Complete Works of Samuel Johnson

by Samuel Johnson

  The poem of the War with Spain begins with lines more vigorous and striking than Waller is accustomed to produce. The succeeding parts are variegated with better passages and worse. There is something too far-fetched in the comparison of the Spaniards drawing the English on, by saluting St. Lucar with cannon, “to lambs awakening the lion by bleating.” The fate of the marquis and his lady, who were burnt in their ship, would have moved more, had the poet not made him die like the Phoenix, because he had spices about him, nor expressed their affection and their end, by a conceit, at once, false and vulgar:

  Alive, in equal flames of love they burn’d,

  And now together are to ashes turn’d.

  The verses to Charles on his Return were doubtless intended to counterbalance the Panegyrick on Cromwell. If it has been thought inferiour to that with which it is naturally compared, the cause of its deficience has been already remarked.

  The remaining pieces it is not necessary to examine singly. They must be supposed to have faults and beauties of the same kind with the rest. The Sacred Poems, however, deserve particular regard; they were the work of Waller’s declining life, of those hours in which he looked upon the fame and the folly of the time past with the sentiments which his great predecessor, Petrarch, bequeathed to posterity, upon his review of that love and poetry which have given him immortality.

  That natural jealousy which makes every man unwilling to allow much excellence in another, always produces a disposition to believe that the mind grows old with the body; and that he, whom we are now forced to confess superiour, is hastening daily to a level with ourselves. By delighting to think this of the living, we learn to think it of the dead; and Fenton, with all his kindness for Waller, has the luck to mark the exact time when his genius passed the zenith, which he places at his fifty-fifth year. This is to allot the mind but a small portion. Intellectual decay is, doubtless, not uncommon; but it seems not to be universal. Newton was, in his eighty-fifth year, improving his chronology, a few days before his death; and Waller appears not, in my opinion, to have lost, at eighty-two, any part of his poetical power.

  His Sacred Poems do not please like some of his other works; but before the fatal fifty-five, had he written on the same subjects, his success would hardly have been better.

  It has been the frequent lamentation of good men, that verse has been too little applied to the purposes of worship, and many attempts have been made to animate devotion by pious poetry. That they have very seldom attained their end, is sufficiently known, and it may not be improper to inquire, why they have miscarried. Let no pious ear be offended if I advance, in opposition to many authorities, that poetical devotion cannot often please. The doctrines of religion may, indeed, be defended in a didactick poem; and he who has the happy power of arguing in verse, will not lose it because his subject is sacred. A poet may describe the beauty and the grandeur of nature, the flowers of the spring, and the harvests of autumn, the vicissitudes of the tide, and the revolutions of the sky, and praise the maker for his works, in lines which no reader shall lay aside. The subject of the disputation is not piety, but the motives to piety; that of the description is not God, but the works of God.

  Contemplative piety, or the intercourse between God and the human soul, cannot be poetical. Man, admitted to implore the mercy of his creator, and plead the merits of his redeemer, is already in a higher state than poetry can confer.

  The essence of poetry is invention; such invention as, by producing something unexpected, surprises and delights. The topicks of devotion are few, and, being few, are universally known; but, few as they are, they can be made no more; they can receive no grace from novelty of sentiment, and very little from novelty of expression.

  Poetry pleases by exhibiting an idea more grateful to the mind than things themselves afford. This effect proceeds from the display of those parts of nature which attract, and the concealment of those which repel the imagination: but religion must be shown as it is; suppression and addition equally corrupt it; and such as it is, it is known already.

  From poetry the reader justly expects, and from good poetry always obtains, the enlargement of his comprehension and elevation of his fancy; but this is rarely to be hoped by Christians from metrical devotion. Whatever is great, desirable, or tremendous, is comprised in the name of the supreme being. Omnipotence cannot be exalted; infinity cannot be amplified; perfection cannot be improved. The employments of pious meditation are faith, thanksgiving, repentance, and supplication. Faith, invariably uniform, cannot be invested by fancy with decorations. Thanksgiving, the most joyful of all holy effusions, yet addressed to a being without passions, is confined to a few modes, and is to be felt rather than expressed. Repentance, trembling in the presence of the judge, is not at leisure for cadences and epithets. Supplication of man to man may diffuse itself through many topicks of persuasion; but supplication to God can only cry for mercy.

  Of sentiments purely religious, it will be found that the most simple expression is the most sublime. Poetry loses its lustre and its power, because it is applied to the decoration of something more excellent than itself. All that pious verse can do is to help the memory, and delight the ear, and, for these purposes, it may be very useful; but it supplies nothing to the mind. The ideas of Christian theology are too simple for eloquence, too sacred for fiction, and too majestick for ornament; to recommend them by tropes and figures, is to magnify, by a concave mirror, the sidereal hemisphere.

  As much of Waller’s reputation was owing to the softness and smoothness of his numbers, it is proper to consider those minute particulars to which a versifier must attend.

  He certainly very much excelled in smoothness most of the writers who were living when his poetry commenced. The poets of Elizabeth had attained an art of modulation, which was afterwards neglected or forgotten. Fairfax was acknowledged by him as his model; and he might have studied with advantage the poem of Davies[m86], which, though merely philosophical, yet seldom leaves the ear ungratified.

  But he was rather smooth than strong; of “the full resounding line,” which Pope attributes to Dryden, he has given very few examples. The critical decision has given the praise of strength to Denham, and of sweetness to Waller.

  His excellence of versification has some abatements. He uses the expletive do very frequently; and, though he lived to see it almost, universally ejected, was not more careful to avoid it in his last compositions than in his first. Praise had given him confidence; and finding the world satisfied, he satisfied himself.

  His rhymes are sometimes weak words: so is found to make the rhyme twice in ten lines, and occurs often as a rhyme through his book.

  His double rhymes, in heroick verse, have been censured by Mrs. Phillips, who was his rival in the translation of Corneille’s Pompey; and more faults might be found, were not the inquiry below attention.

  He sometimes uses the obsolete termination of verbs, as waxeth, affecteth; and sometimes retains the final syllable of the preterite, as amazed, supposed, of which I know not whether it is not to the detriment of our language that we have totally rejected them.

  Of triplets he is sparing; but he did not wholly forbear them: of an alexandrine he has given no example.

  The general character of his poetry is elegance and gaiety. He is never pathetick, and very rarely sublime. He seems neither to have had a mind much elevated by nature, nor amplified by learning. His thoughts are such as a liberal conversation and large acquaintance with life would easily supply. They had, however, then, perhaps, that grace of novelty which they are now often supposed to want by those who, having already found them in later books, do not know or inquire who produced them first. This treatment is unjust. Let not the original author lose by his imitators.

  Praise, however, should be due before it is given. The author of Waller’s life ascribes to him the first practice of what Erythraeus and some late criticks call alliteration, of using in the same verse many words beginning with the same letter. But this kna
ck, whatever be its value, was so frequent among early writers, that Gascoigne, a writer of the sixteenth century, warns the young poet against affecting it; Shakespeare, in the Midsummer Night’s Dream, is supposed to ridicule it; and, in another play, the sonnet of Holofernes fully displays it.

  He borrows too many of his sentiments and illustrations from the old mythology, for which it is vain to plead the example of ancient poets; the deities which they introduced so frequently, were considered as realities, so far as to be received by the imagination, whatever sober reason might even then determine. But of these images time has tarnished the splendour. A fiction, not only detected but despised, can never afford a solid basis to any position, though sometimes it may furnish a transient allusion, or slight illustration. No modern monarch can be much exalted by hearing that, as Hercules had his club, he has his navy.

  But of the praise of Waller, though much may be taken away, much will remain; for it cannot be denied that he added something to our elegance of diction, and something to our propriety of thought; and to him may be applied what Tasso said, with equal spirit and justice, of himself and Guarini, when, having perused the Pastor Fido, he cried out “if he had not read Aminta, he had never excelled it.”

  As Waller professed himself to have learned the art of versification from Fairfax, it has been thought proper to subjoin a specimen of his work, which, after Mr. Hoole’s translation, will, perhaps, not be soon reprinted. By knowing the state in which Waller found our poetry, the reader may judge how much he improved it.

  1.

  Erminia’s steed (this while) his mistresse bore

  Through forrests thicke among the shadie treene,

  Her feeble hand the bridle reines forlore,

  Halfe in a swoune she was for feare, I weene;

  But her flit courser spared nere the more,

  To beare her through the desart woods unseene

  Of her strong foes, that chas’d her through the plaine,

  And still pursu’d, but still pursu’d in vaine.

  2.

  Like as the wearie hounds at last retire,

  Windlesse, displeased, from the fruitlesse chace,

  When the slie beast Tapisht in bush and brire,

  No art nor paines can rowse out of his place:

  The christian knights so full of shame and ire

  Returned backe, with faint and wearie pace!

  Yet still the fearfull dame fled, swift as winde,

  Nor ever staid, nor ever lookt behinde.

  3.

  Through thicke and thinne, all night, all day, she drived,

  Withouten comfort, companie, or guide,

  Her plaints and teares with every thought revived,

  She heard and saw her greefes, but nought beside.

  But when the sunne his burning chariot dived

  In Thetis wave, and wearie teame untide,

  On Jordans sandie bankes her course she staid,

  At last, there downe she light, and downe she laid.

  4.

  Her teares, her drinke; her food, her sorrowings,

  This was her diet that unhappie night:

  But sleepe (that sweet repose and quiet brings)

  To ease the greefes of discontented wight,

  Spred foorth his tender, soft, and nimble wings,

  In his dull armes foulding the virgin bright;

  And love, his mother, and the graces kept

  Strong watch and warde, while this faire ladie slept.

  5.

  The birds awakte her with their morning song,

  Their warbling musicke pearst her tender eare,

  The murmuring brookes and whistling windes among

  The ratling boughes, and leaves, their parts did beare;

  Her eies unclos’d beheld the groves along

  Of swaines and shepherd groomes, that dwellings weare:

  And that sweet noise, birds, winds, and waters sent,

  Provokte againe the virgin to lament.

  6.

  Her plaints were interrupted with a sound

  That seem’d from thickest bushes to proceed,

  Some iolly shepheard sung a lustie round,

  And to his voice had tun’d his oaten reed;

  Thither she went, an old man there she found,

  (At whose right hand his little flock did feed)

  Sat making baskets, his three sonnes among,

  That learn’d their father’s art, and learn’d his song.

  7.

  Beholding one in shining armes appeare,

  The seelie man and his were sore dismaid;

  But sweet Erminia comforted their feare,

  Her ventall vp, her visage open laid.

  You happie folke, of heau’n beloued deare,

  Work on (quoth she) vpon your harmlesse traid,

  These dreadfull armes, I beare, no warfare bring

  To your sweet toile, nor those sweet tunes you sing.

  8.

  But father, since this land, these townes and towres,

  Destroied are with sword, with fire and spoile,

  How may it be, unhurt, that you and yours

  In safetie thus, applie your harmlesse toile?

  My sonne (quoth he) this pore estate of ours

  Is euer safe from storme of warlike broile;

  This wildernesse doth vs in safetie keepe,

  No thundring drum, no trumpet breakes our sleepe.

  9.

  Haply iust heau’n’s defence and shield of right,

  Doth loue the innocence of simple swaines,

  The thunderbolts on highest mountains light,

  And seld or neuer strike the lower plaines:

  So kings haue cause to feare Bellonaes might,

  Not they whose sweat and toile their dinner gaines,

  Nor ever greedie soldier was entised

  By pouertie, neglected and despised.

  10.

  O pouertie, chefe of the heau’nly brood,

  Dearer to me than wealth or kingly crowne!

  No wish for honour, thirst of other’s good,

  Can moue my hart, contented with my owne:

  We quench our thirst with water of this flood,

  Nor fear we poison should therein be throwne:

  These little flocks of sheepe and tender goates

  Giue milke for food, and wooll to make us coates.

  11.

  We little wish, we need but little wealth,

  From cold and hunger vs to cloath and feed;

  These are my sonnes, their care preserues from stealth

  Their father’s flocks, nor servants moe I need:

  Amid these groues I walke oft for my health,

  And to the fishes, birds, and beastes giue heed,

  How they are fed, in forrest, spring and lake,

  And their contentment for ensample take.

  12.

  Time was (for each one hath his doting time,

  These siluer locks were golden tresses than)

  That countrie life I hated as a crime,

  And from the forrests sweet contentment ran,

  To Memphis stately pallace would I clime,

  And there became the mightie Caliphes man,

  And though I but a simple gardner weare,

  Yet could I marke abuses, see and heare.

  13.

  Entised on with hope of future gaine,

  I suffred long what did my soule displease;

  But when my youth was spent, my hope was vaine,

  I felt my native strength at last decrease;

  I gan my losse of lustie yeeres complaine,

  And wisht I had enjoy’d the countries peace;

  I bod the court farewell, and with content

  My later age here have I quiet spent.

  14.

  While thus he spake, Erminia husht and still

  His wise discourses heard, with great attention,

  His speeches graue those idle fancies kill,

 
Which in her troubled soule bred such dissention;

  After much thought reformed was her will,

  Within those woods to dwell was her intention,

  Till fortune should occasion new afford,

  To turne her home to her desired lord.

  15.

  She said, therefore, O shepherd fortunate!

  That troubles some didst whilom feele and proue,

  Yet liuest now in this contented state,

  Let my mishap thy thoughts to pitie moue,

  To entertaine me, as a willing mate

  In shepherd’s life, which I admire and loue;

  Within these pleasant groues, perchance, my hart

  Of her discomforts may vnload some part.

  16.

  If gold or wealth, of most esteemed deare,

  If iewells rich, thou diddest hold in prise,

  Such store thereof, such plentie have I seen,

  As to a greedie minde might well suffice:

  With that downe trickled many a siluer teare,

  Two christall streams fell from her watrie eies;

  Part of her sad misfortunes than she told,

  And wept, and with her wept that shepherd old.

  17.

  With speeches kinde, he gan the virgin deare

  Towards his cottage gently home to guide;

  His aged wife there made her homely cheare,

  Yet welcomde her, and plast her by her side.

  The princesse dond a poore pastoraes geare,

  A kerchiefe course vpon her head she tide;

  But yet her gestures and her lookes (I gesse)

  Were such as ill beseem’d a shepherdesse.

  18.

  Not those rude garments could obscure, and hide

  The heau’nly beautie of her angel’s face,

  Nor was her princely ofspring damnifide,

  Or ought disparag’de, by those labours bace;

  Her little flocks to pasture would she guide,

  And milke her goates, and in their folds them place,

  Both cheese and butter could she make, and frame

  Her selfe to please the shepherd and his dame.

  POMFRET.