2, 4 (1967): 201–209.

  Papastathis, Charalambos. L’eglise et le droit coutumier aux Balkans pendant

  la domination ottomane (Belgrade: Académie serbe des sciences et des arts,

  1974).

  Parveva, Stefka. “Balgarskoto naselenie v kraia na XVII i nachaloto na XVIII v.,”

  unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Institute of History, Bulgarian Academy of

  Science, Sofia, 1992.

  Pavlov, Aleksei Stepanovich. Nomokanon pri novom Trebnike [ Nomokanon of

  new prayer-book] (Moscow, 1897).

  Peirce, Leslie. “‘She is trouble... and I will divorce her’: Orality, Honor, and

  Representation in the Ottoman Court of ‘Aintab,” in Women in the Medieval

  Islamic World: Power, Patronage, Piety, Ed. Gavin R.G. Hambly (New York:

  St. Martin’s Press, 1998).

  ivanova, marital ProBlems of Christian Women

  197

  Peirce, Leslie. Morality Tales: Law and Gender in the Ottoman Court of Aintab

  (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2003).

  Petrushevskii, Ilia Pavlovich. Islam v Irane v VII–XV vekakh [Islam in Iran during

  the seventh to fifteenth centuries] (Leningrad: Izdatelstvo Leningradskogo

  universiteta, 1966).

  Rafeq, Abdul-Karim. “The Law Court Registers and their Importance for a

  Socio-Economic and Urban Study of Ottoman Syria,” in L’espace social de la

  ville arabe, ed. Dominique Chevallier. (Paris: G.-P. Maisonneuve et Larose,

  1979).

  Reindl-Kiel, Hedda. “‘On Monday the Bread of the Baker Malčo has to be

  Written’: Property, Maintenance, Market and Crime in the Early 17th century

  Court of Küstendil,” in Mélanges Prof. Machiel Kiel, ed. Abdeljelil Temimi.

  (Zaghouan: Fondation Temimi pour la recherche scientifique et l’information,

  1999).

  Schacht, Joseph. An Introduction to Islamic Law (Oxford: Oxford University

  Press, 1979).

  Seng, Yvonne. “The Şer’iye Sicilleri of the İstanbul Müftülüğü as a Source for the

  Study of Everyday Life,” Turkish Studies Association Buletin 15, 2 (1991).

  Serebriakova, Meri Nizamovna. Sem’ia i semeinaia obriadnost’ v turetskoi

  derevne [The family and family rites in the Turkish village] (Moscow: Nauka,

  1979).

  Shaguna, Andreiu de. Kratkoe izlozhenie kanonicheskago prava edinnoi sviatoi

  apostolskoi tserkvi [Brief presentation of the canon law of the one holy

  apostolical church] (St. Petersburg: Duhovnaia akademia, 1872).

  Shatzmiller, Maya. “Marriage, Family, and the Faith: Women’s Conversion to

  Islam,” Journal of Family History 21, 3 (1996).

  Singer, Amy. “Marriages and Misdemeanors: A Record of resm-i ‘arūs ve bād-ı

  havā,” Special issue on “Law and Society in Islam,” Interdisciplinary Journal

  of Middle Eastern Studies 4 (1996).

  Snegarov, Ivan. “Brachnoto pravo na Ohridskata arkhiepiskopia v XIII vek” [The

  Matrimonial Law of the Ohrid Archbishopric during the thirteenth century]

  Dukhovna kultura (1926).

  Snegarov, Ivan. “Stariat Tarnovski tzarkoven kodeks” [The old codex of the

  Tarnovo Bishopric], Godishnik na Sofiiskia Universitet, Bogoslovski fakultet

  9 (1933–34).

  Snegarov, Ivan. “Nov kodeks na Tarnovskata Mitropolia” [The new codex of the

  Tarnovo Metropolitan Bishopric], Sbornik na Balgarska Akademia na Naukite

  (1935).

  Snegarov, Ivan. “Gratzski kodeks na Plovdivskata Mitropolia” [Greek codex of

  the Plovdiv Metropolitan Bishopric], Spisanie na Balgarska Akademia na

  Naukite 51, 2 (1946).

  Snegarov, Ivan. “Gratski kodeks na Pelagoniiskata mitropolia [Greek codex of

  the Pelagonia Metropolitan Bishopric], Godishnik na Sofiiski Universitet,

  Bogoslovski fakultet 25 (1947–48).

  198

  Women in the ottoman Balkans

  Snegarov, Ivan. Istoria na Ohridskata arkhiepiskopia-patriarshia [History of the

  Ohrid Archbishopric-Patriarchate], vol. 2 (Sofia: Akademichno izdatelstvo

  “Prof. Marin Drinov”, 1995).

  Sofronij Vračanski. Vie et tribulations du pecheur Sofroni. Trans. and with an

  Introduction by J. Feuillet (Sofia: Sofia Presse, 1981).

  Sonbol, Amira el-Azhary, ed. Women, the Family and Divorce Laws in Islamic

  History (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1996).

  Tiutiundzhiev, Ivan. Tarnovskata mitropolia prez XVII i parvata polovina na

  XVIII vek [The Tarnvo Metropolitan Bishopric during the sevententh and the

  first half of the eighteenth centuries] (Veliko Tarnovo: Slovo, 1996).

  Todorov, Nikolai. The Balkan City, 1400–1900 (Seattle: University of Washington

  Press, 1983).

  Todorova, Maria Nikolaeva. Balkan Family Structure and the European Pattern:

  Demographic Developments in Ottoman Bulgaria (Washington, D.C.:

  American University Press, 1993).

  Todorova, Olga. “Niakoi Slavianski rakopisi kato izvor za yuridicheskite funktzii

  na Pravoslavnata tsarkva v balgarskite zemi ot dovazrozhdenskata epoha

  [Some Slavic manuscripts
as sources for the judicial functions of the Orthodox

  Church in Bulgarian lands from the period before the Bulgarian revival], in

  Vtori mezhdunaroden kongres po balgaristika (Sofia, 23 mai–3 iuni 1986 g.).

  Dokladi, ed. Boiko Kiriakov and Hristo Hristov (Sofia: Bulgarska akademia

  na naukite, 1989), vol. 7.

  Todorova, Olga. “Evoliutsia hristionskih vzgladov na smeshannie braki (hristian s

  miusulmanami) v XV-XVII vv.” [The evolution of Christians’ views on mixed

  marriages (of Christians with Muslims) during the fifteenth to eighteenth

  centuries], Bulgarian Historical Review 1 (1991).

  Todorova, Olga. “Balgarkata hristianka prez XV–XVIII vek” [Bulgarian Christian

  women during the fifteenth to eighteenth centuries], Istoricheski pregled 4

  (1992).

  Todorova, Olga. “Niakoi vaprosi na zhenskia statut prez 16 vek” [Some issues

  relating to the status of women during the sixteenth century], in Balgarskiat

  16-ti vek, ed. Boriana Hristova (Sofia: Izdatelstvo na Narodnata biblioteka

  “Sv. sv. Kiril i Metodii”, 1996a).

  Todorova, Olga “ZHenite v Sofia prez 70-te godini na XVII vek (po danni ot edin

  registar s nasledstveni opisi)” [Women in Sofia during the seventies of the

  seventeenth century (based on data from a register with inheritance records)],

  Istoricheski pregled 3 (1996b).

  Todorova, Olga. Pravoslavnata tzarkva i Balgarite, XV–XVIII vek [The

  Orthodox Church and the Bulgarians, fifteenth to eighteenth centuries] (Sofia:

  Akademichno izdatelstvo “Prof Marin Drinov”, 1997).

  Todorova, Olga. “Prostitutsiata v balgarskite zemi prez rannite vekove na

  osmanskoto vladichestvo” [Prostitution in Bulgarian lands during the early

  periods of Ottoman rule], in Granitsi na grazhdanstvoto: evropeiskite zheni

  mezhdu traditsiata i modernostta [Limits of citizenship: European women

  ivanova, marital ProBlems of Christian Women

  199

  between tradition and modernity], ed. Krasimira Daskalova and Raina

  Gavrilova (Sofia: Bulgarska grupa za izsledvania po istoria na zhenite i pola,

  2001).

  Todorova, Olga. “Mazhki vremena? (ZHenata v publichnoto prostranstvo prez

  parvite stoletia na Osmanskoto vladichestvo) [Masculine times? (Woman in

  the public sphere during the first centuries of Ottoman rule], in Kontrasti i

  konflikti “zad kadar” v balgarskoto obshtestvo prez XV–XVIII vek, Elena

  Grozdanova, et al. (Sofia: Izdatelska kashta “Gutenberg”, 2003.

  Todorova, Olga. ZHenite ot tsentralnite Balkani prez osmanskata epoha, XV–XVII

  vek [Women from the central parts of the Balkans during the Ottoman period,

  fifteenth to seventeenth centuries] (Sofia: Izdatelska kashta “Gutenberg”,

  2004).

  Trayanovski, A. “Brakorazvodni sporovi pred Veleshkite tsarkovnouchilishtni

  obshtini okolu 70-te godini na XIX vek” [Divorce disputes before the Veles

  Church and school councils in the 1870s], Glasnik na Institutot za nationalna

  istoria 1 (1980).

  TSuhlev, Dimitur N. Istoria na grada Vidin i negovata oblast’ [History of the

  town of Vidin and its region] (Sofia: Pechatnitsa P. Glushkov, 1932).

  Tucker, Judith. Women in Nineteenth-Century Egypt (Cambridge, UK and New

  York: Cambridge University Press, 1985).

  Tucker, Judith. “Marriage and Family in Nablus, 1720–1856: Towards a History

  of Arab Marriage,” Journal of Family History, 13, 2 (1988).

  Turski izvori za aydutstvoto i aramiisvoto vo Makedonija [Turkish documents

  about bandits and brigandage in Macedonia], vol. 3 (Skopje: Institut za

  Natsionalna Istorja na Makedonija, 1961).

  Turski dokumenti za istorijata na makedonskiot narod [Turkish documents on

  the history of the Macedonian nation], vol. 3 (Skopje: Arhiv na Makedonija,

  1969).

  Turski izvori za istoriata na pravoto v balgarskite zemi [Turkish Sources on the

  History of Law in the Bulgarian lands], vol. 2, ed. Bistra A. TSvetkova (Sofia:

  Izdatelstvo na Bulgarskata akademia na naukite, 1971).

  Vagabov, Mustafa Vagabovich. Islam i zhenshchina [Islam and woman] (Moscow:

  “Mysis”, 1968).

  Verma, B.R. Muslim Marriage and Dissolution (Allahabad: Law Book Co.,

  1971).

  Walther, Wiebke. Woman in Islam (Montclair: Abner Schram; and London:

  George Prior, 1981).

  Würth, Anna. “A Sana’a Court: the Court, the Family, and the Ability to Negotiate,”

  Islamic Law and Society 2, 3 (1995): 320–40.

  Zarinebaf-Shahr, Fariba. “Women, Law, and Imperial Justice in Ottoman Istanbul

  in the Late Seventeenth Century,” in Women, the Family and Divorce Laws in

  Islamic History, ed. Amira el-Azhary Sonbol (Syracuse: Syracuse University

  Press, 1996).

  200

  Women in the ottoman Balkans

  Ze’evi, Dror. “Women in 17th-Century Jerusalem: Western and Indigenous

  Perspectives,” International Journal of Middle East Studies 27, 2 (1995):

  157–73.

  Ze’evi, Dror. An Ottoman Century: the District of Jerusalem in the 1600s

  (NewYork: State University of New York Press, 1996)

  Ze’evi, Dror. “The Use of Ottoman Shari‘a Court Records as a Source for Middle

  Eastern Social History: a Reappraisal,” Islamic Law and Society 5, 1 (1998):

  35–56.

  Zilfi, Madeline. “We Don’t Get Along: Women and Hul Divorce in the Eighteenth

  Century,” in Women in the Ottoman Empire, ed. Madeline Zilfi (Leiden, New

  York, and Köln: Brill, 1997).

  Zilfi, Madeline, ed. Women in the Ottoman Empire (Leiden, New York, and Köln:

  Brill, 1997).

  7

  Women, Fashion, and Europeanization:

  The Romanian Principalities, 1750–1830

  Angela Jianu

  Le vêtement, plus qu’aucun élément de la culture matérielle,

  incorpore les valeurs de l’imaginaire social et les normes de la

  réalité vécue; c’est le champ de bataille obligé de la confrontation

  entre le changement et la tradition.

  Daniel Roche, Histoire des choses banales

  The history of dress and fashion in western Europe has, in recent years, become

  an important chapter in social history.1 The way people dress—located at

  the intersection of necessity, aesthetics, seduction, frivolity, ethnic-political

  allegiances, and economics—is nowadays a legitimate vehicle for the study of

  mentalities, as well as of the rise and demise of régimes and societies.

  In this essay, I examine clothes, fashions, and consumption as interfaces

  between cultures, as systems of signs and symbols which can encourage imitation

  or prompt rejection, or can serve as identity-building tools. The travel literature of

  the period shows how insistently, throughout the eighteenth and early nineteenth

  centuries, western and eastern Europe looked at each other’s clothes, even literally

  fingered them, trying to fathom what exactly appearances might reveal or conceal

  in terms of human character, social attitudes, political allegiances, and cultural

  determinations. The basic opposition at the heart of all these exercises in sartorial

  reading was broadly between “European” (i.e. West European) fashion on the one

  hand, and “Oriental” fashion on the other—that is, for the purposes of the present

  discus
sion, the dress worn in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries

  in the Near East, the Balkans, and the East European dominions of the Sublime

  Porte. Focusing on the shifts in fashion and consumption in the Romanian

  Principalities between roughly 1780 and 1850,2 I have tried to reconstruct, from a

  number of very different sources, West European perceptions of Romanians in the

  period, as well as the ways in which Romanians used clothes, fashion accessories,

  fashionable household items, and luxury imports in order to construct individual

  202

  Women in the ottoman Balkans

  and collective identities in terms of their own perceptions of “Europe” and

  “European-ness.”

  I refer to the Principalities of Wallachia and Moldavia (the future Romania) as

  they were politically and diplomatically constituted until their unification in 1859

  and their transformation into the Kingdom of Romania in 1866. In their relentless

  push north-westwards, the Ottomans attempted to conquer the Principalities as

  early as the fourteenth century, but either failed to transform them into paşalık s

  proper or chose simply to include them in their sphere of economic and political

  influence.3 By the fifteenth century, Wallachia and Moldavia had become

  Ottoman dominions, controlled according to the strategy of dar al-‘ahd (“abode

  of the covenant”) which guaranteed their autonomy in exchange for a régime

  of material obligations.4 Under this arrangement, the Principalities retained their

  own administration, political structures, religion, and, until the eighteenth century,

  their native princes.5 However, the Prince increasingly became—especially

  from the seventeenth century onwards—a top civil servant in the Ottoman state

  hierarchy, while continuing to pose as a sovereign by divine right at home.

  After 1659, when the Ottomans suppressed revolts in both Principalities, and

  especially after the peace of Karlowits (1699) and Charles XII’s defeat by Peter

  the Great at Poltava (1709), the Porte realized that its control over Moldavia and

  Wallachia was going to be challenged by the emerging eastern powers Austria and

  Russia, and decided to appoint devoted rulers selected from the exclusive circle

  of Greek families residing in the area of Constantinople called Phanar (Fener).6

  In a relatively short time, a permanent link was established between the office

 

‹ Prev